Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moonshinegnomie

(4,030 posts)
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 09:03 AM Aug 2023

arrest clarence thomas

i dont care what teh reason is or even if theres a law.
hes dirty. its obvious. either arrest him or declare that every 5-4 decision where he was on teh majority side is invalid.


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
arrest clarence thomas (Original Post) moonshinegnomie Aug 2023 OP
Soooo, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #1
DOJ needs to investigate him gab13by13 Aug 2023 #2
Yes, that's the correct procedure, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #3
He clearly failed to comply with reporting obligations onenote Aug 2023 #10
so stick your head in the ground and wait. moonshinegnomie Aug 2023 #4
Soooo, like I said, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #5
if thats what it takes moonshinegnomie Aug 2023 #6
No, that's not what it fucking takes, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #7
Follow the $ and finally charge this asshole? Brainfodder Aug 2023 #8
Exactly, investigate first, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #9
Not tehres? Fullduplexxx Aug 2023 #11
Justice that money can literally buy. LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #12

gab13by13

(32,489 posts)
2. DOJ needs to investigate him
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 09:12 AM
Aug 2023

There is evidence that he committed crimes. DOJ may not want to appear to be partisan though because that's what Magats will accuse them of.

The IRS also needs to investigate him.

Clarence Thomas may be the 2nd biggest threat to our democracy next to Trump.

onenote

(46,188 posts)
10. He clearly failed to comply with reporting obligations
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 11:45 AM
Aug 2023

And that can be, but usually isn't, the subject of a criminal prosecution (as contrasted with civil case seeking to impose fines).

As for bribery -- pretty difficult to prove and unlikely that DOJ would bother to try absent some smoking gun evidence showing that Thomas would have voted differently in any particular case but for some financial inducement -- something that given Thomas's long-held judicial philosophy, would be hard to establish.

moonshinegnomie

(4,030 posts)
4. so stick your head in the ground and wait.
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 10:24 AM
Aug 2023

im tired of that. the right plays dirty. taking the high ground doesnt work. its time to fight back just as dirty as they do.



MarineCombatEngineer

(18,131 posts)
7. No, that's not what it fucking takes,
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 11:22 AM
Aug 2023

what it takes is to stay within the Constitution, you know, the law of the land and nowhere in the Constitution, nor the Bill of Rights, is there anything that allows what you're pushing for.

This is what tyrants, despots and dictators do.

You sure you're in the right place?

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,131 posts)
9. Exactly, investigate first,
Thu Aug 10, 2023, 11:31 AM
Aug 2023

like SC Smith has and is still doing.

Unlike the OP, I tend to favor following the Constitution and the BoR, not arrest first then investigate, or make up a law or arrest even if there is not law to arrest for.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»arrest clarence thomas