Jury deliberations begin in contempt of Congress trial

[struggle4progress]

By Tierney Sneed and Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN
Updated 12:05 PM EDT, Thu September 7, 2023

... Prosecutors told the jury during closing arguments Thursday that Navarro “made a choice” not to comply with a February 2022 subpoena.

Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Aloi said that the government only works if people play by the rules and are held accountable if they don’t.

“The subpoena – it is not hard to understand,” she said, adding that Navarro knew “what he was required to do and when he was required to do it.”

Navarro’s attorney Stanley Woodward contested the idea that the subpoena was simple, staying that the subpoena did not specify where in the Capitol complex Navarro was supposed to show up for his deposition ...

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/07/politics/peter-navarro-contempt-of-congress-january-6-committee-subpoena/index.html

[UTUSN]

1. K&R

[maxsolomon]

2. was his attorney making a joke?

"...the subpoena did not specify where in the Capitol complex Navarro was supposed to show up for his deposition..."?

[SeattleVet]

3. His attorney *IS* a joke.

Same MAGAt that represents the Merde-a-Loco folks.

[Goodheart]

6. He told that to jurors who found their own way to a courtroom.

I would've made a bad juror in this trial because I would have bust out laughing.

[msfiddlestix]

4. Wait. How could the jury that was seated this morning already be deliberating?

am I mistaken? Did this trial begin before today??

[struggle4progress]

5. Almost all of the trial was yesterday. Closing arguments were earlier today.

[msfiddlestix]

7. oh oh. omg I was totally not on line yesterday, missed this.

thought I was reading current info in other reports on the jury selection, thinking that was happening today.

thank you for clarifying.