Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why 'Supreme Court Ethics' Is an Oxymoron - Jim Hightower
Let me be blunt: The problem with today's Supreme Court is that it consists of too many 5-watt bulbs sitting in 100-watt sockets.
While most of the nine members are assumed to be brilliant, "smart" is as smart does, and this court's right-wing majority wallows in stupid, consistently pushing plutocracy, autocracy and theocracy over the democratic will of the people. Compounding this stupidity, many of the judges have flagrantly accepted "gifts" of cash, luxury vacations and other freebies from the corporate and right-wing interests that have benefited from the court's rulings. Yet, caught red-handed, the narcissistic jurists assert that We the People should just trust their integrity.
These nine legal power brokers, who pose as America's arbiters of justice, have even exempted themselves from having an ethics code, allowing each one to make up their own, unwritten ethical rules. Thus, corruption flourishes; so, the public, Congress and the media have finally demanded that, at the very least, the eminences be subjected to basic ethics. "OK, OK," the nine finally grumped. "We'll sign onto a code."
BUT... their acquiescence included a killer gotcha: They would write their own rules of behavior! Sure enough, their 14-page code is a toothless watchdog with no bark, much less bite. It starts by snarling that the great unwashed simply fail to understand that the entire court is, as the chief justice had earlier proclaimed, made up of "jurists of exceptional integrity." So, the new "code" promises boilerplate ethical behavior, but provides no enforcement mechanism beyond claiming the judges will police each other.
WHEN AND WHERE WAS THE FIRST THANKSGIVING FEAST?
Let's talk Turkey!
No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I'm talking about the real thing, the big gobbler — 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving.
It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors "fowled up" the bird's origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock — Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey — Wrong! And they thought Turkey was located in Africa — well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused.
While most of the nine members are assumed to be brilliant, "smart" is as smart does, and this court's right-wing majority wallows in stupid, consistently pushing plutocracy, autocracy and theocracy over the democratic will of the people. Compounding this stupidity, many of the judges have flagrantly accepted "gifts" of cash, luxury vacations and other freebies from the corporate and right-wing interests that have benefited from the court's rulings. Yet, caught red-handed, the narcissistic jurists assert that We the People should just trust their integrity.
These nine legal power brokers, who pose as America's arbiters of justice, have even exempted themselves from having an ethics code, allowing each one to make up their own, unwritten ethical rules. Thus, corruption flourishes; so, the public, Congress and the media have finally demanded that, at the very least, the eminences be subjected to basic ethics. "OK, OK," the nine finally grumped. "We'll sign onto a code."
BUT... their acquiescence included a killer gotcha: They would write their own rules of behavior! Sure enough, their 14-page code is a toothless watchdog with no bark, much less bite. It starts by snarling that the great unwashed simply fail to understand that the entire court is, as the chief justice had earlier proclaimed, made up of "jurists of exceptional integrity." So, the new "code" promises boilerplate ethical behavior, but provides no enforcement mechanism beyond claiming the judges will police each other.
WHEN AND WHERE WAS THE FIRST THANKSGIVING FEAST?
Let's talk Turkey!
No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I'm talking about the real thing, the big gobbler — 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving.
It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors "fowled up" the bird's origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock — Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey — Wrong! And they thought Turkey was located in Africa — well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused.
Read More
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.