Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RepublicansRZombies

(982 posts)
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 01:27 PM Nov 2012

Did Obama say that Social Security needed to be 'tweaked' in the debate or not?

Because since he did, all the people telling us to shut the fuck up and wait and see, can now shut the fuck up themselves.

WE are not idiots. WE have been studying the history and actions of the Democratic party perhaps a little longer than 2 months.

Our ancestors fought for US.

The programs they pushed FDR and others into putting in place created the best standard of living on earth and the largest healthy middle class the world has ever seen.

The right wing and their deregulation allowed millions of homes to be stolen from the middle class, crushing millions into poverty and homelessness.

We now have Millions of homeless school children who did absolutely nothing to deserve that.

They were just born into a world where the adults had grown ignorant and complacent.

Now they want to take our retirement and health care we have paid for already, that they stole to pay for wars and Big Government while giving themselves tax cuts so they could hoard more money.

Is this the history we want to leave for future generations?

FDR did not act alone, he was pushed into being the hero we remember now.

Let's make Obama a hero of the future.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Obama say that Social Security needed to be 'tweaked' in the debate or not? (Original Post) RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 OP
He said the fund was more or less secure BainsBane Nov 2012 #1
He actually said that romney's views on social security were not that much different than his own. still_one Nov 2012 #2
Romney has several mzmolly Nov 2012 #5
"rational statement made by Romney"- good one RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #8
In hindsight, mzmolly Nov 2012 #13
Good point, make a choice, a, b, or c still_one Nov 2012 #10
c'mon, posters here just finished painting romney as the political anti-christ & now you're saying HiPointDem Nov 2012 #16
... A rational statement in an attempt mzmolly Nov 2012 #24
It all depends. Will it be "tweaked" with a scalpel Still Sensible Nov 2012 #3
none of the above RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #7
Simply raising the cap Still Sensible Nov 2012 #9
that would work RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #11
"Tweaking" SS is as simple as removing the salary cap rocktivity Nov 2012 #4
sounds good RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #6
keep this up, and Obama-defenders will swear at you Enrique Nov 2012 #12
I support and defend Obama- but he needs to be pushed into doing the right thing, nobody is perfect RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #14
+1 Liberalynn Nov 2012 #17
Does anyone have the quote about Obama wanting us to push him? RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #18
I am totally confused by the mixed metaphor cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #25
yes he did. and he said his position on SS was similar to romney's. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #15
You are a vomit slurper. You are a vomit slurper. cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #19
Oh FFS... Rosco T. Nov 2012 #20
has he mentioned raising the cap as a tweak? RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #22
It HAS been mentioned... n/m Rosco T. Nov 2012 #23
Why yes, yes he did. Now welcome to the vomit slurping club. nt riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #21
And another Manufactured Outrage Widget hits the shop room floor ... THUD. JoePhilly Nov 2012 #26
The main reason I voted for Obama was the Supreme Court. I did not and do not have any illusions still_one Nov 2012 #27
From what I read on DU, the only acceptable tweak is a raise on the cap- agreed? RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #28
I agree still_one Nov 2012 #31
"I suspect that on Social Security, we've got a somewhat similar position." Obama Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #29
Tweaking could mean Rich Pay in More toddmiller Nov 2012 #30

BainsBane

(57,757 posts)
1. He said the fund was more or less secure
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 01:29 PM
Nov 2012

and that it required a bit of tweaking but wasn't a serious fiscal concern like Medicare.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
2. He actually said that romney's views on social security were not that much different than his own.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 01:30 PM
Nov 2012

That happened in the first debate

mzmolly

(52,793 posts)
5. Romney has several
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 02:04 PM
Nov 2012

views. As such, I'm sure the President referred to a rational statement made by Rmoney at some point in history.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
16. c'mon, posters here just finished painting romney as the political anti-christ & now you're saying
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:32 PM
Nov 2012

he may have made a rational statement?

romney is the man who was going to bring on the apocalypse if elected, don't you remember?

mzmolly

(52,793 posts)
24. ... A rational statement in an attempt
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:18 PM
Nov 2012

Last edited Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:02 PM - Edit history (1)

to garner support from rational people at one time. Not a rational statement because he IS rational.

Still Sensible

(2,870 posts)
9. Simply raising the cap
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:08 PM
Nov 2012

on earnings that are subject to SS withholding would be a helpful "scalpel" tweak.

 
11. that would work
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:14 PM
Nov 2012

and they could stop borrowing from it to pay for wars and big government while giving tax cuts.

Who the hell do these people think they are anyway?

Why don't we cancel Congress' retirement and health care, THEY spent the money, not US.

rocktivity

(45,006 posts)
4. "Tweaking" SS is as simple as removing the salary cap
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 01:37 PM
Nov 2012

which can result in EVERYONE paying a LOWER rate.


rocktivity

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
12. keep this up, and Obama-defenders will swear at you
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:17 PM
Nov 2012

and tell you to slurp vomit off the floor, whatever that means.

 
14. I support and defend Obama- but he needs to be pushed into doing the right thing, nobody is perfect
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:28 PM
Nov 2012

And he said at some point (can't find the quote) that he wants us to push him.

He needs to be able to take the bully pulpit and say this is what they American people are demanding, and I must follow the will of the people.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
25. I am totally confused by the mixed metaphor
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:21 PM
Nov 2012

DUers who support entitement benefits swallow bullshit but they slurp vomit.

I still haven't figured out what they do with pee-pee. Inject it?

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
19. You are a vomit slurper. You are a vomit slurper.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 04:46 PM
Nov 2012

Nah na na nahhh na.

You are a vomit slurper.

Only RW trolls support entitlement benefits. Well known fact.

Hey trolly-mac troll-troll.

Yeah... yer Mother is on Medicare.

You eat boogers.


<the preceding is a joke. The fact I have to explain that it is a joke is a tragedy>

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
20. Oh FFS...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 04:48 PM
Nov 2012

raising the cap would be a 'tweak'...

wait till you see the cards he plays before you condemm

 
22. has he mentioned raising the cap as a tweak?
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:02 PM
Nov 2012

Bring it on.

For the record, I fully support Obama.

I think he has a gun pointed at his head by corporations and that any capitulation he does is not exactly his fault.

I think he wants us to push him, he needs us to push him to the point he has to say "I have no choice'

This is what happened during FDR, the people pushed him to make changes, to set up the programs we fight to save today.

It has to be an unstoppable movement of We the People.

WE have to stop allowing the current Republican party nut jobs to get in the way of human progress.

WE have to be the ones to make Obama a great president in the history books, as our ancestors did of FDR.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
26. And another Manufactured Outrage Widget hits the shop room floor ... THUD.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:23 PM
Nov 2012

And some say that America doesn't manufacture anything anymore.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
27. The main reason I voted for Obama was the Supreme Court. I did not and do not have any illusions
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:30 PM
Nov 2012

About anything else

This does not mean the president will not defend social security, we will need to find out

Nothing stops anyone from writing your congress person, senators, or president telling them what you want

Actually social security is not the problem, just raise the cap, and no more problem

That is what I believe will happen

 
28. From what I read on DU, the only acceptable tweak is a raise on the cap- agreed?
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 05:58 PM
Nov 2012

So we'll make it clear to Congress that is the only change we will accept and draw a line in the sand.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
29. "I suspect that on Social Security, we've got a somewhat similar position." Obama
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:04 PM
Nov 2012

to Romney, first debate. I called the WH and asked them to tell me what Willard's position IS, because he's had many of them. Seems Obama is the one man in America who knows and agrees with Mitt's position on Social Security. The WH has yet to send along an answer to that question.

toddmiller

(75 posts)
30. Tweaking could mean Rich Pay in More
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:13 PM
Nov 2012

You only pay into SS for first $110,000. If you raise that number enough then it's solvent for the next century. Given the vagueness of the Presidents' statements it's hard to say that's not part of his plan. Also, many statements obviously were made to appeal to independent voters so now he doesn't have to do that for himself anymore (maybe for party) so will just have to wait and see.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Obama say that Social...