Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking - US intelligence is reporting (Original Post) AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 OP
Wagner and ruzzia.... getagrip_already Oct 2023 #1
I don't see Saudi's supporting an Iranian proxy. Gore1FL Oct 2023 #2
I doubt S. Arabia: deal w Israel prob dead now. Putin benefits from chaos. tRump likes chaos too Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2023 #19
I seriously doubt Saudi Arabia was involved GregariousGroundhog Oct 2023 #22
Really? - Bone-saw murderous MSB notwithstanding? n/t Backseat Driver Oct 2023 #47
Saudi Arabia and Hamas are enemies. former9thward Oct 2023 #50
but Israel played no part in that stopdiggin Oct 2023 #52
That's good, but Iran is still praising the attack so they're still evil Marius25 Oct 2023 #3
You trust US intel? Mosby Oct 2023 #4
Trump trusted Putin over US Intel. keithbvadu2 Oct 2023 #6
Good for Trump. Mosby Oct 2023 #7
But then - perhaps it does peppertree Oct 2023 #21
Probably the same people who ferreted away the kids at sandy hook. Mosby Oct 2023 #27
A former criminal traitor POTUS selling US military secrets and intelligence. hadEnuf Oct 2023 #31
Hear, hear peppertree Oct 2023 #32
do you have a source for this? stopdiggin Oct 2023 #56
Duh. Trump told us to inject bleach housecat Oct 2023 #29
What do you mean "what changed"? AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #14
Seriously. The very same intel that failed to see Hamas coming. People act as if intel's DOUBT is ancianita Oct 2023 #33
a good deal more than some goombah on the internet ... -(nt)- stopdiggin Oct 2023 #54
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2023 #74
There is direct and there is indirect. blm Oct 2023 #5
'No Direct Involvement' Admits Of Many Meanings, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2023 #8
Exactly... PCIntern Oct 2023 #13
If nothing else.. kwolf68 Oct 2023 #17
+100 ancianita Oct 2023 #42
Why are you assuming my gender? AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #16
Magistrate calls everyone "sir." shrike3 Oct 2023 #34
Ya that's pretty unacceptable in the year 2023 AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #37
Hopefully, he'll be mindful. shrike3 Oct 2023 #45
Fingers crossed 🤞 AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #46
The Magistrate has been posting here for more than 20 years. Mosby Oct 2023 #55
No one on here has a right to misgender anyone, no matter how long they have been postying obamanut2012 Oct 2023 #58
yah. little intent to offend. and really stopdiggin Oct 2023 #65
You forgot inthewind21 Oct 2023 #69
Excuse me AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #71
OK, so what are your pronouns? Mosby Oct 2023 #76
Interesting Lurker Deluxe Oct 2023 #39
Not me. progressoid Oct 2023 #61
I guess that's the key, then. shrike3 Oct 2023 #73
Out of morbid curiosity Lurker Deluxe Oct 2023 #38
And, I believe, the U.S. military addresses female officers as Sir OnlinePoker Oct 2023 #63
"I"? You also say you're 30 people, in your profile muriel_volestrangler Oct 2023 #78
Agreed Lithos Oct 2023 #41
I am somewhat surprised but sarisataka Oct 2023 #9
i want to know where they trained. mopinko Oct 2023 #10
Since when does US intelligence make reports to the public? lindysalsagal Oct 2023 #11
Was the Slobfather involved malaise Oct 2023 #12
Maybe Jack Smith does know who flamingdem Oct 2023 #15
Prob only in passing secrets if at all, but tRump benefits if Biden's SArabia/Israel peace deal fail Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2023 #23
No Regional Wider War! McKim Oct 2023 #18
Was CNN the only one to report this? Escurumbele Oct 2023 #20
No there's a story on Politico too AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #49
No absolute statements. Torchlight Oct 2023 #24
Good idea to say that Iran is not involved, gab13by13 Oct 2023 #25
Thought the same thing... at least not yet. More conclusive proof liberalla Oct 2023 #28
Malcolm Nance just on the Stephanie Miller Show.... rubbersole Oct 2023 #26
Old school actually Kaleva Oct 2023 #35
Is Malcom Nance referring to this com-system? Backseat Driver Oct 2023 #66
Hamas leaders operate out of several countries: Turkey, Qatar, Syria, Iran IronLionZion Oct 2023 #30
I view Ruzzia as blue-wave Oct 2023 #36
American war hawks feathers plucked! Those birds can't handle the truth of...no more violence?? Alexander Of Assyria Oct 2023 #40
We're through the looking glass here, people. dchill Oct 2023 #43
I'm sure the GQP will decline this analysis ... aggiesal Oct 2023 #44
But they are glad that it happened Polybius Oct 2023 #48
What does no "Direct" Iranian Involvement mean? former9thward Oct 2023 #51
I suspect... cab67 Oct 2023 #57
I think that is the interpretation US policy makers want to have out there. former9thward Oct 2023 #64
and if you read the actual statement stopdiggin Oct 2023 #68
Mohammed Deif Mosby Oct 2023 #53
The OP is literally reporting what CNN said obamanut2012 Oct 2023 #59
Thank you AntivaxHunters Oct 2023 #77
Hope that's correct. Elessar Zappa Oct 2023 #60
This won't stop the RW politicians and media from pushing the IRAN angle though. progressoid Oct 2023 #62
So who did help them plan and support this attack? keithbvadu2 Oct 2023 #67
They've been practicing a long time. SYFROYH Oct 2023 #72
This Is Nothing More Than A Gut Feeling DallasNE Oct 2023 #70
Need to know confidence rate of what US intel is reporting, high? low? medium? or DK uponit7771 Oct 2023 #75
Russia bdamomma Oct 2023 #79

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
1. Wagner and ruzzia....
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 10:42 AM
Oct 2023

Would be my guess. With possible help from Syria snd Saudi arsbia.

Just saying.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
19. I doubt S. Arabia: deal w Israel prob dead now. Putin benefits from chaos. tRump likes chaos too
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:48 AM
Oct 2023

Hamas does not want anybody to cooperate with Israel.

Putin benefits when Hamas blows up Biden's brokering of a peace deal with Israel. Both the deal and the planning for the atrocities have been in the works for months and years.

If Biden had the peace deal going into the election, it would be tougher for his opponent. No peace favours tRump and the rump favours Putin. The rump would cut funding to Ukraine.

GregariousGroundhog

(7,593 posts)
22. I seriously doubt Saudi Arabia was involved
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:54 AM
Oct 2023

Saudi Arabia and Israeli relations have improved significantly over the last decade or so.

Additionally, Saudi Arabia is looking at U.S. assistance in developing a civilian nuclear program, reportedly consisting of 16 reactors capable of generating 17 gigawatts of electricity along with water desalination.

Saudi Arabia has too little to gain and too much to lose helping Hamas attack Israel.

stopdiggin

(15,463 posts)
52. but Israel played no part in that
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:23 PM
Oct 2023

equally, Iran is a sworn adversary - with Saudi (by extension) showing very little interest in propping up or support for any proxies they have.

As the post points to - there just is very little logic in such a 'Saudi' supposition.

peppertree

(23,343 posts)
21. But then - perhaps it does
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:50 AM
Oct 2023

Who disactivated - undetected - the ultra-sophisticated perimeter surrounding Gaza? (which even monitors underground movement)

This, after all, is what made the assault possible.

We know Cheeto shared Top Secret intel with Russia (and was careless with a lot more besides). Could it have made its way to Hamas?



Don't look at me. I'm Law-and-Order Man!
 

Mosby

(19,491 posts)
27. Probably the same people who ferreted away the kids at sandy hook.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:02 PM
Oct 2023

And took them to the underground NWO base.



hadEnuf

(3,616 posts)
31. A former criminal traitor POTUS selling US military secrets and intelligence.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:18 PM
Oct 2023

But that's got nothing to do with nothing folks, move along.



Sometimes the denial of the obvious is astounding.


ancianita

(43,307 posts)
33. Seriously. The very same intel that failed to see Hamas coming. People act as if intel's DOUBT is
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:29 PM
Oct 2023

some confirmation. It's not confirmation. It's doubting.
But how credible are the doubts of intelligence re Iran, given its recent massive failure.

Hamas could never have done what it did to Israel without other state actors.
So if it wasn't Iran, but intel won't say who else, what good is anything coming from intel at this point.

Iran has a regional ideological axis to build around the destruction of Israel -- and eventually the West, as does Russia.

I'd rather err on the side that Iran were the planners, funders of this war. And that Russia & their trumptool here were the intel source.

PCIntern

(28,366 posts)
13. Exactly...
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:22 AM
Oct 2023

And this is a fluid situation so I make no negative assumptions. Given their “bent”, the Iranians are guilty until proven innocent.

kwolf68

(8,452 posts)
17. If nothing else..
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:32 AM
Oct 2023

The entire Arab world seems to either be celebrating the Hamas attack or don't really care. It's embarrassing to suggest that to defend yourself means you slaughter babies. I understand there are some things in question that are legit concerns over Gaza and the West Bank, but I am no longer interested in hearing them if your mode of "defense" is to slaughter babies, rape women and kill innocent, unarmed victims/civilians. These are not normal people, they are vile scum and want Isriel wiped off the map and appear to have more than a few cursory apologists for their cause. After hearing about what these ghouls did to innocent victims and then seeing arabs around the world celebrating such non-sense, at this point I frankly don't care if Isriel turns Gaza into a parking lot (and the people were warned as well).

 

AntivaxHunters

(3,234 posts)
16. Why are you assuming my gender?
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:25 AM
Oct 2023

What's up with that? Please don't as I'm gender fluid & gender neutral.

 

shrike3

(5,370 posts)
34. Magistrate calls everyone "sir."
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:30 PM
Oct 2023

Calls me "sir " too, and I'm female. I don't think he means anything by it. But if being called "sir" bothers you, I hope he's sensitive to that.

 

Mosby

(19,491 posts)
55. The Magistrate has been posting here for more than 20 years.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:30 PM
Oct 2023

Maybe be mindful of that and show the same respect he shows you.



obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
58. No one on here has a right to misgender anyone, no matter how long they have been postying
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:34 PM
Oct 2023

He also has called me "Sir" in the past, assuming, and I also didn't like that then, but everyone handwaved it, just like you do here. I do not believe the default should be male. Maybe people shoudl be mindful and respectful of that.

stopdiggin

(15,463 posts)
65. yah. little intent to offend. and really
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:44 PM
Oct 2023

pretty slight reason to get snickers all in a twist.

I don't particularly care for being called dude, bub, bro .. sweetie, or any of a dozen others. But I generally let it pass - and find that the (generally) superior option to indignant high dudgeon.

 

AntivaxHunters

(3,234 posts)
71. Excuse me
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 02:54 PM
Oct 2023

It's 2023. Pronouns are a thing. Assuming people's gender is unacceptable for those of us who are gender neutral. How long someone has been a member of this website is
irrelevant in this conversation. You may as well post a lasagna recipe. Big oof.

Lurker Deluxe

(1,085 posts)
39. Interesting
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:45 PM
Oct 2023

Magistrate does not indicate sex:

noun: 1.a: civil officer or lay judge who administers the law, especially one who conducts a court that deals with minor offenses and holds preliminary hearings for more serious ones.

Yet one was assigned ... do you know they is a he?

progressoid

(53,179 posts)
61. Not me.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:37 PM
Oct 2023

I was addressed as "sir" once and asked why he/she assumed I was a man. I never received a response with "sir" again.

 

shrike3

(5,370 posts)
73. I guess that's the key, then.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 06:45 PM
Oct 2023

I don't care one way or the other, but if it bothers people they should do as you did and speak up.

Lurker Deluxe

(1,085 posts)
38. Out of morbid curiosity
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:41 PM
Oct 2023

Sir.

Merriam Webster:

1a:a man entitled to be addressed as sir —used as a title before the given name of a knight or baronet and formerly sometimes before the given name of a priest
b:a man of rank or position

2a:used as a usually respectful form of address
b:capitalized —used as a conventional form of address in the salutation of a letter

In this context 2,b the word "Sir" (capitalized) is simply a form of addressing someone in the salutation of a dialogue, with respect given and no gender assumed.

So ... what word should be used to address someone, such as yourself, in this context? I can think of one ... but I would be willing to bet it is not the same as yours.

OnlinePoker

(6,127 posts)
63. And, I believe, the U.S. military addresses female officers as Sir
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:39 PM
Oct 2023

Here in Canada, we say Ma'am.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,210 posts)
78. "I"? You also say you're 30 people, in your profile
Thu Oct 12, 2023, 05:20 PM
Oct 2023

which means that picking people up on a term of address seems like quibbling. Can we call you "crowd"? "Audience"? "Readers"?

Lithos

(26,638 posts)
41. Agreed
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:55 PM
Oct 2023

The wording was deliberate and vague.

"In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers." Sun Tzu

L-

sarisataka

(22,695 posts)
9. I am somewhat surprised but
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:03 AM
Oct 2023

Will not be a denier.

After the attacks on civilians Iran did promise complete support to Hamas, similar to Biden's pledge to Israel.

One notable difference was the US Congress did not rise up and chant "Death to Palestine" after Biden's speech.

mopinko

(73,726 posts)
10. i want to know where they trained.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:09 AM
Oct 2023

seems to me going back over satellite data, tracing the attack backwards, figure out where they were. this had to b big enough to leave some tracks, right?

imho, that’s THE question.

flamingdem

(40,891 posts)
15. Maybe Jack Smith does know who
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:25 AM
Oct 2023

helped Hamas and that's why this statement was released.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
23. Prob only in passing secrets if at all, but tRump benefits if Biden's SArabia/Israel peace deal fail
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:54 AM
Oct 2023

tRump would have more wind against him if Biden had/has peace deal with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are trying to play both ends; giving tRump golf money and working with Biden on peace deal.

The Oval Office buddy-buddy festival with the Russian Ambassador and Foreign Minister in 2017: tRump apparently gave away secrets about Israeli methods and agents.

Putin benefits if tRump benefits. tRump would sabotage Ukraine for Putin's benefit.

McKim

(2,426 posts)
18. No Regional Wider War!
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:46 AM
Oct 2023

This story is so important so that this war does not turn into a wider regional conflict that would have no end. Just simmer down about Iran. Remember: “Make a way where there is no way!” Said MLK!

Torchlight

(6,830 posts)
24. No absolute statements.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 11:54 AM
Oct 2023

From link to text story (which is not a difficult thing to provide) :

The sources stressed that the US intelligence community is not ready to reach a full conclusion about whether Tehran was directly involved in the run-up to the attack. They continue to look for evidence of Iranian involvement, which caught both Israel and the United States by surprise.


Further...

And since the attack, government officials have noted that Iran has provided longstanding and significant support for Hamas, including weapons and financing, that unquestionably contributed to Hamas’s ability to pull off such a massive operation.


https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/11/politics/us-intelligence-iran-hamas-doubt/index.html#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20has%20collected,sources%20familiar%20with%20the%20intelligence.

liberalla

(11,089 posts)
28. Thought the same thing... at least not yet. More conclusive proof
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:04 PM
Oct 2023

and a careful, cautious plan of what to do. No speculation or weak accustions...

rubbersole

(11,223 posts)
26. Malcolm Nance just on the Stephanie Miller Show....
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:01 PM
Oct 2023

...on how Israeli intelligence missed the warning signs. Basically, Hamas didn't communicate electronically. Small groups of Independent terrorists that didn't know other groups. Modern terrorist MO.

Backseat Driver

(4,671 posts)
66. Is Malcom Nance referring to this com-system?
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:47 PM
Oct 2023
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawala

Hawala or hewala (Arabic: حِوالة ḥawāla, meaning transfer or sometimes trust), originating in India as havala (Hindi: हवाला , also known as havaleh in Persian,[1] and xawala or xawilaad[2] in Somali, is a popular and informal value transfer system based on the performance and honour of a huge network of money brokers (known as hawaladars). They operate outside of, or parallel to, traditional banking, financial channels and remittance systems. The system requires a minimum of two hawaladars that take care of the "transaction" without the movement of cash or telegraphic transfer. While hawaladars are spread throughout the world, they are primarily located in the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Hawala follows Islamic traditions but its use is not limited to Muslims.[3] (snip)


Remember the "beekeepers" in-person Islamic in-tel/fund transfer networks that apparently operated freely in America pre-/post- 9/11?

IronLionZion

(51,267 posts)
30. Hamas leaders operate out of several countries: Turkey, Qatar, Syria, Iran
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:10 PM
Oct 2023

Out of those countries, Syria and Iran are Russian allies.

I find it hard to believe Hamas was able to breach Israel's very sophisticated Gaza barriers without help.

 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
40. American war hawks feathers plucked! Those birds can't handle the truth of...no more violence??
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:53 PM
Oct 2023

Maybe social media in wartime is not such a reliable source??

The EU media regulators…gasp!…gets it and they getting after X!

aggiesal

(10,804 posts)
44. I'm sure the GQP will decline this analysis ...
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 12:58 PM
Oct 2023

since it goes against their $6B talking point.

Polybius

(21,900 posts)
48. But they are glad that it happened
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:11 PM
Oct 2023

Not a cause for war, but it just goes to say what scum the Iranian government is.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
51. What does no "Direct" Iranian Involvement mean?
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:22 PM
Oct 2023

Does that mean no Iranian troops are there? What does that word mean?

cab67

(3,749 posts)
57. I suspect...
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:33 PM
Oct 2023

...it means Iran wasn't involved in the actual planning or execution of the Hamas attack. Iran's continued support for Hamas would be seen as indirect involvement.

Just my interpretation of the term.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
64. I think that is the interpretation US policy makers want to have out there.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:39 PM
Oct 2023

I think they think it may not be in the interest of the US to have Iranian involvement known. That's why I don't trust the use of that word. Anyone can project whatever they want with that word.

Which of course is just my interpretation of the word.

stopdiggin

(15,463 posts)
68. and if you read the actual statement
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:58 PM
Oct 2023

it is careful not to say NO involvement - and goes on to clearly say that Iran has been a source of support and backing in the past. So - I think 'directly involved in planning, prepping or participation' in this specific operation is probably the right interpretation.

And yet - still an important point - as we have had quite straightforward assertions directly to the contrary here over the past several days ...

 

Mosby

(19,491 posts)
53. Mohammed Deif
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:24 PM
Oct 2023

Is the Hamas leader who planned out this operation.

Stop with the conspiracy theories.

Hamas gets 100s of millions of dollars from their patrons like Iran, they had plenty of resources to put this together.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
59. The OP is literally reporting what CNN said
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:36 PM
Oct 2023

CNN and US Intel may or may not be wrong, but the OP is not spreading conspiracy theories.

Elessar Zappa

(16,385 posts)
60. Hope that's correct.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:37 PM
Oct 2023

We don’t need a wider war in the Middle East unless the evidence supports it. I’m still doubtful Iran isn’t involved but I for the most part I trust our intelligence services.

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)
67. So who did help them plan and support this attack?
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 01:48 PM
Oct 2023

It seems to be quite a plan and capability for the Palestinians to do it all by themselves.

SYFROYH

(34,214 posts)
72. They've been practicing a long time.
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 03:07 PM
Oct 2023

There might not be a grand organizer outside of Hamas.

DallasNE

(8,008 posts)
70. This Is Nothing More Than A Gut Feeling
Wed Oct 11, 2023, 02:39 PM
Oct 2023

But how did that military hardware get inside Gaza? To me, that points to the Egyptian gateway. So what happened at the checkpoint that allowed this transfer? How did things get so relaxed?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - US intelligenc...