Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
While the vote to keep slob off the ballot was 4/3 the vote on the question of insurrection by the slob was unanimous. (Original Post) mobeau69 Dec 2023 OP
LOL ... "insurrection by the slob" ... definitely the truth as America saw it bucolic_frolic Dec 2023 #1
If true, that Colorado SCOTUS deemed 1/6/21 an Insurrection, I would hope that the US SCOTUS OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2023 #2
Not according to the dissents dpibel Dec 2023 #3
Was stated by a guest on "All In" tonight. mobeau69 Dec 2023 #4

bucolic_frolic

(55,129 posts)
1. LOL ... "insurrection by the slob" ... definitely the truth as America saw it
Tue Dec 19, 2023, 09:35 PM
Dec 2023

I missed that tidbit, thanks, it should be promulgated promptly and precipitously.

OAITW r.2.0

(32,133 posts)
2. If true, that Colorado SCOTUS deemed 1/6/21 an Insurrection, I would hope that the US SCOTUS
Tue Dec 19, 2023, 09:40 PM
Dec 2023

would affirm this point....it's an important American History moment. Will they decline to hear or hear and hide behind procedural issues?

dpibel

(3,941 posts)
3. Not according to the dissents
Tue Dec 19, 2023, 10:09 PM
Dec 2023

All three of the dissenters argued at length that some sort of adjudication of much higher degree than the lower court hearing was necessary to determine the issue of whether Trump was an insurrectionist.

mobeau69

(12,374 posts)
4. Was stated by a guest on "All In" tonight.
Tue Dec 19, 2023, 11:33 PM
Dec 2023

I can’t give you her name right now but she was supposedly an expert on the court. I tried but couldn’t determine how she arrived at her statement. I couldn’t get an unequivocal answer one way or the other. Maybe she was referring to the lower court ruling which was 1/0 on the question. I’m planning on watching the rerun later.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»While the vote to keep sl...