Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CHECK LAWRENCE SHOW NOW! (Original Post)
elleng
Sep 2023
OP
Ocelot II
(131,193 posts)1. Why?
A HERETIC I AM
(24,902 posts)2. BECAUSE!!
DURHAM D
(33,090 posts)3. Got it.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)4. It's the best part
?si=RyVq5TDRNZhMGuGA
regnaD kciN
(27,697 posts)9. That wasn't the best part...
THIS was:
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)10. Classic
elleng
(141,926 posts)5. ACTUAL election results, NOT polling,
surprising Dem positives, as discussed by R. Gibbs on Hayes show.
gab13by13
(32,741 posts)7. I have been criticized for calling polls propaganda.
Chris Hayes just did the same thing. He said the real test that can't be denied is the number of special elections that Democrats have been winning, and winning over the margin.
Tuesday in Allegheny county, Pa. the Democrat overperformed and won by 14 or 18 points, I forget. Also in N.H. the Democrat won in a district that Trump won.
Hayes had a list of special elections and Democrats were overperforming in all of them, even when the Democrat lost, he/she overperformed.
I ignore the polls.
elleng
(141,926 posts)6. Here, not as detailed as I'd like.
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,879 posts)11. This was a great and encouraging interview