General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEmergency rooms not required to perform life-saving abortions, 5th Circuit rules
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/01/02/texas-abortion-fifth-circuit/Federal regulations do not require emergency rooms to perform life-saving abortions if it would run afoul of state law, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
After the overturn of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sent hospitals guidance, reminding them of their obligation to offer stabilizing care, including medically necessary abortions, under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).
When a state law prohibits abortion and does not include an exception for the life of the pregnant person or draws the exception more narrowly than EMTALAs emergency medical condition definition that state law is preempted, the guidance said.
Texas sued, saying this was tantamount to a nationwide mandate that every hospital and emergency-room physician perform abortions. Several anti-abortion medical associations joined the lawsuit as well.
*snip*
Texas motto: Let women die!
niyad
(132,219 posts)May they receive EVERYTHING they deserve.
yardwork
(69,329 posts)My reaction wasn't something I could post here.
Irish_Dem
(81,127 posts)Nope.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)a bursting appendix and nearly died.
Similar happened to my daughter's brother except he is just eleven, black, they pretended he was drug seeking, and the poor boy ended up in the hospital for almost a month with cascading issues stemming from the bursted appendix.
Yes, they let men and boys suffer and die too.
Not at all to minimize this travesty but you are definitely off base with this piece of it.
Irish_Dem
(81,127 posts)Farmer-Rick
(12,635 posts)They literally put into law, "let the women die". Where does it say let the men die? No where.....yet.
Irish_Dem
(81,127 posts)How long the laws would last? Less than 24 hours.
SpankMe
(3,712 posts)These cases you cite of men being denied appendix treatment had nothing to do with the fact that they were men. They were denied treatment for reasons having nothing to do with gender, one being that they thought the patient was faking appendix pain to get drugs. That isn't a "man" thing. These denials could have been imposed on either men or women.
The criminalization of abortion has become much more than just shuttering clinics where surgical abortions are performed. The mission creep of anti-abortion law and policy have cast a wide net that ensnares women on multiple fronts while having zero impact on men:
1. Hospitals, towns and counties are eliminating prenatal care at their hospitals due to liability concerns (treating a miscarriage could be construed as providing an abortion) and a lack of OB-GYN's willing to practice in these areas.
2. Law enforcement spying on mostly women has seen an uptick recently as women use the internet to communicate with confederates in other states to get drugs for medication abortions, or to travel to other states for abortion care.
3. Anti-abortion statutes have caused increased enforcement and criminal charging of pregnant women who are found to be on drugs or alcohol (so-called "fetal protection" provisions). These laws don't impact men.
4. The availability of certain oral contraceptives (taken only by women) has been curtailed if those medications could be used to induce abortion. There is even a drug used to treat a certain kind of arthritis, but which could also be used in a cocktail for inducing abortion, that can't be dispensed to women without special approvals from the prescribing doctor, and where no such pre-approval is required if the patient is male. I'm not sure of the status of the morning after pill. I hope it hasn't been impacted since the abortion bans are mostly after the first 6-weeks or so but morning-after is effective immediately after intercourse.
So, there are a whole list of new restrictions and hazards that impact women and not men.
That's what everyone's talking about when they refer to men not being told to go off and die.
ShazzieB
(22,557 posts)
enough
(13,755 posts)And lets hope it includes long-drawn-out pain and misery.
CTyankee
(68,158 posts)TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)But theres thousands of folks moving to the great state of Texas every day.
58Sunliner
(6,320 posts)TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Thats how the U.S. works.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)58Sunliner
(6,320 posts)Irony died. The woman in many states can't choose their own health care when it comes to pregnancy. They are crafting laws to disallow pregnant women to leave, which should be their right.
niyad
(132,219 posts)regard to "women deciding for themselves"??? AYFKM???
dem4decades
(14,030 posts)Won't go to jail for saving a woman's life.
Rebl2
(17,700 posts)of any age that believes in womens rights and equality.
spooky3
(38,587 posts)orleans
(36,889 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Orrex
(67,083 posts)At this rate, in a few decades the state might have enough of these folks to change the legislature slightly.
spooky3
(38,587 posts)for a net inflow of fewer than 500 per day (and a gross inflow = about 1600 per day).
https://usafacts.org/articles/596000-people-moved-to-texas-from-other-us-states-in-2020-which-states-did-they-come-from/
(uses IRS data)
on edit: Maybe the net inflow number was depressed by the pandemic? Not much. Per this site, the net inflow in 2022 was about 174000 vs 175000 in 2020.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/these-states-are-bringing-in-more-residents-than-theyre-losing
nocoincidences
(2,489 posts)I know exactly what women aren't missing out on by staying away from that state. Do you want women to move there and get killed by the stupid laws?
I would hope not.
erronis
(23,799 posts)niyad
(132,219 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)and a few misguided Democrats, trying to make their way into The Alamo ???
The rest of us who steer clear of the state, are missing out on dying there??
I will happily miss out on that. Sorry for your misfortune.
"Great state"???
Uh, no.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)only for those people coming in from the south, would Texas be an improvement for them....
I suspect they will continue to flee to the north,
unless the saner part of the union decides to 'build a wall' on the northern border of Texas....
Get out while you can.
Maru Kitteh
(31,742 posts)unless and until it is once again a free state. Until then, fuck that place.
I love my children.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)
as an abortion I finally decided that yes, yes indeed, I am pro-abortion. It is part of womens absolutely necessary health-care.
These evil, evil people would have let my mother die at a young age rather than save her from a near-fatal bleed-out, leaving my first brother and me orphaned as toddlers. They would have let my friend die of cancer rather than have the full pelvic surgery she needed, because she was carrying a 14 week fetus. They would have let a grad school colleague die of a burst ectopic pregnancy rather than remove the damn thing.
They are evil beyond words.
Irish_Dem
(81,127 posts)Their wives, girlfriends and daughters will get them on demand.
It is a way to torture and control women.
And take them back to the dark ages.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Freethinker65
(11,203 posts)Get the fuck out of these States while you still can. If you do not have the means (because there are those living in TX that always say moving is too difficult for many), apply for asylum in non-regressive states. Perhaps Abbott can spend some TX taxpayer money sending American females and their rational thinking families to sanctuary cities.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)Don't really even know what to say about it.
What they are saying here is that the law is murderous.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)Their hatred of women is off the charts.
Timeflyer
(3,751 posts)to arrive armed and ready to persuade medical staff to perform a life-saving abortion if she requires it to continue living. (This is the kind of irrational thinking that these irrational laws lead to--but I'd do anything to save my child's life, so, yeah, irrational. Never going near TX, ever, nor letting female loved ones go there either.)
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)That seems pretty backwards. Most liberals think females can make their own choices, including where they live.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)The individual said he would not let females he loved visit Texas. Do you think thats ok? My wife would tell me she can visit wherever she wants, and shed be right.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Do you think men get to let women visit some state?
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)"Let" was a figure of speech in the post you responded to.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)And I dont know what that person meant, nor do you, aside from his use of that term, which has a pretty clear definition. And its ironic that your defending someone who stated he isnt going to let his women travel to a specific state in a thread discussing a womans right to choose.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)protect their loved ones.
But, you know that.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Said he was never going near Texas and he would not let females he loved go there either. Maybe he misstated his positionthat happens all the timebut youre misrepresenting what he said in an attempt to defend it, and you know that. If the poster wants to clarify or restate he can, but you cant do it for him.
LuckyCharms
(22,586 posts)I just did.
Response to LuckyCharms (Reply #24)
nocoincidences This message was self-deleted by its author.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)You should delete.
On edit, I apologized to the individual who posted that she wouldnt let loved ones go to Texas after she clarified what she meant and that I misunderstood her post. There was no trolling here, despite your unfounded accusation.
GopherGal
(2,901 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(13,290 posts)does that violate the shooter's right under the Second Amendment to fire his gun?
Timeflyer
(3,751 posts)if I had any influence over them I'd educate them about the risks. Jeez, I said it was irrational, right? That's how these kind of laws make informed people, even radical leftist vermin like myself, talk or write crazy once in a while. Calm down, and focus on the real problem here--TX, where guns have more rights than women.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)And thanks for responding.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)The poor medical staff, caught in the middle, are even more likely to leave that god-forsaken state....
then maybe those people who remain will start to vote for "freedom".
In my personal opinion..... (deleted)
The Texas GOP is the modern 'Santa Anna'...
dalton99a
(94,087 posts)58Sunliner
(6,320 posts)UTUSN
(77,708 posts)erronis
(23,799 posts)Retrograde
(11,416 posts)the man who claimed that abortions deprived [male] doctors of the joy of seeing a newborn?
ShazzieB
(22,557 posts)Texas actually went to court to argue for the "right" to let women die of treatable pregnancy complications, because... uh... err... hmm... the salvagable life of an actual living, breathing, human female is worth less to the Texas state government than that of a tiny, nonsentient potential human, even in cases where that tiny, nonsentient potential human is clearly nonviable and/or doomed by said pregnancy complications?
Yeah, I think that pretty much sums things up, in which case there is only one thing left to say:
niyad
(132,219 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,196 posts)Like who? Pretty sure it isn't the AMA or any other medical association that expects its doctors to honor the Hippocratic oath.
ShazzieB
(22,557 posts)They're not mainstream, but they do exist. One "notable" example is the American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which bills itself as "the largest organization of pro-life obstetricians and gynecologists in the world." *gag*
I have no idea how many of these groups there are, how many members they have, or how many of those members are actual health care professionals, but it would sure be interesting to find out!
Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)Inclusion
Diversity
Equity
Autonomy
Each of these are the pillars on which a just society is formed.
orleans
(36,889 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,039 posts)barbtries
(31,300 posts)"Texas motto: Let women die!"
literally true. who the fuck are these creatures.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)is that they have NEVER had a women in their life with a life-threatening pregnancy. They think "life-threatening" is always an overstatement, and nothing bad will really happen in the end. It's their ignorance of pregnancy and reproduction that's at work here. They are not doctors, and so just don't get it.
There is also a strong undercurrent of women need to be punished for having sex and enjoying it, but that's only part of this.
What they forget is that each and every pregnancy out there is caused by a man. Not very many immaculate conceptions occur -- actually only one supposedly has, and that's not actually documented or verified. No woman gets pregnant by herself.
I think that one possible solution would be that all men have their DNA taken at puberty. Whenever a mother isn't getting child support, find the guy and collect from him.
erronis
(23,799 posts)Maybe go pray for them or ask for money.
But some are just totally lacking in any empathy at all.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,919 posts)Farmer-Rick
(12,635 posts)A pool of her own blood passed out on the floor on her way to the bathroom, I realize how very deadly pregnancy can be.
She survived because the hospital was only 10 min away.
Texas would have let her die.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,919 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 2, 2024, 10:26 PM - Edit history (1)
to an abortion fund -- preferably one in Texas.
BlueMTexpat
(15,688 posts)US voter who did NOT vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 OWNS THIS!
WE WARNED YOU!
niyad
(132,219 posts)triron
(22,240 posts)riversedge
(80,727 posts)@tooronlists
Thanks to the 5th Circuit, if you get pregnant in Texas, you have no rights, up to & including the right to live. If you flee to live, you can be turned in by a private citizen, incarcerated and tried for murder.
This is the Republican vision for America. #TheGOPKillswomen
Link to tweet
?s=20
Warpy
(114,588 posts)Cue torrent of OB-Gyn docs fleeing red states.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)I think they are oppression of women obsessed and the Bible is just the most handy yet sparse to outright false fig leaf they can reach for to spin up some excuse for it.
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,185 posts)They should not be making medical decisions. This goes for public health measures like covid also. The real death panels are the conservative-packed federal courts.
Medical_Mom
(44 posts)I was lucky enough to never face a situation like this but have had plenty of patients facing an unviable pregnancy about to cause major hemorrhaging and possibly death if left untreated. These are not women deciding in late pregnancy that maybe they dont want kids. These are women that perhaps didnt even know they were pregnant, or, if they did, never imagined that a pregnancy could be life-threatening.
How does the U.S. have such an high maternal mortality rate amongst developed nations in 2024?!
https://fortune.com/2023/05/14/america-highest-maternal-mortality-rate-among-developed-nationsand-rise-pregnancy-health-crisis-asima-ahmad/amp/
This ruling is nauseating but not surprising out of the 5th circuit. (Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana). Apparently, its ok to let women die as long as most of them keep putting out babies that the Rs wont support once theyre born is worth it to them.
This is one more reason to get involved and not sit back this election season. Knock on doors, make phone calls, phone bank, text bank. You dont have to be mobile or have lots of spare time to make an impact! Studies show that outreach from neighbors is much more effective than outreach from campaign emails or calls . We can do this!
I know Hugh and I are getting involved this year, even though these rulings dont affect us since were past procreating years. Please donate time, talent, or treasure when you can!!!
niyad
(132,219 posts)chowder66
(12,220 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,706 posts)These conservative judges and the politicians who made these laws are absolute sadists.
Apparently "life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are no longer rights guaranteed to pregnant women.
CTyankee
(68,158 posts)in her home state of MA. However, she cannot find an OB-GYN for her medical needs now because they are leaving in droves. I wonder how soon she'll just get fed up and move back East to her very blue state. She is not used to living around such vile treatment of women, but she loves her job so that is important, too.
pfitz59
(12,661 posts)But her coworkers and employer won't stand up for her rights? A puzzler...
CTyankee
(68,158 posts)to do and a comfortable liberal. Her work is rewarding. And she has a network of friends.
PJMcK
(25,046 posts)Over turning Roe v. Wade, etc.
It might be time to move.
nakocal
(625 posts)The fifth circuit court just proved that they do NOT support the Constitution. The supremacy clause of the Constitution overrules state law. What a bunch of stupid, women hating scum.
DET
(2,489 posts)Ruling appears to have been made by an all male three judge panel. Two are Trump appointees, one is a Bush appointee. Judge Ho was not on the panel (or it would have been even worse).
COL Mustard
(8,192 posts)Remember how x45's appointments to the Supreme Court have changed our society. Stay angry and vote to never let him have another chance. VOTE and GET OUT THE VOTE.
That is all.
mucifer
(25,657 posts)Other people to vote and vote blue.
moonshinegnomie
(4,011 posts)let them die in the parking too
PTL_Mancuso
(276 posts)Let them gag on the irony!
RandySF
(83,964 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Silent Type
(12,412 posts)an abortion based upon the lack of specificity in Texas law as to what is an acceptable danger . . . . . . That will be the best time to file another case, with a chance to win.
In meantime, choice lobbyists are working to define the exceptions like danger to mother to the 6-week threshold.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,919 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)We have to end this evil shit -- vote every Republican out of every office everywhere.
AKwannabe
(6,890 posts)Fuck all these misogynistic bastards!
peggysue2
(12,528 posts)Womens lives dont matter bc religious ideology trumps all.
Damn them. Damn them all.
Vote. Them. Out.
Maru Kitteh
(31,742 posts)Right back at you, you prehistoric shithouse bottom-crawlers.
NHvet
(296 posts)Neo-Christian male judges playing doctor again.
Mad_Machine76
(24,951 posts)is literally the worst, most effed up court in the country.
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)It only represents Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi
Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
ShazzieB This message was self-deleted by its author.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,781 posts)chronic Lonestar Beer poisoning or of snakebites acquired during religious services.
I hate to think of how the Texas Legie wants to treat rape victims brought in for emergency care.
ecstatic
(35,066 posts)We have to recognize this for what it is: Women are being used as pawns in the fight to keep red states red. For many years we've heard a lot of talk of how Texas was on the verge of turning blue. Now look at it. You couldn't pay me to move to Texas. Mission accomplished. Same with Florida. They want to keep us out, and they're willing to sacrifice / torture women and trans persons.
BobTheSubgenius
(12,212 posts)"Leviticus 19:28 probably prohibits tattoos of all kinds, so I'm going to err on the side of self-righteousness and not perform the life-saving surgery this patient needs."
"Oh, yeah. Non-CIS gendered people are wasting their time coming to this facility, as well. I'll probably think of some others before long, so check back often."