General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA survey of 250 students in the US who sympathise with the phrase "From the river to the sea" showed that:
- 53% don't know which river and sea
- 25% never heard of the Oslo Accords
- 10% thought Yasser Arafat was the first prime minister of Israel
- After learning a few basic facts about the Middle East, 68% changed their view, and rejected the popular phrase.
The more you know...
Link to tweet
lapfog_1
(31,935 posts)sigh
LeftInTX
(34,557 posts)In light of widespread anti-Israel protests across college campuses, students could not name which river and which sea the rallying cry is about.
By JERUSALEM POST STAFF
In a recent survey of 250 college students across the US, some 86% supported the Palestinian chant From the river to the sea, but only slightly more than half of them (47%) were able to name the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea as the boundaries that the slogan is talking about.
Some of the alternative answers were the Nile and the Euphrates rivers, the Dead Seaand even the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. Less than a quarter of these students knew who Yasser Arafat was or what the Oslo Accords were.
After learning a handful of basic facts about the Middle East, two-thirds of the surveyed students went from supporting "from the river to the sea" to rejecting it.
When 80 of the students were shown on regional map that a new Palestinian state would stretch from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sealeaving no room for Israelthree-fourths if them changed their support to "probably not."
hlthe2b
(114,201 posts)CincyDem
(7,402 posts)Should be an entrance exam at the protest
point to Gaza on a world map. 70% will probably plop it in the Caribbean.
NCIndie
(556 posts)FBaggins
(28,706 posts)but yes. Useful idiots usually are
usonian
(25,908 posts)Israel free from Netanyahu, and
Palestine free from Hamas.
Aint going to happen soon, and neither is any kind of peace.
Aussie105
(8,039 posts)Bibi types and his hard faced generals on the Israeli side, Hamas freedom fighters on the Palestinian side.
Hard to think of peace if both sides feel they are fighting for their very survival.
(They need not be.)
As for the IYoA (Ignorant youth of America) - you don't need facts or a study of history of the region to take sides.
In fact being ignorant of facts and history helps with that.
Take sides, have a street march, throw insults and punches at the other side. I'm sure it will help.
usonian
(25,908 posts)I liked any rebel cause. Of course, that was easy with the likes of Kissinger supporting brutally repressive regimes all over the world.
Now I know that nobody is free of the powerful and those who want to be powerful, the people be damned.
Even here in the U.S., people stealing from charities. Effin awful.
https://archive.is/ZPTPi
These posts never mention the second part of the chant, namely Palestine will be free. You cant blame them for that.
NotVeryImportant
(578 posts)question everything
(52,223 posts)Some of the alternative answers were the Nile and the Euphrates, the Caribbean, the Dead Sea (which is a lake) and the Atlantic.
also
Would learning basic political facts about the conflict moderate students opinions? A Latino engineering student from a southern university reported definitely supporting from the river to the sea because Palestinians and Israelis should live in two separate countries, side by side. Shown on a map of the region that a Palestinian state would stretch from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, leaving no room for Israel, he downgraded his enthusiasm for the mantra to probably not. Of the 80 students who saw the map, 75% similarly changed their view.
Cheezoholic
(3,790 posts)Is there a lemon education law? Wow, just wow.
progree
(13,037 posts)I expected one couldn't post or reply without being a member, but now the site is minimally viewable. GRRRRRR.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)I can't read it, but there it is.
progree
(13,037 posts)nothing about having to be a WSJ subscriber. And no indication that Dani Buller has any ties to WSJ. Nothing at all in the tweet about WSJ. Its all about creating an account at X.
So my opinion of X is that its still pretty much unusable unless one joins, and I don't think I'll ever be that desperate.
progree
(13,037 posts)so I can peek (and post and respond etc. Uggh, what a moral dilemma)
progree
(13,037 posts)Example:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GAvrLr0XwAAo7MC?format=jpg&name=small
Above as an embedded image:

LeftInTX
(34,557 posts)LeftInTX
(34,557 posts)In light of widespread anti-Israel protests across college campuses, students could not name which river and which sea the rallying cry is about.
By JERUSALEM POST STAFF
In a recent survey of 250 college students across the US, some 86% supported the Palestinian chant From the river to the sea, but only slightly more than half of them (47%) were able to name the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea as the boundaries that the slogan is talking about.
Some of the alternative answers were the Nile and the Euphrates rivers, the Dead Seaand even the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. Less than a quarter of these students knew who Yasser Arafat was or what the Oslo Accords were.
After learning a handful of basic facts about the Middle East, two-thirds of the surveyed students went from supporting "from the river to the sea" to rejecting it.
When 80 of the students were shown on regional map that a new Palestinian state would stretch from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sealeaving no room for Israelthree-fourths if them changed their support to "probably not."
LexVegas
(6,960 posts)Cha
(319,609 posts)The following day, he added, in another interview with the IRGC-affiliated Fars News: We will witness the liberation of the dear homeland of the Palestinian people from the river to the sea, as well as the destruction of the Zionist regime.
Though the tens of thousands of anti-Israel protesters worldwide chanting from the river to the sea fully understand its true meaning, many insist that this phrase is merely an expression of support for the Palestinians and want the world to believe that it is not a call for the destruction of Israel and for killing Jews.
https://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/jns/ask-hamas-from-the-river-to-the-sea-is-a-call-for-the-destruction-of/article_1a500541-b79e-5ea7-bc75-80984cd19cd2.html
a supporter of Zionism; a person who believes in the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel:
LeftInTX
(34,557 posts)In all, after learning a handful of basic facts about the Middle East, 67.8% of students went from supporting from the river to sea to rejecting the mantra. These students had never seen a map of the Mideast and knew little about the regions geography, history or demography. Those who hope to encourage extremism depend on the political ignorance of their audiences. It is time for good teachers to join the fray and combat bias with education.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/from-which-river-to-which-sea-anti-israel-protests-college-student-ignorance-a682463b?reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink