Supreme Court caves! Will not hear immunity claim!

[senseandsensibility]

@@%%$$!!!!! Looks like some of you were right! Just now on CNN and MSNBC.

[malaise]

1. Eff them

K & R

🎄 🎄. 🎄 🎄

[senseandsensibility]

2. So disappointing

especially when they don't even give an explanation. They're obviously enabling his efforts to delay, delay, DELAY.

[Ms. Toad]

11. Are you aware that the normal path for an appeal

Is an appeal to the circuit court, before seeking cert from the SCt.

Choosing not to hear an appeal when it is not yet ripe hardly constitutes enabling efforts at delay.

[senseandsensibility]

3. Lisa Rubin is on MSNBC saying that the dissenting judges

didn't write anything, and she finds that odd as do I.

[tritsofme]

7. This could imply there were no recorded dissents.

You would think there would be at least a short written dissent if there were objections.

[senseandsensibility]

9. Yes, they are criticizing the lack of transparency

on MSNBC. It's hard to imagine a more momentous issue going into the 2024 election.

[former9thward]

18. What dissenting judges?

[moondust]

4. Doing nothing is hard werk!

Clarence deserves a raise.

[Emile]

23. +1

[Tribetime]

5. Trump will not face justice until he dies

[Emile]

6. In the United States you are innocent until proven broke.

[NJCher]

8. rec rec rec

rec rec rec rec rec

[asiliveandbreathe]

10. The DC appeals court still has the issue of immunity..right??

With oral arguments set for January 9th 2024, right??

Answered my own ?

https://www.meidastouch.com/news/supreme-court-denies-jack-smiths-petition-for-expedited-review

Smith will now have to wait on the D.C. Circuit to act on Trump's immunity appeal

The Supreme Court has denied Special Counsel Jack Smith's request to expedite review of Donald Trump's appeal of Judge Chutkan's denial of Trump's motion to dismiss based on immunity.

[senseandsensibility]

12. Yes, I believe so

but this will still lead to several weeks of delay from what I understand.

[asiliveandbreathe]

14. Just updated my post..

Smith will now have to wait on the D.C. Circuit to act on Trump's immunity appeal

and yes..delay..hopefully the DC Appeals court..by then (January) they will have enough evidence to expedite..

[W_HAMILTON]

17. But the issue was never the D.C. Circuit ruling on the immunity appeal.

The issue was that once they do rule, then THAT decision will inevitably be appealed, all the way through the normal judicial process, until it hits the Supreme Court, which is why Smith was saying let's get this over with and you all go ahead and make your decision now.

[asiliveandbreathe]

22. Yes, hopefully the DC Court of Appeals will answer expeditiously

their ruling the pos DOES NOT HAVE Presidential Immunity..appeal away pos..here is where the rubber meets the road SCOTUS..are they really going to let him off scott free..

[Arazi]

13. They don't want to work over the holidays?

Need to get their orders from their billionaire masters?

Still helping #Traitor by enabling the delay?

[dweller]

15. Cowards !

SCoCo should remove the stay on their ruling and force SCOTUS into action .


✌🏻

[duckworth969]

16. No dissents

Might be better for Appeals Court to hear it first.

We got a good draw on judges.

IMHO, the more case law the SC has to work with, in this instance anyway, the better.

[W_HAMILTON]

19. The issue is that that decision will then be appealed until it gets to the Supreme Court anyway.

So, the Supreme Court's decision today just gives Trump more time to delay his court trial.

[WarGamer]

20. They denied the option to take the case BEFORE the lower court.

After the lower court rules, SCOTUS will accept it.

[senseandsensibility]

21. Actually I meant what I said