Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nittersing

(6,413 posts)
Sat Jan 27, 2024, 04:14 PM Jan 2024

Trader Joe's Attorney Argues National Labor Relations Board Is 'Unconstitutional'

A lawyer for the union says the company is aligning itself with right-wing ideologues who want to destroy the regulatory state.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trader-joes-attorney-nlrb-unconstitutional_n_65b41e7ae4b014b873b11cc2

Trader Joe’s is facing a litany of union-busting charges before the National Labor Relations Board. The agency’s prosecutors have accused the company of illegally retaliating against workers, firing a union supporter and spreading false information in an effort to chill an organizing campaign.

But in a hearing last Tuesday, the grocer’s attorney briefly summarized a sweeping defense it intends to mount against the charges: The labor board itself, which was created during the New Deal and has refereed private-sector collective bargaining for nearly 90 years, is “unconstitutional.”

The argument would appear to fit inside a broader conservative effort to dismantle the regulatory state, which has taken aim at agencies tasked with enforcing laws to protect workers, consumers and the environment.

The exchange, a transcript of which HuffPost obtained through a public records request, came at the start of a trial to determine whether Trader Joe’s violated workers’ rights. Trader Joe’s’ attorney, Christopher Murphy of the law firm Morgan Lewis, informed the judge, Charles Muhl, that there was “one final thing” the grocery chain wanted to add to its defense before proceedings began.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trader Joe's Attorney Argues National Labor Relations Board Is 'Unconstitutional' (Original Post) Nittersing Jan 2024 OP
They're gonna send it to SCOTUS budkin Jan 2024 #1
Lost a good customer. usonian Jan 2024 #2
If they continue in this manner, they'll lose most of their customers. erronis Jan 2024 #4
I thought "Trader Joe's Attorney" was going to be about Alina Habba! Shermann Jan 2024 #3
DUzy! senseandsensibility Jan 2024 #6
ouch, bro lol Takket Jan 2024 #8
Received gift cards for Christmas senseandsensibility Jan 2024 #5
"Unconstitutional" Takket Jan 2024 #7
Also, this post from a couple of weeks ago Nittersing Jan 2024 #9
kick senseandsensibility Jan 2024 #10

erronis

(15,513 posts)
4. If they continue in this manner, they'll lose most of their customers.
Sat Jan 27, 2024, 04:57 PM
Jan 2024

TJ folks tend to be very liberal and very attuned to labor issues. This is a big mistake for them.

Perhaps they need to rethink how to deal with employee rights rather than attacking the USG.

Takket

(21,745 posts)
7. "Unconstitutional"
Sat Jan 27, 2024, 05:02 PM
Jan 2024

Definition:
1. Anything the violates the tenants of the Constitution
2. Anything a Republican does not like

Nittersing

(6,413 posts)
9. Also, this post from a couple of weeks ago
Sat Jan 27, 2024, 05:45 PM
Jan 2024
https://www.democraticunderground.com/111714794

"A federal judge threw out Trader Joe’s trademark infringement claim against its workers’ union on Friday, delivering the equivalent of a legal smackdown in an order dismissing the complaint.

Hernán D. Vera, a judge for the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California, wrote that the grocer tried to “weaponize the legal system” against the union, Trader Joe’s United, all in the hopes of “gain[ing] advantage in an ongoing legal labor dispute.”

Vera determined that Trader Joe’s legal effort against the union “comes dangerously close to the line of Rule 11” ― a federal rule that allows district courts to sanction attorneys for submitting filings for an “improper purpose.”

A Trader Joe’s spokesperson could not immediately be reached Saturday for comment on Vera’s order. Nor could David Eberhart, a partner at the law firm O’Melveny & Myers, who was listed as the lead attorney on the complaint against Trader Joe’s United."
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trader Joe's Attorney Arg...