General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrader Joe's Attorney Argues National Labor Relations Board Is 'Unconstitutional'
A lawyer for the union says the company is aligning itself with right-wing ideologues who want to destroy the regulatory state.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trader-joes-attorney-nlrb-unconstitutional_n_65b41e7ae4b014b873b11cc2
Trader Joes is facing a litany of union-busting charges before the National Labor Relations Board. The agencys prosecutors have accused the company of illegally retaliating against workers, firing a union supporter and spreading false information in an effort to chill an organizing campaign.
But in a hearing last Tuesday, the grocers attorney briefly summarized a sweeping defense it intends to mount against the charges: The labor board itself, which was created during the New Deal and has refereed private-sector collective bargaining for nearly 90 years, is unconstitutional.
The argument would appear to fit inside a broader conservative effort to dismantle the regulatory state, which has taken aim at agencies tasked with enforcing laws to protect workers, consumers and the environment.
The exchange, a transcript of which HuffPost obtained through a public records request, came at the start of a trial to determine whether Trader Joes violated workers rights. Trader Joes attorney, Christopher Murphy of the law firm Morgan Lewis, informed the judge, Charles Muhl, that there was one final thing the grocery chain wanted to add to its defense before proceedings began.

budkin
(6,849 posts)To dismantle it.
usonian
(17,308 posts)Traitor Joe
erronis
(19,298 posts)TJ folks tend to be very liberal and very attuned to labor issues. This is a big mistake for them.
Perhaps they need to rethink how to deal with employee rights rather than attacking the USG.
Shermann
(8,914 posts)
senseandsensibility
(21,810 posts)
Takket
(22,948 posts)senseandsensibility
(21,810 posts)after those are spent, I will boycott. Disgusting.
Takket
(22,948 posts)Definition:
1. Anything the violates the tenants of the Constitution
2. Anything a Republican does not like
Nittersing
(7,191 posts)"A federal judge threw out Trader Joes trademark infringement claim against its workers union on Friday, delivering the equivalent of a legal smackdown in an order dismissing the complaint.
Hernán D. Vera, a judge for the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California, wrote that the grocer tried to weaponize the legal system against the union, Trader Joes United, all in the hopes of gain[ing] advantage in an ongoing legal labor dispute.
Vera determined that Trader Joes legal effort against the union comes dangerously close to the line of Rule 11 ― a federal rule that allows district courts to sanction attorneys for submitting filings for an improper purpose.
A Trader Joes spokesperson could not immediately be reached Saturday for comment on Veras order. Nor could David Eberhart, a partner at the law firm OMelveny & Myers, who was listed as the lead attorney on the complaint against Trader Joes United."
senseandsensibility
(21,810 posts)Very important topic.