General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPic Of The Moment: Trump-Appointed Judge Compares Pregnant Women To Wild Animals

Trump judge's actual argument for abortion bans: Doctors are harmed without cute sonograms
Trump-Appointed Judge Cites Wildlife Cases As a Reason to Ban Abortion Pills

sinkingfeeling
(57,326 posts)niyad
(129,824 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,294 posts)in such a way that you should overly concern yourself with it.
yardwork
(68,988 posts)After all, some of them are male.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)We're shockingly high on the list.
2naSalit
(100,270 posts)As simply "dumb animals" our suffering is only imagination. Besides, I'd be willing to bet $ that this cad also believes that women are just waiting around for our next sexual encounter because we "want it all the time".
I hope his dick stops working or falls off.
Mz Pip
(28,361 posts)The uterus as a fish bowl. Geez, what a jerk
louslobbs
(3,416 posts)Stopped working ..his brain too evidently.
2naSalit
(100,270 posts)Warpy
(114,426 posts)because this porker has never had to endure pregnancy, childbirth, or the back breaking labor of raising his own spawn.
All that is pushed off on his breeding stock.
This is why I say the definition of feminism is the recognition that women are adult human beings.
This clod obviously doesn't think so. We're just cows to be bred at his will. At best we achieve the mental and emotional status of four year old males.
electric_blue68
(26,080 posts)What a clod!
Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)ones doing the viewing.
K&R
Dustlawyer
(10,538 posts)Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)yardwork
(68,988 posts)Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)NowISeetheLight
(4,002 posts)I'll admit seeing a door ding on a car sends me into a blubbering mess of emotions!
Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)underpants
(195,149 posts)Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)- they are showing off the fetus. The woman is merely the cabinet that holds it.
calimary
(89,161 posts)Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Madison Cawthorn publicly referred to women as "Earthen vessels, sanctified by Almighty God"
https://democraticunderground.com/100216110827
You know::::: property
calimary
(89,161 posts)Gee, its so nice to be a THING.
central scrutinizer
(12,648 posts)Thats the highlight of any zoo visit.
Solly Mack
(96,457 posts)And then they marvel at how women seem almost human. Almost.
vanlassie
(6,226 posts)Otherwise, they are attention seeking and disrespectful of others and also looking to contaminate the minds of young observers.
central scrutinizer
(12,648 posts)But only after shes made my sammich.
niyad
(129,824 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Diamond_Dog
(39,845 posts)The father of a 13 year old who was brutally raped, cheered and eagerly shared photos of the sonogram with family and friends, and was delighted at the forced birth.
Ill bet the parents of unborn babies in Texas who had extreme fetal anomalies did the same
..
Put this guy on one of Musks rockets and blast him into space.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)marble falls
(71,194 posts)CousinIT
(12,297 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 19, 2023, 07:19 AM - Edit history (1)
That's the attitude behind all this.
Delmette2.0
(4,473 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 18, 2023, 05:39 PM - Edit history (1)
We're just breeder cows who need to be regulated. 😡😡😡😡😡
Swede
(38,465 posts)I read this somewhere, and it's true.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)yardwork
(68,988 posts)This is so true.
Buns_of_Fire
(19,029 posts)James Ho: Former Solicitor General of Texas. No comment.
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)And I have something to say to him:
他到底是什麼狗東西? (What kind of dog-thing is he? Which is a common put down in Taiwan)
niyad
(129,824 posts)nowforever
(586 posts)Not only shouldn't he be a judge...I wouldn't trust him to even cut my grass. Incomptetence, ignorance and prejudice the supreme qualifications for GOP appointees to the Supreme Court.
Picaro
(2,340 posts)Just make shit up and ultimately the entire judicial system and the laws that undergird it will collapse under the weight of the absurdity of the farcical reasoning advanced in the service of tyranny.
The seeds of this were sown in 2000 when the SC just handed a presidency to George W Bush based on the harm that would be done to Bush if a full recount was performed in key counties in Florida.
The decision made no legal sense because the damage (harm) forecast to be done to Bush was the loss of the election. Given that elections are designed to identify winners and losers to advance a ruling like this set judicial reasoning on its head.
Now this kind of fictional reasoning seems to be the right wing norm.
underpants
(195,149 posts)Im other words, they picked their friends interest
Picaro
(2,340 posts)The decision was marked with that disclaimer.
In any other country there would have been riots in the streets. But in our strangely politically inert nation nothing happened (at least in part because Gore discouraged any violent reaction).
yardwork
(68,988 posts)That was back when many Democrats felt that it was important to "be reasonable."
Picaro
(2,340 posts)That case was one of the reasons I became an actual Democrat rather than an Independent that voted exclusively Democratic.
Hekate
(100,132 posts)does is precedent. They lied.
underpants
(195,149 posts)I had a side job (cash) working at a corner market. A bunch of kids younger than me came in and got a 12 pack. Clearly they were going out. I broke the news to them. It was when I said it out loud that I got it. inevitable.
sinkingfeeling
(57,326 posts)Skittles
(169,802 posts)I was like, WTF, SINCE WHEN DOES THE SUPREME FUCKING COURT PICK THE PRESIDENT - I live in a red state and desperately searched online for people like me who KNEW that was some FUCKED UP SHIT.
Brainfodder
(7,781 posts)I could get very nasty with comparisons on this one, WOW!
That is just so dumb!
Biophilic
(6,425 posts)kimbutgar
(26,905 posts)There is no law school he would hear this in.
niyad
(129,824 posts)group headquartered in texas that seems to specialize in "religious freedom" lawsuits.
Johnny2X2X
(23,710 posts)These are the types of idiots only the internet could create, and they are in positions of power.
Delmette2.0
(4,473 posts)Is there more than one doctor who is forced to perform abortions??
Perhaps this is another case of a mythical complaint.
SpankMe
(3,662 posts)A parent doesn't get to gaze upon their adorable first grade child any more after a school shooting, right? So - by the exact same reasoning - we should allow the banning of guns if this idiot judge's reasoning holds. The principles are identical.
This is clearly disqualifying for a federal judge.
If a Democratically-appointed judge included such immature reasoning within a ruling, Repubs would be starting an impeachment process within hours and the judges statements would be dominating the conservative disinformation-sphere.
StarryNite
(11,980 posts)What a weirdo.
Lonestarblue
(13,253 posts)Every law school needs to be shut down until they revamp the curriculum to produce rational lawyers who have more legal reasoning skill than your average stalk of broccoli!
Harker
(17,462 posts)correspondence course.
keroro gunsou
(2,304 posts)Bob Jones U
Liberty U
Oral Roberts U
Bother Love's Travelling Salvation U...
Delmette2.0
(4,473 posts)LOL. I love that song.
keroro gunsou
(2,304 posts)is the best school...
cause when he lets go, half the valley SHAKES!
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)And a graduation picture alongside a Trump cardboard image.
NoMoreRepugs
(11,824 posts)rubbersole
(11,013 posts)..more like brimming at a CPAC convention.
smb
(3,598 posts)Prairie_Seagull
(4,606 posts)I just love baby snakes. Wait, I think I am proving their point.
BootinUp
(50,979 posts)Id be concerned about what is wrong with this judge.
malthaussen
(18,427 posts)In any event, last time I looked, "aesthetic pleasure" was not a protected right.
-- Mal
MagickMuffin
(18,096 posts)
Apparently they are some sort of power couple, just like Clarence and Ginni. Ho must really look up to Clarence and Ginnis lifestyle and now wants a piece of the cake. He is also a Federalist society member!
https://texaslawbook.net/texas-appellate-power-couple-judge-jim-and-allyson-ho-how-they-met-rests-with-textualism/
niyad
(129,824 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 18, 2023, 07:46 PM - Edit history (1)
Dear Goddess, I just checked. They have twins, a girl and a boy.
AdamGG
(1,866 posts)You shouldn't have posted that.
Ziggysmom
(4,067 posts)play a cancel culture victim on TV is the Supreme Court nomination he hopes will follow.
https://ballsandstrikes.org/legal-culture/the-worst-trump-judge-in-america-is-james-ho/

unweird
(3,277 posts)And reading the spew attributed to the judge it seems he suffers the same affliction.
Truly an abomination.
Recycle_Guru
(2,973 posts)what a deranged radical scumbag
dalton99a
(92,354 posts)musclecar6
(1,884 posts)Another right wing favorite of the defendant, and the right wing he serves. The defendant did a lot of damage in the 4 years we were stuck with him and this character is not the only one with bizarre justifications for crazy views.
piddyprints
(15,061 posts)Still, he's a fine one to be insisting that women indulge his hunger for aesthetic pleasure.
I think looking at his face and reading what he wrote caused me aesthetic injury. Can we ban him now?
elias7
(4,229 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,532 posts)cbabe
(6,263 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(133,192 posts)cbabe
(6,263 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)It was on Animal Planet, and his herd was being featured.
chowmama
(1,016 posts)We can be legally required to smile. When does that start and what are the penalties? What's his legal ruling for a sexy dress code, with miniskirts and 5" heels? Makeup and hair? Once we're no longer young and attractive, are we on house arrest? Or will a burka suffice?
They could lock me up for life first. Barf on his shoes, sure. Smile, never.
Neither my nor any child of mine's job is to be pleasing to look upon for any available rando.
niyad
(129,824 posts)don't you. " Myy reply usually was, "pray tell, what do I have to smile about?" That generally stopped them cold. On several occasions, my response was extended to, "having to deal with assholes all day", and a smile.
chowmama
(1,016 posts)Obviously, the health care aspect is much worse. But the whole argument shows that in their world view, we only exist to satisfy them. We have no inherent right to satisfy ourselves and they have no obligation to satisfy us.
In the health care argument, we aren't even the habitat in which the joy-inducing life exists. (A life that they have no obligation to care for and no interest in doing so.) We're the interests that want to damage the habitat (our reproductive parts), removing the life they want to, briefly, giggle about. Before booking it for the next entertainment.
None of them should ever be allowed to procreate again. Or have non-procreative sex. Or be smiled at.
Non-fuck them all.
BamaRefugee
(3,880 posts)bucolic_frolic
(54,164 posts)I suppose we could construct a hypothetical connection between anything and anything else. But this is a court of law, not clergy arguing about how any angels can fit on the head of a pin.
Mblaze
(927 posts)Does an aesthetic injury to my sense of reality.
ShazzieB
(22,246 posts)Aesthetic injury? Give me a freaking break! By that yardstick, we should outlaw all ugly things and even unattractive people! I suffer an aesthetic injury every time I see the face of a certain former potus or hear his braying voice! What are you going to do about that, Judge Asshat?
To argue that one person's aesthetic injury is grounds for violating another person's rights is one of the most ludicrous things I've ever heard!
LetMyPeopleVote
(175,450 posts)yardwork
(68,988 posts)lonely bird
(2,789 posts)I got nothing other than fuck the right wing asshats
All of them, every last one.
Scrivener7
(58,474 posts)czarjak
(13,459 posts)niyad
(129,824 posts)sonograms out there, in medical books, online, etc. I mean, the PATRIARCHAL WOMAN-HATING pro-death cultists seem to have no difficulty finding them. I even recall seeung them on trucks driving around. What a hate-filled, insane argument this misogynist makes.
JuJuChen
(2,253 posts)It's the weirdest freaking thing to see Asian Republicans. Like, whyyyyy did you choose a team that basically hates your race?
niyad
(129,824 posts)Skittles
(169,802 posts)women, black folk, even the "Log Cabin Republicans".......you're right, it's like chickens supporting Colonel Sanders, makes no sense
Blue Owl
(58,242 posts)Im stunned
WTF is next? Rock, Paper, Scissors to decide sentences?
Unphuckingbelievable.
SunSeeker
(57,653 posts)AdamGG
(1,866 posts)Aren't they very vulnerable to being overturned? I would hope...
Rhiannon12866
(250,862 posts)What injury does a doctor have if their patient takes the abortion pill? According to a right-wing judge, pictures of fetuses are "a source of profound joy, therefore doctors experience an aesthetic injury when they are aborted. Pretty deranged, says Chris Hayes. - Aired on 08/17/2023.
Johonny
(25,557 posts)This dude should be removed from the bench. If we had a functioning government he'd never have been appointed.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,855 posts)We do have one, its just that its current function is to force everything to the extreme right, regardless of what the majority wants.
Voter apathy has led us to this point.
As Carlin said, a nation of undereducated, uninformed, apathetic dimwits gets the exact government it deserves.
dlk
(13,130 posts)Anything to justify imposing his personal views on women.
Hassler
(4,782 posts)Hassler
(4,782 posts)niyad
(129,824 posts)Iris
(16,851 posts)niyad
(129,824 posts)be required reading by this asshole.
pansypoo53219
(22,909 posts)Aussie105
(7,664 posts)But it's the Republican way.
Dig deep to make the irrational rational, the insane sane, to inject logic into total illogical insanity.
I suffer an aesthetic injury just looking at his face now that I know what goes on in that brain.
niyad
(129,824 posts)Skittles
(169,802 posts)WTF
ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)There are no words
😣😳😱🫣😵💫🤪