General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust read an article from the Times of Israel that Blinken brought a peace proposal to Israel and was turned down flat
The story says that Blinken has assurance from Saudi Arabia that they would recognize Israel, contribute to rebuilding Gaza and helping the Palestinian Authority administer Gaza peacefully in return for Israel entering into negotiations for establishment of a Palestinian State. Netanyahu supposedly rejected the proposal outright. I get that Netanyahu is up to his eyeballs with trouble and in a very weak political position given the Oct 7 attack that caught his government unprepared and surprised. And while the proposal does not solve the ongoing military threat from Hamas and Hezbollah, it could set the groundwork for Arab support that could weaken Hamas and Hezbollah and counter the negative influences of Iran. Yes, not a full and complete fix but a big step in the right direction that could deflect and decrease growing international criticism and erosion of world support for Israel. Just one man, one vote here but I am really against further $$$ support to Israel or rebuilding Gaza if all the parties don't get real that the threat to Israel will not go away nor will the Palestinian problem without some concrete movement toward a Palestinian State.
Lonestarblue
(13,480 posts)He lso stated that he will push ahead with war until all of Hamas is defeated. What that means for the civilians in Gaza is more death and destruction. Unless Bibi is stopped, he will bomb gaza until there is no infrastructure left to support a population and in the process murder hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Arabs and western powers are offering Israel an opportunity for peace. They are refusing it. Again. Bibi is the one who bragged on the that he deliberately blew up the Oslo Accords to prevent a Palestinian state. Imagine how many deaths and violence might have been avoided for both sides had those Accords been successful. Israelis re not being well served by Netanyahu and his right-wing ministers.
Israel cannot just continue rejecting the notion that Palestinians have no rights and must be absorbed into the populations of other countries. I think their drastic war in Gaza has wakened the world to the damage they are doing, not just to the Palestinians, horrible as that is, but to the risks of creating a broader war in the whole area.
Arthur_Frain
(2,358 posts)But then half of Americans think tfg is a good choice for our next prez so theres that.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)But presenting Bibi with a proposal like this one is still part of the job, even if he's pretty sure what the response will be. Doing so and then reporting Bibi's rejection creates important documentation of what the U.S. and other nations have tried to do as well as Netanyu's refusal to cooperate.
I imagine Blinken's pretty sick and tired of the whole thing, but he knows how important it is to document every offer of assistance that is made and rejected. But, yeah, there are plenty of pea brains that still think this should be a cinch.
Turbineguy
(40,076 posts)is another way of saying "we want Hamas to continue its terror campaign!"
The fact is that the Palestinians need to have a piece of land and sovereignty. Doing that will be difficult enough as the "settlers" and many other Israelis will have to move, as well as Palestinians.
In the interim, having the Saudis administer things would be much better than an Israeli occupation.
In order to get this to end, people are going to have to make compromises.
They are going to have to do something like the 38th Parallel as well as make Jerusalem an Open City.
ripcord
(5,553 posts)Grins
(9,459 posts)Its time the world, now affected by events in the Middle East, creates the Palestinian state Bibi doesnt want.
And then cut off aid to Israel.
ripcord
(5,553 posts)Let them deal with Hamas but Israel isn't going to stop until Hamas has been dealt with, doing so would just invite another terrorist attack.
dutch777
(5,068 posts)It may get a new name, new leadership, changes in tactics but it will be prone to violence and supported by Iran and others. No different than the Israeli cause, the Palestinian cause will remain with adherents willing to kill and die for it funded by outside cash. I can see why the Israeli's fear establishment of a Palestinian state but their chosen alternative has not proven to fix anything or be better. Maybe time to try something new?
GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)We need to start tightening the screws on him.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)The other Arab states need to be tightening the screws on them too.
I guarantee you theres not an Israeli PM of any party that would accept any peace plan until Hamas is permanently crushed. The dynamics in Israel have utterly changed and thats just the new reality now.
Israel is a net weapons exporter now. They dont actually need US at all. The $$ we give them is to pay for Israeli intelligence in the region and were not giving that up either
Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)Both are obstacles to a lasting peace.
OMGWTF
(5,131 posts)All of the Talibangelists are cheering this war in the ME, because they are convinced that it'll bring back JHC, and they can sneer and thumb their noses at us and say, "I told ya so!" as JHC sucks them up in His Vacuum Cleaner of Righteousness.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)as there has been no country called Palestine in recorded human history.
Lonestarblue
(13,480 posts)sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Or is this just a deflection from a false fact?
PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)One would assume no false facts and incomplete history are posted,
One would also assume that POTUS Biden would be supported and not undermined by rightwing politics.
PatrickforB
(15,426 posts)and the British Empire laid the initial groundwork for this violence, just as they did with the formation of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia after WWI.
Celerity
(54,410 posts)Palestine (Arabic: فلسطين, romanized: Filasṭīn[d]), officially the State of Palestine (دولة فلسطين, Dawlat Filasṭīn), is a state in the Southern Levant region of West Asia. Founded on 15 November 1988 and officially governed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), it claims the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip as its territory, all of which has been Israeli-occupied territories since the 1967 Six-Day War. The West Bank contains 165 Palestinian enclaves that are under partial Palestinian rule, but the remainder, including 200 Israeli settlements, is under full Israeli control. The Gaza Strip was governed by Egypt but conquered by Israel in 1967. Israel governed the region until it withdrew in 2005. Hamas seized power after winning the 2006 Palestinian legislative election. The Gaza Strip has since been blockaded by Israel and Egypt.
Mandatory Palestine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine
Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity that existed between 1920 and 1948 in the region of Palestine under the terms of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine. During the First World War (19141918), an Arab uprising against Ottoman rule and the British Empire's Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF) drove the Ottoman Turks out of the Levant. The United Kingdom had agreed in the McMahonHussein Correspondence that it would honour Arab independence if the Arabs revolted against the Ottoman Turks, but in the end, the United Kingdom and France divided the area under the SykesPicot Agreementan act of betrayal in the eyes of the Arabs.
Further complicating the issue was the Balfour Declaration of 1917, in which Britain promised its support for the establishment of a Jewish "national home" in Palestine. At the war's end the British and French formed a joint "Occupied Enemy Territory Administration" in what had been Ottoman Syria. The British achieved legitimacy by obtaining a mandate from the League of Nations in June 1922. One objective of the League of Nations mandate system was to administer areas of the defunct Ottoman Empire "until such time as they are able to stand alone".
During the Mandate, the area saw successive waves of Jewish immigration and the rise of nationalist movements in both the Jewish and the Arab communities. Competing interests of the two populations led to the 19361939 Arab revolt in Palestine and the 19441948 Jewish insurgency in Mandatory Palestine. The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine to divide the territory into two states, one Arab and one Jewish, was passed in November 1947. The 1948 Palestine war ended with the territory of Mandatory Palestine divided among the State of Israel, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, which annexed territory on the West Bank of the Jordan River, and the Kingdom of Egypt, which established the "All-Palestine Protectorate" in the Gaza Strip.
Mandatory Palestine was designated as a Class A Mandate, based on its social, political, and economic development. This classification was reserved for post-war mandates with the highest capacity for self-governance. With the exception of mandatory Palestine, all Class A mandates had gained independence by 1946.

OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)Celerity
(54,410 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)Embarrassing, huh?
Celerity
(54,410 posts)A large majority of the other nation states on the planet recognise the State of Palestine, including us here in Sweden.
The State of Palestine has been accepted as an observer state of the United Nations General Assembly in November 2012.
As of 2 June 2023, 139 of the 193 United Nations (UN) member states have recognized the State of Palestine.
Sweden becomes first EU member in western Europe to make move, saying we hope this will show the way for others
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/30/sweden-officially-recognises-state-palestine
Thu 30 Oct 2014
Sweden has officially recognised the state of Palestine, the Swedish foreign minister said, less than a month after Stockholm announced its intention to make the controversial move. Today the government takes the decision to recognise the state of Palestine, Margot Wallström said in a statement published in the Dagens Nyheter newspaper on Thursday. It is an important step that confirms the Palestinians right to self-determination, the foreign minister said. We hope that this will show the way for others.
Swedens new prime minister, Stefan Löfven, announced in his inaugural address to parliament in early October that his country would become the first EU member in western Europe to recognise a Palestinian state. While the Palestinians cheered the move, Israel summoned Swedens ambassador to protest and express disappointment. Israel says the Palestinians can only receive their promised state through direct negotiations and not through other diplomatic channels.
Seven EU member states have already recognised a Palestinian state Bulgaria, Cyprus, Slovakia, Hungary, Malta, Poland and Romania. Non-EU member Iceland is the only other western European nation to have done so. The US cautioned Sweden against recognition, calling it premature and saying the Palestinian state could only come through a negotiated solution between Israelis and Palestinians.
In Thursdays announcement, Wallström said: The government considers that international law criteria for recognition of a Palestinian state have been fulfilled. A spokesman for the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, welcomed Swedens decision, describing it as brave and historic. All countries of the world that are still hesitant to recognise our right to an independent Palestinian state based on 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, [should] follow Swedens lead, his spokesman quoted him as saying.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)See how easy?
Celerity
(54,410 posts)Done here.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)Your "fact", at the very least, undermines the argument for a two-state solution. Your answer: "It already exists!" Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.
Buh bye.
red dog 1
(33,063 posts)Celerity
(54,410 posts)CelticCrow
(78 posts)That would be Jesus H Christ
Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)There has never been a sovereign country called Palestine.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)red dog 1
(33,063 posts)Grins
(9,459 posts)Surprised I missed it.
lefthandedskyhook
(1,180 posts).
Backseat Driver
(4,671 posts)Let's ask those we speak with about release of hostages, needs of women, children, and sick and injured's basic needs to have a supervised observer vote on changing those palestinian officials' group name; those that won't come up with an official governing name for whomever we speak to for peace and protection of the palastinian civilians trapped inside Gaza; to H*ll with the others willing to use the name of a terrorist group though they see nothing wrong with the Hamas brand and using citizens as shields for governing by terror. It's just a small thing...if there's truly a difference???
Seems Israel's Netanyahoo can be philosophy-branded as the leader/member of a RW Israeli party...I think we have our own issues with a branded GOP RW ex-leader in this country. This must create a difficult trust issue between themselves, Israel and ally America, and any other ME countries' peace negotiators??? Yeah, I know:
Nolite Te Bastardes Carborundorum - I'm patient and hopeful for the living; but still feel a bit of empathy for those still in grave danger trapped by escalating terror and fear.
Alice Kramden
(2,951 posts)To postpone his own poltical day of reckoning
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)be prosecuting the war as would any plausible leader of any actual nation in the same position.
Sooooo much chest beating bullshitting goes on with this.
No other nation ever is putting up with this even half as well for even a tenth as long.
Netanyahu will not be replaced with some new incarnation of Buddha and the Palestinians or who ever they are represented by are unlikely to want a nation of their own if the price is peaceful coexistence with Israel.
A nation of genocidal martyrs for the Middle East version of The South Shall Rise Again aren't looking for deals or productive negotiations nor should much desire to do so with a best case scenario of hostile safe haven of state based terrorism free to import all the implements of destruction to launch at you while setting up a base of regional attack once again.
If the threat has not been abated then the only option is to eliminate or disable it.
Failure to do so is the abdication of a state's must basic obligation.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)and take the land. That much is clear. That's why he doesn't want peace.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)If Israel wanted that outcome it would have already happened.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)It's something he's already proposed, hardly bullshit.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Where Netanyahu proposed that?
CNN: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/israel-s-far-right-wants-to-move-palestinians-out-of-gaza-its-ideas-are-gaining-attention/ar-AA1n6Dat
An Israeli source: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4656a2ad492dff6eJmltdHM9MTcwNTYyMjQwMCZpZ3VpZD0wYzRmNGUzNS1iMzM1LTZhMzEtMTZlMi01ZTVhYjI0YjZiMTYmaW5zaWQ9NTMzMQ&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=0c4f4e35-b335-6a31-16e2-5e5ab24b6b16&psq=israel+send+palestinians+africa&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaGFhcmV0ei5jb20vaXNyYWVsLW5ld3MvMjAyMy0xMi0yNi90eS1hcnRpY2xlL2lzcmFlbGktbWstaXNyYWVsLWhhcy1yZWNlaXZlZC1pbnF1aXJpZXMtZnJvbS1jb3VudHJpZXMtdG8tYWNjZXB0LXJlZnVnZWVzLWZyb20tZ2F6YS8wMDAwMDE4Yy1hNTBlLWQ0MDgtYTk5Zi1lZDVlYzRmMDAwMDA&ntb=1
https://issafrica.org/iss-today/african-countries-should-not-entertain-taking-forcibly-displaced-palestinians
Wall Street Journal: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/israel-s-far-right-calls-for-palestinians-to-resettle-outside-gaza/ar-AA1mJfCZ
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-negotiating-african-countries-expel-palestinians-gaza-report
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/658358-insanity-and-israeli-plans-to-relocate-palestinians-to-africa-by-owei-lakemfa.html
And to Canada:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/israel-allies-warn-against-displacement-palestinians-gaza-1.7073734
Then Israel has passed a law making it easier to strip Palestinians of residency: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/16/israeli-law-allowing-palestinian-prisoner-deportation-a
There are doubtless more.
And of course it was posted on DU, and in five minutes you'll be pretending it never happened.
GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)Need to be a little more firm with Bibi...
Pull Ambassador, cut funding...
STOP indiscriminate destruction.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Has been indiscriminate. I cant believe that any reasonable person would make that claim. It simply isnt true. Hamas likes these types of posts though.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)You don't kill 10,000 children if you're waging war in a cautious manner.
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Not me. The use of that word suggests that you think Israel is acting without restraint. Im glad to see you clarified that you dont think that is the case and that we both support Israels right to defend itself.
Do you agree that the most important step is for Hamas to surrender the murderers and rapists who planned or participated in October 7? That should be non-negotiable.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)There is always the "right thing to do" and the best thing to do.
In a perfect world, Harry Potter hands me his wand and every HAMAS murderer keels over and assumes room temperature.
Hostages come home and the world is a better place.
But... reality is reality.
This is an example I used a while back. There is a history of military force being used against unorganized militants, targeting civilians.
It's as old as history itself...
Carthago delenda est.
(Carthage must die)
And one must see the situation from the rest of the world's eyes.
Half the planet sees the IDF acting like Hitlers SS after Czech partisans executed Reinhard Heydrich in Prague in 1942.
The SS killed thousands in reprisals, allegedly hunting down other partisans and their supporters.
Entire villages were leveled with every citizen murdered.
Of course, it's not an apt comparison because Hamas started it and the IDF isn't the SS... but half the planet thinks it is.
Don't get me wrong... there's no easy solution. But everything Bibi does must be balanced by the words of the UN.
Otherwise, what good is the UN if Israel and the USA (Iraq v2.0, 2003-2011) can run rough shod over countries with no opposition?
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)And all the shitty things the Israelis have done to the Palestinians isn't an excuse justifying a terrorist attack.
Having said that... events don't happen in a vacuum.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)If some group came to my home and used violence to make me leave and repeated that kind of thing against my neighbors and friends for decades
.
Imprisoned our youth when they tried to fight back
And i knew that the leaders of these oppressivers hope was to take all of our land
I surely would not believe,we started it
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)That Hamas killed more than 1,000 civilians, murdered children in their beds, and raped and mutilated Israeli women?
And youd rape and mutilate men and women and kill children in their beds? That seems extreme
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Hamas is really starting it. Shocked that you even think thats debatable.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Its an urban war zone, the battlefront is entirely of Hamas choosing.
Israel is waging war after being attacked. Any nation would do the same and justifiably so. These casualty numbers, while horrific, arent even near the same level as other recent conflicts yet only Israel gets singled out.
This is what war looks like. Every war, and especially urban warfare
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)They should fight Revolutionary War style... by gathering in a big field and marching across the wheat fields in line? With drums and flutes singing?
That hasn't happened in a loooong time.
And is it a compliment to say that the IDF is waging a similar war to the Soviets in the Battle of Berlin?
Where German citizens literally had NO WHERE to run to...

Arazi
(8,887 posts)They tried to clear a battle zone north of the Wadi. Hamas bombed and shot those trying to get out of the way.
Or how about letting the civilians shelter in the fucking tunnels?
Or maybe stop shooting rockets from on top of occupied apartment complexes or hospitals?
The civilian deaths are on Hamas
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)If you are going to defend launching massacres and sending rape and mutilation gangs to rampage then scurrying off to hide behind women and children as some fucked up moral defense shield against consequences for depravity then don't fucking dare cry about what absolutely must happen when that shit is rightfully put down.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)And having them acknowledge that Israel exists as some sort of inducement seems almost silly.
Are they going to support PA troops in Gaza? Please.
Why is anyone even talking about a Palestinian country?
Where did this weird calculus come from where terrorism is rewarded with an independent country?
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Establish a Palestinian state where? Would Hamas still govern that state?
Heres a thoughtHamas surrenders all the rapists and murderers who participated in or planned the October 7 atrocities and releases all the civilian hostages seized during those reprehensible attacks and in exchange Israel will cease current military operations on Gaza. That seems fair, no?
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)Hamas, Hezbollah, and friends as you were and carry on until it is possibly hoped that one sunny day support for them will weaken.
That peace is a lie and makes lie to the concept.
GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)roamer65
(37,953 posts)By any means necessary.