If Biden claimed presidents need immunity,

[sheshe2]

Link to tweet

Brian Tyler Cohen

'If Biden claimed presidents need immunity, it'd be nonstop fainting spells. But because TRUMP said it, and they’ve all taken up residence in the protective warmth of his colon, suddenly it’s crickets from the supposed party of the Constitution.'

Ouch, but true!

[Cha]

1. Excellent point from Brian Tyler Cohen..

No One Is Above the Law... not even Creepy ex Treasonous pissants.

Mahalo, she

[sheshe2]

2. I LOVE this part!

TRUMP said it, and they’ve all taken up residence in the protective warmth of his colon

[Hermit-The-Prog]

3. The Russiapublican party is the party of constipation -- can't move a thing.

They just keep spewing shit but nothing is allowed to pass.

[sheshe2]

4. "the party of constipation -- can't move a thing."

Stop it! You are cracking me up!

Your whole post is solid gold.

Thanks

[Hermit-The-Prog]

5. You just made my day.

[sheshe2]

6. You made mine!🤣

[BWdem4life]

7. By the same token

If Rump pardoned one of his kids, it wouldn't even make a ripple no matter how large the offense. But let Joe pardon Hunter for whatever minor offense they finally get him on....

[mopinko]

10. i hope he does pardon him.

let the process play out, after the election, he shd say- he was charged cuz he’s my son. i’m pardoning him, cuz he’s my son.

[Emile]

12. I want Joe to pardon Hunter just to piss off

the fascists.

[NBachers]

8. It's a breeding nest for squirming infectious Crankpot Hemorrhoids

[sheshe2]

9. Hey, NBachers.

You guys are coming up with the best comments of the day!

[Emile]

11. So true!

[Igel]

13. Biden has a lot of immunity.

Nobody in Yemen is going to launch a civil suit against him in an American court and not have it tossed because he authorized actions that led to death and destruction of Yemeni people and property.

The DOJ isn't about to investigate him and the military men under him for murder.

They have immunity for officially sanctioned actions that fall within the boundaries of their authority.

Whatever Trump says in public, the court filing is clear: The claim is that actions he took that he's being tried for are those that are specifically within the boundaries of his authority. The other bit of hair splitting is being clear about exactly which actions and acts he's being tried for. People blur the legal claims on both sides to make them say what the actual claims do not say. Sticking to the actual facts is boring and tedious, so I get it.