Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mark Meadows asked for more time to surrender in Atlanta. (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 OP
LOL! Fani Willis isn't playing. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #1
We should nickname Fanni Willis "Unconditional Surrender Willis" DBoon Aug 2023 #2
LOL!! peggysue2 Aug 2023 #5
I saw "surrender in Atlanta" and this came to mind DBoon Aug 2023 #9
Good one, Boon peggysue2 Aug 2023 #15
Except Grant didn't go to Atlanta ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #29
was Grant in his chain of command? DBoon Aug 2023 #30
I.O.W. spanone Aug 2023 #3
Yep. Take your extension and shove it up your ***. Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #7
👍🏼🤣 spanone Aug 2023 #24
Snarf! hlthe2b Aug 2023 #4
Wow, very impressive. Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #6
and the message to Meadows was actually message to Trump Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #20
It certainly seems that way. Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #22
Just because Meadows has cut a deal with Jack Smith and the Feds does not mean he doesn't have to .. Botany Aug 2023 #8
I bet Jack is smiling at this Tree Lady Aug 2023 #18
If Meadows has flipped for Smith, would Smith want Fani to make nice with Meadows? Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #25
Now without any real knowledge of what is going on I would bet $5.00 that both Fani and Jack ... Botany Aug 2023 #27
Fani admitted in an interview on TV that she has talked to Smith. Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #28
... roamer65 Aug 2023 #10
Didn't meadows get removed to federal court? getagrip_already Aug 2023 #11
No. The motion hasn't been heard yet. Ocelot II Aug 2023 #17
Oh no! You mean Mark Meadows (RC - Republican Coward) isn't special? MLAA Aug 2023 #12
Dear Mark, Bayard Aug 2023 #13
Two Trump-linked attorneys -- Alex Kaufman and Kurt Hilbert -- have been subpoenaed to appear LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #14
Well, mr. Meadows--most likely the 3 AM slots on TW and Thrus are open. You can sneak riversedge Aug 2023 #16
So Meadows defense in the Georgia case was he was just following orders but dem4decades Aug 2023 #19
This letter from Meadow's attorney is really arrogant LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #21
Ha, it's stated he has the right 'not' to be arrested. miyazaki Aug 2023 #31
If he can travel to Georgia to commit election fraud at a moment's notice, he should have no problem JohnSJ Aug 2023 #23
Meadows has filed new motion demanding immediate removal to Federal Court or stay from arrest LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #26
 

ExWhoDoesntCare

(4,741 posts)
29. Except Grant didn't go to Atlanta
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 07:33 PM
Aug 2023

The one who beat Atlanta like a shag rug was this guy:


DBoon

(24,987 posts)
30. was Grant in his chain of command?
Wed Aug 23, 2023, 04:39 PM
Aug 2023

I mean, I couldn't resist "Unconditional Surrender" and Atlanta, even if Grant wasn't actually there

hlthe2b

(113,971 posts)
4. Snarf!
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 03:58 PM
Aug 2023

She's got their "number," that's for sure.


BTW, is a calligraphy rendering of a signature technically legally binding? I like it and perhaps it isn't much different from a signature "stamp," but...? **Never Mind--on edit, I see it is from her email**

Irish_Dem

(81,266 posts)
6. Wow, very impressive.
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 03:59 PM
Aug 2023

No kid gloves for Trump's friends.

Now she needs to do the same in regard to Trump.

Recycle_Guru

(2,973 posts)
20. and the message to Meadows was actually message to Trump
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 04:30 PM
Aug 2023

ALL will be treated the same as other criminal defendants in this jurisdiction.

Botany

(77,323 posts)
8. Just because Meadows has cut a deal with Jack Smith and the Feds does not mean he doesn't have to ..
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 04:00 PM
Aug 2023

... fellow the rule of law in Georgia.

Mark Meadows: Can you give me more time?

Fani Willis: No.

Meadows is looking @ a RICO charge in Georgia from D.A. Willis. 5 years mandatory time. Time for
you to get chatty Mark.

Irish_Dem

(81,266 posts)
25. If Meadows has flipped for Smith, would Smith want Fani to make nice with Meadows?
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 05:03 PM
Aug 2023

To keep Meadows happy? Or would Smith want Fani to squeeze Meadows even more?

Botany

(77,323 posts)
27. Now without any real knowledge of what is going on I would bet $5.00 that both Fani and Jack ...
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 05:40 PM
Aug 2023

are working very hard not to talk to each other outside of their peoples working on
the scheduling of "court stuff" in order to avoid any appeals of their verdicts because
of something or other. Now if either team Jack or team Fani exposes stuff during their
trials then the other team might use that "stuff" in their work.

I'm willing to bet that Meadows will sing like a bird to avoid the 5 year mandatory sentence
for RICO charges.

I might be wrong but I bet that Donny is looking to flee America because the walls are closing
in on him PDQ.

Irish_Dem

(81,266 posts)
28. Fani admitted in an interview on TV that she has talked to Smith.
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 05:53 PM
Aug 2023

She would not say what they talked about but it appeared to be more than just scheduling issues.
(So I will take your bet!)

Yes it is apparent that fleeing is on Trump's mind.

riversedge

(80,810 posts)
16. Well, mr. Meadows--most likely the 3 AM slots on TW and Thrus are open. You can sneak
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 04:21 PM
Aug 2023

in and out under cover of the Dark. go for it.

dem4decades

(14,057 posts)
19. So Meadows defense in the Georgia case was he was just following orders but
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 04:26 PM
Aug 2023

Then in the same case he says he can't follow orders.

Fuck these guys.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
23. If he can travel to Georgia to commit election fraud at a moment's notice, he should have no problem
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 04:42 PM
Aug 2023

within a two week time frame


LetMyPeopleVote

(179,869 posts)
26. Meadows has filed new motion demanding immediate removal to Federal Court or stay from arrest
Tue Aug 22, 2023, 05:35 PM
Aug 2023

Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2023, 06:13 PM - Edit history (1)

This motion is very arrogant. Meadows filed to remove to federal court. That statute provides that the state criminal proceeding continues until the case is formerly removed. The federal court ruled earlier that Meadows’ motion is sufficient to avoid an immediate dismissal and set a hearing for Monday of next week

Meadows’ motion simply assumes that Meadows is entitled to immediate removal to federal court or a stay. I hope the judge rejects this motion



Here is a link to the filing
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.319225/gov.uscourts.gand.319225.17.0.pdf
This part of the motion is really concerning
The Federal Officer Removal Statute by default removes to federal court the entire
case, not just the charges against Mr. Meadows—whether or not other defendants
wish to remove or have a legal basis to do so. See Heinze, 637 F. Supp. 3d at 1325
n.8 (“‘It is well settled that if one claim cognizable under Section 1442 is present,
the entire action is removed, regardless of the relationship between the Section 1442
claim and the non-removable claims.’”) (quoting Nadler v. Mann, 951 F.2d 301, 306
n.9 (11th Cir. 1992)). Mr. Meadows, of course, had no control over how the case
was presented to the grand jury and seeks removal only on his own behalf. A district court
court may remand proceedings against remaining defendants after dismissing
charges against federal officials, see Spencer v. New Orleans Levee Bd., 737 F.2d
435, 438 (5th Cir. 1984), and at least one has severed a case after permitting removal
and then remanded the non-removable portion to state court, see Joyner v. A.C. & R.
Insulation Co., No. CIV. CCB-12-2294, 2013 WL 877125, at *9-10 (D. Md. Mar.
7, 2013). But however the Court should proceed, Mr. Meadows has an “absolute”
right to have the charges against him heard in federal court, Willingham, 395 U.S. at
406, and the Federal Officer Removal Statute calls for prompt consideration of his
Notice

Meadows is swinging for the fences and I hope that the judge tells Meadows to shut up and get arraigned.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Meadows asked for mo...