If the buoys that Abbott has placed in the rio grande river

[Beachnutt]

are violating a treaty with the United States and Mexico and may possibly be in Mexican territory why can't Mexico just go take the buoys ?

[orthoclad]

1. Why doesn't the US send in Federal boats

to remove these hazards to navigation in US waters?

USians put them there. The Federal government has jurisdiction.

Two people have died shredded by razor wire.

This reminds me of that little foofaraw about the Federal fort in Charleston (except Beauregard didn't kill anybody there). The Covfeferacy is challenging Federal authority.

[2naSalit]

2. +1

[erronis]

3. Excellent definition of where "covfefe" came from!

This reminds me of that little foofaraw about the Federal fort in Charleston (except Beauregard didn't kill anybody there). The Covfeferacy is challenging Federal authority.

[orthoclad]

5. I've used that term for a while now

The Confederacy lost the battelfield, but won the peace when reconstruction was scuttled (in a compromise to settle a challenged Presidential election, btw). Dixie never went away. It kept threatening to rise again, and it did, with some additional Northern states like the Dakotas, largely inspired by Trump. So, to clarify the difference, I say "Covfeferacy" for 21st cenutry Dixie.

It's more diverse and inclusive (heh).

[rurallib]

4. Supposedly they are on the American side of the river

Supposedly