Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"anonymous" firewall the new birth certificate? (Original Post) arely staircase Nov 2012 OP
Actually there is more CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence of this nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #1
there is no evidence whatsoever of either arely staircase Nov 2012 #3
Ok nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #14
I agree also Coyotl Nov 2012 #15
I LOVE that picture, so cute and sweet of Obama to pose that way. nt Raine Nov 2012 #19
Disagree. The origin of the original BC issue was that it was photoshopped by someone aletier_v Nov 2012 #4
We can disagree nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #13
I like the idea that this is possible. BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #28
Are BeBeVers the new Birthers? RomneyLies Nov 2012 #2
What are BeBeVers? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #30
It's certainly possible that the voting system was hacked. aletier_v Nov 2012 #5
i don't doubt rove's willingness to steel an election arely staircase Nov 2012 #7
I think the anonymous post is aletier_v Nov 2012 #10
Well, I'm being censored and shit on now for telling the truth aletier_v Nov 2012 #12
No one censored you, you put up your opinion but people have the right Raine Nov 2012 #21
It's certainly possible Barack Obama's birth certificate was forged. RomneyLies Nov 2012 #24
Connecticut? hedgehog Nov 2012 #26
What is that supposed to mean? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #31
Sounds like a good little Republican argument. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #6
i have simply asked a question arely staircase Nov 2012 #8
Oh, you read my answer, and quite well, I presume. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #9
i read your poorly thought out comment arely staircase Nov 2012 #11
First of all, try some correct grammar in the OP. Secondly, apples and oranges? WinkyDink Nov 2012 #37
It's just one of those things we'd like to be true. Warpy Nov 2012 #16
How about: The President never claimed to be born in Kenya. GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #17
+1 nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #18
Sounds so nifty. You're so cool. Laugh away electronic vote manipulation. It's silly. Overseas Nov 2012 #20
I believe in electronic vote manipulation Mr. Mojo Risen Nov 2012 #22
But you know the difference between a proven falsehood and a possible one. Overseas Nov 2012 #23
I am not laughing at vote manipulation arely staircase Nov 2012 #35
Election integrity is a serious issue. pa28 Nov 2012 #25
Here's what I'm looking at - hedgehog Nov 2012 #27
and that is evidence that anonymous prevented an election theft? arely staircase Nov 2012 #32
Rove loves the birthers RobertEarl Nov 2012 #29
how do you get from rove's meltdown to anonymous saved the day? arely staircase Nov 2012 #33
Anyone with moderate knowledge about IT knows the story is full of holes and is 100% bullshit. nt Comrade_McKenzie Nov 2012 #34
K&R&LOL n/t Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #36
Why are you trying to compare a scurrilous and baseless ATTACK on the DEMOCRATIC President with WinkyDink Nov 2012 #38
because believing baseless claims by anyone is foolish arely staircase Nov 2012 #39
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
1. Actually there is more CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence of this
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:31 PM
Nov 2012

than the birth certificate. It helps if you know the culture and a tad about computers.

Alas circumstantial it will remain unless a level of forensics rarely done on computer systems (it is the cost stupid) is done

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021845743

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
4. Disagree. The origin of the original BC issue was that it was photoshopped by someone
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:35 PM
Nov 2012

I'm very suspicious of the OH vote in 2008
and the subsequent death of the GOP IT Guy
but I've seen nothing to support this latest Anonymous Hacked theory.

The technical explanation is Wizard of Oz mumbo jumbo at its finest.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
28. I like the idea that this is possible.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 01:11 AM
Nov 2012

It would be nice if Anonymous would have a deeper and closer look at Wisconsin where something fishy appears to be going on. Too many Republicans are stealing elections left and right using voter suppression. Texas would be another great state to watch, too. Oh, and Aryanzona.

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
5. It's certainly possible that the voting system was hacked.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:39 PM
Nov 2012

Having hacked a couple of systems myself,
I know it can be very easy under the right circumstances.

But I also know that half of being a magician
is convincing the audience that you are a magician.

I have no doubt Rove revels in his reputation as an Evil Genius,
because half the trick of being an evil genius is making people believe it,
and react to it.

But as near as I've seen so far,
the entire hacking theory is based on Rove's reaction.

Be honest here.
Romney's camp was deluded into believing they were winning.
Rove's reaction could just as easily be attribute to that.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
7. i don't doubt rove's willingness to steel an election
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:43 PM
Nov 2012

i am specifically talking about the anonymous saved the day business.

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
10. I think the anonymous post is
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:46 PM
Nov 2012

a) a practical joke

b) an attempt to elevate the reputation of anonymous by capitalizing on a coincidence.


I did the same thing for a few years.
Once you have a reputation as a magician,
it becomes almost self-fulfilling. The audience
almost fills in the blanks for you.

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
12. Well, I'm being censored and shit on now for telling the truth
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 08:50 PM
Nov 2012

I should have expected as much on this board.

Have a good night.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
21. No one censored you, you put up your opinion but people have the right
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 09:40 PM
Nov 2012

to agree or disagree ... that's freedom of speech not censorship.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
31. What is that supposed to mean?
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 01:25 AM
Nov 2012

You think Obama forged his birth certificate?

You've gone over the edge.

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
16. It's just one of those things we'd like to be true.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 09:06 PM
Nov 2012

There is no proof Rove was hacking Ohio beyond his meltdown when it was called for Obama. There is also no proof that Anonymous had anything to do with the fact that such hacking didn't work.

It's just one of those stories that people will enjoy telling for many, many years, so get used to it.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
20. Sounds so nifty. You're so cool. Laugh away electronic vote manipulation. It's silly.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 09:38 PM
Nov 2012

Nothing to see here. Those folks are all kooks.

You are the smart ones. You know they are fools. Don't you feel smart and strong?



Overseas

(12,121 posts)
23. But you know the difference between a proven falsehood and a possible one.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 12:41 AM
Nov 2012

You're not jumping in to crush all discussion by equating a proven falsehood with a potential one.

We don't know if the Anonymous things were hoaxes issued by the same people that may or may not have interfered with electronic vote manipulation,

or hoaxes issued by those with or without a relationship to Anonymous, just to intimidate potential vote manipulation efforts, or to draw attention to the possibility of it being tried.

Those still attempting to craft better means of electronic vote manipulation would very much like us to relegate all such discussion to the taboo Conspiracy Theory department. To make all who talk about it into CT nuts. Issuing bold claims of victory on behalf of Anonymous could be one way of making all such talk appear more ridiculous.

We may never know.

But we do know our president was born in Hawaii. We knew that before he won the primary. Before he was elected to the Senate already.









arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
35. I am not laughing at vote manipulation
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:28 AM
Nov 2012

I am laughing at the claim (presented with zero proof) that anonymous prevented it on a large scale.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
27. Here's what I'm looking at -
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 01:07 AM
Nov 2012

- it has become accepted in many quarters that Gore won in 2000, but that the Supreme Court interfered with the vote count and declared Bush President in a judicial coup d'etat.

- the Ohio Secretary of State openly tampered with the vote in 2004 by manipulating the placement of polling booths to depress the vote in Democratic districts.

- Gerrymandering, albeit a hallowed American tradition used by both parties, has been raised to an art form by the Republican Party to ensure a Republican House.

- Open attempts to suppress the Democratic vote were made in several states.

- People backing Romney had so much money to spend that in the final days there was literally no more commercial time left to purchase in many markets.

Somehow, the theory that Karl Rove engineered or knew of a plot to give Ohio to Romney does not seem far fetched to me!

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
32. and that is evidence that anonymous prevented an election theft?
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:23 AM
Nov 2012

really? that is what I am asking about.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
29. Rove loves the birthers
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 01:11 AM
Nov 2012

And explain Rove denying the fact that Ohio's votes were going to Obama. It was on camera. What is your explanation for that?

Frankly, you trying to equate a total proven falsehood - "Birthers" with a known problem of computer code vote counting is the worst kind of political persuasion. It's bald faced trash talking. And is not much more than an attempt at flaming.

Explain Rove denying, on national TV, the Ohio vote outcome.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
33. how do you get from rove's meltdown to anonymous saved the day?
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:25 AM
Nov 2012

you are confusing

a. Rove tried (or would try) to steel an election

with

b. Anonymous stopped Rove from steeling an election.

my post is about the latter

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
38. Why are you trying to compare a scurrilous and baseless ATTACK on the DEMOCRATIC President with
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:41 AM
Nov 2012

a claim by Anonymous---WHO, IF LEGITIMATE, WAS ANTI-ROVE AND ANTI-ROMNEY---that would explain what people witnessed: Rove's panic and incredulity at the Ohio results?

There has been anecdotal evidence FOR YEARS of Republican-owned voting machines (Diebold, e.g.) "flipping votes." INDEED, we have video evidence from this past election.

"Anonymous" exists.

Vote-tampering has happened.

NONE OF THIS COMPARES TO THE "OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE" REPUBLICAN INSANITY.





arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
39. because believing baseless claims by anyone is foolish
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:48 AM
Nov 2012

one should be a little more discriminating before jumping on bandwagons - be they racist birtherism or comic bookish worship of anonymous people on the internet who claim to have performed daring deeds that saved democarcy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"anonymous" fir...