Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

swimboy

(7,331 posts) Tue Oct 24, 2023, 07:40 PM Oct 2023

RE: Race for House Speaker; here's the deal

The Republicans in the House no longer represent one party.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

RE: Race for House Speaker; here's the deal (Original Post) swimboy Oct 2023 OP

I don't even think they represent the same country anymore Walleye Oct 2023 #1

Agree. Help me understand this.. Deuxcents Oct 2023 #2

They represent the Slobfather and no one else. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2023 #3

It's not a race. It's more like Gladiators in the Arena. Wonder Why Oct 2023 #4

Walleye

(44,800 posts)

1. I don't even think they represent the same country anymore

Reply to swimboy (Original post)

Tue Oct 24, 2023, 07:43 PM

Oct 2023

Deuxcents

(26,915 posts)

2. Agree. Help me understand this..

Reply to Walleye (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 24, 2023, 07:56 PM

Oct 2023

There is a trial about to happen in Georgia, concerning the interference with the last presidential election. Three of the 19 co defendants have pled guilty for their roles. It has been determined that the election was fair and Biden is the current president. Why is it that the republicans in the House can’t vote for a Speaker if the candidate voted to certify the election?

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,697 posts)

3. They represent the Slobfather and no one else.

Reply to swimboy (Original post)

Tue Oct 24, 2023, 07:58 PM

Oct 2023

Wonder Why

(7,024 posts)

4. It's not a race. It's more like Gladiators in the Arena.

Reply to swimboy (Original post)

Tue Oct 24, 2023, 09:17 PM

Oct 2023

Reply to this discussion