General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"10 POINTS & VIDEO FOR ALL YOU NEWLY MINTED PALESTINE/HAMAS ALLIES"
Link to tweet
The video is graphic. Be warned. 😞
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)The title alone has the smell of bullshit.
calguy
(6,154 posts)The ten points Nance makes are nothing but the truth. Mr. Nance knows far more about the region than any of us keyboard warriors ever will.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)I am very sad for you that you also think this is fine.
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)are suddenly self-professed experts.
Hes noting that people who are advocating for innocent Palestinians, rightly so, often misunderstand Hamas strategy.
AntiFascist
(13,751 posts)every day that civilians, including children, are shown being killed or injured, Israel (and by virtue of its sponsorship, the US) are losing more and more respect in the eyes of the world. Meanwhile, more and more Gazans are probably becoming radicalized, feeding the terroristic goals of Iran.
I'm one who believes that Hamas needs to be eliminated, but it needs to be done with 'intelligence' and that should mean using Israeli intelligence to persuade moderate Palestinians to turn against Hamas. Of course, Netanyahu just wants continual war so that he can remain in power. In essence, Netanyahu and Iran are working toward the same goal.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,512 posts)Seems to me Nuttyahoo (borrowed from someone else) was voted out a while ago. I don't know why he's a thing again.
None of this would be happening if someone(s) weren't making a shit ton of money off it, IMO. Oh, I just thought of something: if millions in support for Palestine is being intercepted by/funneled to Hamas, where is the millions donated to Israel going? If Nuttyahoo is supporting/encouraging Hamas as well?
Sorry if I'm totally off track here. It's all such a clusterfvck to me.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)lapucelle
(21,061 posts)"Hey just spitballing here... Could it be that Netanyahu is supporting or encouraging Hamas? And where are donations to Israel actually going?"
yardwork
(69,364 posts)Malcolm Nance isn't talking to DU. He's talking to everybody in the world. There are plenty of "newly minted" allies of Palestine in the world who don't know what they're talking about. They're woefully ignorant of facts and running around making wild accusations and some of them are committing violent, criminal acts. They're in the news every day.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)upon what they see. The conclusion they draw may be right or wrong, but things like photos of shot-up ambulances, burned out neighborhoods, and bombed refugee camps do have very bad optics regardless of the facts of the individual cases.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)I put all of Malcolm Nances 10 Points into a post for those who dont like clicking on X.
By the way, he is considered an informed and reliable source at DU.
WA-03 Democrat
(3,355 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,765 posts)for hours.
calguy
(6,154 posts)leftstreet
(40,682 posts)This I didn't know
calguy
(6,154 posts)Everyone means well, but many are too naive to see what's actually going on.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Some people seem to think that if you don't back Israel, 100%, unconditionally, regardless of their actions, then you are a Hamas supporter.
I don't back my own government, my own friends or my own family like that. I am not a Hamas supporter, but I don't wear blinders either.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)But I dont think were supposed to call our individual posters, but there is a post that that referred to Hamas as fighting for human rights I believe it was a new member though, so could be a troll.
I do agree that questioning Israels methods (which I 100% support) does not make one a Hamas sympathizer.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,512 posts)and imagining a poorly written sentence means the poster is a troll. SMDH.
The post did NOT say Hamas was fighting for human rights, JFC!
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)clarify?
but they are not fighting for human rights, like Hamas
This was called out by numerous subsequent posters, but I didnt see that it was explained or retracted.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Cha
(319,081 posts)Cha
(319,081 posts)scathing posts to her about it and got crickets.
And, NO I didn't fucking deliberately misinterpret it like the accusation goes.
And, I haven't seen anyone else get a reply addressing it the last I looked.
Patton French
(1,824 posts)And is very clear. The defense of it is almost as absurd.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)and the curious speculation that Netanyahu is supporting and/or encouraging Hamas.
=====================================

=====================================
yagotme
(4,135 posts)#20 stands out, mostly.
ETA: And here, #25
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218425016#post25
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)yagotme
(4,135 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)yagotme
(4,135 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...but as for #25, I have never heard of hamas being a group that's "fighting for human rights" before. Is that somethng that they are claiming? Hard sell, that.
In any case, the automatic assumption in the title of "American/maga Allies" OOPS, I mean, "Palestinian/hamas Allies", has immediately shut down any chance that I would read the thing.
I try to avoid exposing myself to anything that I know is not going to be presenting truth.
Palestinian doesn't equal hamas.
American doesn't equal maga.
Mexican doesn't equal rapist.
Trans doesn't equal groomer.
I could go on but you get the picture.
yagotme
(4,135 posts)That's why I added link #2. Just took me awhile to find it.
The "human rights" was brought up to support the claim that there are Hamas supporters on this board. Some have stated there are none, but with a comment like that, it kinda seems so.
And, I get the picture. You assume some post is going to offend you, so you don't read it. OK.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...and yes, when a writing of any kind starts out with implying rascist conflation, such as the title of the Nance piece, I try to avoid it.
yagotme
(4,135 posts)I always try to bite down when reading a title. Sometimes gems appear downthread.
Response to yagotme (Reply #27)
BootinUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
yagotme
(4,135 posts)Seems poster didn't care if misinterpreted.
calguy
(6,154 posts)I'm not a tit-for-tat kind of guy. I've read dozens of posts, and this is my observation.
Feel free to disagree.... This is DU, where opinions are free to be expressed.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...are you saying that you have seen "too many posts to link" that show hamas has allies here on DU?
calguy
(6,154 posts)I'm saying everyone has their own opinion. Many conversations here about both sides of the issue, and I don't have the motivation to have one with you.
Enjoy your weekend.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)"Hey just spitballing here... Could it be that Netanyahu is supporting or encouraging Hamas? And where is the money to Israel actually going?"
Patton French
(1,824 posts)So theres that.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Cha
(319,081 posts)Oct 7 Attack on Innocent Jewish Babies, Children, Women, aand Men they are HAMAS Apologists.
Response to Cha (Reply #39)
BootinUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(319,081 posts)others who called her out on it, then?
ETA.. Since it was "scrambled" as you say.. it's no one's fault that they misinterpreted it..as someone keeps accusing.
Response to Cha (Reply #92)
BootinUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
wnylib
(26,019 posts)but no knowledge of the 100 year old backdrop affecting I/P today, are inadvertently and naively supporting Hamas with uninformed statements about the current war.
He's right, IMO.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)It is also beyond condescending that you equaye anyone not agreeing with you as "naive."
Hysterical.
calguy
(6,154 posts)Trump University?
Turbineguy
(40,077 posts)useful idiots.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Butterflylady
(4,584 posts)TubbersUK
(1,517 posts)PCIntern
(28,369 posts)I didnt see much weeping for the dead Israelis and others killed on 10/7 from the Palestinian side. I didnt hear any blanket condemnations of these actions by any of the organizations. All I heard was a mealy-mouthed unfortunate circumstances led to this. Nance understand.
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)I think Nance has had his fill. Twitter is a cesspool.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)If that means that both sides revile me, so be it.
It appears Israel is playing into the hands of Hamas, in a way. But they have little choice at the moment.
There is a good discussion on Twitter (Nance's feed) about the ordeal if you're interested.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)You say neither party in this present war is all right or all wrong.
The two parties are Israel and Hamas. While I can agree that Israel is not all right ( in a historical context), I do think Hamas is all wrong. I see nothing right about them.
Do you see anything right about Hamas?
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)question.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)not approve as I despise attacks on civilians; I don't like war among armies, but I hate terrorism. I will never sanciton the murder of innocent people, any time, any where by anyone. That said, and sincerely so, I have some understanding as to why Hamas does it. To answer you question more directly, No, I do not think that Hamas is 100% bad any more than I think that Israel is 100% good. Is that the answer you were looking for?
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)Well just agree to disagree on whether or not Hamas is 100% bad.
But I do appreciate you answering.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Malcolm Nance, generally considered a reliable knowledgeable source by DU.
I copied this from the link in the OP.
10 POINTS & VIDEO FOR ALL YOU NEWLY MINTED PALESTINE/HAMAS ALLIES:
1) Since 2019 Israel & HAMAS had an Egyptian brokered ceasefire w/Israel. From that moment HAMAS worked with Iran & planned & prepared for a full scale invasion of Israel. MISSION: Mass murder any and all the Jews they could find.
2) 06:30 on 10-7 HAMAS prepared and fired 10,000 rockets into Israel and blitzed S. Israel cities with1,500 terrorist attackers.
3) The terrorists hand massacred 1,400 Israelis from 52 countries ONE BY ONE BY ONE. Man, woman and child
4) HAMAS PLANNED TWO YEARS AGO FOR AN AERIAL BLITZ & LAND INVASION. IT WAS NOT JUST EXPECTED, IT WAS NECESSARY FOR THEIR STRATEGY TO GAIN ARAB ALLIES BY BROADCASTING DEAD CIVILIANS.
5) HAMAS built 300 miles (500km) of concrete lined tunnels and NO DEFENSES FOR CIVILIANS. Not one concrete bus shelter for the population. Not. Fucking. One.
6) HAMAS Strategy was to let Civilian concrete buildings to ABSORB Israeli airstrikes. People were to be used as HUMAN SPONGES of Israeli fire, NOT HUMAN SHIELDS. They did not care about the population above ground at all.
7) Your new found outrage over their strategy is now their best weapon. They placed tunnels & bases under apartments, next to hospitals and show every child killed by the war they brought to Gaza. They admit they "need the blood" of civilians to motivate them to fight in the streets.
8) IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY THIS CRISIS IS HAPPENING LOOK AT THE VIDEO BELOW. IT IS THE PRECIPITATING EVENT. THEY WERE KILLED ONE BY ONE.
9) If you say Israel brought the 10-7 slaughter on themselves by their past history, then you just hate jews. Really. Who cares about just ONE set of babies ... admit it.
10) If you're mad at ME for telling you how fucked up YOUR UNINFORMED NEWLY FORGED UNSHAKABLE OPINION IS? You don't really care about any of the victims. This is well over 100 years in the making and you're 3 weeks into it.
Cha
(319,081 posts)be informative on that Hamas apologist thread.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)
forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with them when they love their children more than they hate us.
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 4, 2023, 04:21 PM - Edit history (1)
stated.
that no one is FORCING the Israeli government to kill Palestinian children. It's not always an accident. It's a conscious choice or they would not do it.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)want to read anything Nance writes
calguy
(6,154 posts)I only read the writings of people I admire and trust
Thanks for proving my point
Autumn_Angler
(44 posts)claudette
(5,455 posts)Seems many here who make statement like that about a me just lack the skill of reading comprehension. Bye
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)"Everything we do is justified."
"No civilians were killed"
"We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do this again and again. "
Cha
(319,081 posts)Are those exact quotes? TY
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)From Hamas spokesman Ghazi Hamad. I am not sure if it was him or another who said "No civilians were killed; only on and off-duty military personnel."
Cha
(319,081 posts)On the morning of October 7, 2023, heavily armed men breached the fences separating Israel and Gaza and entered southern Israel. At least 1,400 people were killed, many of them civilians, including children, according to Israeli officials. Human Rights Watch continues to investigate these incidents, as well as others, as war crimes.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/18/israel/palestine-videos-hamas-led-attacks-verified
Link to tweet
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,512 posts)I regret buying a book of his years ago, and was really put off by the typos and poor editing. How hard is it to proofread before printing? Very unprofessional, IMO.
He's too melodramatic and hyperbolic for me.
SHOUTY CAPS LOCK, like Slobby.
claudette
(5,455 posts)America supplied money and weapons to Israel to defeat them. What Hamas did on 10/7 was HORRIFIC and is NOT condoned at all. The collective punishment by the Israel government in Gaza is just as horrific with thousands more innocents dying there.
Who cares what Nance says? I don't think like him.
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Post removed
roamer65
(37,954 posts)mzmolly
(52,793 posts)Nance's. Read the ten points?
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Was Sirhan Sirhan.
He wasn't the last one though.
dalton99a
(94,133 posts)aeromanKC
(3,892 posts)Basic LA
(2,047 posts)...when people of the world align themselves between Pro Occupation and Anti Occupation.
Once before there was a realignment and that was between pro Vietnam war and anti Vietnam war. It was cultural, world-wide, unstoppable. Suddenly the tide turned. I feel that shift now. All we need is the music.
ExciteBike66
(2,700 posts)There will always be crazies who don't know what hamas is. That doesn't man we should be killing thousands of kids in response. But since the casualty numbers come from hamas I'm sure they are completely false and zero kids have been killed by Israel...
I have no idea what the accurate numbers are. Neither do you by the way. But I can tell you this with absolute certainty. I'd trust a crack addicted kleptomaniac with my wallet before I'd believed any statistics coming from Hamas.
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 5, 2023, 11:50 AM - Edit history (1)
take their children and leave given they had forewarning. Some have suggested Hamas will not allow it? Palestinian officials have indicated Hamas kills Palestinian children, blaming Israel for PR purposes. Others have said the refugee camps held mainly Hamas militants, which is why many of the survivors of bombings are fully grown men. Perhaps some of the militants have families who become casualties?
Horrific situation all around - regardless. No child deserves to be victimized by war. But I wouldnt say with certainty that Israel is responsible for all civilian deaths under the circumstances.