Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:32 PM Aug 2023

Come on, people. The appointment of Weiss as special counsel for Hunter Biden was brilliant.

It's not a new prosecution at all. What it means is that now Weiss is independent of the DoJ and the GOPers in Congress can't credibly complain that "Biden's DoJ" is pulling the strings.

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Come on, people. The appointment of Weiss as special counsel for Hunter Biden was brilliant. (Original Post) Ocelot II Aug 2023 OP
Will Weiss appointment appease maga? Deuxcents Aug 2023 #1
Weiss was a Orange maggot appointee in 2018 kimbutgar Aug 2023 #4
Are you kidding me? Tickle Aug 2023 #49
It won't appease them because now the investigation is not under the control Ocelot II Aug 2023 #5
no. was avout how FBI conducted 2016 Russia - Trump investigation Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #6
Thanks..I just looked it up..so much going on Deuxcents Aug 2023 #13
It's confusing. Legal folks on MSNBC say this is worse for Biden; he has "exposure for a allegorical oracle Aug 2023 #25
Are you referring to President Biden? BlueIdaho Aug 2023 #40
So Johnny2X2X Aug 2023 #2
Prosecutors just agreed to dismiss the tax charges without prejudice. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #8
The judge voided the plea bargain Johnny2X2X Aug 2023 #14
They're likely going to trial on the taxes now, thus increasing the peril for Hunter, per all on the Celerity Aug 2023 #18
I bet there will be a plea deal eventually, it just won't be as good the first one. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #20
Meh jcgoldie Aug 2023 #3
We just don't know. Joyce Vance just said it could be that they have other evidence tulipsandroses Aug 2023 #7
GOP's "other evidence" is nothing more than wishful thinking and fantasy speculations. FSogol Aug 2023 #10
We can't know for sure that there are no legal violations tulipsandroses Aug 2023 #23
He paid his taxes late...if he was anyone else, he would have paid a fine and be on his merry way. Demsrule86 Aug 2023 #35
Gun Charge NowISeetheLight Aug 2023 #36
If there's other evidence, so be it. But however it shakes down, Ocelot II Aug 2023 #15
That works for me too, show up TFG crowd by appearing to treat Hunter like a normal defendant? Brainfodder Aug 2023 #16
They'll rant and rave no matter what dalton99a Aug 2023 #9
This!!! BlueMTexpat Aug 2023 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author LakeArenal Aug 2023 #11
this is part is potentially not correct Celerity Aug 2023 #12
Those things were always under investigation, so not really new; Ocelot II Aug 2023 #17
Yes, but the failure to register as a foreign agent would be a new charge. Celerity Aug 2023 #24
I assume that always has been under investigation, just hadn't been charged yet. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #26
Yes, that may be true, but it would be a new prosecution.. which is why I replied intially. Celerity Aug 2023 #32
exactly bigtree Aug 2023 #19
It is an elegant move ZonkerHarris Aug 2023 #21
My opinion of Merrick Garland diminishes daily. comradebillyboy Aug 2023 #22
Obama chose him because he was seen as a centrist jcgoldie Aug 2023 #28
Not one of Obama's better moves in my opinion. comradebillyboy Aug 2023 #30
If you have a memory, it didn't matter what move Obama made calguy Aug 2023 #33
Obama was weak nowforever Aug 2023 #45
Thank you...n/t SheilaAnn Aug 2023 #37
once the maggots took the House, Garland knew he had to agingdem Aug 2023 #27
Whatever Hunter may have done, *he* did it - Joe didn't. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #31
never let it be said Merrick Garland does not have a sense of humor!!! agingdem Aug 2023 #34
Then it's a smart move Sugarcoated Aug 2023 #47
This won't change a thing AFA the GOP is concerned. 50 Shades Of Blue Aug 2023 #29
soon we can put this talk all Tickle Aug 2023 #38
"can't credibly complain". That'll stop 'em. nt LexVegas Aug 2023 #39
And the GOP is now whining, gnashing teeth, and rending garments BumRushDaShow Aug 2023 #42
I think the biggest harm is going to be that group of voters Cheezoholic Aug 2023 #43
Good tiredtoo Aug 2023 #44
Wouldn't go that far Deminpenn Aug 2023 #46
Trump and company want Hunter Biden bs in the media 24/7 Catherine Vincent Aug 2023 #48

Deuxcents

(26,914 posts)
1. Will Weiss appointment appease maga?
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:35 PM
Aug 2023

Please remind me of what the Durham report was about..I’m thinking Hunter Biden was the subject of that

kimbutgar

(27,248 posts)
4. Weiss was a Orange maggot appointee in 2018
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:36 PM
Aug 2023

So I’m not confident he will be an honest Special counsel because he might be a cult partisan.

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
5. It won't appease them because now the investigation is not under the control
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:36 PM
Aug 2023

of the DoJ. It wan't intended to appease them. There might be some other issues that are investigated but the GOP can't complain that Garland or Biden is calling the shots.

allegorical oracle

(6,480 posts)
25. It's confusing. Legal folks on MSNBC say this is worse for Biden; he has "exposure for a
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:52 PM
Aug 2023

broader array of acts that he may have been involved in." And now has to stand trial.

Johnny2X2X

(24,207 posts)
2. So
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:35 PM
Aug 2023

The prosecutor who just caved to GOP talking points and voided the deal he had made with Hunter's lawyers, now if free from any DOJ oversight at all. And you think that's a good thing?

Spin City.

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
8. Prosecutors just agreed to dismiss the tax charges without prejudice.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:38 PM
Aug 2023

Maybe to be refiled in a different venue?

Johnny2X2X

(24,207 posts)
14. The judge voided the plea bargain
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:43 PM
Aug 2023

It was voided because the proscutor was basically lying about continuing to investigate Hunter for being an unlicensed foreing agent. A total reneg on their deal as a direct result of Republican meddling.

This just guarenteed Weiss will continue to investigate Hunter through the 2024 election.

Celerity

(54,405 posts)
18. They're likely going to trial on the taxes now, thus increasing the peril for Hunter, per all on the
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:46 PM
Aug 2023

MSNBC panel.

jcgoldie

(12,046 posts)
3. Meh
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:36 PM
Aug 2023

House republicans will not change their tune. Whether their complaints are “credible” is not going to matter to any of their intended audience in my opinion.

tulipsandroses

(8,251 posts)
7. We just don't know. Joyce Vance just said it could be that they have other evidence
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:37 PM
Aug 2023

and if so then may go to trial

FSogol

(47,623 posts)
10. GOP's "other evidence" is nothing more than wishful thinking and fantasy speculations.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:39 PM
Aug 2023

In other words, no evidence.

tulipsandroses

(8,251 posts)
23. We can't know for sure that there are no legal violations
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:48 PM
Aug 2023

for Hunter. Trying to link President Biden to anything is BS. But if there is evidence that Hunter was operating as a foreign agent. We just don’t know.
Whether Hunter is in violation of anything, it’s still outrageous that they are doing this. He is a private citizen. But keeping the case in the media they get to keep suggesting that President Biden is guilty of something .

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
35. He paid his taxes late...if he was anyone else, he would have paid a fine and be on his merry way.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 01:07 PM
Aug 2023

NowISeetheLight

(4,002 posts)
36. Gun Charge
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 01:12 PM
Aug 2023

I think the big issue with the plea was the gun charge. The tax deal was fairly routine and he did pay it all off already. I thought I read somewhere where the judge was questioning why the gun charge was "bundled" with the tax charge. Deferment programs that lead to a downgrade of charge level (from felony to misdemeanor) are also fairly common.

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
15. If there's other evidence, so be it. But however it shakes down,
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:43 PM
Aug 2023

using a special counsel takes the case out from under the direct control of the DoJ and the GOP can't claim Biden or Garland has their thumb on the scale. Hunter might get stuck on the tax charge at trial (venue was a problem), but the law applies to him like everybody else. Andrea Mitchell, of course, claims that it's terrible for Joe Biden, but then she would. It's not clear to anyone why the plea deal fell apart. I think there will eventually be a plea deal, if not as favorable as the original one.

Brainfodder

(7,781 posts)
16. That works for me too, show up TFG crowd by appearing to treat Hunter like a normal defendant?
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:43 PM
Aug 2023

No one giving Hunter special treatment and absurd lawsuits blocking it for eternity?


Awaiting TFG and his phony crazy BS to get wilder to try to compete with all the wall to wall Hunter coverage about to hit?

Response to Ocelot II (Original post)

Celerity

(54,405 posts)
12. this is part is potentially not correct
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:41 PM
Aug 2023
It's not a new prosecution at all.


On MSNBC they are (as I type) talking about potential NEW charges for failure to register as a foreign agent (and perhaps other things as apparently the investigation is being widened), and they are also now very likely going to trial on the tax charges as they cannot agree on a plea deal.

All the panel agrees this is a bad day for Hunter Biden, unfortunately.

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
17. Those things were always under investigation, so not really new;
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:45 PM
Aug 2023

Weiss always had said there was an ongoing investigation. They hadn't venued the tax case properly, so it's still the same case if it's refiled in a different venue.

Celerity

(54,405 posts)
32. Yes, that may be true, but it would be a new prosecution.. which is why I replied intially.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:59 PM
Aug 2023

you said in your OP:

It's not a new prosecution at all.


Which is, as I intially replied, incorrect IF they do charge and prosecute him for failing to regester as a foreign agent. He has not been charged/prosecuted for that before, thus by simple definition and basic logic it would be a new prosecution.

bigtree

(94,261 posts)
19. exactly
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:47 PM
Aug 2023

Aug. 11, 2023, 12:34 p.m.
Michael S. Schmidt

One of the most powerful provisions in place for a special counsel is a trigger related to Congress. If a special counsel wants to take an investigative move that is overruled by higher ups at the Justice Department, the department is required to report that to Congress. This type of provision is designed to give a special counsel the freedom to follow the facts without fear of undue influence.

comradebillyboy

(10,955 posts)
22. My opinion of Merrick Garland diminishes daily.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:48 PM
Aug 2023

I never understood why Obama wanted him on the Supreme Court and I was dumbfounded when Joe made him AG.

jcgoldie

(12,046 posts)
28. Obama chose him because he was seen as a centrist
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:54 PM
Aug 2023

He thought he was an apolitical choice that McConnell couldn’t justify grandstanding against. Mitch replied, “hold my beer.”

calguy

(6,154 posts)
33. If you have a memory, it didn't matter what move Obama made
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 01:03 PM
Aug 2023

Moscow Mitch had already declared that he wouldn't consider ANY SCOTUS nomination Obama was going to make.

 

nowforever

(586 posts)
45. Obama was weak
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 03:43 PM
Aug 2023

He should have protested and fought to have his nomination forwarded. McConnell could have been forced to move his nomination with real political pressure. The choice of Garland for AG by Biden was serious error, like Obama allowing Comey to remain FBI head. Democrats need to learn how to play hardball instead of being the nice guys. Biden I think has finally figured that out.

agingdem

(8,848 posts)
27. once the maggots took the House, Garland knew he had to
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:54 PM
Aug 2023

get the January 6/stolen documents investigations as far away from Jordan and McCarthy..they had already demanded all documentation regarding the two investigations be turned over ASAP...Garland politely told them to go fuck themselves...he then appointed Jack Smith special counsel, allowing the investigations to continue uninterrupted ...and this is precisely what Garland did when he appointed Weiss special counsel...Comer, Jordan, Greene, McCarthy can bray like the asses they are but "they can't touch this"...

contrary to what a MSNBC panel asserts...this is not a bad day for Hunter Biden...

Ocelot II

(130,526 posts)
31. Whatever Hunter may have done, *he* did it - Joe didn't.
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 12:57 PM
Aug 2023

And now, according to MSNBC, Jim Jordan is having a hissy fit about this appointment, claims Weiss can't be trusted! LOL! Let Weiss keep investigating; it won't turn up any evidence against Joe, and if Hunter really is guilty of something he should be treated like everyone else.

Cheezoholic

(3,719 posts)
43. I think the biggest harm is going to be that group of voters
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 03:32 PM
Aug 2023

that are always saying the whole system is corrupt, both sides do it, why even vote. There are a lot of voters who feel that way as lazy of an excuse not to vote that it is. In that sense it could help Repukes.

tiredtoo

(2,949 posts)
44. Good
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 03:40 PM
Aug 2023

If Hunter Biden is found guilty of any crime, let him pay the penalty. NO ONE is above the law.

Deminpenn

(17,504 posts)
46. Wouldn't go that far
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 03:44 PM
Aug 2023

Weiss ASKED to be named special counsel. When considering this request, I'd have considered that Weiss wrote a poor plea agreement that was either misleading to Hunter Biden/his attorneys or an outright lie. It was so bad, the judge, after asking basic questions, discovered both parties had completely different understandings of it and refused to accept it.

It might have been politically expedient to appoint a special counsel, but I'd have found a non-partisan R prosecutor (I'm sure there's a few out there) and named that person.

If I were Pres Biden, I'd make it clear to Weiss that he cannot be BOTH a special counsel and contimue as the USA for Delaware. Remember Jack Smith resigned his position at The Hague when he was appointed special counsel.

Catherine Vincent

(34,610 posts)
48. Trump and company want Hunter Biden bs in the media 24/7
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 04:01 PM
Aug 2023

To try and ease up on all of Trump's many crimes. I always notice right wing sources, when talking about Hunter Biden, they just use Biden. Think they're slick.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Come on, people. The appo...