General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Reagan had not emptied the mental institutions.
Would there even be a Republican Party. Just read that online.
Response to Duncanpup (Original post)
Post removed
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 17, 2023, 07:07 AM - Edit history (1)
What does that mean?
rubbersole
(11,223 posts)..never having been institutionalized. They're just marrying each other after bowling alley sex ed classes. Then getting elected to congress.
wnylib
(26,019 posts)The problem was in not following up with outpatient care and assimilation to society. They were just dumped and left to fend.
Some mental health patients in institutions did not belong there at all. Their conditions were manageable but family and friends did not want to be bothered. Some, especially women, were institutionalized as ill for not following social conventions, but posed no threat to themselves or society - other than being unconventional. Some women were dumped in institutions by husbands who wanted to be rid of them.
Those who needed close supervision, daily medication, job training, and follow up treatment did not get it. They ended up on the streets, or bouncing from job to job and address to address with no stability in their lives.
Reagan and succeeding Republicans cut more and more services for mental health care. The situation grew worse for people who became society's throwaways.
And yes, some of them probably are MAGAs, if they pay attention to politics all.
But the tone of the OP seems equally cold and dismissive of the mentally ill. They are people, with basic human rights and with needs that are not being met. Society is reaping the consequences of neglect.
raccoon
(32,390 posts)really didn't need to be--husbands wanted to be rid of them, etc.
Great post.
Scottie Mom
(5,838 posts)appalachiablue
(44,024 posts)and the program went national. But the plan was a racket, a scam. Proposed community centers for people in need weren't implemented and funds for community based homes were drained by real estate companies, if I have this right. A tragic con job that's led to years of crisis.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)Which President Carter had signed into law in 1980. Reagan was able to repeal many the law's provisions in 1981.
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 which defunded mental health institutions, passed the Senate 80-14 and the House 232-193.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-bill/3982/all-actions?q=%7B%22roll-call-vote%22%3A%22all%22%7D
Carter's Patient Bill of Rights, a provision of the Mental Health Systems Act, was not repealed. This law made it much harder to institutionalize patients and keep them institutionalized against their will. Because of this law, many patients in mental health institutions who did not want to be there were discharged.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Only Congress can change federal laws.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)f you read my post, you'll see that I mentioned the role Congress played in gutting the Act.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)1) The ACLU filed a series of lawsuits in the mid 1970s to end involuntary mental health holds. They were successful. They proudly detail their role on their website. https://www.aclu.org/documents/aclu-history-mental-institutions
2) Reagan was a long, long time ago. If states or the federal government wanted to reverse whatever Reagan did they could have. They don't want to.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)I mentioned how the Senate and House voted. And I mentioned it was Carter, not Reagan, who signed into law the Mental Health Systems Act of 1980.
Old Crank
(7,084 posts)Support the republican party and its abject cruelty?
wnylib
(26,019 posts)Skittles
(171,717 posts)it's all bullshit, just a matter of degree
czarjak
(13,639 posts)Mariana
(15,626 posts)It clearly does not mean that.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,956 posts)Skittles
(171,717 posts)there is some kind of mental disconnect going on
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,956 posts)going on here and it's horrifying to watch. People who suffer from mental illness such that they can't live on their own are some of the most vulnerable and oppressed in this country, and mocking them interchangeably with Republicans is deeply disturbing.
Skittles
(171,717 posts)still, there has to be some kind of mass psychosis going on - nothing about Trump and his admirers is in any way connected to reality - it's like they live in in alternate universe
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,956 posts)Mopar151
(10,348 posts)Reagan's attacks on "welfare queens", unions, and the mentally ill are just examples of how a certain kind of cruelty is seen by some as a normal and necessary part of life.
" It had to be done."
edisdead
(3,396 posts)Cruelty, especially male cruelty has been becoming a desirable quality for the last 6 decades or more.
Manliness has been conflated with being an asshole. Not just being tough but being an asshole who could kick the shit out of anyone they deem to be lesser is an attractive quality somehow.
Fucking gross. Being a Badass is all that matters.
LuckyCharms
(22,653 posts)"Manliness has been conflated with being an asshole. Not just being tough but being an asshole who could kick the shit out of anyone they deem to be lesser is an attractive quality somehow".
Well done.
Mopar151
(10,348 posts)I've known several real life Badasses. Most were intelligent, one way or another, and anything but belligerent.. This doesn't mean that cowards aren't dangerous! Fear is not a logical emotion, it's an impetus to act out and make bad choices!
Response to Duncanpup (Original post)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
NowISeetheLight
(4,002 posts)Looking at the homeless crisis I often wonder what it would be like if they hadn't basically opened the doors and let people out with no support.