Isaac Chotiner: How to Define Genocide
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-to-define-genocide
No paywall
https://archive.li/85ZMO
Last week, the Times published an opinion piece by the historian Omer Bartov, which raised the question of whether Israels military actions in Gaza constitute a genocide. I believe that there is no proof that genocide is currently taking place in Gaza, although it is very likely that war crimes, and even crimes against humanity, are happening, Bartov wrote. That means two important things: First, we need to define what it is that we are seeing, and second, we have the chance to stop the situation before it gets worse. (More than eleven thousand Palestinians have been killed, according to Gazas Ministry of Health. A State Department official testified before Congress that it is very possible that the figure is even higher than reported.)
Bartov, who was born in Israel and currently teaches at Brown University, is one of the foremost scholars of the Holocaust, as well as German policy during the Third Reich. In numerous books and essays, he has sought to explain how Nazi ideology manifested throughout Hitlers regimeand especially in its military. Bartov ended this latest piece by writing, There is still time to stop Israel from letting its actions become a genocide. We cannot wait a moment longer. I recently spoke by phone with Bartov. During our conversation, which has been edited for length and clarity, we discussed how precisely to define genocide, the importance of establishing intent when labelling something a genocide, and why a focus on terminology can be important in preventing mass atrocities.
What distinguishes genocide from crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing?
There are clear differences in international law. War crimes were defined in 1949 in the Geneva Conventions and other protocols. They are serious violations of the laws and customs of war and international armed conflict, and they can be committed against either combatants or civilians. One aspect of this is the use of disproportionate forcethat the extent of the harm done to civilians should be proportionate to your military goals. It could also be other things, such as the maltreatment of prisoners of war.
Crimes against humanity do not have a U.N. resolution, but they were defined by the Rome Statute, which is now the basis for the International Criminal Court. That talks about extermination or other crimes against civilian populations, and it does not have to happen in war, whereas war crimes obviously have to happen in the context of war.
*snip*