General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsK&R if you support President Obama's position on Hamas and Israel.
"There's not a country on earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders," Mr. Obama said. "We are fully supportive of Israel's right to defend itself from missiles landing on peoples' homes."http://m.cbsnews.com/fullstory.rbml?catid=57551659&feed_id=30&videofeed=null
I'm with you, Mr. President.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)Count me in.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)support the notion that a nation is somehow entitled to keep an entire population locked up in what is in fact an open air prison in perpetuity.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
unreadierLizard
(475 posts)Well said.
Tired of seeing people cheering for Hamas firing rockets into Israel as well as using Gaza strip civilians as human shields.
MineralMan
(151,148 posts)out of Middle East issues, except as an advocate for peaceful solutions. Our history in that region when we have attempted to do more is not remarkable for its successes.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,832 posts)Quezacoatl
(113 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)teddy51
(3,491 posts)videos of what many in the rest of the world think about what is going on.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113422298
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)The U.S. should be using the threat of withholding aid (military and otherwise) to Israel to get them to a) stop and b) sit down at the negotiating table..
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)...as they've shown through peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, and a sincere attempt to conclude agreements with the Palestinian Authority. The truth is that Hamas has no intention of ever having peaceful co-existence with Israel.
RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)I know Bibi is a jerk, but he did not start this - Hamas did.
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)He was going to cakewalk in the January elections no matter what as there is no credible opposition in Israeli politics at the moment. He's firmly in the center-right and there is no center-left, only a divided, and weak left and a strengthening far-right. So long as Ehud Barak remains allied with Netanyahu...Netanyahu will be in power if he wants it. Scroll down a little bit and look at current polling for Prime Minister - Netanyahu does not have a credible challenger. He has nothing to gain and everything to lose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Israeli_legislative_election#Opinion_polling
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Israel is only acting like the bully because the US always has its back...if we tell them they're on their own I think their behavior will change radically and instantly..
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)The 1948 and 1967 wars were all fought by Israel without substantial US backing. You'd do well to understand the Cold War history of the Middle East in this regard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_%E2%80%93_United_States_military_relations#Overview
Israel frankly could still fight two-wars at the same time without US backing. US Military Aid to Israel is about $3 billion annually: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_%E2%80%93_United_States_military_relations#Military_aid - the IDF annual budget is about $15 billion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Defense_Forces#Budget - Israel makes substantial investment in its Defense Sector much like the United States. Israel is not a poor country, so long as they are able to buy weapons on the international marketplace they will be able to afford weapons. Israeli military policy is designed to be self-sufficient irregardless of US assistance! So it's really a flawed thesis to assert that if the US withdrew it's support that "their behavior will change radically and instantly." Israel will not under any circumstances bow to a terror group/state like Hamas.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...and what about the Nukes they have? Did those just evolve out of thin air, or did some friendly country "make them available"...
Bottom line Israel is a loud-mouthed bully that would change its tune in an instant if it's Sugar Daddy said they were going to sit this one out...
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I'm with the President on this one.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Its a standard line from presidents. Meanwhile, I bet he is in reality not pleased with the right wing Nutenyahu and this overkill business. 100 dead so far, many innocent civilians.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)It's not like he has to worry about his re-election. He is free to say and do what he genuinely feels is the right thing.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Taking sides in a civil war is never good policy. See Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan for recent examples.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)About blowing Gaza back to the Middle Ages as a well.
Sorry, I'm not with the President on this one. Frankly I think he needs to use his position as POTUS to rein in Israel, but that's not going to happen.
Mr Dixon
(1,185 posts)[IMG]
[/IMG]
I have a feeling that if Israel was located near Canada or Iceland this would not be an issue. The Holy land aside, I think Israel is a proxy for the elites to maintain a close eye on the rich resources of the Middle East. There has to be a monetary reason, War is always about money and resources. After a quick review of the attached image, things seem very clear, what say you?
closeupready
(29,503 posts)We support Israel for lots of reasons, securing our oil supply being a big one.
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)BUT
I am pretty sure he is also thinking:
"There's not a country on earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders," Mr. Obama said. "We are fully supportive of the Palestinians right to defend itself from missiles landing on peoples' homes."
but for obvious, huge, mammoth reasons he can't say that out loud.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,832 posts)Their missile defense is only intercepting 30% of the incoming missiles. What I don't understand is how the 70% of the rockets fired by Hamas manage not to hit anything with a few exceptions.
RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)Since this "conflict" began.
I have relatives in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem fearing for their lives right now. Even with the defense shield.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,832 posts)It's a miracle a rocket doesn't hit something and cause real damage or damage beyond what we have seen.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)The Israeli military technology advantage situationally is that they can ID and return fire on any launch site very quickly and able to ID many launchers before they can successfully launch...so for Hamas it's very much a matter of pop-up, target as fast as possible (accuracy be damned), fire and immediately run like hell because return fire may be coming.
Factor in that Hamas forces are guerrillas, many of them fervent new converts, rather than a trained military and you get the other half of the equation.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It is merely the continuation of the long-standing imbalanced policy of blind support for Israel.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I always took my unrecs like a man. I never cried and whined over them.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)There are other ways that Israel could deal with this instead of employing wholesale slaughter of civilians.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Upton
(9,709 posts)Obama should be cutting off Israel's $3 billion a year welfare check instead..
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Response to Waiting For Everyman (Reply #41)
Post removed
kickysnana
(3,908 posts)They and we should know better than to allow this abomination.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,644 posts)100%