General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSoledad O'Brien Does It Again.
Using facts, logic, & reason to dismantle a RWNJ on Benghazi & Susan Rice:
Article here: http://americablog.com/2012/11/soledad-obrien-gop-rep-heck-benghazi-rice.html?
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Was it that there might be a connection with the movie protests? When was that found to be wrong? Clearly the attacks had some connection to that, even if it was not a central factor. Where has it been shown that:
a) there was a well formed group of terrorists
b) that were planning to attack at this exact place, date and time
c) without respect to any of the other events that were going on in the region?
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Just waiting for her to lose her job because of it.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)It probably has a lot more to do with their ratings. I don't know how she does, but I'd think she should get good ratings.
If I watched that kind of a program, I'd watch hers. But basically I don't have the time to sit around for hours watching people hash the same old stuff, usually just repeating the same tired talking points. There is a lot more to life than that.
I agreed to participate in a Nielson survey this week. They are going to find the data entry very easy in my case. I only have a few entries for the week. Teevee is such a waste of time.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 16, 2012, 12:24 AM - Edit history (1)
-- even one -- of anything -- any little thing -- that we could have done differently to get a different result?
I have not. They just seem to be talking in circles, and frankly I can't understand what the issue is.
Yeah, we get it that 4 people died, and we're all sorry for that. But what should have been done differently that would have prevented those deaths?
And if they are so good at that, how about they go ahead and give us the plan for how we can stop ALL future terrorist attacks?
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)trying to pin some blame on Obama to make him look bad.
trying to block Susan Rice because SOMEBODY is telling them to do so.
Who?
demwing
(16,916 posts)till now. Is that inappropriate? Ah hell, who cares...I even love her name!
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)RVN VET
(492 posts). . . so you guys' intentions better be honorable or I might have to resort to a 2nd Amendment response.
I'm not gay, but if I were........
calimary
(81,265 posts)I'm old enough to be her adoptive mother, and yeah boys, you BETTER be gentlemen!
I remember her from a syndicated show called "The Site." I always appreciated it when an intelligent, attractive BRUNETTE got an anchor job, instead of a continuing series of blondes.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)I'm a dirty old man, so.....
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)onlyadream
(2,166 posts)And I thought she was great back then, too. We had mutual friends .
I'm so proud of her!!!!
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)"that was interesting"
demwing
(16,916 posts)"that" = "watching a real journalist at work"
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)pnwest
(3,266 posts)Spazito
(50,338 posts)That was both and
The repub in trying to blame Ambassador Rice exonerates her from what the repubs are trying to smear her with.
Wow.
Soledad O'Brien did a stellar job on this, she is the only real journalist on that network, imo.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)It said - This guy is an idiot.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)was wrong. or what she said.
could this be more stupid.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Rice should not be confirmed because Heck feels the administration sucks.
Oh, okay. She did her job, and for that, she should be fired.
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)calimary
(81,265 posts)Glad you're here. I love how it's going out on CNN, which has cable penetration everywhere! Also - hopefully, she's giving some of her colleagues ideas of how these bloviating partisans SHOULD be interviewed.
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)IcyPeas
(21,871 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,361 posts)Thanks for the thread, JaneyVee.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Doesn't give them a pass. Republicans are not used to that.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)And the fact that he became flustered is icing on the cake!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Heck (R) does not have a firm grip on the Rep[uliPoo his is flinging...
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)I watch CNN very seldom but I like what I hear about Soledad.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Useless. K&R
shenmue
(38,506 posts)It made me sound like that Republican.
LoisB
(7,206 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)What a convoluted argument, and so clearly hypocritical.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)to smash the logic of this gop argument.
Second thought:
I'll bet Joe Heck is cursing that uppity N!@@3% and B!^@4 for daring to shine a light on his script.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)For a little balance?
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)That way the truth reaches a wider audience - and that's important.
that would be a powerhouse lineup.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)just as bad as FoxNoise, only on the opposite side. We need more people like Rachel, Chris Hayes, Lawrence, Soledad, etc. on the other networks.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)They move from one non sequitur to the next, defying gravity all the while.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Excellent journalism by Soledad...as always.
pa28
(6,145 posts)She's supposed to just nod gravely and ask what the president knew and when he knew it . . . not point out that his argument contradicts itself and he's basically full of shit.
Joe's mad.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)At a time when no one (probably not even those on the ground in Libya) knew exactly what had happened?
And, for that NON-transgression on her part, they want to block her nomination?!?!?
*CUCKOO* *CUCKOO* *CUCKOO*
Mittshit was out there in front of the cameras before the incident was over. Trying to look and sound like he knew what was going on. No briefing, nothing. Amb. Rice went out with information provided by the CIA. Now you make a judgement on culpability.
get to the point. This whole charade is about President Obama isn't it? Quit trying to bully a woman and fight like a man. The President called you out.
atufal
(46 posts)Liberal1975
(87 posts)If the Republicans would have shown half as much zeal getting to the bottom of the intelligence failures that led to 911. "BinLaden determined to attack the United States" anyone? It's been the same dog and pony show since the 90's when they realized they could create a false narrative with half baked politicized witchunts like Foster and Whitewater and of course the BlowJob that destroyed America (I'm not kidding either that BJ literally destroyed America) meanwhile stuff like Iran Contra 9/11 and the outing of CIA agent Plame, secret meetings with Energy Industry executives, embedded reporters in Whitehouse press core who moonlight as prostitutes etc, etc, etc is all "move along, nothing to see here"...glad for O'Brien and sad that a reporter who doesn't lay down to spin is so rare these days...
yonder
(9,666 posts)JustFiveMoreMinutes
(2,133 posts)Ugh.
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)essentially say at the end that it was the administration and the intelligence information and left Rice out of it.
qanda
(10,422 posts)I'm pretty sure pretzels can't walk.
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)Listening to that guy is much like the couple of times I tried to listen to rush. Incomprehensible.
MagickMuffin
(15,942 posts)In June, July, August 2001 when the president is being briefed virtually every day in his morning intelligence briefing that something is about to happen, and he never chairs a meeting and he never asks Condi Rice to chair a meeting about what we're doing about stopping the attacks. She didn't hold one meeting during all those three months.
April 18, 1983: Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut
Reagan administration officials said that the attack was carried out by Hezbollah operatives, a Lebanese militant Islamic group whose anti-U.S. sentiments were sparked in part by the revolution in Iran. The Hezbollah operatives who carried out the attack on the embassy reportedly were receiving financial and logistical support from both Iran and Syria. [For more on how and why Iran and Syria were helping to direct attacks on the U.S., see FRONTLINE's interviews with Robert Oakley and Robert C. McFarlane.]
The U.S. government took no military action in response to the embassy bombing, although, according to retired Marine Lt. Col. Bill Cowan, a covert military team entered Beirut in order to gather intelligence in preparation for retaliatory strikes.
Oct. 23, 1983 Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut
In his September 2001 FRONTLINE interview, Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger said the U.S. still lacks "actual knowledge of who did the bombing" of the Marine barracks. But it suspected Hezbollah, believed to be supported in part by Iran and Syria. Hezbollah denied its involvement.
The president assembled his national security team to devise a plan of military action. The planned target was the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters. Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger aborted the mission, reportedly because of his concerns that it would harm U.S. relations with other Arab nations. Instead, President Reagan ordered the battleship USS New Jersey, stationed off the coast of Lebanon, to the hills near Beirut. The move was seen as largely ineffective.
Four months after the Marine barracks bombing, U.S. Marines were ordered to start pulling out of Lebanon.
Dec. 12, 1983 Bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait
The U.S. military took no action in retaliation. In Kuwait, 17 people were arrested and convicted for participating in the attacks. One of those convicted was Mustafa Youssef Badreddin, a cousin and brother-in-law of one of Hezbollah's senior officers, Imad Mughniyah. After a six-week trial in Kuwait, Badreddin was sentenced to death for his role in the bombings.
Over the following years, the arrest and imprisonment of the "Kuwait 17" (also known as the "Al Dawa 17" , became one of the most consistent demands of the kidnappers of Western hostages in Lebanon and plane hijackers.
Ironically, when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the Iraqis unwittingly released the imprisoned Badreddin and the remaining members of the Kuwait 17. Press reports vary about Badreddin's current whereabouts.
More incidents of terrorists attacks at link
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/target/etc/cron.html
I think these republicants need a past history lesson in terrorists attacks under the leadership of their party's presidents.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)He seems to be saying that Condi was intentionally lying whereas Ambassador Rice was not, so it's the administration's fault. Hunh?
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)Please proceed
(59 posts)And apparently 4 is the magic number of deaths that the GOP cares about. Because they certainly didn't care when the Bush Administration ginned up the case against Sadaam causing the death of thousands of brave Americans.
underpants
(182,803 posts)I love the name.
Please proceed Guvenuh!!! - my wife and I said that to each other the whole next day
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Great comment.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)dchill
(38,492 posts)Welcome to DU, Please proceed.
Cha
(297,220 posts)Priceless. Soledad is showing others in her field how easy it is(if you're bright) And, how much FUN!
reformist2
(9,841 posts)They've got nothing and they know it. The smirks that occasionally break out on Joe Heck's face give his game away.
underpants
(182,803 posts)He was rocking on his heels.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I want to post Bill Plimpton's amazing cartoon of "Your Face"....
but I can't find a video of it online.
damnit!
Oh wait.... here it is!
http://tu.tv/videos/bill-plympton-your-face-short-fi
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)underpants
(182,803 posts)mwb970
(11,359 posts)Why are they ALL like this now?
juajen
(8,515 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Poor Heck is blinking up a storm because he knows his canned talking points are not holding up under scrutiny and then Charles Blow piles on just for fun
ashredux
(2,605 posts)First, Soledad nailed him. She is becoming the new hard ass on cable.
This is my first post on DU...have never come over here except to read.
Glad to be here....
ash
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)these idiots think they can say anything and it is etched in stone truth that people drop to their knee and revere. These are some fucked up individuals that are our so-called congressional 'leaders' of real thinking people. How do they get voted in? Oh I forgot, LIV's. Bane of civilized people.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Pwned by Soledad O'Brien.......
southmost
(759 posts)plus huge girl-crush on her
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)I was as confused as Soledad
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)NCGardenGirl
(53 posts)Hamlette
(15,412 posts)so the argument is, if you knowingly lie, its fine, if you don't know you are lying, it is grounds for impeachment.
This should be played to every sentient being in the country and then ask: WTF???????
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)And, now... a let's immortalize that moment from the Mr. Heck...
[url=http://www.cosgan.de/smilie.php][img][/img][/url]
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Seriously, what is the supposed scandal? That Obama supposedly didnt say the word "terrorism" in a speech? WTF?
This is the stupidest "scandal" in history, next to the gun walking thing.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)decide on getting to work on settling real problems facing the American people.
The point is that the Republican want to continue to smear Obama in hopes somehow that will bring the GOP back into power.
Maineman
(854 posts)The politician was so full of bull, it was a joke. And, at the end, he acted as if he had finally succeeded in getting Soledad to understand his twisted BS. The guy is an idiot.
They_Live
(3,233 posts)all they had to say was "for reasons of National Security", and anyone asking questions about ANYTHING would have nothing else to say.
dtom67
(634 posts)MCcain and Graham didn't say boo about Condy being full of shit; more boring GOP bluster.
MCcain ( and his Mutated Jowls ) should (finally ) just empty his Depends(TM) and retire.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Obama's administration. They continue to play petty politics to the detriment of this country. The SOBs should be working for the American people instead of wasting everybody's time on a petty point of who knew what when. I will venture to say that most people really don't give a damn.