General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've been thinking about the responsibilities and duties of the judges in TFG's cases,
and I've been wondering how I would handle those responsibilities if I were one of those judges. Were I the 1/6 judge, my speech to the parties at their next appearance might go something like this:
This defendant is in the unique position of running for president next year while being charged with serious crimes in four different jurisdictions. This is all the more reason why we will be adhering to a rigid schedule. And the defendant is to be reminded that this case has priority over his campaign events. It will not suffice as an excuse to delay or reschedule any part of it that he has to attend a rally or a debate or a caucus. He is expected and required to appear in this court as scheduled, no exceptions.
Finally, I must remind the defendant and his counsel that the terms of the protective order are not negotiable and must not be violated under any circumstances. The purpose of the order is to make discovery materials available to the defense while ensuring that sensitive information, especially the names and statements of witnesses, will not be disclosed to the public, and most especially that these witnesses, along with any other persons involved in this matter, including counsel, court personnel and judges, are not put at risk by inflammatory or inciteful statements made by the defendant or his representatives or agents, on social media or otherwise.
The defendant was also reminded about this at his arraignment, but almost immediately, the very next day, he posted a statement implying an intent to "come after" anyone who "came after" him. While the defendant is presumed innocent at this time, and has every right under the First Amendment to proclaim his innocence using any means of communication, his right to free speech does not include the right to threaten or intimidate anyone, and I will not tolerate it. The defendant is reminded that his release on his own recognizance pending trial depends on complying with the agreed conditions of that release, which include avoiding any public statements tending to intimidate or influence witnesses, potential jurors, or others involved in the case. I do not want to impose stricter sanctions - which could include incarceration pending trial, if that became necessary to prevent further such incidents - but you can be sure that I will if I have to in order to protect the integrity of the trial and the safety of the public.
The next appearance will be on x/x/23 for _____. Do not ask for a continuance or a rescheduling because you won't get one. Good day, gentlemen.
Tree Lady
(13,336 posts)trying to figure out what to do with him before trial.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)will be dictated by his own actions.
There, I just defined FAFO in 20 words.
Irish_Dem
(81,896 posts)And is probably used to dealing with sociopaths.
She may be taken aback that he started his crap so soon after
arraignment, but she is not shocked or having a bad weekend.
But I do think Trump is very foolish to aggravate her.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)his lawyers should bring on extra help.
Ocelot II
(130,872 posts)that the judge reminds them that TFG has the resources to hire as much help as he needs, and that maybe they'd have more time to work on the case if they didn't spend so much time visiting the cable tv talk shows.
Irish_Dem
(81,896 posts)Yes a billionaire should have no problem hiring additional attorneys and paralegals.
And if the attorneys stopped mugging for the cameras maybe they could get
some actual gd work done.
Talitha
(8,090 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,896 posts)I am laughing out loud at the part about actual deaths being the only allowed reason for delays.
I like the shorter message to Trump in clear, simple terms.
There are way too many words in the rest of the speech for him to absorb in
one sitting.
gab13by13
(32,511 posts)doing as you opine.
I like her.