General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQ: How do you monetize a civic event like an election?
Answer: Draw it out. Make the campaign last eighteen months to two years and release contentious polls frequently.
IMO the voters of America are being played by the ridiculously lengthy campaigns designed to empty your pockets, exhaust your empathy and pit neighbour against neighbour.
Ask yourselves: Who are the winners in this process? Many other countries have six week campaigns and do just fine.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Campaigns are designed to win elections. That may mean start six months before Election Day, or it may mean lay the groundwork four years before election day by gaining public exposure and collecting chits for helping other candidates and Party Committees.
Case in point: Governor Newsom gave a speech to the Iowa Democratic Party this weekend. Is he "campaigning"? Did someone force him to start five years before the 2028 election? Or did he think it was good political exposure.
FWIW: Legally, the campaign "starts" when filing for the general election begins. But that pesky First Amendment means you can't stop a prospective candidate from doing political things beforehand. I'll also point out that those wonderful countries with six week election campaigns more often than not deny you the voter an option to pick the Party candidates.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)By laughing out loud at your ludicrous comments, but I will suggest that you know no better because you have never resided or voted in another country.
But please, read this article: https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/all-trump-all-the-time-former-president-s-legal-problems-a-bonanza-for-network-20231006-p5ea6n.html
A snip:
Can you expand on your statement about six week campaigns denying me some options?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)canetoad
(20,769 posts)Of extremely long, contentious campaigns by highlighting the drawcard of trumps candidacy.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)He's just the icing on the cake.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)or certainly inauguration.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)It varies, I remember one of less than that but no longer than 2 months. Possibly UK and Canada. Definitely NZ. Are you seeing a pattern here?
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)And opposition doesnt do anything until 2 months before election? And there are no approval polls until 2 months before election? And no one gives a damn . . . . .
Sorry, I dont think so.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)Oops, I got that the wrong way around.
I live here. I have for sixty years. Maybe you are seeing something that I have missed in all that time.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)If No, I am surprised and will consider I have learned something new.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)But not many.
Are you aware that we have compulsory voting in Australia? And that when we compulsarily (is that a word?) vote, we do it by marking our ballots 1 to 5 or six - in your terms, ranked choice voting?
Nearly all Aussies regard voting as a civic duty and turn out to cast their vote on election day, where sausages are sizzled and folk catch up with their neighbours. Penalties for not voting (and I know this was your next question) are small - a few bucks, smack on the wrist. Usually applied to protest non-voters. It's just something that we cheerfully do. It's out duty.
Feel free to PM to share voting differences; I joined DU to understand the US system more closely and I have done that.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Im not being contentious. Its just Im sure your candidates are just like ours, they are running/campaigning long before the date their name is printed on the ballot.
BTW, I prefer Australias position on guns and many other issues. Glad to have your perspective.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)To think that other countries shared the US election craziness?
It may be better to accept that other nations have different systems and function quite happily and peacefully with them.
And no guns.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Just like Theresa Mays Government did in 2017. Just like David Cameron did in 2014. Just like the Conservative manifesto promised in 2010.
Its a metaphor for how our countrys been run for the past thirteen years. The cameras get called, the press releases written.
All smiles for the photos, and then its back to Westminster. Job done. Rinse and repeat.
https://labour.org.uk/updates/press-releases/keir-starmers-speech-to-the-north-east-chamber-of-commerce/
Please describe what does and doesn't constitute a "campaign" (nb: the next UK election isn't until 2025).
canetoad
(20,769 posts)Responding to obscure references. You win. Everyone thinks so.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)It's big.
It's an ally.
It's a good country, worth knowing a little about.
Canada beats "American exceptionalism" in several key areas you could easily find out.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)I appreciate the insight.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)All the same, the Leader of the Opposition is in continual attack mode, some of which is desirable in terms of holding Government accountable, but a lot of it is just twisted and warped innuendo, "Will the Prime Minister tell us when he is going to stop kicking his dog?"
malaise
(296,096 posts)Financed by the billionaires - it is almost a complete farce.
Sadly these high priced campaigns are spreading.