Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,344 posts)
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 08:03 PM Dec 2023

In case the US Court of Appeals or SCOTUS need material support for unprecedented jurisprudence...

Jack Smith files a Notice (redacted evidence, pp. 4,5,6) -- his blueprint for the government's prosecution.

NOTICE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) by USA as to DONALD J. TRUMP. (zhsj) (Entered: 12/05/2023)
Date Filed: December 5th, 2023, 12:54 p.m. EST


https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/176/united-states-v-trump/









8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In case the US Court of Appeals or SCOTUS need material support for unprecedented jurisprudence... (Original Post) ancianita Dec 2023 OP
Trump has to be wondering.... OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2023 #1
Right? Wondering is the exact right word. Since ancianita Dec 2023 #2
TFP.....that's a target rich field of rats. OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2023 #3
Lest we forget, right? ancianita Dec 2023 #4
Future Hi-Stake Criminals take note. OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2023 #5
lol yeah they should. ancianita Dec 2023 #6
Thanks for posting courtlistener doc duckworth969 Dec 2023 #7
My pleasure. ancianita Dec 2023 #8

ancianita

(43,344 posts)
2. Right? Wondering is the exact right word. Since
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 08:31 PM
Dec 2023

it couldn't be that his doing what he's always gotten away with gets stopped by rule of law and evidence.

Remember this boatload of "rats" from EarlG?





OAITW r.2.0

(32,563 posts)
3. TFP.....that's a target rich field of rats.
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 08:37 PM
Dec 2023

But maybe Smith has a couple of other rats that have even more evidence of crimes committed by Trump/

ancianita

(43,344 posts)
4. Lest we forget, right?
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 08:45 PM
Dec 2023

Last edited Tue Dec 5, 2023, 11:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Remember that pp. 4,5, and 6 have names redacted.
Not to mention all those that Jack Smith puts on the witness stand next March.

Jack Smith has evidence of how Trump condemns the DOJ, judiciary and the current president since the DC indictment because he chooses to believe that his campaign make him immune to rule of law.



OAITW r.2.0

(32,563 posts)
5. Future Hi-Stake Criminals take note.
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 08:55 PM
Dec 2023

You can avoid Justice by running for President, renewable every 4 years. It's called the Trump Gambit.

ancianita

(43,344 posts)
6. lol yeah they should.
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 09:04 PM
Dec 2023

After this chess v checkers game, the court and due process precedents will be there. After this round, the aiders/abetters/accessories after the fact are going down. In the House they're getting more hysterical by the day.

duckworth969

(1,407 posts)
7. Thanks for posting courtlistener doc
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 10:59 PM
Dec 2023

It’s a good read. That section on the manufactured riot in Detroit was new information for me.

ancianita

(43,344 posts)
8. My pleasure.
Tue Dec 5, 2023, 11:08 PM
Dec 2023


You're not alone; that Detroit event is an evidentiary revelation to everyone. It's just a taste of the huge iceberg that lies below the surface of what we know will be coming during the March 2024 trial. I do wish it were televised so that all Americans can see and hear the prosecution. Jack Smith's case will be gloriously historic. I'll consider it my late Christmas present.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In case the US Court of A...