General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat about this as a solution to the conflict?
Something just occured to me.
💡💡💡💡💡💡
What about looking at the solution that brought peace & an end to the conflict in Northern Ireland as a way to end the conflict between Israel & Hamas?
Granted, that was a little before my time but from what I've read there seems to be pretty close parallels between the 2 conflicts & I've not seen anyone bring that conflict up as a path forward to ending all this.
What if this happened in Gaza? 👇🏽
The Good Friday Agreement aimed to establish a power-sharing government in Northern Ireland, known as the Northern Ireland Assembly, with representation from both unionist and nationalist parties. It also included provisions for cross-border cooperation between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as well as addressing issues like disarmament, justice, policing, and human rights.
Following the agreement, paramilitary groups on both sides, such as the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and loyalist paramilitaries, gradually disarmed and disbanded. The violence and conflict significantly reduced, and the peace process gained momentum with the establishment of a devolved government in Northern Ireland.
Although sporadic incidents occurred in subsequent years, the Good Friday Agreement marked a significant turning point in the Northern Ireland conflict and laid the foundation for a more peaceful and democratic society in the region."
Warpy
(114,507 posts)People are still suffering there, but there wasn't a bloodbath once the British army left.
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)And that certainly sounds like something for me to study.
Thanks Warpy! 🤠
Torchlight
(6,521 posts)and how would it be applied to the middle east?
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Unsure if you saw it as I just did it.
What do you think?
Torchlight
(6,521 posts)Given the consequences of the Sikes-Picot Accords, it seems simply a updated imitation of that.
gab13by13
(31,644 posts)would be if the government was secular, separation of church and state, and that's not going to happen.
Xavier Breath
(6,559 posts)I recently watched on our local PBS affiliate. It's called Once Upon a Time in Northern Ireland, and it is a five episode deep-dive on the conflict as told through archival footage and compelling testimony by participants/survivors on both sides of the conflict.
Seriously, I cannot oversell it.
I was only a few years old when it all started, so I grew up hearing about the violence on the news, but that doc taught me a great deal more about the conflict than I could have imagined.
https://www.pbs.org/show/once-upon-time-northern-ireland/
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Adding it to my watch list 😀
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)In the case of Northern Ireland, you had the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. Neither questioned the sovereignty or existence of the other. The fighting was over Northern Ireland, which was internationally recognized as part of the UK. However, Northern Ireland had a significant population that would prefer to be part of the Republic of Ireland.
Who is supposed to be Northern Ireland in the Israel/Palestine conflict? Certainly not Gaza, which is not a mixed area like Northern Ireland was. The entirety of Israel and Palestine? No way. I can't think of a worse idea than pushing Israelis and Palestinians into a forced marriage. Neither side wants that, unless they see it as a stepping stone towards vanquishing the other completely.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)Youre suggesting that the State of Israel have a power sharing agreement with the Palestinians?
I
Jedi Guy
(3,447 posts)And as long as Palestinians cling to the notion that "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free", a two-state solution is not happening. They want it all, meaning the destruction of Israel.
Until they ratchet down that expectation, a two-state solution is impossible and it'll be unending conflict with occasional lulls.
sarisataka
(22,361 posts)There were three parties the the conflict, Northern Ireland, Ireland and the UK. The IRA wanted NI to be unified with Ireland.
In the current situation there are only two, Israel and Gaza. Hamas does not want Gaza to be unified with any other country. They want the land that is now Israel.
The IRA never claimed England was an illegal country. If the IRA slogan was "From the Channel to the Atlantic Ireland must be free" they would have goals more akin to Hamas
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Israel, Hamas, & the Palestinian Authority.
sarisataka
(22,361 posts)As the Palestinian government because they believe in coexistence with Israel.
And that unaddressed point is still the key difference.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)will be eager to share power with Hamas in governing Israel.
TheRealNorth
(9,647 posts)Hamas is okay to continue killing and Israel doesn't want to allow what would be a Palestinian majority to have a say in the government.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)moonshinegnomie
(3,931 posts)they are no better than isis
until they are gone there can be no solution
