Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:07 PM Nov 2012

WAS LIFE BETTER BEFORE FOX NEWS?


68 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
YES
67 (99%)
NO
0 (0%)
IT WAS THE SAME
1 (1%)
I don't know.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAS LIFE BETTER BEFORE FOX NEWS? (Original Post) AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 OP
Other: HELL YES! William769 Nov 2012 #1
I should have added that..but AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #2
Some people would like to see FAUX just disappear. So I guess it all evens out. William769 Nov 2012 #5
I don't understand it... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #9
Fairness Doctrine was important but even moreso were regulations on ownership Doremus Nov 2012 #47
Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They love to hate LeftInTX Nov 2012 #3
yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes......... OneGrassRoot Nov 2012 #4
and yet... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #7
You have to ask? SheilaT Nov 2012 #6
only because there are some AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #8
I voted yes, but frankly, I found life better before there was color teevee. HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #10
I voted yes, Fox news is responsible for the dumbing down of a lot of America quinnox Nov 2012 #11
ITS A POLL that is obvious only for the reason AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #12
good post quinnox Nov 2012 #16
Thank you... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #18
agreed, Asahina quinnox Nov 2012 #19
Life is better now, but certainly not because of fox news. JVS Nov 2012 #13
The Right wing has AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #15
Yes, but we were still subjected to USA Today. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #14
If, by "life", you mean ... DividedWeAre Nov 2012 #17
We have AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #20
I can't say sakabatou Nov 2012 #21
"Fox first tried its hand at a news show in 1988" AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #24
Yup sakabatou Nov 2012 #25
There were plenty of dark times before Fox News onenote Nov 2012 #22
I think the robber baron media barons controlled the papers much like FOX news Johonny Nov 2012 #28
Faux News was founded by Roger Murdoch in 1996 and public discourse has gotten.... OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #23
Remember 1996 was also the year of the TeleCom Act Blue_Tires Nov 2012 #30
It's not just Fox. badhair77 Nov 2012 #26
I don't know why but it all reminds me of AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #34
The WWE, Howard Stern, etc... Shankapotomus Nov 2012 #45
It screwed up my parents, I hate it. tridim Nov 2012 #27
Same here. narnian60 Nov 2012 #52
I want a harder question, AsahinaHimi! MrMickeysMom Nov 2012 #29
Network News was different in the old days... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #35
And, to the point of Ted Turner, when it all started changing... MrMickeysMom Nov 2012 #40
Wow, in other words hogwyld Nov 2012 #31
News has always been somewhat entertainment, but not like it is now that we have Fox gollygee Nov 2012 #32
Yes, but FOX says it was worse. Motown_Johnny Nov 2012 #33
I assume it must have been...I've never watched fox news. Tikki Nov 2012 #36
Not having a TV I haven't watched it either... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #37
Yes, we had CNN, and it was a news network instead of entertainment news. modem77 Nov 2012 #38
My family even got along better felix_numinous Nov 2012 #39
The more voices and opinions, the better, even those we disagree with. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #42
The more voice and opinions the better? AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #43
I take it you want all news stories approved by the Democratic Party first? GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #46
i am going to quote someone from above to answer your silly post..... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #50
I remember biases stories passed off as news during those days. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #68
more voices and opinions have dropped away with media consolidation Kumbricia Nov 2012 #61
I agree with your last statement AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #69
Yes, but... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #44
This country was better off before Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine, period. Jamaal510 Nov 2012 #48
LIFE print magazine Special Prosciuto Nov 2012 #49
It was... beyond a doubt. defacto7 Nov 2012 #51
You should rephrase this. Cleita Nov 2012 #53
History shows there has always been AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #57
and the bigger problem is-they pay for placement in restaurants, bars, hotel lobbies, diners graham4anything Nov 2012 #54
Like living in a different country. mmonk Nov 2012 #55
I try not to criticize other poster...ever. But, I can not help it. This is the Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #56
it was obvious for a reason AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #60
Thanks and sorry. I agree, and it really has affected the wingnuts this time around. Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #62
Sadly you are correct... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #63
YES Special Prosciuto Nov 2012 #58
Belligerence is now common place KT2000 Nov 2012 #59
Sad Johnny2X2X Nov 2012 #64
They are in a totally different mindset... AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #67
Fox and their ilk created an alternate reality. hay rick Nov 2012 #65
Its like the world has AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #66

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
2. I should have added that..but
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:11 PM
Nov 2012

There are some people who don't want the fairness doctrine back. Okay..than what else can be used? I am willing to bet the overwhelming answer on DU will be yes to the above question.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
9. I don't understand it...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:25 PM
Nov 2012

Its that people hate it.. and yet are willing to live with it. c'est la vie...

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
47. Fairness Doctrine was important but even moreso were regulations on ownership
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 06:19 PM
Nov 2012

Allowing plutocrats to consolidate the media industry was downright idiotic. Five megacorps own most of the media today, a situation that is causing our nation great harm.

I'm old enough to remember when news outlets had to justify their programming on the "people's airwaves" vis-a-vis a written report on the worthiness of various programs and how they served the public good. Amazing, huh? That was back in the day when Americans considered it their civic duty to stay up-to-date on current affairs and faithfully tuned in to the nightly news and/or subscribed to the daily newspaper toward that end. Just a coincidence that society was far more liberal-minded then? I don't think so.

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
4. yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.........
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:14 PM
Nov 2012

I've watched them poison minds (granted, minds already predisposed to be bigoted and hateful) to the point that you can't have a rational conversation, and I've removed people from my life because of their hatefulness.

Limbaugh was first, but the 24/7 Fox propaganda bumped it all up quite a few notches, to Batshit Crazy.



AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
7. and yet...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:20 PM
Nov 2012

We allow it because it comes under "free speech". Everyone knows they lie.. everyone knows they pull stories from gods knows where, and yet some people are stupid enough to be sucked into it and believe it...live it..breath it.

When the Fairness act was removed, so were the barriers.. and if anyone has money, they can put forth the most offensive, racist, bigoted, sexist, homophobic news programs ever, and no one... no one can say a thing against it, because its their opinion, their right to free speech.

I think America was better before Fox News.. and yet, we have taken a step forward, that can never be walked back, ever.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
12. ITS A POLL that is obvious only for the reason
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:34 PM
Nov 2012

THAT WHILE EVERYONE (who is a liberal, Democrat) Hates Fox News... we are all willing to allow it to exist.. I don't believe in evil.. but any organization who has the power to lie to the masses, and get them to fight back, or revolt for something that may actually be very good for them, is silly. Its like a kid having a temper tantrum and saying "no" to everything, only because it can say "no".

The Republicans and Conservatives have turned this country inside out with some of their backward ideas, and yet we allowed it to happen. How can any country make any progress when you have millions holding on to the Anchor SAYING.. no we won't move forward, and in fact try to drag it backwards to an earlier time?

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
18. Thank you...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:46 PM
Nov 2012

I just hope that most Americans will eventually find Fox News irrelevant and just not pay attention to them any longer. It would be nice to see them lose revenue and just crumble apart.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
15. The Right wing has
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:40 PM
Nov 2012

Demonized the Left. How can any country move forward in progress when so many people have put their feet to the brakes.

DividedWeAre

(109 posts)
17. If, by "life", you mean ...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:44 PM
Nov 2012

If, by "life", you mean everything in the universe and all of its sub-texts and every damn thing you can think of, then "oh yes", it was better. Much better before hate became the norm for so many people.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
20. We have
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:55 PM
Nov 2012

life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in this country. Yet the Right wingers think we still don't have any of this, and intend to change it to their definition. That even includes things like child labor laws stripped, slavery brought back? The right to discriminate? Because they don't have it their way..they are filled with so much hate...


and damn it, Even having HATE, is their right too... they demand to have the right to hate. The right to go to war, and the right to kill at their discretion. Present laws should not apply to them... they would just sooner change this country to their hateful model.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
24. "Fox first tried its hand at a news show in 1988"
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 07:10 PM
Nov 2012

according to wiki.. I was around then.. in fact, 14 years old then. I remember my parents watching ABC, NBC, CBS and NPR. My Father and Mother both watched the News Networks then... I don't think my parents paid for Cable TV then..but I don't recall us having it back then. Things have sure changed a lot since then.

onenote

(42,733 posts)
22. There were plenty of dark times before Fox News
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 07:07 PM
Nov 2012


African American living in the South in the early 1960s (or even later) -- it wasn't Fox News that made your life bad. A woman with no legal right to abortion prior to 1973? Again, it wasn't Fox News that you had to worry about. A college age kid faced with the draft or leaving the country during the Vietnam War? Fox News wasn't your problem.

Fox News showed up on the scene in 1996. It didn't have anything to do with Nixon's reelection in 1972, or the rout of Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale by Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984, or Bush I's victory over Michael Dukakis or the takeover of the House by the Republicans in 1994, or the confirmation of Scalia in 1986 or Thomas in 1991.

Johonny

(20,872 posts)
28. I think the robber baron media barons controlled the papers much like FOX news
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:17 PM
Nov 2012

controls the media spin today. I think the small post robber baron era before the Reagan era leaves a lot of people believing the world was always better before FOX news. The media has always had internal bias and often it was again the working person. 24/7 cable news might be as bad now as it ever was, but it hasn't been around that long.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
23. Faux News was founded by Roger Murdoch in 1996 and public discourse has gotten....
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 07:08 PM
Nov 2012

....progressively worse.

Remember, 1996 was the year Bill Clinton was reelected. The Lewinsky affair broke in 1998, and the "ace journalists" at Faux went nuts.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
30. Remember 1996 was also the year of the TeleCom Act
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:19 PM
Nov 2012

Which deregulated a lot of the media, most notably ownership restrictions...

badhair77

(4,220 posts)
26. It's not just Fox.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:15 PM
Nov 2012

It's Rush, the Rush wannabees, the woman on local radio talk that wants to be Laura Ingraham or Michelle Malkin, . . . and the list goes on. They have no show without controversy, and with controversy comes anger. They have built a sphere of hate. At some point they will have to evaluate their lives and determine just what good they have contributed with their presence in this world. They will come up with with negativity and bluster, nothing in the positive column.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
34. I don't know why but it all reminds me of
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 09:17 PM
Nov 2012

The Jerry Springer Show. The kind of people on that show.. were the kind of greedy, selfish, out of control Republicans.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
45. The WWE, Howard Stern, etc...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:31 PM
Nov 2012

Same mentality....as the same audience "grew up" they brought the same mentality to politics...it's still low brow, anti-intellectual competitive entertainment for them. They want to see people fighting. NPR is boring to them.

I always say: Some people listen to NPR to hear people discuss politics. Others listen to Right Wing Radio to hear people fight about it.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
29. I want a harder question, AsahinaHimi!
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:19 PM
Nov 2012

Like, "Where are all the old funny morning shows that used to be a part of the Ted Turner Cable Channel?"

[url=http://www.cosgan.de/smilie.php][img][/img][/url]

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
35. Network News was different in the old days...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 09:25 PM
Nov 2012

People would speak of Walter Cronkite.. Chet Huntley and David Brinkley... broadcasters back then who gave you the idea of News that had integrity, News you could trust. Some where it all went off the cliff... Some where it went from what was fact... to what could be spun...


spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin the the news, and bend the truth!

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
40. And, to the point of Ted Turner, when it all started changing...
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 12:08 AM
Nov 2012

He DID have this different type of thing introduced in the morning... comedy news... It was rather short-lived... perhaps someone developing the Fox network got the idea that news should be a joke... punch line's on us!

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
32. News has always been somewhat entertainment, but not like it is now that we have Fox
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:29 PM
Nov 2012

It used to be maybe 60-70 percent news, 30-40 percent entertainment, but now it's like 95 percent entertainment, and 5 percent news at Fox. And the popularity of Fox has influenced all news programs, so there's some of that to all of them.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
37. Not having a TV I haven't watched it either...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 09:33 PM
Nov 2012

Any of it that I see comes from what is posted here on DU.

I do remember seeing just some outrageous pure crap coming from them, over the years. We could have a separate posting alone about all of the crap Fox News has done, from Putting a "D" for Democrat next to a Republican politician who has messed up to ..hosting Donald Trump to talk about the President's birth certificate.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
39. My family even got along better
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:36 AM
Nov 2012

we used to have more fun, before this crap ruined the conversation. I think this is what happened nationally--and they create a lot of stress in elders too.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
41. The more voices and opinions, the better, even those we disagree with.
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 12:20 AM
Nov 2012

It is amazing how many here want the liberal voice to be the only voice heard. When every voice is required to agree with us, we will become completely corrupt.

Freedom of speech, even of opposition voices, is what keeps us honest.

Response to GreenStormCloud (Reply #41)

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
43. The more voice and opinions the better?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 05:30 AM
Nov 2012

News is not supposed to be reported with some opinion. News was: What, When, Where, How, and maybe Why. You didn't have a newscaster sitting their spouting his opinions about the news. It was supposed to present facts. People could read the stories and make up their own minds.. but that was not a News Reporters job to thrown in his or her own opinion. Speculation sometimes came in, but there was no spin.. from a Liberal or a Conservative view point.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
46. I take it you want all news stories approved by the Democratic Party first?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 06:00 PM
Nov 2012

You either have freedom of speech or you don't. You claim that it was fair then but lots of folks claim that the media was biased towards liberals. Whether it was or wasn't isn't the point. Those folks felt that it was and FOX spoke to them.

I would much rather live in a country with many voices that disagree than in aq country with only one voice, approved by the party in power.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
50. i am going to quote someone from above to answer your silly post.....
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 06:46 PM
Nov 2012

quoted from above:

"Allowing plutocrats to consolidate the media industry was downright idiotic. Five megacorps own most of the media today, a situation that is causing our nation great harm.

I'm old enough to remember when news outlets had to justify their programming on the "people's airwaves" vis-a-vis a written report on the worthiness of various programs and how they served the public good. Amazing, huh? That was back in the day when Americans considered it their civic duty to stay up-to-date on current affairs and faithfully tuned in to the nightly news and/or subscribed to the daily newspaper toward that end. Just a coincidence that society was far more liberal-minded then? I don't think so. "



News was NOT ABOUT opinion. It was about what was fact. Yes you have the freedom of speech to respond to the news in your own way as a consumer, but the NEWS put out by a responsible newscaster was hard core, verified facts. There was no room for spin...

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
68. I remember biases stories passed off as news during those days.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 04:10 PM
Nov 2012

In 1982 the mobile oil rig Ocean Ranger sank with all 84 hands. A TV documentary was produced by, IIRC 60 Minutes, about what happened. At the time of the documentary I worked as a Ballast Control Room Operator for ODECO, the company that owned the rig. I knew what things were really like on an off-shore rig, and what had really happened on the Ranger. The documentary was way off base.

The major media has always been biased against individual gun ownership. Their stories on gun were biased then, and are biased now.

The only way to counter one side's opinion is to allow other side to speak their opinion. I solidly reject any concept of censorship.

Kumbricia

(84 posts)
61. more voices and opinions have dropped away with media consolidation
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 05:55 AM
Nov 2012

I agree, we need more voices and opinions. Which is why media consolidation brought about by the deregulation (one of the blunders of the Clinton era along with financial deregulation) and Murdoch's attempts to buy up all the media he possibly can need to be reversed. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting which founded PBS/NPR was created in the late 1960s specifically to increase representation and diversity in the media so now the Right Wing wants to do away with PBS because its doesn't always directly fall into line with their agenda. Thank God for the internet cause TV has gone to hell.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
69. I agree with your last statement
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 04:31 PM
Nov 2012

I no longer have a TV. The internet seems the best source. You just need to know how to wade out, to get to the truth without getting your feet cut from the sharp jagged edges on the bottom.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
44. Yes, but...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 05:33 AM
Nov 2012

...they and Rush and Beck are responsible for the implosion of the Republican Party. I kind of like having them around, now.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
48. This country was better off before Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine, period.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 06:20 PM
Nov 2012

Once he did that, it opened up a can of worms, which ultimately paved the way for the likes of Fox News and RW radio talkers to mislead half the country into supporting a regressive fiscal agenda. From what I understand, aren't there other countries that have laws making it illegal to lie on the news? If so, America is long overdue for this.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
53. You should rephrase this.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 06:56 PM
Nov 2012

Life was going downhill even before Fox News because of Reagan. What you should say, is that news was more unbiased before Fox News or something to that effect.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
57. History shows there has always been
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 07:21 PM
Nov 2012

"Yellow"Journalism. Rag papers that had biased reporting... but with the deletion of the Fairness Doctrine came the creation of these giant mega networks bent on a certain political slant. Corporation backed networks like Fox, Salem Broadcasting's Christian talk, and Clear Channel Communications had thousands of radio stations dotted across the country sending out the same political slant to people in areas where they might have only one or two radio stations in the area. Only one side was being heard and it was almost as if there was no other side to any conversation.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
54. and the bigger problem is-they pay for placement in restaurants, bars, hotel lobbies, diners
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 07:00 PM
Nov 2012

and it is the default station in those places.

and they also pay for the minute news on car radios all across the nation, which in some places, drivers only hear that news and none others

so they figure it must be true

I refuse now to eat in any place that has it on. And tell them I am leaving and not eating because of it. Some actually will NOT change the channel

Gotta get sirius radio one of these days

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
56. I try not to criticize other poster...ever. But, I can not help it. This is the
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 07:08 PM
Nov 2012

most no-brainer poll ever.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
60. it was obvious for a reason
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 05:22 AM
Nov 2012

when we lost the fairness doctrine, look what has happened to us and continues to happen to our country every day. No one has to be responsible for whats in the News anymore, and even the supreme court said, that Fox News does not have to tell the truth. That was the day integrity in News was lost...and so what do we get?

Lies and spin.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
62. Thanks and sorry. I agree, and it really has affected the wingnuts this time around.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 09:27 AM
Nov 2012

My inlaws only watch Fox and listen to Rush. So, what they heard was complete propaganda and the truth was censored. They just KNEW Romney would win. Thinking back, during the election period, I always thought it was strange when I saw them, because they always thought he was ahead, even when Obama had bigger leads in most all polls.

Now, few people may feel "sorry" for them - they can turn the channel, but they don't. But, in a way, I think, it is unfair to these lowbrow people. Perhaps, some of their more less partisan, more open minded viewers (the cream of their crop) may realize that they had been handed a pile of crap.

I do think it's an interesting discussion topic though....WHY did they do this? Was it more than just keeping them pumped up so they vote? I think it was. I think it was to create and to continue to promote Obama's illegitimacy as President. "He stole it." "He bought it" "Hate the minorities" "Hate government assistance" "Do not help fellow human beings get care from a hospital and doctor, screw them"

Even if we did restore the Fairness Doctrine - we still would have the problem that has evolved with our hyper-technological world. There is no longer an accepted source of truth in the world.

KT2000

(20,585 posts)
59. Belligerence is now common place
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:22 PM
Nov 2012

It used to be the younger generation that was considered rude but now it is the middle and older people who feel compelled to bellow their contempt for others in any public place they happen to be in.
Lots more anger.

Johnny2X2X

(19,095 posts)
64. Sad
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 10:37 AM
Nov 2012

It's really sad, why? Because the FOX viewers are Americans too, I want them to come back to the table for good debate, it makes us stronger, but as long as FOX News is peddling total misinformation as the news Americans cannot even have an honest debate between Conservatism and Liberalism. You can't argue with someone who has an entirely different set of facts about the World as their basis for debate.

FOX harms our Country.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
67. They are in a totally different mindset...
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 12:06 PM
Nov 2012

You can scream the sky is blue and clouds are white, but in their world, who knows what they are really seeing. Maybe its just all gone black.

hay rick

(7,633 posts)
65. Fox and their ilk created an alternate reality.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 11:52 AM
Nov 2012

In the world according to Fox, older middle class whites are being victimized by minorities and liberals. What used to be laughable paranoia now passes for conventional wisdom among this set.

I've lost a lot of friends to their diseased worldview.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WAS LIFE BETTER BEFORE FO...