General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre we allowed to express a libertarian view point here
I agree that the states or the federal government shouldn't have a say over a woman's body
usedtobedemgurl
(2,050 posts)Viewpoint.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts).
I've never met a Libertarian who wasn't plugged into as many perks as they could.
They are the biggest moochers of the government, all while claiming otherwise.
Libertarians are self-affecting, meaning that they only do things that directly benefit them.
If they push a plan or law, it's for their benefit. If others benefit from it, it is purely by chance.
They view government programs they can plug into as deserved.
They view government programs they can't tap into jealously, claiming it's somehow a tax they are paying to fund others.
.
Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)of a civil right to bodily autonomy. Libertarians are basically just Republicans who want to smoke pot. They don't believe in economic regulation. I knew one who didn't think the FAA should regulate aviation safety since if enough airplanes crashed, airlines and manufacturers would eventually have an economic incentive to voluntarily make flying safer, even if a lot of people got killed in the meantime. Libertarians are idiots - they mostly start as teenaged boys who read Atlas Shrugged and thought they'd discovered a brilliant political philosophy and never outgrew it as adults,
Aristus
(72,187 posts)My own viewpoint is that the people who insist that government is too intrusive in the lives of citizens, and too regulatory towards corporations, and needs to back off, would be the very people demanding that the government do something about all those planes crashing.
Igel
(37,535 posts)Those I've known were against a lot of economic regulation, against abortion regulation, against drug regulation, against sexuality regulation, against workplace regulation.
They were against _________ regulation and government except when necessary in their view (and while that varied within a narrow range of function, it did vary).
(D) like the first, not the second or third and want to enforce pro regulation for the fourth and entirely onboard for the fifth.
(R) are against the first, for the second and third and fourth, and against the fifth. Grosso modo.
I've seen the claim that "libertarian" is just a euphemism for (R), but, you know, it's not. Just like I've seen the claim that "libertarian" is just a euphemism for "liberal", (D), or "progressive"--but, you know, it's not.
It's like saying that cats are just autistic dogs.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Socially liberal, fiscally liberal: Democratic
Socially conservative, fiscally conservative: classic Republican
Socially liberal, fiscally conservative: Libertarian
Socially conservative, fiscally liberal: tends authoritarian and fascistic
The thing about quasi-libertarians is that they want to escape liability and responsibility.
They want their cattle to graze the commons and when they rip it up they want the public/government to fix it up at no cost to them.
They want to have their cake and eat it too.
Kennah
(14,578 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)It's long been my observation that Libertarians themselves, not just quasi-libertarians, is that they want to escape liability and responsibility. Take full advantage of everything that taxes pay for, while trying very hard not to pay taxes themselves.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)And probably would call themselves "Independents".
KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)We can see how little they care about Liberal viewpoints. Plus they're behind stacking the SCOTUS.
This Forum is a Democratic one not a libertarian one. IMO libertarians usually feel more at home with
repugs than anyone else.
Prairie_Seagull
(4,688 posts)Now it is just Charles Koch and this single individual, by name, should take the brunt of our Ire.
IMO
Attilatheblond
(8,876 posts)lovebugg
(64 posts)I like afternoon naps the best
musette_sf
(10,485 posts)since the current libertarian position on legal pregnancy termination relies upon the non-aggression principle, i.e., rights apply at conception. Previous positions included the States Rights argument: I believe Ron Paul was a proponent of rights on the state level. So perhaps you could clarify your position.
lovebugg
(64 posts)Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration, Libertarian Party platform states
W_HAMILTON
(10,333 posts)Note that the 2022 platform doesn't use the words, but it's still at right angles to both (R) and (D).
W_HAMILTON
(10,333 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 2, 2024, 01:41 AM - Edit history (1)
Yes, that was once their stance.
It is no longer their stance.
I linked their current platform. it specifically removed the abortion-related parts that existed in prior platforms because the party has become more hostile to abortion rights in recent years, partly due to many disaffected Republicans joining their ranks and altering their stances to more closely align with their former party.
musette_sf
(10,485 posts)Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)is inappropriate. We support the election of Democrats.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)?
Bev54
(13,431 posts)of government at all, full stop.
lovebugg
(64 posts)They just like to play with the word and meaning in my opinion
musette_sf
(10,485 posts)are the libertarians who align with the Republican Party, which includes Ron Paul who was caucus chair from 1995-2002.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)musette_sf
(10,485 posts)He ran for POTUS as a libertarian candidate in 1988.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)Before you go getting yourself into any strife, it is worth reading the terms and conditions of DU so that you know exactly what is expected of DU members. It really is worthwhile.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
I consider my self liberal on just about everything and generally want less government
control over my life.
dpibel
(3,943 posts)Cha
(319,067 posts)John Shaft
(808 posts)How does the government "control" your life?
Be specific.
lovebugg
(64 posts)Marcus IM
(3,001 posts)How utterly quaint.

Hekate
(100,133 posts)Torchlight
(6,827 posts)Stop signs are the worst. Too much control.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(16,211 posts)Can you be specific?
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Is that if you do assert government's principal duty is protection of property, and do so in circumstances where most have little and a few have lots, you cannot do otherwise than end in a totalitarian government. You cannot have democracy, if you do, sooner or later the government will be directed to redistribution. If you cannot have democracy, you cannot have civic liberty, and personal liberty alone tends to mere decadence. You start out demanding freedom from government, and wind up dependent on its holding down the populace to a few's benefit.
And I would not dispute that's generally where government winds up, from whatever premises it begins, and by however twisty a route it may take....
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Mostly from reading on pre-Franco Spain.
If it's not coals to Newcastle, you might find this link interesting:
https://www.niskanencenter.org/
Sort of the black sheep of the CATO Institute....
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)the propertarian branch - the anarcho-capitalists and right libertarians, are almost exclusively a US phenomena, although they have managed to spread out over the last few decades.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Is how it preserved in vigor into the twentieth century the pre-Bolshevik political taxonomy of Europe. A sort of political Australia, with a full suite of marsupials. Something akin to a natural experiment illuminating what developments beyond the Pyrenees might have been without the Great War.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Bev54
(13,431 posts)doctor. Why should the government be involved at all? Do you want them to decide when men can get a vasectomy? There should not be any government interference as long as the procedures are considered safe. That is their only responsibility.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)Bev54
(13,431 posts)at all and hopefully never will despite the attempts by the conservatives here. Seriously who is to decide restrictions? The government? No again it is up to the doctor and the woman, if it is late term it is usually always because there is a problem not because some woman wants to carry a fetus for months on end and then decide to terminate. There is no room for government in that decision. Dr's here can opt out not to perform abortions if it against their beliefs but the hospitals cannot prevent a doctor from performing abortions in the hospital as they are taxpayer funded. Abortion should never ever be a legal issue and should never ever be debated by others who are not involved, especially those who do not have a uterus, meaning men.
ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)I didn't used to have a problem with the idea of gestational limits, but a while back I came to the realization that they are unnecessary. The people who have pushed for them the hardest are the so-called "pro life" crowd, who seem to be convinced that without such limits, people will get abortions willy-nilly, at any stage of gestation, just because they can. Therefore, their argument goes, we MUST have these limits or else havoc will ensue!
(These same people are also constantly trying to roll gestational limits on abortion farther and farther back, because their real agenda is trying to make it harder and harder to access abortion care legally.)
The need for gestational limits is simply based on false premises. The truth of the matter is, most abortions happen as early in pregnancy as possible, because someone who gets pregnant and doesn't want to be is anxious to take care of things as soon as she can. A woman doesn't choose to wait until late in a pregnancy to have an abortion because she just woke up one morning and decided she didn't feel like being pregnant anymore.
Most abortions that happen at a later stage of gestation occur because something is desperately wrong with either the woman's health, the development of the fetus, or both. Many severe fetal abnormalities are not diagnosable until the fetus reaches a certain stage of development, and pregnancy complications can crop up at any time. Decisions about how best to treat such problems are medical decisions and should be left up to properly trained health care providers, in consultation with their patients (and anyone else the patient chooses to involve, such as their partner). Everybody else needs to stay out of it!
In short, the idea that gestational limits on abortion need to be enacted into law is based on the belief that there is a need to 1) prevent people from doing certain things that are assumed to be harmful and 2) punish them if they do those things. If you look at abortion as a medical decision, there is no reason not to trust pregnant people and their doctors to make these decisions without direct governmental involvement.
TxGuitar
(4,340 posts)find a fascist.
And this is not a libertarian view, as said more eloquently above.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Socially liberal, fiscally liberal: Democratic
Socially conservative, fiscally conservative: classic Republican
Socially liberal, fiscally conservative: Libertarian
Socially conservative, fiscally liberal: tends authoritarian and fascistic
Libertarians do not like fascism, which is authoritarian control of the economy every bit as much as Maoists and Stalinists want to control everything.
Communism is left-wing authoritarianism.
Fascism is right-wing authoritarianism.
Libertarians hate authoritarianism.
Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)right-libertarians convince themselves that they have to align with fascism to prevent the horrors of socialism. For example, see the rise of fascism in post WWI Italy, where many within the 'individual anarchists' transitioned to the fascist movement.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)Read the terms of service.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
lovebugg
(64 posts)Democratic Underground is an online community for friendly, politically liberal people
Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)They don't believe in a fair society; they believe in a society in which government doesn't constrain opportunities to get rich at the expense of others.

lovebugg
(64 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)I will look to find copy at library tomorrow
Will be leaving boston soon
nice people but very crowded
Ate pizza there
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Great city otherwise when I visited it was the first time in my life I realized I was part of a whole ethnic group that looked like me and my family.
No wolves though. By the way, since the pack you fed fish to seemed tame, did you train them to haul your sled?
Response to Hekate (Reply #152)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Most so-called libertarians are against government regulation of capitalism, which is ironically anti-freedom for individual consumers. What they completely miss is that unfettered capitalism will allow powerful collectives (corporations) to consolidate economic power and use that to lobby for favorable laws to bolster their own interests that completely undermine the freedom of individual consumers. Libertarians favor freedom of corporations over freedom of consumers, so they contradict their own espoused values.
In a libertarian economic system, huge corporations would be free to use their massive financial strength to perpetuate a system that benefits them and limits the freedoms of individual consumers. Libertarianism, in this regard, actually works against individual liberty and for absolute corporate control.
A true, small-l libertarian would enthusiastically support consumer protections, while the fake Libertarian party rails against them.
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)Its modern roots trace back to the enlightenment and the class struggle between the mercantile and proto-industrialists, the emerging bourgeoisie, against the ruling aristocracies.
The core belief is in the equality of individuals, but it is equality basically of property rights. See for example our own Declaration of Independence, which decrees we are all created equal (except of course if you are not a white propertied male human) and are free to pursue happiness, as best we can, given our material circumstances.
The propertarian branch is currently known as neoliberalism- as it explicitly attempts to rewind and undo the reforms of the other modern liberal branch, the social democratic branch, which in this country has to hide its label under terms like progressive as anything evoking socialism is taboo.
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)And, I was curious about how OP would "answer" this.
Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)They believe in individual rights and limited government, which is under the umbrella of liberal ideologies. They are not center left social democratic 'progressive'' liberals, not are they center right neoliberals, both of whom support a more expansive role for government, but right-libertarianism is a liberal ideology.
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)Start here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)Seeing your comment about reproductive rights for women means are you probably a democrat.
BTW, Welcome to DU?
lovebugg
(64 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,698 posts)Have you just now gotten old enough to vote?
What other good reason is there for never voting?
lovebugg
(64 posts)I am staying in a city now but grew up in my own built cabin
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)lovebugg
(64 posts)I was taught the old ways
Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)I grew up in my own built cabin? That is not possible.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Many an early nineteenth century Presidential candidate was reared up in a log cabin he built with his own hands....
dpibel
(3,943 posts)Pretty sure they're good with the more primitive tools.
lovebugg
(64 posts)I have same pack visit cabin for maybe 6 years now
feed one by hand but not others
I just leave fish out
I try to answer all questions but many questions
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)By the way, how did the Boston friend with the mortgage problem contact you? Were sled dogs or smoke signals involved?
And if you grew up in the cabin you built, how did you come to have a friend in Boston who could write your early Democratic Underground posts for you?
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #202)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandiFan1290
(6,710 posts)Stop being so naive, DU
lol
0/10
not even a good attempt but you fooled many here.
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)go on ice."
Who then shoots a gun all day to get you to walk to the river to meet him.
To deliver the letter.
If your language is so rudimentary, how did you know what the letter said?
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)"snow machine go on ice" and a shotgun, why didn't he check if you were dead or alive for four years straight?
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #219)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)Sorry, son. She don't like you, house or no house.
Glad you at least have your wolf friend.
And, of course, I assume you have friends at your Connecticut house. The one with those high taxes you've been posting about.
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #221)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)from stream and put in bags. And Connecticut village elder shun lovebugg and don't talk to lovebugg for four years! Because lovebugg complain about Connecticut taxes on cabin lovebugg built in Connecticut wilderness of Alaska when lovebugg was baby.
It all kinda dopey.
Torchlight
(6,827 posts)Luck, the best of
Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)That, is the question.
Brother Buzz
(39,898 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Alaska
village holy cross nearest but much far away from me
John Shaft
(808 posts)Is Russian your native tongue?
RandiFan1290
(6,710 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)betsuni
(29,077 posts)Like Jack London.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)Im waiting for Grizzly Adams to show up
Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Boy talks like some 'injun' in a 50s TV horse-opera....
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)pass me some of that popcorn!
Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)I am serious: "I grew up in my own built cabin."
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Response to Hekate (Reply #153)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)spooky3
(38,632 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)lovebugg
(64 posts)Or tell me I can't fish to feed myself
Is that allowed here ?
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)It goes into the ground and into bodies of water, where it picks up pollutants. Do you think government should regulate polluting industries so they don't dump poisons into the water? Cities take water from rivers or lakes and purify it, removing sewage so we can drink it without getting cholera. We pay for this - not for the water so much itself, but for the service of purifying it and making it safe. Would you rather just drink the "free" water that falls from the sky into a lake and take your chances with giardia, cholera or heavy metal poisoning?
What about those fish? Do you object to paying the state for a fishing license so it has funds for conservation and environmental protection, to ensure that there will be more fish? Do you object to limits on the number of fish you can catch or how you can catch them so there will be enough fish in the future, for you and all the animals who live on them, or will you just take as many as you can catch in a net and hope that other people aren't doing the same?
You wouldn't have clean water or safe fish to eat (if any at all) without regulation. The libertarian position opposes that sort of regulation. Just ask any CEO of a chemical company.
lovebugg
(64 posts)I would go to the river and catch fish for winter .
Why would I pay someone to catch fish from the river and oceans
They do not own them
Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)to as many fish as you want and let others pay to keep the water and the beaches clean, restock the fish, make sure there are enough? Fishing without a license is basically theft from the public, you dont own those fish either.
lovebugg
(64 posts)Only enough for winter
Beaches ? No beaches no people there just me
restock ? Fish give birth in river no one puts them in there
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)lovebugg
(64 posts)Not lonely
have wolves , moose , eagles
In city so far I see many lonely people
Hekate
(100,133 posts)lovebugg
(64 posts)KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)
made me double up with uncontrollable laughter.
He was born and raised in the US, like me, but there the resemblance pretty much ended. Our paths crossed at University of Hawaii about 1970 I was raised in Hawaii and he was from a Black neighborhood in Chicago. In explaining his language journey he gave me a sample of the only way he knew how to talk until he was drafted (incomprehensible to an outsider) . He decided to change his prospects and teach himself another language and like my husband, whose first language was Belgian French until the age of 6, television was a great help. Hi-yo, Silver
dpibel
(3,943 posts)Yes, and...
Hekate
(100,133 posts)herding cats
(20,049 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Oneironaut
(6,299 posts)This in turn stimulates the local economy, at a small expense of massive pollution and a complete destruction of the environment. We should be grateful they let us have any of that water. /s
senseandsensibility
(24,973 posts)do you support? The pro choice position is shared by progressives and libertarians so it would not be prohibited here. Are there positions that are exclusively libertarian that you agree with?
lovebugg
(64 posts)I have never been very political
Cha
(319,067 posts)Political site?
lovebugg
(64 posts)I guess that?
Cha
(319,067 posts)KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)What city are you living in now? Employed, self employed, or own a business?
Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)dpibel
(3,943 posts)the poster indicates, or intimates, or vaguely suggests that he, she, or it is in Boston.
Which is a long way from the shining big sea waters, you must admit.
lovebugg
(64 posts)I was asked to bring money to help out my friend
she said she had trouble with losing house
I didn't have money but have gold and brought her 3 pouches
She said more than I need . I don't really need money the way I live but
much gold in part of river I know
FreeState
(10,702 posts)Sold some of those pouches of gold that I assume you panned yourself in Alaska?
lovebugg
(64 posts)she bought ticket for me to go and come back
I went and left because had trouble going on plane with gold
I took 3 boats to get there long time but this time will fly back
Can pan but don't have to big nuggets can see in water but smaller will pan for
I don't tell anyone where ever . Some people ask when sold some once and I didn't like
gave money to village elder to build new house
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)The Google machine there?
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)Many figures of speech seem missing in wilderness cabin with much easy gold.
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #147)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Blue Dawn
(970 posts)I looked up your profile and your previous posts, and you seemed quite capable of expressing yourself in a normal manner.
What is up with the broken English?
Response to Blue Dawn (Reply #162)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Blue Dawn
(970 posts)Since I don't know you, I will not jump to conclusions.
Response to Blue Dawn (Reply #167)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)lovebugg (56 posts)
18. The jury believed her so that's all that mattered in the case
What anyone else really thinks doesn't matter and I'm sure she doesn't care. She going to maybe get a lot of money after a few years if the appeals process loses'
As to the date I don't think many questioned if it was real because of the date . It was the year she changed after the dress
she had on the magazine cover claiming it was the original one she wearing and had Trumps DNA on it.
The designer was contacted and said the dress wasn't available until early 1995 for the retail market and she said
the assault must have been 1995 then changed it again to maybe 1996
I think that with claiming she had his DNA on it and the dress mistakes and the Law Order episode that played on TV
of the woman being raped in that same dept store changing room probably had a lot to do with it.
Good thing was all this stuff the judge ruled was inadmissible during the trial so it helped her out .
But lovebugg tells us their friend helped them write this, so that explains everything! Back to panning for gold, I guess.
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #191)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #195)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)hand-fed wolf. I'm sure they all miss you.
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #199)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)You're welcome.
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)pronouns and articles and now tenses disappear from way you speak.
Parts of speech disappear happen sometimes.
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)It is quite offensive to me.
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #136)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Response to Hekate (Reply #190)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)betsuni
(29,077 posts)popular in that region. Always wanted to try one.
Fla Dem
(27,633 posts)are you an American citizen, or grow up in America? No problem either way, but even saying you grew up in a log cabin you built yourself makes me wonder.
If not OK, you certainly ask some good questions about how things are done.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)Far from a village in Alaska. Now they are in Boston. They speak like a racist "TV Indian" from a 1950s TV Western. They do not believe in paying to fish or water bills.
That is what I was able to glean.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)
to help their friend pay off the house bills!!!! Isnt that fabulous?
We are entering Door Buzzard territory at last.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)But without the gay sex with inanimate objects, or the wholesome takedowns of the alt-right.
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)I think I read about that in Call of the Wild.
ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)JI7
(93,615 posts)and he is the most popular libertarians.
senseandsensibility
(24,973 posts)Well, I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Keep the gubmint out of white males' (only)
business except of course when said white male needs help from the gubmint.
JI7
(93,615 posts)most libertarians are anti choice.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)From Mother Jones

lindysalsagal
(22,910 posts)Originally, the steam train robber barrons put down train tracks at different widths so that other trains could not use them. It took federalizing transportation to end that regressive, controlling practice.
Rinse, repeat, for everything: trade, defense, education, food, drug, air, water safety. Some things can only happen with the organization of government.
Do you travel freely around your city? Your government gave you that right.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)You HAVE that right naturally.
Government enforces that right. Big difference. Government defends the right to move around.
Your example of train tracks is excellent.
limbicnuminousity
(1,416 posts)To save time: And what federal protections should women have against local, state-wide bans on abortion? And should transportation along federal highways be protected if a woman leaves an anti-abortion state to have an abortion outside of that state?
Edit 2. Saving more time. Should a woman be forced to carry a non-viable fetus until it miscarries if local laws prohibit abortion?
Progressive dog
(7,602 posts)exclusively libertarian? It might be one of the few view points Libertarians share with me.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Basically, he believes in a libertarian ideal, but is first and foremost a realist and pragmatist and thus happily co-exists with many other political stripes.
Libertarianism is a fantastic ideal, just as communism is a fantastic ideal. By "fantastic" I mean the "fantasy" sense of the word.
Libertarians imagine a world where everyone is focused on working hard to get ahead and everyone is cooperating to get stuff done because it is in their best interests; cooperating by being careful and responsible. Communists imagine a world where everyone works at their best ability and everyone gets what they need and the rest is spread around.
Both ideologies are imagining idealized human beings who are cooperative, work hard, never exploit anyone and jointly make life fair in somewhat different senses. Both will never be achieved because they are both unrealistic.
I value highly freedoms and rights, but I believe no right is in isolation. Rights are shared and not owned. Rights are frequently in conflict and have to be balanced. That means no pure form of social governance, no crystalline distillation into simplest principles will ever be sufficient or workable or desirable.
I believe that in the future, government will be reduced but never eliminated. The only way it will be reduced is when people learn to get along without shooting each other, bombing each other, exploiting each other, or being nasty to each other. To the extent that people the world over cooperate with each other responsibly and respectfully, ... to that extent government can be reduced. Though that is an idealistic dream, it is a dream worth having. "Imagine." But don't depend on it arriving next week.
For example, libertarians believe government should get out of things like welfare and providing health care. The libertarian fantasy is that everyone will be motivated to donate to charity and it will all work out. The reality is that the poor donate a much larger percentage of their income than rich people do, despite rich people having a much much greater percentage of disposable income to give out.
So I hold libertarianism as an unobtainable ideal that is worth moving towards by enlightening and educating the public, especially the rich fuckers who should know better but are very unenlightened. It seems that money and privilege are counterproductive for enlightenment. I also hold that it is a better ideal than marxism or communism.
My liberal progressive libertarianism is a far cry from Republican faux libertarianism and much closer to liberalism, progressivism, Democratic policies, and Canadian Liberal Party / New Democratic Party policies.
Thus I am comfortable here, and very glad to be accepted for what I post from time to time.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Mosby
(19,491 posts)I encountered libertarianism in a book I read as a kid, and gave it some thought. I didn't know the name at the time, but seems like something we could think of as a near impossible ideal, but maybe with a lot more social and personal evolution, we might be able to develop that degree of responsibility, compassion and concern where everyone follows a moral/ethical code without the need for most laws.
The book was A Martian Odyssey by Stanley Weinbaum.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Kennah
(14,578 posts)Kennah
(14,578 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)The fallacy of all-or-nothing yes/no black/white all-bad/all-good kind of thinking is a dead end, intellectual laziness and a lack of introspection.
I'm a progressive liberal and Liberal (Canadian party) who leans libertarian. Since we are not libertarian as societies and since we will never be libertarian, I'm happy as I am while seeking to enlighten people and shift things slightly in the libertarian direction.
The Pauls are faux libertarians who lean loony.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)You'll see the usage in describing Spanish politics before the civil war, when Anarchists fielded a great trade-union coalition and a working political party. Which provided much of the Left's strength when fighting broke out.
DBoon
(24,983 posts)See Ayn Rand as an example.
LW libertarians want to free the working class and peasantry from the oppression of the state.
LW libertarians ("Anarchists" ) make the most sense when speaking of a society comprised of peasants. The Makhnovist Revolution in Ukraine after the 1917 revolution is an example.
DBoon
(24,983 posts)A libertarian perspective on the Democratic view point may be useful
Democrats usually believe humans have equal inherent dignity, that wealth and income should not confer control over society. Most libertarians are fine with the wealthy having control, as private property outweighs other restraints.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)that the people should be able to exercise the freedom to control their own personal lives,
(things that are described as "social issues" now, and the position to which most of the Democratic Party is sympathetic),
and the polar opposite of the Democratic party on economic issues, and whether the government should be employed to try to improve the lives of the people (to which the modern American Libertarian party is totally OPPOSED--)
The Libertarian party is basically opposed to all taxes,
and consider the Constitutional amendment instituting the Income Tax,
to be "illegitimate"...
Indeed, on economic issues and the 'proper role of government',
there is little difference between the Libertarian and Republican parties....
I would not be insulted if someone calls me a "libertarian",
but just don't call me a "Libertarian"....
brush
(61,033 posts)republianmushroom
(22,324 posts)czarjak
(13,639 posts)Screw anyone who isnt me.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 2, 2024, 01:22 AM - Edit history (1)
Libertarians very often present themselves as Republicans who like sex and smoking pot (which makes them kind of a joke among Dems) but otherwise seem to have little in common with our particular politics.
By all means stick around if you find us congenial. And do read the TOS, which you signed.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)that is 'libertarian' with a small L, as opposed to "Libertarian" as in having to do with the "Libertarian Party"....
In their personal lives, Americans should be free to make their own decisions, as long as those decisions do not infringe upon the rights of others....
(and therein lies much of the argument--- those on the far right seem to believe that when citizens who exercise liberties with which they do not agree, that it somehow infringes on "their rights"--- which is an obvious blatant falsehood.)
The Democratic Party is the only party remaining which defends individual freedoms,
regardless of what other parties may call themselves...
As I have read in this thread, most here now seem to consider those positions to be 'progressive',
which is also true--- but they are based on personal liberty--- thus "libertarian" in the classical definition,
but not necessarily the position of the modern "Libertarian Party" in the United States.
That said, I have known some adherents to the Libertarian Party who were opposed to the government attempting to regulate or limit abortion--- which was the correct position for them to take, if the name of their party means anything...
However, as far as the rules of this forum go, this is a forum for Democrats---
thus, expressing support for the Libertarian PARTY,
or any party but the Democratic Party, is not allowable under the rules.
However, since you wrote 'libertarian' with a small L,
my answer to your question would be YES, IMHO.
Arthur_Frain
(2,355 posts)nt
dpibel
(3,943 posts)That is so rich!
Thank you, Arthur, for one of the best laughs ever.
blogslug
(39,167 posts)Do not post support for Republicans or independent/third-party "spoiler" candidates. Do not state that you are not going to vote, or that you will write-in a candidate that is not on the ballot, or that you intend to vote for any candidate other than the official Democratic nominee in any general election where a Democrat is on the ballot. Do not post anything that smears Democrats generally, or that is intended to dissuade people from supporting the Democratic Party or its candidates. Don't argue there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats.
source: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)herding cats
(20,049 posts)This is not Libertarian Underground. Sorry, not sorry. I'm 100% not buying the schtick.
I, personally, want absolutely nothing to do with any of the Libertarian politicians I've ever met. I've met and spoke to several from local to state level. I met Ron Paul back in the day. I've never encountered a more anti regulation, anti government, person who was more than happy to take his government benefits and paycheck than him. What a hypocrite he was. Their supporters are even worse. Ron Paulite types who want to not pay taxes and have zero regulations and somehow think we can self-regulate. News flash. Assholes are literally destroying the world for creature comforts and corporate profits. We cannot self-regulate.
Beyond the fact they run as spoilers in many states, I've never met a single one who was sincere beyond padding their pockets and making sure Democrats lose. It's a nifty gig if you can get it, but they're not a genuine party and I'm positive they're not pro choice anymore as my nutcase neighbor has changed their stance. If anyone here knows a nutty Libertarian they can attest to the fact they're a whack-a-doodle fringe party.
So yeah, I'm definitely not about to entertain some lame faux (which makes it even more lame) Libertarian crap here on a Democratic site. That's not now, nor ever, who we are here.
Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)They should all get a quick pizza.
betsuni
(29,077 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)OP needs to tweak their routine.
dpibel
(3,943 posts)Within this very thread, the OP went from a person who knew about pronouns to someone who'd make Iron Eyes Cody cry.
Some serious improv, man.
My guess is that this is a person with some experience who believes there's a number of posts to reach that gives relative protection from certain negative events.
This is a pretty clever way to pile up a bunch of posts without having to say anything substantive.
Don't be too surprised when Three Pouch Gold suddenly turns raving MAGA.
Response to dpibel (Reply #165)
Name removed Message auto-removed
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)You neo Jack London. Where sled dog? You pan gold Placerville, too?
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)
dpibel
(3,943 posts)Just a couple of days ago, our wilderness-dwelling friend not only knew about pronouns and standard English word-order, he knew about conditions, including taxation, in Hartford, CT. What's more, somehow taxes on his childhood construction project had gone up 35% and he got a letter to that effect, apparently from the far distant village where he does not live.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10421867#post1
lovebugg (56 posts)
3. No guns lol
Reply to CTyankee (Reply #1)
Wed Jan 31, 2024, 09:47 PM
They have shootings weekly in Hartford
lovebugg (56 posts)
2. I wish there was a way to make them realize property taxes are really hurting people here
Reply to question everything (Original post)
Wed Jan 31, 2024, 09:43 PM
Towns have gone insane
Mine is going up 35%
Got the letter in the mail last month
dpibel
(3,943 posts)A mere 24 hours before the devolution into Nanook of the North, our friend was opining at length on the weakness of E. Jean Carroll's case, reciting a set of FoxNews talking points. Nearly unmasked on that one.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18643733
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)Are you a Libertarian or a Democratic?
betsuni
(29,077 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)From Dominos?
Response to betsuni (Reply #124)
Name removed Message auto-removed
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)There's a pretty good fella up there who can give you a hand named Jack London.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Torchlight
(6,827 posts)libertarian's party's differences, platform, and convictions. I'd think spending a day or two with Wikipedia or a library and look at the libertarian ideal, its method to practically achieve it (if any), and getting a grasp on what it stands for, what it supports, and what it opposes before declaring yourself an ally of any one political party. It's a difficult thing to proclaim green our favorite color if we've never been exposed to green.
ok_cpu
(2,242 posts)Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses
by Mark Twain
https://twain.lib.virginia.edu/projects/rissetto/offense.html
Swede
(39,492 posts)Libertarians are like house cats: absolutely convinced of their fierce independence while utterly dependent on a system they don't appreciate or understand.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)niyad
(132,440 posts)made the observation (having sat silently listening for about half an hour), that they all wanted small government, but one large enough to give them a taxpayer-funded job, and that "libertarian politician" is an oxymoron.
Some people are sooooooo touchy!!!
Polybius
(21,900 posts)For example, I see some here are for the death penalty. Some are anti-immigration. I'm anti-property taxes. Are people here allowed to express that viewpoint? What about voting for non-Democrats years ago? I voted for Bloomberg in 2005.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)So many debates, etc. the last few weeks re: I/P issues and other things, yet this thread brings us all together!
Or, rather: Thread bring together!
GiqueCee
(4,254 posts)... "When I grow up, I'm gonna be a Libertarian!"
His mother replied, "Well, dear, which is it going to be? You can't do both."
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)Response to beaglelover (Reply #215)
Name removed Message auto-removed
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)beaglelover
(4,466 posts)dpibel
(3,943 posts)"News is good!"
"When back to village I come, elder with machine go on snow give machine make spark in wires. And give magic box speak to moving stars in sky. Oh. Also little box name tab-lit."
"Now I talk to nice DU peoples from cabin."
"Day most happy."
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)betsuni
(29,077 posts)They get very excited at being mentioned here so I don't think they'll be able to resist.
ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)That's a new one on me. Is that its real name? (I'm guessing not, based on a quick Google search, lol.)
betsuni
(29,077 posts)First time I heard it here I thought "the Cave" was a nickname, but no, it's a Cave. Trolls banned from DU and totally obsessed with it for years and years, have a forum called "The DUmpster" where they obsess. Bragged about trolling, gave DUers insulting nicknames, an award for the worst DUer of the year. I admit, sometimes it was sort of funny (unless my posts were made fun of, of course). But they were horrible about doxxing people, very scary.
Now there are hardly any members, a shadow of its former self, boring. But still obsessing about DU! I look at it every few months when I remember.
ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)I'll have to check it sometime.
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)Brother Buzz
(39,898 posts)Trolls love eating pizza under the bridge

Response to lovebugg (Original post)
LudwigPastorius This message was self-deleted by its author.