Michigan Supreme Court denies complaint seeking to prevent Trump from appearing on primary ballot..

[onenote]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/27/politics/michigan-supreme-court-rejects-insurrectionist-ban-case-and-keeps-trump-on-2024-primary-ballot/index.html

[Prairie Gates]

1. Presented for your consideration

Angry objections!
Multiple condescending legalish "explanations."
Like-minded supporters to the rescue.

Should be fun.

[Old Crank]

2. Every question

Is a political question.
All laws are politically approved
Laws.

[FBaggins]

3. This was part of the CO dissent

Few states have the same process that led to the CO ruling… and thus the result would inevitably be a patchwork of on/off states.

[getagrip_already]

4. Not much of a decision - legally like kissing a bowling ball

Only applies to the primary, only applies to Michigan, did not get to the questions of whether he engaged in sn insurrection or was even an officer.

It was very narrowly focused on procedural grounds around how Michigan runs its primaries.

Doesn't mean a damn thing other than it's a conflicting opinion to drive scotus to take up the case quickly.

PS - I was going to say like kissing your sister, but according to pornhub, that is a real turn on for red state porn viewers.