Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"As long as it's accompanied by significant spending cuts"
Boehner, who presented his framework for a broad tax-and-spending overhaul to be undertaken in 2013, also sounded an optimistic note.
"To show our seriousness, we've put revenue on the table, as long as it's accompanied by significant spending cuts," Boehner said. "It's going to be incumbent on my colleagues to show the American people we're serious."
The first part of such a deal would be legislation this year that would commit Congress to specific revenue increases, favored by Democrats, and spending cuts, as advocated by Republicans. How those increases and cuts would be achieved would be worked out in the second stage next year by the new Congress.
Not addressed was how to resolve the standoff over this year's expiring tax rates. Resolving the tax breaks for wealthier Americans remains, in many ways, the linchpin to a deal.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fiscal-cliff-20121117,0,19628.story
Gee, I wonder which "significant spending cuts" that Boehner has in mind?
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"As long as it's accompanied by significant spending cuts" (Original Post)
YoungDemCA
Nov 2012
OP
It takes a lot of work to kick the can down the road and blame the other guy kicking it with you -nt
LARED
Nov 2012
#2
"compensated way too much for the meager work they're doing." Clearly!
RepublicansRZombies
Nov 2012
#7
Yes and after the spending cuts, the Republicans get back in power and cut taxes.
denverbill
Nov 2012
#6
"bans cutting taxes if doing so would cause a deficit." ...well there goes the Republican platform
RepublicansRZombies
Nov 2012
#9
They want cuts- Let's make a list of acceptable cuts- Oil Subsidies (DUH!)
RepublicansRZombies
Nov 2012
#10
liberalmuse
(18,881 posts)1. I say we cut Congresspersons pay and benefits first off.
They're being compensated way too much for the meager work they're doing.
LARED
(11,735 posts)2. It takes a lot of work to kick the can down the road and blame the other guy kicking it with you -nt
Fridays Child
(23,998 posts)3. Second thing would be to end the war in Afghanistan.
Actually, maybe this should be the first thing we do. Then, by all means, cut their pay. In fact, I wonder what might happen if we had an all-volunteer Congress.
RepublicansRZombies
(982 posts)7. "compensated way too much for the meager work they're doing." Clearly!
+ 1000000
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)4. I'm guessing it's not in the Defense Budget... n/t
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)5. This "compromise" mantra is unconscionable.
The poor and the middle class in this country have been systematically looted for thirty years.
We just won a landslide. We should be talking about justice and reparations.
denverbill
(11,489 posts)6. Yes and after the spending cuts, the Republicans get back in power and cut taxes.
Then, OMG, we've got to fix the deficits again by cutting spending.
There needs to be an amendment to the Constitution that bans cutting taxes if doing so would cause a deficit.
RepublicansRZombies
(982 posts)9. "bans cutting taxes if doing so would cause a deficit." ...well there goes the Republican platform
+10000000000000
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)8. Cuts on the very rich Mr Bones!
RepublicansRZombies
(982 posts)10. They want cuts- Let's make a list of acceptable cuts- Oil Subsidies (DUH!)
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)11. Corporate farms ..........