General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking - US intelligence is reporting
Iran DOES NOT appear to be involved in helping Hamas plan attacks.
I see this as VERY good news!

getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)Would be my guess. With possible help from Syria snd Saudi arsbia.
Just saying.
Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)Syria or Russia, possibly.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Hamas does not want anybody to cooperate with Israel.
Putin benefits when Hamas blows up Biden's brokering of a peace deal with Israel. Both the deal and the planning for the atrocities have been in the works for months and years.
If Biden had the peace deal going into the election, it would be tougher for his opponent. No peace favours tRump and the rump favours Putin. The rump would cut funding to Ukraine.
GregariousGroundhog
(7,593 posts)Saudi Arabia and Israeli relations have improved significantly over the last decade or so.
Additionally, Saudi Arabia is looking at U.S. assistance in developing a civilian nuclear program, reportedly consisting of 16 reactors capable of generating 17 gigawatts of electricity along with water desalination.
Saudi Arabia has too little to gain and too much to lose helping Hamas attack Israel.
Backseat Driver
(4,671 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)equally, Iran is a sworn adversary - with Saudi (by extension) showing very little interest in propping up or support for any proxies they have.
As the post points to - there just is very little logic in such a 'Saudi' supposition.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Mosby
(19,491 posts)What changed?
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Mosby
(19,491 posts)This doesn't involve fucking Donald trump.
peppertree
(23,343 posts)Who disactivated - undetected - the ultra-sophisticated perimeter surrounding Gaza? (which even monitors underground movement)
This, after all, is what made the assault possible.
We know Cheeto shared Top Secret intel with Russia (and was careless with a lot more besides). Could it have made its way to Hamas?
Don't look at me. I'm Law-and-Order Man!
Mosby
(19,491 posts)And took them to the underground NWO base.
hadEnuf
(3,616 posts)But that's got nothing to do with nothing folks, move along.
Sometimes the denial of the obvious is astounding.
peppertree
(23,343 posts)The pink elephant in the room in this calamity.
Or should we say, orange.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)I can't find this in any of my feeds.
housecat
(3,138 posts)AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)some confirmation. It's not confirmation. It's doubting.
But how credible are the doubts of intelligence re Iran, given its recent massive failure.
Hamas could never have done what it did to Israel without other state actors.
So if it wasn't Iran, but intel won't say who else, what good is anything coming from intel at this point.
Iran has a regional ideological axis to build around the destruction of Israel -- and eventually the West, as does Russia.
I'd rather err on the side that Iran were the planners, funders of this war. And that Russia & their trumptool here were the intel source.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)blm
(114,658 posts)Results are the same.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Was anything more specific said?
PCIntern
(28,366 posts)And this is a fluid situation so I make no negative assumptions. Given their bent, the Iranians are guilty until proven innocent.
kwolf68
(8,452 posts)The entire Arab world seems to either be celebrating the Hamas attack or don't really care. It's embarrassing to suggest that to defend yourself means you slaughter babies. I understand there are some things in question that are legit concerns over Gaza and the West Bank, but I am no longer interested in hearing them if your mode of "defense" is to slaughter babies, rape women and kill innocent, unarmed victims/civilians. These are not normal people, they are vile scum and want Isriel wiped off the map and appear to have more than a few cursory apologists for their cause. After hearing about what these ghouls did to innocent victims and then seeing arabs around the world celebrating such non-sense, at this point I frankly don't care if Isriel turns Gaza into a parking lot (and the people were warned as well).
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)What's up with that? Please don't as I'm gender fluid & gender neutral.
shrike3
(5,370 posts)Calls me "sir " too, and I'm female. I don't think he means anything by it. But if being called "sir" bothers you, I hope he's sensitive to that.
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)shrike3
(5,370 posts)AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Mosby
(19,491 posts)Maybe be mindful of that and show the same respect he shows you.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)He also has called me "Sir" in the past, assuming, and I also didn't like that then, but everyone handwaved it, just like you do here. I do not believe the default should be male. Maybe people shoudl be mindful and respectful of that.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)pretty slight reason to get snickers all in a twist.
I don't particularly care for being called dude, bub, bro .. sweetie, or any of a dozen others. But I generally let it pass - and find that the (generally) superior option to indignant high dudgeon.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)little woman at the end of your sentence!
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)It's 2023. Pronouns are a thing. Assuming people's gender is unacceptable for those of us who are gender neutral. How long someone has been a member of this website is
irrelevant in this conversation. You may as well post a lasagna recipe. Big oof.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)Lurker Deluxe
(1,085 posts)Magistrate does not indicate sex:
noun: 1.a: civil officer or lay judge who administers the law, especially one who conducts a court that deals with minor offenses and holds preliminary hearings for more serious ones.
Yet one was assigned ... do you know they is a he?
progressoid
(53,179 posts)I was addressed as "sir" once and asked why he/she assumed I was a man. I never received a response with "sir" again.
shrike3
(5,370 posts)I don't care one way or the other, but if it bothers people they should do as you did and speak up.
Lurker Deluxe
(1,085 posts)Sir.
Merriam Webster:
1a:a man entitled to be addressed as sir used as a title before the given name of a knight or baronet and formerly sometimes before the given name of a priest
b:a man of rank or position
2a:used as a usually respectful form of address
b:capitalized used as a conventional form of address in the salutation of a letter
In this context 2,b the word "Sir" (capitalized) is simply a form of addressing someone in the salutation of a dialogue, with respect given and no gender assumed.
So ... what word should be used to address someone, such as yourself, in this context? I can think of one ... but I would be willing to bet it is not the same as yours.
OnlinePoker
(6,127 posts)Here in Canada, we say Ma'am.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,210 posts)which means that picking people up on a term of address seems like quibbling. Can we call you "crowd"? "Audience"? "Readers"?
Lithos
(26,638 posts)The wording was deliberate and vague.
"In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers." Sun Tzu
L-
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Will not be a denier.
After the attacks on civilians Iran did promise complete support to Hamas, similar to Biden's pledge to Israel.
One notable difference was the US Congress did not rise up and chant "Death to Palestine" after Biden's speech.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)seems to me going back over satellite data, tracing the attack backwards, figure out where they were. this had to b big enough to leave some tracks, right?
imho, thats THE question.
lindysalsagal
(22,915 posts)malaise
(296,101 posts)His son in law or his close family friends?
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)helped Hamas and that's why this statement was released.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)tRump would have more wind against him if Biden had/has peace deal with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are trying to play both ends; giving tRump golf money and working with Biden on peace deal.
The Oval Office buddy-buddy festival with the Russian Ambassador and Foreign Minister in 2017: tRump apparently gave away secrets about Israeli methods and agents.
Putin benefits if tRump benefits. tRump would sabotage Ukraine for Putin's benefit.
McKim
(2,426 posts)This story is so important so that this war does not turn into a wider regional conflict that would have no end. Just simmer down about Iran. Remember: Make a way where there is no way! Said MLK!
Escurumbele
(4,094 posts)AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)I've not checked others
Torchlight
(6,830 posts)From link to text story (which is not a difficult thing to provide) :
Further...
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/11/politics/us-intelligence-iran-hamas-doubt/index.html#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20has%20collected,sources%20familiar%20with%20the%20intelligence.
gab13by13
(32,321 posts)even if it was. It could lead to WW III.
liberalla
(11,089 posts)and a careful, cautious plan of what to do. No speculation or weak accustions...
rubbersole
(11,223 posts)...on how Israeli intelligence missed the warning signs. Basically, Hamas didn't communicate electronically. Small groups of Independent terrorists that didn't know other groups. Modern terrorist MO.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)Backseat Driver
(4,671 posts)Hawala or hewala (Arabic: حِوالة ḥawāla, meaning transfer or sometimes trust), originating in India as havala (Hindi: हवाला
Remember the "beekeepers" in-person Islamic in-tel/fund transfer networks that apparently operated freely in America pre-/post- 9/11?
IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)Out of those countries, Syria and Iran are Russian allies.
I find it hard to believe Hamas was able to breach Israel's very sophisticated Gaza barriers without help.
blue-wave
(5,130 posts)the most likely culprit.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Maybe social media in wartime is not such a reliable source??
The EU media regulators
gasp!
gets it and they getting after X!
dchill
(42,660 posts)aggiesal
(10,804 posts)since it goes against their $6B talking point.
Polybius
(21,900 posts)Not a cause for war, but it just goes to say what scum the Iranian government is.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Does that mean no Iranian troops are there? What does that word mean?
cab67
(3,749 posts)...it means Iran wasn't involved in the actual planning or execution of the Hamas attack. Iran's continued support for Hamas would be seen as indirect involvement.
Just my interpretation of the term.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)I think they think it may not be in the interest of the US to have Iranian involvement known. That's why I don't trust the use of that word. Anyone can project whatever they want with that word.
Which of course is just my interpretation of the word.
stopdiggin
(15,463 posts)it is careful not to say NO involvement - and goes on to clearly say that Iran has been a source of support and backing in the past. So - I think 'directly involved in planning, prepping or participation' in this specific operation is probably the right interpretation.
And yet - still an important point - as we have had quite straightforward assertions directly to the contrary here over the past several days ...
Mosby
(19,491 posts)Is the Hamas leader who planned out this operation.
Stop with the conspiracy theories.
Hamas gets 100s of millions of dollars from their patrons like Iran, they had plenty of resources to put this together.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)CNN and US Intel may or may not be wrong, but the OP is not spreading conspiracy theories.
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)We dont need a wider war in the Middle East unless the evidence supports it. Im still doubtful Iran isnt involved but I for the most part I trust our intelligence services.
progressoid
(53,179 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)It seems to be quite a plan and capability for the Palestinians to do it all by themselves.
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)There might not be a grand organizer outside of Hamas.
DallasNE
(8,008 posts)But how did that military hardware get inside Gaza? To me, that points to the Egyptian gateway. So what happened at the checkpoint that allowed this transfer? How did things get so relaxed?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)bdamomma
(69,532 posts)is in on this, smells like Putin.
