Garland says they won't be releasing names

[MOMFUDSKI]

of failed coppers in Uvalde shooting. No mention of any charges. This was a tots and pears newser

[Ocelot II]

1. If any of the officers are accused of committing federal crimes,

at some point their names will be released.

[onecaliberal]

2. What a fucking joke.

[Emile]

3. Did he say when he is putting Trump in jail?

[brooklynite]

8. HAs Trump been convicted of something in my absence?

[Emile]

11. That's the problem, thanks for pointing it out.

[Scrivener7]

12. Ummmmm.... Get it?

[brooklynite]

13. You mean: am I aware that the American criminal justice system isn't based on "I saw it on TV"?

Yup.

[Scrivener7]

14. I guess you don't.

[SYFROYH]

4. Why the hell not?

If you're going to conduct an investigation and write a report, make it transparent.

[Ocelot II]

10. Are any of the officers being accused of federal crimes?

There was a lot of incompetence, confusion and other serious failures, but this isn't a criminal investigation. No doubt there will be litigation, and whatever crimes any of the officers might have committed will be state crimes. If those things happen names of officers will be released; but if this isn't a federal criminal investigation there's no reason to release names in connection with it. Some of the officers will be found culpable at least of gross negligence but some might not be at all.

[PufPuf23]

5. Garland is a mistake as Attorney General.

Would have joined the rightwing club of the USSC.

Garland is GOP; there are Democrats that could have been put in the job and done better.

The excuses are bullshit.

Garland has been politically compromised from Day 1.

[tritsofme]

7. This is pure unadulterated nonsense.

[PufPuf23]

9. Thank you!

Pure unadulterated nonsense!

Would not want to be like you.

[Raven123]

6. I don't think this was a criminal investigation

Last edited Thu Jan 18, 2024, 04:09 PM - Edit history (1)