General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExcellent quote by President Eisenhower
In 1966, Former President Eisenhower wrote a letter complaining about critics who
Equate an individuals strength of dedication with oratorical bombast; equate determination with public repetition of a catchy phrase; equate achievement with the exaggerated use of the vertical pronoun I. To them the record means little; manner and method are vital.
Most of us probably cant remember the time when a decent Republican could occupy the White House. Yes, it has been that long.
The Unmitigated Gall
(4,710 posts)Where the first repuke was Nixon.
Polybius
(21,383 posts)Well, the most decent Republican President since Eisenhower at least.
brush
(61,033 posts)Today Eisenhower would be a centrist Dem. And also remember his warining about the military/industrial complex.
Now that party seems intent on installing a fascist government if they ever get the WH back.

Seeking Serenity
(3,252 posts)Polybius
(21,383 posts)DFW
(59,678 posts)Without them, Humphrey might well have won.
Seeking Serenity
(3,252 posts)And if it hadn't been for Wallace picking off some Southern states, the Solid South would have gone Democratic.
DFW
(59,678 posts)Wallace in 1968, Nader in 2000, for example.
Sure, they called themselves "American Independent Party" in 1968 and "Greens" in 2000, etc.,
but we all know where they came from, and what they were doing when they did it.
Polybius
(21,383 posts)The South did not want Humphrey after LBJ, who admitted that his policies lost the South for a generation. 1968 was gonna be lost with Humphrey no matter what. RFK living and winning the nomination is a whole other story.
Polybius
(21,383 posts)Wallace won 46. If all of them would have went to Humphrey instead, that gives him 237. He still loses. The rest of the South wasn't going to vote Democratic anymore, because of LBJ. And Johnson knew it, saying that we've lost the South for a generation (little did he know it would still be lost).
Polybius
(21,383 posts)If it's legal, does that count? Would lying count as dirty tricks?
What about 1960? Kennedy might have lost had it not been for that debate and him looking much better than Nixon. So, was he "legitimately elected"? Of course he was imo.
Personally, I think they both were legitimately elected. Unless something highly illegal happens (1972 for sure, and 1980 allegedly), then they are legit.
DFW
(59,678 posts)I don't think legality was their primary concern.
Seeking Serenity
(3,252 posts)Period, end of it. They're enemies of the people, all in the pockets of big business. They cannot win but for illegitimate means.
keep_left
(3,143 posts)Written to a constituent in 1959, Eisenhower warned against the tendency of many Americans to prefer the certainty of dictatorship to the doubt and disorder of more democratic forms of government. In closing, Eisenhower recommended one of his favorite books, Eric Hoffer's classic The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (1951). Eisenhower himself was known to have given copies to friends.
I have thought for many years that The True Believer should be required reading for high school civics, along with Fromm's Escape from Freedom (1941). A lot of our fellow Americans could greatly benefit from both of them.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218041638#post17
I first heard about the Biggs letter in a talk given by reporter Max Blumenthal. Here is an excerpt of the letter.
The mental stress and burden which this form of government imposes has been particularly well recognized in a little book about which I have spoken on several occasions. It is The True Believer by Eric Hoffer; you might find it of interest. In it, he points out that dictatorial systems make one contribution to their people which leads them to tend to support such systems--freedom from the necessity of...making up their own minds concerning...complex and difficult questions. But while this responsibility is a taxing one to a free people it is their great strength as well--from...free minds come new ideas, new adjustments to emerging problems, and tremendous vigor, vitality and progress.
One of my own major aims and efforts has been to assist in every way open to me in giving our people a better understanding of the great issues that face our country today--some of them indeed issues of life and death. Through being better informed, they can best gain greater assurance regarding our nations situation and participate in establishing policies and programs which they think to be sound and right. The quest for certainty is at best, however, a long and arduous one. While complete success will always elude us, still it is a quest which is vital to self-government and to our way of life as free men.
BOSSHOG
(44,571 posts)General Ike was an anti maga. And the Hoffer book is probably on a ban list initiated by the Moms for Hitler Values.
Prefer the certainty of Dictatorship.? Thats why republicans love stupid people.
keep_left
(3,143 posts)...the situation in which we now find ourselves. It would be great if they were required reading material for high school civics or history classes. The two works reinforce and complement each other.
marybourg
(13,588 posts)I was thinking of that as I transcribed. Damn theres a lot of semicolons. Old School English. They do come in handy when writing about what someone wrote 60+ years ago.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)who put "country before party"---
but he was also probably one of the least 'ideological' presidents in the last 100 years.....
He sent Federal troops to Little Rock to enforce desegregated schools....
What Republican would do that today??
More likely, they would send troops to enforce segregation....
(and to shut down those awful "gay drag" shows, OMG...)