General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould you live (happily) in a micro apartment?




The development firm Panoramic Interests is building about two dozen 'micro-apartments' in San Francisco. The company is poised to offer even smaller units if the city approves a proposed new minimum size of 220 square feet. (Image credit: Artist's Rendering of Smartspace Unit Courtesy of Panoramic Interests)
http://www.kqed.org/news/story/2012/10/24/109998/as_apartment_rents_climb_skyward_san_francisco_considers?category=economy
http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Micro-apartments-next-for-S-F-3706648.php#photo-3192726
As Apartment Rents Climb Skyward, San Francisco Considers Downsizing Apartments
by Stephanie Martin | October 24, 2012 7:07 AM
[The development firm Panoramic Interests is building about two dozen 'micro-apartments' in San Francisco. The company is poised to offer even smaller units if the city approves a proposed new minimum size of 220 square feet. (Image credit: Artist's Rendering of Smartspace Unit Courtesy of Panoramic Interests)]
The development firm Panoramic Interests is building about two dozen "micro-apartments" in San Francisco. The company is poised to offer even smaller units if the city approves a proposed new minimum size of 220 square feet.
neeksgeek
(1,250 posts)Not sure what my wife, two dogs, and a cat would think of it, however.
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,411 posts)To each his own. Maybe suited to a bachelor or single young woman, but only if the rent/cost is really low and you could save for a space that's truly a place to rest, regroup and prepare for the next working day.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)...no sweat
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Michigan Alum
(335 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)And sometimes with a roommate. I had a bunk bed, a small fridge, a tv, a small desk and a closet.
But now, with a husband and 7 and 8 year olds it would be kind of tough. Their toys alone take up one whole room. I guess the toys would have to be downsized too.
madaboutharry
(42,032 posts)Hmm, It really is only a little bigger than a suite room in a college dorm. Maybe it is ok for one person. I think that two adults living in that space could result in domestic boundary issues.
I could have lived there when I was single. But after age 25, not so much.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)With a pull down table built into the exterior.
Quite clever, I think.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)(because some of the pictures don't match that layout) I would put a loft bed above the desk. That's wasted space anyway and that way you don't have to deal with a Murphy bed. Make the windows floor to ceiling and the full width (or as close as possible) of the unit and I'd be good to go. A balcony would be a bonus.
People live on yachts, small ones even...

oldtime dfl_er
(7,176 posts)if i was a college student or somesuch.
the real problem is there are too many people in the world.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)When are they coming to DC or NYC? I'll all over that provided the rents are reasonable. Ideally, I'd like to see something like that in cooperative housing. Small units paired with shared community spaces.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)& you could open up more living space in the apartment.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)and more profitable.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)what I'm talking about is co-housing types of arrangements where each unit has a small studio room that doubles between entertaining and sleeping space, a kitchenette and a bathroom. That's it for private space...300' square or less.
Renters/owners have access to community space including common-rooms, full kitchens, in-building gyms, saunas, building gardens or other amenities; there is likewise the expectation of participation in communal life: you are expected to attend communal meals, help with small building chores (such as sweeping), participate in building events (we might have a Superbowl pot-luck or book-club or whatever the community is organized around.)
It's not for everybody admittedly, it's a very communitarian lifestyle and extremely at-odds with the individualism of American culture. For some people, the concept is appealing.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)the tenements of yore: shared bathroom & cooking outside.
communal kitchens may be fine in some circumstances, but not where you have no control over who you share the kitchen with, i.e. not in a free market world.
cohousing is a little different; there's some control.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Hell, I even refuse to use a urinal unless it is in a stall with a door. I am extremely averse to washing and pissing in public.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)the kitchen and living room are on one side of the house (8 1/2' wide) the bedroom and bath on the other side. Again 8 1/2' wide). This was originally a two bedroom home but I renovated it into a one bedroom, just so I had some room to roam around. lol. I have a tough time in this place and cannot wait to move back to the states this Spring. I could not last long in an even tinier apartment.
Squinch
(59,444 posts)When I moved from 400 square feet to a 650 square foot studio with a bedroom alcove, I thought I had died and gone to heaven. Then I moved to a 1000 square foot apartment, and couldn't handle it. I lived primarily in the bedroom, and seldom went to the living room for about a year!
silverweb
(16,410 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]It was my first time living alone in decades. The bedroom window had the best view, so I put my desk there, and I lived in that room and the kitchen. The living room never got used unless the kids were visiting.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)More at home than a hotel room, but I would have freedom to venture out just like at a hotel.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Mine is set up completely differently (boat) but the square footage is about the same. Every inch of space has a purpose, pretty much.
Bit bonus - it's a breeze to clean the whole house!
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)a porpoise.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)the boat sleeps, we reply "2" (even though it actually has sleeping space for 6).
peacebird
(14,195 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)sleeping areas, a kitchen area that is somewhat separate, a desk and a big round table. Every piece of furniture is, of course, built in. I don't need any more space at all.
Cobalt Violet
(9,976 posts)Too small. I couldn't even fit my painting into that place.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)kitchen does not look like it's useful for much more than reheating.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)It was fine. The trick is figuring out how to multipurpose and define separate spaces.
In the one shown above, I'd just install a panel curtain to be pulled across the kitchen area when I went to sleep.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)but not for more than one, it would be terribly cramped. I could live in that amount of space personally.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)And if I didn't have kids. In that case yes. But not in the situation I'm in now. I'm in about as small a place as my family can handle. It was our "starter home" and is only 1200 square feet. When we had more money we were tempted to buy up, as most families do, but we decided to stay put inside as more space wasn't really necessary. I'm glad we did as it's made us very financially stable, but I can't imagine such a small space with them.
But on my own in a big city? Sure.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)I prefer living rural with plenty of room and open spaces around me.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)The front porch is one of my favorite places - that and my office.
Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)I can't hear my neighbors breathing and I like it that way. Don't get me wrong, I like all but 2 of my nearest neighbors, but I wouldn't want them 6 or even 10 feet away from me at all times and I'm pretty sure they feel the same. I would be fit to be tied after a few days in a place that tiny.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)Would I want to? I wouldn't be my preference. I really like my house in the burbs.
Baitball Blogger
(52,296 posts)there would have to be three secret exits and lots of security camera t.v.s
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:47 AM - Edit history (2)
but as a young single or a senior citizen it'd be plenty of space. I grew up in a small house with a large family.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)But I lived in an Airstream travel trailer for 10 years, too...
PDJane
(10,103 posts)And there's no room for mobility aids. Hell, the bathroom in this place isn't really big enough.
Add to that that the computer is always up and I need space for my embroidery frame.....no.
This is fine if you're able bodied and able to get out, but I rely on people coming to see me. It's not gonna work.
sakabatou
(46,106 posts)yardwork
(69,304 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Thanks for sharing it.
nilram
(3,543 posts)Much nicer concept that the example for the SF location.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)TYY
jackbenimble
(251 posts)Had never thought of that concept. Very cool. I'll have to keep something like that in mind when I design my small retirement home.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Living in NYC in the 80s a studio was all I could afford. And it was not as nice as the apartment in the pictures above. However, I was single, and would only ever want to live in such a place if it was by myself.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)The trick is, you only keep stuff you need and use. You can't accumulate stuff.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I am running out of closet space. I have 2 bedrooms, and the 2nd one of full of stuff I have accumulated. I am a pack rat.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Once you go through the stuff you never use and will never use, you might be surprised that there could be some money in it too.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I guess I could probably make some money.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)One of my neighbors actually does a "free" table for the stuff he knows he can't sell but doesn't want around anymore either.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)My mother is. What does she do with her overflow? Sends it down to my house. Then, at any time later when she wants it, I had better still be storing it for her. It just kills me. When I was a kid, my closet was not really mine. It was full of her stuff. Now, my trailer/hovel (everyone I know calls my little trailer a hovel, so I do too now, but I love this place, it has potential, as I see it) is full of my mother's stuff. I'm saving up to build a largish shed in the backyard to store all her crap, while her huge metal building at her house sits empty except for her van. It just kills me.
I do have a small collection of rocks and Japanese stuff, but if this place had only my stuff, it would fit nicely with no problems. It would actually look really nice if I could actually put it up on the wall in shadow boxes. As of nowadays, I don't really collect any more stuff, at least not physical stuff.
The computer helps a lot with the accumulation of stuff nowadays. Now, my hard drive and how quickly I can fill a hard drive is another story. I'm a full on hoarder when it comes to files. Hell, I even make computer art and leave it the highest quality and the size to make into wallpaper. I can't help it. There is a whole world of fun inside this little machine. I love it!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Tell her you need your space for your own things.
Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)Seriously, she rules this family with an iron fist. It would be nice if that could happen though.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)for the past 13 years.
Sometimes I live here:

but it's not called a micro apartment, it's called a cabaña, and I pretty much live outside there unless I'm sleeping or it's raining.
And sometimes I live here:

And pretty much the rest of the time I live in my motorhome somewhere.
I don't do civilization well, but could live happily in a micro apartment if it was in a beautiful, sparsely populated area.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)It is a single wide, but it is 10 feet wide and 40 feet long, just enough room for me and my Chihuahua, though I did also have a Rottweiler (who is now in doggie heaven), but there was room for her also.
Arkansas Granny
(32,265 posts)marlakay
(13,263 posts)not just a small place squished but this looks well planned out for storage and has double uses like table and bed.
Also would be nice to have view like that, if small place overlooked parking lot or close to another building i might feel claustrophobic.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)if i had to. but i would prefer a hut an at least an acre or more of land with water.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)edit- two thing:
1- I lived in a 500 square foot cabin for 4 years, and loved it.
2- I'm looking for a new place to live, and am going through massive emotional difficulty over the "monstrosities to materialism" that I am encountering. Americans have serious issues I am discovering. No one needs 4000-10,000 square foot houses. Some super rich guy down the street from me is selling his 17,000 square foot house because he's tired of paying the property tax.
I can't find a place that isn't HUGE. And I'm disgusted.
My room serves as a machine shop, garage, bathroom, kitchen, and bedroom.
MineralMan
(151,187 posts)At one time, I designed a living space that was only 120 sq. feet, but it had a sleeping loft of 48 sq. feet which added to the space. It was solar heated, had a skylight for additional daytime lighting, and was heavily insulated. Every single furnishing in it was custom-designed and built-in, and everything that a person sat on or laid on was also a storage space.
I built it as a standalone building in the backyard of my house and rented it to a college student for about three years. Then I converted it into an office for myself. The student liked it very much, and made excellent use of its design features.
Today, with flat-screen TVs and computer monitors it would have been even more convenient. For me, the only real inconvenience that was required was the shower, which was one of those camper-style showers. The bathroom and shower were the most difficult thing to deal with, but the solution worked out fairly well, and the student who lived there never complained about that feature.
I had sketched out the plans for a village of such living spaces, where they were clustered in groups and built as modular structures with varying numbers of individual spaces. Working with a developer, I attempted to create a small development of 36 units near the local university, but were never able to get approval, despite having one test unit that was occupied full time for a couple of years.
Another idea, another time. It would have been fun, though.
jackbenimble
(251 posts)librechik
(30,957 posts)it was heavenly, I'm told. Don't remember much of those years myself!
Ah, the 70s.
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)I'm cold just thinking about it! Did you do it for love?
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)He too, does not remember a whole lot of the period.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)My macrame board and chair would take up half of that.
Thegonagle
(806 posts)And a garage/workshop for my tools and hobbies.
Dining table that converts to a bed? No thanks, unless I'm living in an RV or travel trailer.
EC
(12,287 posts)And if multi-units can go up fast or even prefabs, I could see it being used for emergency housing.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Initech
(108,674 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)obamanut2012
(29,346 posts)eShirl
(20,223 posts)I could live in an RV, wandering the Earth...
Arcanetrance
(2,670 posts)I think I'm already living in one lol
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,595 posts)Hell, my study is 440 square feet.
And where would my husband's parlor grand piano go?
It just wouldn't work for us.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(156,595 posts)RobertBlue
(81 posts)You sound very pretentious IMHO.
mentalsolstice
(4,653 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Raine
(31,173 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)No way!
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I can't imagine not having a detached home with some space around it right now.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I've lived in very small spaces before totally happy, 144 sq. feet.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)And imagine sharing it with a partner. Ugh.
I hate this push to get people to embrace the idea of 'micro apartments'.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)who wants to sleep in their kitchen? Not me anyway.
I guess if you commuted to a city and needed a place to crash occasionally. Or if you were college age and it was a temporary thing. I've actually lived in worse places - art studios without a kitchen at all, a shared bathroom, and no heat. But that gets pretty old after a while.
'micro apartments' as a place to live? No. No thank you.
I actually find the barrage of articles about them kind of offensive.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Were it not for those three factors, if it was cheap I could do it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Books galore, plants galore (shelving in front of windows, off the ground so as not to take up valuable floor space).
Dogs? Two toy dogs would be totally at home there. But not cats...no space for litter boxes.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Like, 9 bookshelves full plus about 6 more boxes.
Maybe if the apartment had rolling shelves it would work.
MineralMan
(151,187 posts)kept all their books. When my wife and I moved from California to Minnesota, I had roughly 5000 books in my library. I sold almost all of them to a second hand bookstore before we moved. Now, I have maybe 400 books and a Kindle. I can't remember the last time I pulled any of the books off the shelves in the basement, but I add new books to the Kindle all the time, mostly from Gutenberg.org. I'm a big fan of 18th and 19th century non-fiction, and it's all free now. I never cared about the physical books. All of mine were reading copies, not collector books.
The second hand bookstore paid pretty well for all those old books. I'm glad to be free of them, to tell the truth. Now, my set of Pepy's Diaries takes up a megabyte or so of Kindle space, and is always there for me if I want to read in them. And so on, and so on.
Today, the kids don't have all those physical books. They don't need that space. It's a changing world.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Part of it is that I spend half the day looking at a screen anyway, and sometimes I just want to unplug.
MineralMan
(151,187 posts)Now, I prefer being more unencumbered. Very much. The knowledge is still there for me to peruse. The weight is less.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Kindle would help. But of course, there's no replacement for a real book.
I probably have about 7 full bookshelves of 'em. 30" by 7 feet tall. I recycled some in the last years. I need to recycle more.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)And I need at least an acre of space around my dwelling.
Illinoischick
(35 posts)Think of how many resources we could save by not having extra space!!
Pisces
(6,225 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:59 AM - Edit history (1)
This reminds me of Jodorowsky's Holy Mountain
I wish I could find a photo of the scene. The design the character is selling is basically row upon row of coffin shaped 'housing units'. (You could call them 'micro-apartments' and add a 'sustainability' selling point if you want.)
Here's a description:
Lut, an architect. After building a multi-family complex explains how he realized he made a mistake: We lost money.
Giving the residents small gardens, windows, water, and lighting and heating systems was a wrong concept. At a large dinner gathering, presumably comprised of shareholders or other members of industry, Lut claims that:
A man doesnt need a home, all he needs is a shelter. If we can sell him on the idea of a shelter, we can make millions. A worker will come here only to sleep, he wont need electricity or water. He wont have to cook, well condition him to eat at the factory. These are communal latrine trucks for the entire building.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Incitatus
(5,317 posts)I couldn't as a permanent residence. I could for a period of time if it was near a cool place.
Bad_Ronald
(265 posts)When I was in college, I shared a one bedroom pad with three other people. We had no privacy. Provided you're single & living alone, this amount of space is adequate.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think to myself about the squallid living conditions currently enjoyed by three-quarters of the world's population-- sleeping on dirt floors, no electricity, no clean water, etc., and am fored to admit to myself how complacent, how decadent, how indulgent, and how royal my own small "modest" apartment would seem to them.
We've set so high a standard for our subjective definitions of happiness, that we often balk at that which swo many others would see as kingly.
cmf
(1,834 posts)with Mr. cmf, no freaking way.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)The 220 sq ft one looks difficult because things need to be converted from one thing to another --just a little too cramped.
But the 300 sq ft example with the bed already out, a living room that doesn't need to be set up (who eats at the table anymore?) and a separate bathroom, the tub/shower combo is better than the shower in the middle of the bathroom. That setup looks do-able.
If it was the difference between living somewhere interesting and not having to commute, the tradeoff might be nice.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,651 posts)The 150sf would be a challenge, but my place now is 30x40 and there is plenty of unused space. I am a minimalist, so that works, but (!) I am also very lazy. Not having an oven and washer/dryer would be an issue. Don't suppose they could work those in?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)i don't have a lot of crap or a big wardrobe.
the only problems with it are 1) no garden; 2) little space for any craft you might do such as sewing.
cecilfirefox
(784 posts)cecilfirefox
(784 posts)silverweb
(16,410 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Maybe, hypothetically if it were a spectacularly affordable pied-à-terre. Otherwise it is just another way to fleece pretentious dickheads too stupid to leave San Francisco.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I'm just a pretentious dickhead who loves the city in which I live.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)"Otherwise it is just another way to fleece pretentious dickheads too stupid to leave San Francisco."
No truer words have ever been spoken.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)Familes spent years in about that much space. Personally, I need four rooms at least.
InsultComicDog
(1,209 posts)about the size of a FEMA trailer, though it wasn't from FEMA.
But there was actually more living space if you count the covered area outside the trailer where I spent more time than inside. Usually cooked outside too. And sometimes used a kerosene heater if it was cold.
It was cheap and not too bad of a way to live for a while. Wouldn't want to do it for too long, or during major storms.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)I'd feel institutionalized in one of those, too rigid, too bleh!
Give me the soothing feeling of windows and reclaimed wood, handbuilt by yours truely...
In fact, the wife and I have something very similar (maybe a touch larger) in mind after we become empty nesters in the next 5 years.
Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)You can keep it rather small as far as how much space it takes up at ground level and have a loft area too. I have seriously been thinking about saving up for one of those barn shaped sheds I have seen. Some insulation and plumbing and a small root cellar below it and it would be doable. I'd certainly like it. My only stipulation would be no pressed board for the walls or roofing material. That stuff gets wet and you find yourself living in glue and sawdust with problems galore. I'm a stickler for old timey plywood. If I ever get to remodel this place I live now (if I ever get it paid off), I'm going to redo the floors and at least get rid of the pressed board. That stuff has already messed up and made me have to rebuild the floors in two rooms. That pressed board crap turns any place into a money pit. Add high southern humidity at all times and it is a recipe for disaster.
But, the cabin idea, with a few modifications on the type of wood used, I like that idea. I had a friend who was given a thick beam from an old church that partially burned. He took that and built a guitar out of it. It was beautiful too. I like plain old pine and there are zillions of them around where I live. They grow fast and can be replanted to grow right back to the size they were in just a few short years. Plus, as pine wood ages, it hardens. The only problem is, the sap never leaves the wood and it becomes what we call lider wood down here. It is highly flammable and burns to a crisp at severely high temperatures. Makes great firestarting wood, but you would not want to use it as the regular logs for constant burning, because it pops and sends out super hot embers too much. Still, if there was a way to work around the resin becoming flammable and keep the fact that it gets super hard and sturdy with time, pine would be a good easily sustainable building material for green living.
Jack Sprat
(2,500 posts)The older I get, the more sense it makes to downsize. I like the economy of both space and energy costs. I would like a micro house or a micro apartment.
I'm thinking right now that I always have more living space than I want or need.
theKed
(1,235 posts)I'm never one for big spaces. I like my apartments cozy and close (granted, it's living for one, I'm sure these are more geared towards single life) and bigger space just encourages me to get more stuff, which I don't need. And the cost might be lower.
bluedigger
(17,433 posts)I'm in a small place now, three rooms and a bath (too lazy to get out the tape measure, which is 4' from me as I type
). Location is more important to me than excessive space, but it would be nice to have a two bay garage/shop.
shanti
(21,799 posts)could i do it, yeah. would i want to, no. never with another person, though. it's way too cramped for more than one person.
also, i do a lot of crafts, so would need room to store my "stuff", so that would be an added expense. and having cats and a catbox.....just no.
it seems so cell-like with that one window. skylights would help.
obamanut2012
(29,346 posts)But would only do it if I didn't have my kitties. I have lived in spaces as small as 200-400 square feet, and been fine.
I think most of us have too much stuff and too much space. I love the "apartments" set up in IKEAs, and how they show what you can do with just a few hundred square feet.
I would like a small over/stove and combo front loader w/d by the windows. Then, perfect.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)blocks of where one lives.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)to the Library of Congress, and from time to time, scholars contact me to see the collections.
I inheirted a collection of monographs in my teens, and have been building it ever since.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)It was laid out a little better, but it flooded three times.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)I need a real kitchen, some storage space, my preference is to be able to run a projector so I need some throw space and a big wall for the screen. I don't have one right now but the capability has value to me.
highplainsdem
(61,923 posts)which honestly looks more like a walk-in closet converted to an apartment.
As silly as McMansions are, micro homes are just as silly, IMO. But I can see why developers in expensive cities would love to be able to convince people that shoebox-size apartments are acceptable. Much more money for them that way.
InsultComicDog
(1,209 posts)about that size
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Okay -- they will shelter you from the storm. They will provide that pied-a-terre for the out of towner (one at a time). They would be okay for transitional housing of some sort (college dorm room to career or something). Kids? a mate? a pet? ANY companionship? Uh -- no.
But permanently? Nuns, monks, hermits, maybe. People who want no personal possessions beyond a rice bowl, chopsticks, and an extra saffron robe while one is in the wash.
Me? I am a book collector. I am also an indoor person, not someone who spends all her life outdoors and only comes in to sleep.
>sigh< But I bet there is a market for these things....
Hekate
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)The size didn't bother me. Everybody is different. Some people are perfectly fine with small spaces. Other people feel more comfortable with more space. To each his own.
Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)To each their own. I'm a firm believer in that. If others are fine in something that small, more power to them. It's just not something I would want to do.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)but 14 feet longer. I am perfectly comfortable. The only problem is I don't have enough storage. Fortunately, there is an attached garage with no room to park my car since I have to use that for storage.
Cha
(318,831 posts)than my studio except I have a loft(like going up into a tree house to sleep) on Kaua'i and I am happy. It had only a hot plate and a mini fridge when I moved in.. I replaced those with a Waring Hot Burner, a convection oven, and a GE Energy Star Fridge. I decided I didn't need a lot of space and pared down by belongings to fit.
Excellent location is a deciding factor... by the Ocean, bike trail, library, bank, health food co-op, bus stop..
I saw these Micro Apts on youtube awhile ago.. in Hong Kong from
Architect Gary Chong who uses sliding walls to create the ultimate compact living apartment."
Warpy
(114,585 posts)but it wasn't for long and it was in the middle of a fascinating city with plenty to do outside the tiny room.
There's a lot to be said for compact living spaces, mostly the ease of keeping them tidy as long as they're well planned.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Lived in travel trailers for 12 yrs (with a spouse)....does that count?
Lived in a 20 ft'r for 6 yrs....then got a 30 ft fifth wheel. Learned ALOT about how to use every inch of storage space (much I learned I still use today). But I am saying that yes it's very doable...but it's not for everybody that is for sure!
BeyondGeography
(41,075 posts)I spent a decade living with someone in a railroad apt. in New York. That was about 500 square feet or so and just fine. Discreet spaces are good; we had four small but separate environments and almost as many cats. Very cozy. If the landlord hadn't engaged in a terror campaign to empty the building we might still be there.
donheld
(21,331 posts)BainsBane
(57,751 posts)They have the bed right next to the sink and the fridge. I wouldn't like that. This particularly apt is badly set up.
Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)where I live now, if I wanted it. There is no way I would pay those prices for that tiny little space. I like my 980 sq. ft. that I have right now, but that's small enough for me. I'd like to have one more room, but that's it. So, I don't exactly need a huge mansion, just enough space to not feel claustrophobic...
Other than the price, living in a tiny little room like that would be pure hell for my poor pitiful toes. I'm as clumsy as they come. It's one thing I have in common with my cat. We are both incredibly clumsy. I think that it why he understands when I trip over him and I understand when he just up and falls off whatever he is standing on. I've done that too. Even growing up in a regular sized house, I already had toes that went every which way by the time I was a teenager from hitting them and sometimes breaking them on the furniture. It was that heavy wooden furniture made with 2x6s. I could not simply sit down without either bumping my knees, hip, arms, legs, and most especially my toes. I have no heavy duty furniture now, except my bed, but I build the frame for it to leave some of the mattress over the edge. My toes thanked me. So far, I have not hurt myself on the bed...yet.
I've even wrapped my toes around the stand of an oscillating fan, not one of the tall ones, a short one! I cried and cussed over that for a good 10 minutes. See Peter Griffin from Family Guy. Yeah, that. It really hurt that bad. Poor toes. RIP toes.
In a place that small and that near tons of other people, I would be knocking lamps over and tripping over everything all night long. I would end up getting evicted for waking the neighbors with all the cussing while I held my toes on one foot and hopped around on the other foot every night. Never mind the possible broken bones and broken furniture from trying to maneuver through there.
There is just no way. I need a modest size house with very little furniture and padded carpet throughout. Padded walls wouldn't hurt either considering how many times I bump into door frames on the way in and out of the room. And, yes, I can even trip over the tiny little spaces between hardwood floor boards. Been there, done that.
My answer is a firm no. My toes thank me and approve of this message.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)35MM films in each of the two new spaces, charging the same amount as they had for the 70MM single-screen.
Things haven't changed much, it seems.
MrScorpio
(73,772 posts)If you throw in a LeeLoo with her Multipass, it might not seem so bad

StarryNite
(12,104 posts)That's for people with little to no stuff.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Leaving aside the whole "family plus pets plus stuff" issues.
Both these and the detached micro-houses always seem to have totally insane $-per-sqft ratios, though I suppose these at least have the excuse of the San Francisco rental market.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Phentex
(16,708 posts)Young and single, i would love it!
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Squinch
(59,444 posts)Heywood J
(2,515 posts)What's the next step, capsule hotels for everyone when only the rich can afford the American dream?
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I once lived on a houseboat just a big larger than that apartment.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)I think it was a bathroom/1 bedroom conversion.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)They just have to give up their beanie dolls and other hideous statuettes. Unfortunately in New Jersey they would sill cost a quarter of a million and up to buy one.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)settle for less and less while $$$ stay flat or increase. Now a builder/developer could build lots of these in a small area, price per sq. ft. return could be phenomenal. ... modularize these in a factory in China, ship them here, assemble them into a framed building/shell and the profit margins could be exceptional. Meanwhile the Lemmings squeeze in while being told how great it is ... and in the big picture are screwed ... and future generations find living in matchboxes exceptional.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)These aren't the new, cool design trend. They are a new profit opportunity at the expense of the 99 percent.
What a scam. Just imagine that windowless shoebox after a few years of use, with smudged walls and cheap, battered furniture.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)silverweb
(16,410 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 18, 2012, 04:25 AM - Edit history (1)
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]And I love it.
It's more square-shaped than the one shown above and is overall 270 sq ft with an 8-ft ceiling. It has a large, west-facing picture window facing a tiny "yard" with a tall wooden fence that I hang plants on for a pretty view. My cats have 24-hour access to the outside through an adapted side panel of the picture window, and they're perfectly happy.
The #1 priority in small-space living is to not allow a bed to hog the room. I use a futon with "click-clack technology," which is very practical and perfectly comfortable. When it's being a sofa, the apartment is a comfortable living room with a kitchenette.
My only problem is insufficient closet/storage space, but I'm working on that. One project I've sketched out is a shelving/cabinet/loft area at one end of the room (similar to the diagrams above, but smaller). As soon as I've finished my current yard project, I'll be starting on that.
There are 3 couples in the building that I know of, who seem to be doing fine living in units this size. I'd have a problem with it if I had to live with another person, but it's perfect for just me and my fur kids.
Just outside this building of cozy nests is a lovely, green, walkable city, complete with buses and light rail. I couldn't ask for more.
BlueMan Votes
(903 posts)in an urban setting however- no way.
Rhythm
(5,435 posts)I'd have no problem, providing i didn't let things get cluttered.
jackbenimble
(251 posts)In fact I am planning to live in a very small place when I retire. Aside from lower costs, I don't want to leave 50 years of accumulated junk for my family to dispose of. I'll give away heirloom stuff to the family member who wants it and sell everything else that I don't need or wont fit. I don't need much to live a good life. Probably my place will be a mostly kitchen, decently sized bathroom and small but accessible bedroom/living area.
I'm kinda looking forward to it.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I live in a small cabin.
I'd put a little wood stove in the middle of that thing and save a lot of wood.
OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(73,393 posts)are 4 people and 2 cats here. If it was just me, I could probably live in a small place again.