Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:04 PM Aug 2023

Rep. Comer says Merrick Garland blocked his interfering plans with the special counsel appointment

...Merrick Garland (and ostensibly, David Weiss) effectively checked GQP plans to further politicize the Hunter Biden probe by giving the 5-year investigator the independence from congressional meddling and prying into the investigation which the Special Counsel designation provides.

MeidasTouch @MeidasTouch 4h
James Comer claims House Republicans were just about to crack the Hunter Biden case wide open and trace it to President Biden, but Garland foiled their plans at the last minute by appointing a special counsel.

The Chair of the House Oversight Committee tried to capitalize on the announcement by continuing his congressional clue whisperer media tour by appearing on Newsmax, Fox News, Newsmax, CNN, and Fox Business. Despite suffering from an acute case of evidence deficiency, Comer asserted his investigation was the victim of the “weaponization” of government and that he and his team were SO close to cracking the Biden case wide open but Attorney General Garland foiled their plans with the special counsel appointment. Comer insisted, "And right as we get to the point to where we've traced it to Joe Biden and we're at a position where we can win in court to fight their attorneys and get their actual personal bank records. He comes out with this."

This investigative breakthrough must be news to fellow Republican House Oversight Member Nick Langworthy who was pressed repeatedly by Fox News anchor Gillian Turner after contradicting Comer when he said, “We have never claimed we have direct money going to the president.”
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/inspector-comer-claims-garland-foiled-his-plans-to-crack-the-biden-case-wide-open



47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Comer says Merrick Garland blocked his interfering plans with the special counsel appointment (Original Post) bigtree Aug 2023 OP
Curses, foiled again Aviation Pro Aug 2023 #1
just was thinking that . lol AllaN01Bear Aug 2023 #36
me too CatWoman Aug 2023 #46
All the brains equals none. dchill Aug 2023 #2
Garland is a genius, gab13by13 Aug 2023 #3
blocking congressional interference into investigations is a bad thing? bigtree Aug 2023 #5
I was about to ask you the same question. gab13by13 Aug 2023 #12
none of that. Not one word. bigtree Aug 2023 #14
You make a good point I hadn't considered. I always thought that Weiss was the honest one who was keopeli Aug 2023 #32
lol. Having that ability to ignore Congress until the end of the probe doesn't extend it bigtree Aug 2023 #38
Yes, and you're right to point out the flaw in my reasoning. keopeli Aug 2023 #41
c'mon, Friday! bigtree Aug 2023 #42
How is that supposed to work? FBaggins Aug 2023 #4
that doesn't mean that Congress should be able to pry into the details of investigations bigtree Aug 2023 #7
That's the reason he was appointed special counsel? gab13by13 Aug 2023 #15
yes, you are 'confused.' bigtree Aug 2023 #20
+1! ShazzieB Aug 2023 #29
Huh? A Special Counsel has very limited responsibilities to Congress. W_HAMILTON Aug 2023 #45
And very little immunity from it FBaggins Aug 2023 #47
My evil plan would have worked MontanaMama Aug 2023 #6
Aw, boo hoo! Jilly_in_VA Aug 2023 #8
More like a face wanting a fist. captain queeg Aug 2023 #11
Backfeifen-something. Iggo Aug 2023 #34
The face of the Nazi Party Eliot Rosewater Aug 2023 #9
They were just about to crack the case wide open... captain queeg Aug 2023 #10
He was gonna crack the case wide open. usonian Aug 2023 #13
Perfect. For some reason Devin Nunes (or James Inhofe) came to mind as Wile E. erronis Aug 2023 #19
Nobody's stopping you from turning over evidence to Weiss, dipshit. GoCubsGo Aug 2023 #16
EXACTLY! MyOwnPeace Aug 2023 #44
So Comer was outsmarted by Biden again Fullduplexxx Aug 2023 #17
Congressman ComCom is such a bloody liar and whiner. i hate his guts Trueblue1968 Aug 2023 #18
Ha malaise Aug 2023 #21
Comer says a lot of stuff that is untrue/bullshit, doesn't he? emulatorloo Aug 2023 #22
Comer is such a fucking worm. mobeau69 Aug 2023 #23
comer is full of shit spanone Aug 2023 #24
I am sick of the republicans gaslighting everyone, trying to narrate a perception to the Bev54 Aug 2023 #25
Except if this was true, they'd be leaking like my great-grandfather on a long hike Mr. Ected Aug 2023 #26
Oh, forgive me EndlessWire Aug 2023 #30
But we were going to pry through their bank records! Bayard Aug 2023 #27
And I'm willing to bet that Rep. Comer (Idiot Party), that ... aggiesal Aug 2023 #28
Loving it wryter2000 Aug 2023 #31
They're just mad Jilly_in_VA Aug 2023 #33
If Comer had any real evidence, the whole world would be Jarqui Aug 2023 #35
Dummy, Garland is giving you a way out. Sneederbunk Aug 2023 #37
I knew it.. AG Garland did the right Cha Aug 2023 #39
What's Stopping Him? NowISeetheLight Aug 2023 #40
PERFECT evidence. BEST evidence ever produced usonian Aug 2023 #43

gab13by13

(32,324 posts)
3. Garland is a genius,
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:13 PM
Aug 2023

appointing a special counsel for political reasons. Is that what Meidas touch is claiming?

Doesn't one need evidence of criminal activity before appointing a special counsel, or can one be appointed to stymie the 5 year bogus investigation?

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
5. blocking congressional interference into investigations is a bad thing?
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:23 PM
Aug 2023

...is that what you're arguing?

What's 'political' in giving the prosecutor independence from clear meddling from Jordan and Comer?

Who or what are you defending here?

gab13by13

(32,324 posts)
12. I was about to ask you the same question.
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:41 PM
Aug 2023

They have been investigating Hunter and Joe for 5 years and came up with triviality.

Doesn't appointing a special counsel give credence to the bogus investigation?

Remember what Trump said, I don't need proof just the appearance of criminality and Congressional Republican will do the rest.

The appointment of a sc ensures this Hunter/Joe drama will play out right up to the election.

What were the reasons that Garland made Weiss a sc, when Garland himself said Weiss had all the authority he needed? What changed?

Was there new reputable evidence of Hunter's criminal activity? I confuse easy, but this seems to me to be a bad deal.

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
14. none of that. Not one word.
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:44 PM
Aug 2023

...this allows Weiss to avoid testifying to republicans until well after the election.

Weiss isn't a threat to the Democratic party, but interfering republicans sure are.

keopeli

(3,582 posts)
32. You make a good point I hadn't considered. I always thought that Weiss was the honest one who was
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 05:55 PM
Aug 2023

under enormous pressure from GQPers. He dragged his feet and came up with small fry (just like Durham).

It is Weiss who made the request for Special Council privileges, I'm convinced. Garland said he would do it if Weiss requested it.

To me, this Garland decision was strategic, but I could not see the strategy.

Your insight that the Special Counsel is now immune from Congressional oversight temporarily and can use his favorite tactic - delay - to get past the 24 Election.

Reasonably, after the Plea Agreement was withdrawn, the Democrats realized there was no way to eliminate the Hunter story before the election. Because of that, the delay until after 24 is best.

One hiccup remains: Weiss now has the power to coordinate an "October Surprise" with a surprise leak or other transgression. I call this particular type of election interference a "Comey Surprise". It comes from an independent law enforcement agency under the guise of trying to help, to clarify, or to assist voters by putting an issue to rest before voting. It's very easy for someone with a little power to overstep their boundaries and compromise an entire election, consequences be damned. I believe the 24 election is particularly vulnerable to this type of interference/sedition.

Thanks for helping me understand the benefits of the Special Council status!

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
38. lol. Having that ability to ignore Congress until the end of the probe doesn't extend it
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 06:12 PM
Aug 2023

...you put 2 and 4 together and came up with 'apple.'

If and until there's something new this prosecutor brings forth -who's had 5-years and all the authority he needed to investigate and bring charges anywhere in the nation, and came up with a late payment of taxes and a gun charge that's rendered moot by a ruling the law is unconstitutional in a similar case - all of this concern is a wasted effort.

There's no new threat to Hunter Biden, and it was NOT this designation by Garland which triggered the unraveling of the plea deal which extended this case.

Nothing after that judge balked and refused the plea deal meant that the case was going away, so it's absurd to blame the SC appointment for the reality that the Hunter Biden probe isn't over.

But having the ability to put the REPUBLICAN-LED committee off until after the election doesn't control that eventuality in any way at all. There is no straight line to be drawn between the two.

Having an SC designation doesn't give Weiss ANY MORE authority than he ALREADY HAD to continue his probe as long as he wants. He always had that option.

keopeli

(3,582 posts)
41. Yes, and you're right to point out the flaw in my reasoning.
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 06:28 PM
Aug 2023

My concern isn't Hunter. Never was. Nor his prosecution. I'm more focused on the intersection of law enforcement and election interference. But, that's neither here nor there. I'm glad to still be learning about this latest DOJ tactic.

In any case, it's just a Sunday! lol

Thanks again, BigTree!

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
4. How is that supposed to work?
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:17 PM
Aug 2023

A special prosecutor is supposed to be independent of the rest off the executive branch - but not congress.

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
7. that doesn't mean that Congress should be able to pry into the details of investigations
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:24 PM
Aug 2023

...that are ongoing.

They'll have the opportunity for those questions when the investigation is over.

Weiss was ready to fold to House republicans and testify to Congress, as early as next month, now there's zero obligation for him to appear.

gab13by13

(32,324 posts)
15. That's the reason he was appointed special counsel?
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:46 PM
Aug 2023

Now I am really confused.

People are putting a lot of faith in Weiss, someone who was originally appointed by Trump, and for what it matters, he is a Republican, hoping he isn't a Magat.

bigtree

(94,265 posts)
20. yes, you are 'confused.'
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:54 PM
Aug 2023

...no one is 'placing faith in Weiss.'

What most people who's hair isn't on fire about this have noted is there's no indication the probe has expanded,the gun charge is moot because of a recent ruling on the law's constitutionality in another case, and the tax charges aren't actually prosecutable.

Most believe if it all comes to trial, there will likely be an acquittal. That's the reason for the earlier plea, that and Hunter's wish to put this all in the past.

Let us know when all of the stuff you imagine is happening comes to fruition.

Jilly_in_VA

(14,371 posts)
8. Aw, boo hoo!
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:33 PM
Aug 2023

Go cry me a river, asshole. Incidentally, did you ever see anyone with a face more like a fist?

captain queeg

(11,780 posts)
10. They were just about to crack the case wide open...
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:38 PM
Aug 2023

How many times have we heard this over the last 5 years? Now they will say their investigation was stymied by the special counsel. They’ll whine but probably are happy in secret. They can just keep claiming a conspiracy rather than continually looking like idiots because they can never produce any evidence.

GoCubsGo

(34,915 posts)
16. Nobody's stopping you from turning over evidence to Weiss, dipshit.
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 03:47 PM
Aug 2023

I'm sure he'd be happy to have it--if you actually have any, which I doubt you do. Put up or shut up. I'm betting you've got nothing--other than made-up bullshit that would never stand up anywhere other than your kangaroo court.

MyOwnPeace

(17,562 posts)
44. EXACTLY!
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 07:36 PM
Aug 2023

He should be happy - he now has somebody who might listen to him!

I remember the last 'big deal' Congressional investigation - it was something about Jan. 6 and it seems to me they found LOTS OF SHIT and not everybody in Congress was 'buying' it. However, they DID send ALL records of interviews and witnesses to SP Jack Smith - and it looks like SP Smith has indeed used some of that material in his charges so far.

So, here you go, Comer - Have something? Send it to SP Weiss and see how much all of your "BREAKTHROUGH" information is of interest to him.

FUCKIN' LIAR!!!!!!!!!

Bev54

(13,431 posts)
25. I am sick of the republicans gaslighting everyone, trying to narrate a perception to the
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 04:46 PM
Aug 2023

public, instead the reality is their deceptions of the public. Does anyone remember that 32 senators, including all those that are excoriating Garland for appointing Weiss to SC, signing a letter in September '22 requesting that Weiss be elevated to SC?

Here is a copy of their letter:

https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Hunter-Biden-Special-Counsel-Letter-FINAL-2.pdf

Mr. Ected

(9,714 posts)
26. Except if this was true, they'd be leaking like my great-grandfather on a long hike
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 04:48 PM
Aug 2023

They don't have anything, they never had anything, and they just had their ball taken away from them.

aggiesal

(10,804 posts)
28. And I'm willing to bet that Rep. Comer (Idiot Party), that ...
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 05:27 PM
Aug 2023

he never told any of the news outlets mentioned that it was the (R)'s who requested a Special Counsel for the Hunter Biden case, and are now complaining that Merrick Garland did what was asked.

Can't win for losing with this group of idiots.

Jilly_in_VA

(14,371 posts)
33. They're just mad
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 05:55 PM
Aug 2023

that Garland stole their thunder and did what they wanted. Traitor Greene is all bent out of shape too. But the kicker is that if Hunter's name was Hunter Jones, they wouldn't give a flying Wallenda in a Buffalo blizzard about him or anything he (allegedly) did. It's just a backhanded way of trying to get at his dad.

And never mind about Jarvanka. Never a whisper about them.

Jarqui

(10,909 posts)
35. If Comer had any real evidence, the whole world would be
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 06:03 PM
Aug 2023

looking at it.

Just a smear job ..

Cha

(319,080 posts)
39. I knew it.. AG Garland did the right
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 06:14 PM
Aug 2023

thing Busting magat Chops.


Now they can just Whine, piss, and moan.

NowISeetheLight

(4,002 posts)
40. What's Stopping Him?
Sun Aug 13, 2023, 06:17 PM
Aug 2023

I mean he has so much evidence, tons of it, it's everywhere. I'm looking forward to seeing it. See Comer... I want to SEE ACTUAL EVIDENCE. Innuendo and accusations with no proof are just NOTHING.

Comer = Nothing?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Comer says Merrick G...