Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(95,269 posts)
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 09:59 PM Sep 2023

Texas drunk drivers will now have to pay child support if they kill a parent, guardian

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/02/us/texas-drunk-driver-child-support-law/index.html

Texas drunk drivers will now have to pay child support if they kill a parent, guardian
By Michelle Watson, CNN
Published 7:48 AM EDT, Sat September 2, 2023

CNN — A new law in Texas requires convicted drunk drivers to pay child support if they kill a child’s parent or guardian, according to House Bill 393.

The law, which went into effect Friday, says those convicted of intoxication manslaughter must pay restitution. The offender will be expected to make those payments until the child is 18 or until the child graduates from high school, “whichever is later,” the legislation says.

Intoxication manslaughter is defined by state law as a person operating “a motor vehicle in a public place, operates an aircraft, a watercraft, or an amusement ride, or assembles a mobile amusement ride; and is intoxicated and by reason of that intoxication causes the death of another by accident or mistake.”

If someone is unable to pay the restitution because they’re incarcerated, they’re expected to make payments no “later than the first anniversary of the date,” of their release, the law says.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas drunk drivers will now have to pay child support if they kill a parent, guardian (Original Post) dalton99a Sep 2023 OP
Wouldn't the drunk driver be in prison? Beaverhausen Sep 2023 #1
That's covered in the text of the law. Igel Sep 2023 #2
That's the children Johnny2X2X Sep 2023 #4
It's right in the OP MichMan Sep 2023 #5
They'll accumulate back support liability leftstreet Sep 2023 #6
Good ! MichMan Sep 2023 #3
I'm actually OK with this. Initech Sep 2023 #7
Good idea. RandySF Sep 2023 #8
I wonder if this new law will apply to Republican public officials? gratuitous Sep 2023 #9
Undoubtedly there is an exception for them. raccoon Sep 2023 #12
And if assault rifles kill Uvaldy school children the people fighting applegrove Sep 2023 #10
isn't that what Social Security is for? Unless the deceased parent never paid into it. raccoon Sep 2023 #11
I would take it further and say cause the death or disability of a parent Buckeyeblue Sep 2023 #13
Good! 👍 nt Raine Sep 2023 #14

Beaverhausen

(24,706 posts)
1. Wouldn't the drunk driver be in prison?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:01 PM
Sep 2023

How are they going to make money to make payments? I mean the idea isn’t bad but ???

Igel

(37,613 posts)
2. That's covered in the text of the law.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:06 PM
Sep 2023

Per the OP.

I'd have had it read "until age 22 if in college or a training program, or 18 if not admitted to a training program or college or university." Or something along those lines.

Johnny2X2X

(24,435 posts)
4. That's the children
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:14 PM
Sep 2023

Not the drunk driver.

I think the idea is that when they get out of prison they start paying.

MichMan

(17,393 posts)
5. It's right in the OP
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:42 PM
Sep 2023
If someone is unable to pay the restitution because they’re incarcerated, they’re expected to make payments no “later than the first anniversary of the date,” of their release, the law says.

leftstreet

(41,253 posts)
6. They'll accumulate back support liability
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:52 PM
Sep 2023

I believe this is so the state can issue support payments, then collect later

Initech

(109,266 posts)
7. I'm actually OK with this.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:53 PM
Sep 2023

I honestly can't fathom that in the day and age of ride sharing that people would drink too much and get behind the wheel, but it still happens. Me personally, if I'm going out drinking, someone else is doing the driving. I'll happily pay the Uber surcharges. In the end, it's much cheaper than a DUI, or worse.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. I wonder if this new law will apply to Republican public officials?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:57 PM
Sep 2023

They're very important, you know.

applegrove

(133,102 posts)
10. And if assault rifles kill Uvaldy school children the people fighting
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 11:58 PM
Sep 2023

to keep them legal face nothing? I mean I'm all for DUI penalties but Texas GOP is acting like they don't legislate to unmitigate deaths to the public and they do.

I mean:

Texas AG appeals judge’s order that allows women with complicated pregnancies to get abortions
State District Court Judge Jessica Mangrum on Friday issued a temporary exemption to Texas’ abortion ban. Hours later, the attorney general’s office filed an appeal, which blocked the order.

BY WILLIAM MELHADO
AUG. 4, 2023
UPDATED: AUG. 5, 2023

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/04/texas-abortion-ban-lawsuit/

"SNIP..........

A Texas judge on Friday issued a temporary exemption to the state’s abortion ban that would allow women with complicated pregnancies to obtain the procedure and keep doctors free from prosecution if they determined the fetus would not survive after birth.

But hours later, the attorney general’s office filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court, blocking the judge’s order from taking effect.

State District Court Judge Jessica Mangrum of Austin wrote that the attorney general cannot prosecute doctors who, in their “good faith judgment,” terminate a complicated pregnancy. Mangrum outlined those conditions as a pregnancy that presents a risk of infection; a fetal condition in which the fetus will not survive after birth; or when the pregnant person has a condition that requires regular, invasive treatment.

Last month, the court heard from three women who testified against Texas’ abortion ban, describing how delayed medical care impacted their pregnancies. The women are suing the state over the law, seeking to clarify when a medical emergency justifies an abortion. Currently, the law allows termination of a pregnancy if the mother’s life is in danger.

........SNIP"

A need death is a death.

Buckeyeblue

(6,439 posts)
13. I would take it further and say cause the death or disability of a parent
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 06:55 AM
Sep 2023

Severe disability of a parent can cause just as much or even more economic stress on the family.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas drunk drivers will ...