General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"anonymous" firewall the new birth certificate?
what more evidence is there that anonymous people stopped karl rove from rigging the election than there is that the president was born in kenya?
seriously
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)than the birth certificate. It helps if you know the culture and a tad about computers.
Alas circumstantial it will remain unless a level of forensics rarely done on computer systems (it is the cost stupid) is done
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021845743
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)circumstantial or otherwise.
both are baseless claims.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)aletier_v
(1,773 posts)I'm very suspicious of the OH vote in 2008
and the subsequent death of the GOP IT Guy
but I've seen nothing to support this latest Anonymous Hacked theory.
The technical explanation is Wizard of Oz mumbo jumbo at its finest.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I am not saying it happened, just that it is possible.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)It would be nice if Anonymous would have a deeper and closer look at Wisconsin where something fishy appears to be going on. Too many Republicans are stealing elections left and right using voter suppression. Texas would be another great state to watch, too. Oh, and Aryanzona.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)I think so.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)aletier_v
(1,773 posts)Having hacked a couple of systems myself,
I know it can be very easy under the right circumstances.
But I also know that half of being a magician
is convincing the audience that you are a magician.
I have no doubt Rove revels in his reputation as an Evil Genius,
because half the trick of being an evil genius is making people believe it,
and react to it.
But as near as I've seen so far,
the entire hacking theory is based on Rove's reaction.
Be honest here.
Romney's camp was deluded into believing they were winning.
Rove's reaction could just as easily be attribute to that.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)i am specifically talking about the anonymous saved the day business.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)a) a practical joke
b) an attempt to elevate the reputation of anonymous by capitalizing on a coincidence.
I did the same thing for a few years.
Once you have a reputation as a magician,
it becomes almost self-fulfilling. The audience
almost fills in the blanks for you.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)I should have expected as much on this board.
Have a good night.
Raine
(30,540 posts)to agree or disagree ... that's freedom of speech not censorship.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Please, stop the CT crap.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You think Obama forged his birth certificate?
You've gone over the edge.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)have an answer?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)but have seen no answer to my question.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Warpy
(111,222 posts)There is no proof Rove was hacking Ohio beyond his meltdown when it was called for Obama. There is also no proof that Anonymous had anything to do with the fact that such hacking didn't work.
It's just one of those stories that people will enjoy telling for many, many years, so get used to it.
GeorgeGist
(25,315 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)Nothing to see here. Those folks are all kooks.
You are the smart ones. You know they are fools. Don't you feel smart and strong?
Mr. Mojo Risen
(104 posts)I also believe that letter from anonymous is likely a fraud.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)You're not jumping in to crush all discussion by equating a proven falsehood with a potential one.
We don't know if the Anonymous things were hoaxes issued by the same people that may or may not have interfered with electronic vote manipulation,
or hoaxes issued by those with or without a relationship to Anonymous, just to intimidate potential vote manipulation efforts, or to draw attention to the possibility of it being tried.
Those still attempting to craft better means of electronic vote manipulation would very much like us to relegate all such discussion to the taboo Conspiracy Theory department. To make all who talk about it into CT nuts. Issuing bold claims of victory on behalf of Anonymous could be one way of making all such talk appear more ridiculous.
We may never know.
But we do know our president was born in Hawaii. We knew that before he won the primary. Before he was elected to the Senate already.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)I am laughing at the claim (presented with zero proof) that anonymous prevented it on a large scale.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Unless anonymous has evidence they are cheapening the issue.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)- it has become accepted in many quarters that Gore won in 2000, but that the Supreme Court interfered with the vote count and declared Bush President in a judicial coup d'etat.
- the Ohio Secretary of State openly tampered with the vote in 2004 by manipulating the placement of polling booths to depress the vote in Democratic districts.
- Gerrymandering, albeit a hallowed American tradition used by both parties, has been raised to an art form by the Republican Party to ensure a Republican House.
- Open attempts to suppress the Democratic vote were made in several states.
- People backing Romney had so much money to spend that in the final days there was literally no more commercial time left to purchase in many markets.
Somehow, the theory that Karl Rove engineered or knew of a plot to give Ohio to Romney does not seem far fetched to me!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)really? that is what I am asking about.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And explain Rove denying the fact that Ohio's votes were going to Obama. It was on camera. What is your explanation for that?
Frankly, you trying to equate a total proven falsehood - "Birthers" with a known problem of computer code vote counting is the worst kind of political persuasion. It's bald faced trash talking. And is not much more than an attempt at flaming.
Explain Rove denying, on national TV, the Ohio vote outcome.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)you are confusing
a. Rove tried (or would try) to steel an election
with
b. Anonymous stopped Rove from steeling an election.
my post is about the latter
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)a claim by Anonymous---WHO, IF LEGITIMATE, WAS ANTI-ROVE AND ANTI-ROMNEY---that would explain what people witnessed: Rove's panic and incredulity at the Ohio results?
There has been anecdotal evidence FOR YEARS of Republican-owned voting machines (Diebold, e.g.) "flipping votes." INDEED, we have video evidence from this past election.
"Anonymous" exists.
Vote-tampering has happened.
NONE OF THIS COMPARES TO THE "OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE" REPUBLICAN INSANITY.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)one should be a little more discriminating before jumping on bandwagons - be they racist birtherism or comic bookish worship of anonymous people on the internet who claim to have performed daring deeds that saved democarcy.