General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEmbattled 'Squad' members Bowman, Bush face growing primary threat
A couple of the Squads most high-profile members are facing formidable primary challenges as criticism over their stances in office mounts.
Reps. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) have both been outraised by centrist primary opponents, according to the latest filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), even as other Squad members such as Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) are financially thriving.
The development comes as Bush and Bowman have faced blowback not only for their positions on the Israel-Hamas war, but also growing scrutiny over more personal public controversies.
Their possible defeat at the hands of more moderate Democrats would deal a significant blow to the Squad, Congresss most vocal left-wing group, and hand the establishment-aligned faction of the party a significant victory.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4445124-cori-bush-jamaal-bowman-squad-israel-primary/
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)*snip*
To some extent, it's not about Israel at all, Latimer said. It's about (how Bowman) doesn't vote for the infrastructure bill when we desperately need money for infrastructure to deal with backyard issues. It's the question of how do you gear up your district office to really focus on the local needs of a community and are you more interested in the national profile that you're creating for yourself?
https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2023/12/george-latimer-says-run-against-bowman-about-more-israel/392550/
betsuni
(29,078 posts)wouldn't sit well with constituents, I'd think. I have a feeling the majority are regular people and not revolutionaries demanding their reps pass all-or-nothing Justice Democrats/Democratic Socialists of America purity tests.
Cha
(319,079 posts)Got Someone Working for them and Working With Pres Biden.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)in trouble for doing so because of purity tests, like people being mad at John Fetterman!
Cha
(319,079 posts)going on for too long.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,869 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)lapucelle
(21,061 posts)As Earth Month comes to a close, County Executive George Latimer is announcing his introduction of four bills aimed at advancing the environmental goals of his administration. These new proposals come at the end of a month filled with action on the environment by Latimer on behalf of the roughly one million current residents of Westchester and all its future residents.
Latimer said: Whether its ensuring communities that have been overlooked are now addressed to promote real environmental justice, encouraging our partners in government to find innovative ways to expand their renewable energy capacity or ensuring the safety of our parks and the children who play in them these bills I am proud to introduce take aim at long-standing environmental issues we as a County must address. We only have one planet and its on us all to work to protect it.
https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9822-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-introduces-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations
--------------------------------------------------
Published: 12 October 2023
(White Plains, NY) In a significant milestone for the residents of Westchester County, County Executive George Latimer signed several crucial environmental bills that have been crafted by his Administration, through the Countys Director of Research Ellen Hendrickx and Director of Environment, Energy, & Sustainability Peter McCartt, and refined through months of collaboration with the Board of Legislators. These bills represent the Countys commitment to enhancing the quality of life for our community by addressing pressing issues and meeting the evolving needs of our residents.
Latimer said: The signing of these bills into law is a testament to the power of collaboration and the steadfast dedication of our Board of Legislators to improve the lives of Westchester County residents and protect our planets future. Through their hard work and our shared commitment to good governance, we have crafted and signed laws that address pressing issues in our community. Further, our bold steps towards expanding access to Electric Vehicle charging stations and electrifying our car and bus fleet reflect our determination to lead the way in sustainability. We are proud to serve the people of Westchester, and together, we are building a brighter, cleaner future for our County."
https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9974-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-signs-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations
Cha
(319,079 posts)will be a brilliant Benefit for the Dem party!
Mahalo for his, Lapucelle!
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)Lacy Clay, who Ms Bush ran against was hardly a centrist nor was Mr Engle who Mr Bowman beat. They were both on the extreme left flank of the Democratic party. Yelling the loudest is great for organizing but not for legislating.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Them vs Us.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)/sarcasm.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)They are solid progressives.
bottomofthehill
(9,390 posts)Eliminating Customs and Border Patrol, the Infrastructure Bill....
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)You are in favor of a big police state? Odd stance for a liberal.
Where have they argued for the ELIMINATION of customs and border patrol?
Specifics on the Infrastructure Bill that are not in line with the party?
Those sound a lot like RW talking points against them. Only this missing is that they are socialists.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)It is a fallacy to say that if a person is against cutting that they are therefore in favour of expansion. It is a false dichotomy. "Dichotomy" means "split into two", as if there are only two choices.
In reality there are many choices and even if you were to grossly limit the choices there are at least three: reduce, stay the same or increase. But that is still a ridiculous mischaracterization of options. There are many choices, like 1% cut, 10% cut, 50% cut, 100% cut or 2% increase, 5% increase, and on and on. Essentially an infinite array of options.
It is important to know that most things are measured in real numbers (think decimal numbers and fractions and percents), not binary numbers 0 or 1, not yes/no, not black/white.
Defunding does not necessarily mean elimination. Likewise, being against defunding does not necessarily mean calling for a huge expansion into a police state such as tRump would like to create.
It is not respectable to make appeals to logical fallacies. Outlandish invocations of binary thinking is a good way to make allies angry and to sink a meaningful discussion.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)I realize there is nuance in the issue. But how is what the "squad" is proposing not Democratic. Generally, the Democratic position would be to not increase the size and military-ness of the police. Just like the stance of the Democratic Party is pro-choice. You can nuance the shit out of the abortion issue, but it wouldn't be wrong to say that the Dems are pro-choice.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)---------------------------------------------
In what world is being against defunding the police equivalent to being "in favor a big police state"?
---------------------------------------------
Both Bush and Bowman are to the right of Leader Jeffries in terms of their policy positions and votes in Congress. They might present as "socialists", but they don't govern that way. Nancy Pelosi's record makes them look positively centrist.

Nancy Pelosi is a Hard-Core Liberal
======================

Cori Bush is a Populist-Leaning Liberal
======================

Jamaal Bowman is a Moderate Liberal
======================

Hakeem Jeffries is a Libertarian-Leaning Progressive
https://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm
======================
Constituents will have a choice in the primaries. For many, that's a good thing

https://www.timesofisrael.com/j-street-pulls-jamaal-bowman-endorsement-over-anti-israel-rhetoric/
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)that they did it for specific reasons with the constituency and with the approval of the whip since they had the votes for it to pass, right?
It just seems to me that those who are progressive would not want to see a big police state. Which the "squad" is pointing out. Rather than give money to a large, basically military organization, for more and more weaponry, why not give more money to social workers and other more fit to deal with domestic violence, drug addiction, etc. Defunding the police should be a Democratic stance.
My comment about socialists is that that is what the RW usually throws at them. I fully realize they aren't.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)That's not what they said on social media.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is trying to tweet her way out of her vote against the Democrats' $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill even correcting President Biden's claims about its benefits.
Why it matters: AOC, the rest of The Squad and two other progressives were the only Democrats to vote against the bill. That prompted criticism from their colleagues and social media followers, since the road-and-bridge spending will so directly impact their constituents. Thirteen Republicans helped cover their lost votes.
- "We did not fund the replacement of every childs [lead water] pipe & we shouldnt tell people we did," Ocasio-Cortez tweeted about Biden.
- The other five Democrats who voted against have released their own statements and explanations on Twitter.
- They placed blame on other factors like the president, "corporate polluters," conservative Democrats, procedural issues and agreements, as well as a refusal to "choose" between supporting union workers or childcare and health care workers.
https://www.axios.com/2021/11/09/aoc-squad-defend-infrastructure-no-vote
-------------------------------------------------------------
Where did you read that the 6 Democrats who voted "no" had the approval of Majority Whip Clyburn?
Clyburn wound up having to (indirectly) reach out to Republicans to get President Biden's bill passed.
NORTH CHARLESTON House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn took credit for securing the 13 GOP votes necessary to push President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure plan across the finish line last week, but some Republicans are saying Democratic pressure is overblown.
Speaking to reporters at the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments office in North Charleston on Nov. 9, the Democratic congressman from Columbia took some credit over the passage of the bill, which will bring $6 billion in federal dollars to South Carolina.
"I indirectly whipped those votes," Clyburn told The Post and Courier. "I had members in the caucus assigned to certain Republican people that I couldn't talk to and that's how we got those votes."
https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/scs-jim-clyburn-takes-credit-for-whipping-13-gop-votes-for-bidens-infrastructure-package/article_64e731c6-4191-11ec-89d2-af61ab228177.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congressman Jim Clyburn was confident he would secure enough votes to pass President Joe Bidens infrastructure bill after a day of arm twisting, which put Democrats on the precipice of their most important legislative victory since the party reclaimed the White House.
But there were a handful of holdouts who Clyburn, the chief vote counter for House Democrats, had outstanding concerns about heading into the Friday evening vote.
The South Carolina congressman and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gathered with staff just off the House floor in a small, gilded, gold room that had little more than a printer, chairs and a monitor that displays vote totals. Pelosi was speaking to the president on her cell phone and asked Clyburn to update Biden on the status of negotiations.
I need you to talk to him, to explain to him where we are, Clyburn recalled Pelosi telling him. So I told the president that I thought that we were in a good place. That we could pass a bill. But I thought that he needed to get on the phone with several people.
https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article255742646.html
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)The first part says, "I want to protect our party from the disappointment and collapse in turnout from communities like mine that occurs when we tell them we did things we didn't do." So, you know, she did indicate it was about her constituents. And Axios was also clear to point out that she fact checked Biden about fixing the lead pipe problems. Why didn't you include that information?
Also, Clyburn thought there would be 21 no votes from the Dems and only had 19. So things were fine. And clearly AOC and the squad didn't blindside Clyburn.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Similarly, wanting to "protect our Party" by stemming a potential collapse in turnout is not the same thing as addressing the needs of constituents.
(Interesting fact: In the 2022 midterm elections, in AOC's NY-14 district overall turnout was down by almost 100,000 voters with AOC receiving more than 70,000 fewer votes than she did in 2020. Overall turnout for NY-14 was also down from 2018 midterm levels, with AOC receiving 25,000+ fewer votes in the 2022 midterms than she did in 2018.)
https://ballotpedia.org/New_York%27s_14th_Congressional_District
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
While it may be true that a representative hastily "fact checking" a president might temporarily forestall criticism for a bewildering vote on that president's signature legislation, it is not particularly wise if it ignores the fact that someone like President Biden knows how to play a longer game in order to accomplish major policy goals.
Splashy, publicity-generating non-binding resolutions like the Green New Deal document of 5 years ago are all well and good, but executable policy takes real planning and real work, sometimes over the course of several years, and the Biden-Harris Administration know how to get that done.
FACT SHEET: The Biden-Harris Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan
Vice President Kamala Harris to Announce Action Plan that Accelerates Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Investments to Replace All Lead Pipes in Next Decade
Today, the Biden-Harris Administration is releasing its Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan. The plan represents a historic effort of unprecedented ambition that will deploy catalytic resources from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law while leveraging every tool across federal, state, and local government to deliver clean drinking water, replace lead pipes, and remediate lead paint. The plan includes over 15 new actions from more than 10 federal agencies that ensure the federal government is marshalling every resource to make rapid progress towards replacing all lead pipes in the next decade.
That is why the President and Vice President made replacing lead pipes a centerpiece of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to deliver clean drinking water to families and children across America. These game-changing investments will put American plumbers and pipefitters to work replacing all of Americas lead pipes and service lines and making other critical upgrades. All families, children, and Americans should be able to turn on the faucet at home or school and drink clean water including in low-income communities and communities of color that have been disproportionally affected by dangerous lead pipes while we also create good paying jobs remediating lead paint in homes.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/12/16/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-lead-pipe-and-paint-action-plan/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Actions and Progress to Protect Communities From Lead Pipes and Paint
Today, at a White House Summit on Accelerating Lead Pipe Replacement hosted by Vice President Harris, the Biden-Harris Administration announced new actions and progress to deliver clean drinking water, replace lead pipes, and remediate lead paint to protect children and communities across America. Through historic levels of funding from President Bidens Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and American Rescue Plan, annual appropriations, and harnessing a variety of tools across federal, state, and local government, the Administration is delivering tangible progress on the groundbreaking Biden-Harris Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan announced in December of 2021. The Biden-Harris Administration is working aggressively to replace all lead service lines in America in the next decade.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/01/27/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-and-progress-to-protect-communities-from-lead-pipes-and-paint/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Action to Protect Communities from Lead Exposure
The Biden-Harris Administration is working to ensure a future where every child and family can live safely in their communities without the fear and harmful effects of lead exposure. Today, as part of President Biden and Vice President Harriss vision for a lead-free future, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to strengthen its Lead and Copper Rule that would require water systems to replace lead service lines within 10 years, helping secure safe drinking water for communities across the country.
The Presidents Bipartisan Infrastructure Law invests over $50 billion for the largest upgrade to the nations water infrastructure in history, and todays action builds on these historic levels of funding from President Bidens Investing in America agenda, a key pillar of Bidenomics, to replace lead service lines across the nation.
snip==================
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides $15 billion in funding specifically dedicated for replacing lead service lines, along with an additional $11.7 billion in general-purpose funding through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, which can also be used for lead pipe replacement. To date, EPA has awarded over $3.5 billion of this lead service line funding to replace hundreds of thousands of lead service lines in homes, buildings, and schools. To advance President Bidens Justice40 Initiative, EPA has committed to deploying at least 49 percent of its State Revolving Funds to disadvantaged communities. In total during this administration, EPAs Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund programs have provided over $796 million to help systems that serve disadvantaged communities begin removal of lead service lines across the country, protecting the health of over 9.8 million people.
Funding from the American Rescue Plans $350 billion State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund can be used by states and communities to replace lead service lines and remediate lead paint. To date, well over $20 billion nationwide has been invested in water infrastructure projects, including significant clean water investments.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/11/30/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-action-to-protect-communities-from-lead-exposure/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA proposal would accelerate progress toward achieving President Bidens goal of removing 100% of lead pipes
November 30, 2023
WASHINGTON Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to strengthen its Lead and Copper Rule that would require water systems across the country to replace lead service lines within 10 years. EPA is also proposing additional improvements to protect public health, such as lowering the lead action level and improving sampling protocols utilized by water systems. Todays proposed action significantly advances President Bidens commitment to remove every lead service line in America to protect children and vulnerable populations from the negative impacts of lead in drinking water, particularly those living in disadvantaged communities.
https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-proposes-strengthen-lead-and-copper-rule-protect-all
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)lapucelle
(21,061 posts)We're Democrats.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Chuuku Davis
(607 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)GOTV in NY District 16 For George Latimer!!
ificandream
(11,837 posts)I believe the Democratic Party should be wide-ranging. I like the Squad even if I dont always agree with them.
bahboo
(16,953 posts)Polybius
(21,902 posts)She is by far the best of the bunch.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)opponents crush them.
Cha
(319,079 posts)Please check out Post #8 I jsut posted on George Latimer.
And, I hear ya!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)level headed Democrat would be better than the attention seeking "squad". I don't take any of them seriously, because they're not serious people.
Much luck to George Latimer, I hope he's a serious threat to Bowman.
Cha
(319,079 posts)to recruit George Latimer to run against Bowman for Months.
And, he's taken the Plunge!
I Know he'll vote For Pes Biden's Democratic Agenda and Help his District 16 to Flourish . Not Always Voting Against.
🕊️🕯️💙🌊
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)use all the help we can give him.
Cha
(319,079 posts)womanofthehills
(10,988 posts)The Squad are my favorites in Congress. Sad- that AIPAC is going after them - but their young constituents will save them.
From Democracy Now -
AIPAC vs. AOC & The Squad: Pro-Israel Lobby Group to Spend $100M to Target Progressive Lawmakers
As we begin a pivotal election year in the United States, we look at the powerful U.S. lobby group AIPAC, which is set to spend more than $100 million to defeat progressives who are critical of Israeli human rights violations in Palestine.
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/1/2/ryan_grim_the_squad_congress_2024
Cha
(319,079 posts)George Latimer in New York!!
🇺🇸💙🌊
PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)Lattimer has been around a long time and he's been a good County Executive. I think if he were going to veer right we would have seen it already.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)of changed votes or policies or turning into Republicans or any of this corruption: Saying something makes it true! At least they stopped using the word "beholden" in every sentence.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, long expected to inject money into his campaign, donated over $600,000 to him in the latest filings, over 40% of his fundraising total.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" donating to County Executive Latimer's campaign?
AIPAC is a single issue lobbying group. Mega-donors are individuals.
Definition and meaning of megadonor: A Megadonor is an individual who makes extraordinarily large political donations to a candidate, political party, or organization. These donations are often in the millions of dollars and greatly exceed the legal limits of donations set by the Federal Election Commission. Megadonors are often major players in American politics, contributing immense amounts of money to influence the outcomes of elections and policy initiatives.
https://goodparty.org/political-terms/megadonor
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So one more time, who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" funding Dmocratic County Executive George Latimer?
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Definition and meaning of megadonor: A Megadonor is an individual who makes extraordinarily large political donations to a candidate, political party, or organization. These donations are often in the millions of dollars and greatly exceed the legal limits of donations set by the Federal Election Commission. Megadonors are often major players in American politics, contributing immense amounts of money to influence the outcomes of elections and policy initiatives.
https://goodparty.org/political-terms/megadonor
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)He is heavily funded by them. Very disappointing.
Thanks for the heads up.
Where's Eliot Engel when you need him?
PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)Have neither the energy nor will to argue.
Not much on being called antisemitic nor not knowing about AIPAC either.
That is ludicrous.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)AIPAC is right wing and gives money to more GOP members of Congress than Democrats but more to individual Democrats, close to 3/4s of the House take money from AIPAC.
There was a concentrated effort by AIPAC to fund opponents to Democratic incumbents against progressive Democrats in 2022 and even more for 2024. Not hard to find reputable documentation.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)to distort elections?
Think weird there is a contingent that do not fully support POTUS Biden's efforts in Middle East.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)that automatically turns Democrats into Republican monsters if it comes from the wrong place. BEHOLDEN FOR ALL ETERNITY.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)glorified for simply doing their job. I have never understood the hype surrounding these attention seeking individuals. The more I hear about them, the more I despise them, especially Jayapal.
I wish they would all just go away. Other than talking a lot, I'm not sure what they've actually accomplished.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)"Be a workhorse, not a showhorse. Go to all your hearings. Come early, stay late. Do your homework. Don't do national press. Be accessible to your state media and to your constituents. That sounded smart to me. ... I'd be Minnesota's senator and nobody else's."
His chief of staff called it the "Hillary Model" because of her "not just earning the respect of her colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but getting a whole lot done for the people of the state."
That's the point. Getting things done for the people.
PufPuf23
(9,856 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Good call on not giving a shit about such a lie and utter nonsense.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)hear that it's just another in a long line of vicious & antisemitic tropes. Shouldn't be allowed here, but I don't run the joint.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)or some other anti-Semitic nonsense?
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)AIPAC is an American organization. It's right there in the name: American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)One of the subjects of the OP said "What it is about is white supremacy" the other day.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Especially when the subject is Jews!
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Bowman has the record of a moderate liberal.
=======================================

Jamaal Bowman is a Moderate Liberal
https://bit.ly/488WQzW
redqueen
(115,186 posts)They supported the campaigns of 37 Republicans in Congress who voted against certifying Biden's 2020 U.S. presidential election victory after the 2021 United States Capitol attack.
Imo it's sickening to see them praised here, but politics makes strange bedfellows.
Wonder how many of the challengers they're funding support medicare for all
Celerity
(54,410 posts)AIPAC is not a Dem ally on balance. As stated above, in 2022 they endorsed 109 Republicans who refused to certify Biden's election (Including the christofash Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Gym 'the paedo enabler' Jordan, ultra MAGAette cheerleader Elise Stefanik, the worm of worms Kevin McCarthy, the crazed gunhumper Greg Steube, Ronny 'Trump's drunk Dr Feelgood' Jackson, Joe 'you lie!' Wilson, John 'I am a racist, climate change denying MAGAt, but look!, Henry Cuellar campaigns and fundraises for me so it's all good' Carter, Troy 'make shit up about being threatened, get caught, and then distract by trying to get Biden 25th Amendment'ed' Nehls, etc etc). AIPAC values fealty to a foreign power more than the health of American democracy as shown by their support for those RW treasonous MAGAts simply because the MAGAts are also pro-Israel hawks.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/18/pro-israel-lobby-group-aipac-midterms-election-deniers-and-extremist-republicans

The USs largest pro-Israel lobby group is backing dozens of racists, homophobes and election deniers running for Congress next month because they have pledged to defend Israel against stiffening criticism of its oppression of the Palestinians. The powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) has justified endorsing Republicans with extremist views, including members of Congress with ties to white supremacist groups and representatives who attempted to block Joe Bidens election victory, on the grounds that the singular issue of support for Israel trumps other considerations.
But Aipacs support for rightwing politicians has privately embarrassed some Democrats also endorsed by the powerful group and drawn accusations from more moderate pro-Israel organisations that it is attempting to stifle legitimate criticism of hardline Israeli policies. Logan Bayroff, a spokesman for J Street, a group campaigning for Washington to take a stronger stand to end the occupation of Palestinian territories, accused Aipac of attempting to impose a narrow definition of what it is to be pro-Israel amid shifting views in Democratic ranks.
Their actions have made clear that they view pro-Israel, pro-peace progressive Democrats as threats and Trumpist Republicans as allies. That worldview could not be more out of touch with the vast majority of American Jews, he said. Aipac may hope to silence and intimidate political leaders who believe that settlement expansion, endless conflict and permanent occupation are harmful to Israel, the Palestinian people and US interests. Ultimately, however, these common-sense views are too popular, widespread and important to be suppressed, and will continue to gain strength within American politics and among the American Jewish community.
Aipacs backing of extreme rightwing Republicans follows its $27m advertising campaign during the Democratic primaries to defeat candidates who spoke up for Palestinian rights, mostly with attacks over issues that had nothing to do with Israel. The campaign is part of push by more hawkish pro-Israel groups to shore up support in Congress in the face of rising advocacy for the Palestinian cause within the Democratic party and erosion of approval for Israeli actions among American Jews, particularly younger people.
snip

updated list:
https://jstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AIPAC-Endorsee-List-042022.pdf
AIPAC endorsees that voted against certifying the 2020 presidential election results
Robert Aderholt (AL-04)
Jerry Carl (AL-01)
Barry Moore (AL-02)
Gary Palmer (AL-06)
Mike Rogers (AL-03)
Andy Biggs (AZ-05)
Debbie Lesko (AZ-08)
David Schweikert (AZ-01)
Rick Crawford (AK-01)
Ken Calvert (CA-41)
Mike Garcia (CA-27)
Darrell Issa (CA-48)
Doug LaMalfa (CA-01)
Kevin McCarthy (CA-20)
Jay Obernolte (CA-23)
Doug Lamborn (CO-05)
Kat Cammack (FL-03)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-25)
Byron Donalds (FL-19)
Neal Dunn (FL-02)
Scott Franklin (FL-15)
Carlos Gimenez (FL-26)
Brian Mast (FL-18)
Bill Posey (FL-08)
John Rutherford (FL-04)
Greg Steube (FL-17)
Daniel Webster (FL-11)
Rick Allen (GA-12)
Buddy Carter (GA-01)
Ross Fulcher (ID-01)
Mike Bost (IL-12)
Jim Baird (IN-04)
Jim Banks (IN-03)
Greg Pence (IN-06)
Ron Estes (KS-04)
Jake LaTurner (KS-02)
Tracey Mann (KS-01)
Hal Rogers (KY-05)
John Kennedy (LA-Sen)
Garret Graves (LA-06)
Clay Higgins (LA-03)
Mike Johnson (LA-04)
Steve Scalise (LA-01)
Andy Harris (MD-01)
Jack Bergman (MI-01)
Lisa McClain (MI-09)
Tim Walberg (MI-05)
Michelle Fischbach (MN-07)
Michael Guest (MS-03)
Trent Kelly (MS-01)
Steven Palazzo (MS-04)
Sam Graves (MO-06)
Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO-03)
Jason Smith (MO-08)
Matt Rosendale (MT-02)
Adrian Smith (NE-03)
Jeff Van Drew (NJ-02)
Yvette Herrell (NM-02)
Chris Jacobs (NY-24)
Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11)
Elise Stefanik (NY-21)
Dan Bishop (NC-08)
Virginia Foxx (NC-05)
Richard Hudson (NC-09)
Greg Murphy (NC-03)
David Rouzer (NC-07)
Steve Chabot (OH-01)
Bill Johnson (OH-06)
Jim Jordan (OH-04)
Stephanie Bice (OK-05)
Tom Cole (OK-04)
Kevin Hern (OK-01)
Mike Kelly (PA-16)
Dan Meuser (PA-09)
Scott Perry (PA-10)
Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14)
Lloyd Smucker (PA-11)
G.T. Thompson (PA-15)
Jeff Duncan (SC-03)
Ralph Norman (SC-05)
Tom Rice (SC-07)
William Timmons (SC-04)
Joe Wilson (SC-02)
Tim Burchett (TN-02)
Scott DesJarlais (TN-04)
Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03)
Mark Green (TN-07)
Diana Harshbarger (TN-01)
David Kustoff (TN-08)
John Rose (TN-06)
Jodey Arrington (TX-19)
Brian Babin (TX-36)
Michael Burgess (TX-26)
John Carter (TX-31)
Michael Cloud (TX-27)
Lance Gooden (TX-05)
Ronny Jackson (TX-13)
Troy Nehls (TX-22)
August Pfluger (TX-11)
Pete Sessions (TX-17)
Beth Van Duyne (TX-24)
Randy Weber (TX-14)
Roger Williams (TX-25)
Chris Stewart (UT-02)
Ben Cline (VA-06)
Morgan Griffith (VA-09)
Rob Wittman (VA-01)
Scott Fitzgerald (WI-05)
Carol Miller (WV-01)
SocialDemocrat61
(7,648 posts)Your posts are always so informative.
womanofthehills
(10,988 posts)He claims AIPAC tried to buy AOC with a huge donation but she declined & now they are going after her. I like the congresspeople who cant be bought.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/reporter-who-played-up-tara-reades-allegations-against-joe-biden-becomes-a-lightning-rod-in-debate-over-her-claims/2020/05/30/a676cf08-9e03-11ea-b5c9-570a91917d8d_story.html
Cha
(319,079 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Some people sure do rely on some interesting sources.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)It's even worse than I thought.
Sad to see people here cheering for this ally to the far right.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)They also give to famous "far right"
politicians like Nancy Pelosi.
AIPAC isn't left or right, they are pro-Israel. I understand you might want to over-simplify things into some sort black/white, right/left, my team/their team dichotomy because it's simple, but it's lacking context and a lazy way to think.
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)Very disappointing.
Cha
(319,079 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(11,704 posts)AIPAC is NOT a democratic ally.
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)- AIPAC is one of several lobbying groups that advocates pro-Israel policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States.
- AIPAC is not a "right wing organization".
- Democratic Westchester County Executive George Latimer is not being funded by "Trump-GOP super-donors [sic]"
- Democratic Westchester County Executive George Latimer is not accepting donations from foreign nationals or foreign countries.
- AIPAC has contributed to the campaigns of 208 Democratic representatives and senators because of their support of pro-Israel policies.
- So far in the 2024 cycle, 62.7% of AIPAC funding has gone to Democratic candidates while 37.2% has gone to Republicans.
-----------------------------------
It appears that several people are misinformed about the distinction between a "right wing organization" and a lobbying group. There also seems to be confusion about the difference between "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" and a single-issue pac.
Some have even gone so far to claim that a Democrat currently in office is knowingly accepting funds from a foreign country when doing so is a crime.
There is a point when misinformation becomes disinformation.
Caveat lector
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)Thank You So Much For This Reality Check on AIPAC, Lapucelle!
I know it wasn't a bad thing but this gives us who know better the actual facts.
And, you are so good at Shining the Light on that.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Polybius
(21,902 posts)She has long been my least favorite elected Democrat.
Cha
(319,079 posts)As Earth Month comes to a close, County Executive George Latimer is announcing his introduction of four bills aimed at advancing the environmental goals of his administration. These new proposals come at the end of a month filled with action on the environment by Latimer on behalf of the roughly one million current residents of Westchester and all its future residents.
Latimer said: Whether its ensuring communities that have been overlooked are now addressed to promote real environmental justice, encouraging our partners in government to find innovative ways to expand their renewable energy capacity or ensuring the safety of our parks and the children who play in them these bills I am proud to introduce take aim at long-standing environmental issues we as a County must address. We only have one planet and its on us all to work to protect it.
https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9822-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-introduces-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations
--------------------------------------------------
Published: 12 October 2023
(White Plains, NY) In a significant milestone for the residents of Westchester County, County Executive George Latimer signed several crucial environmental bills that have been crafted by his Administration, through the Countys Director of Research Ellen Hendrickx and Director of Environment, Energy, & Sustainability Peter McCartt, and refined through months of collaboration with the Board of Legislators. These bills represent the Countys commitment to enhancing the quality of life for our community by addressing pressing issues and meeting the evolving needs of our residents.
Latimer said: The signing of these bills into law is a testament to the power of collaboration and the steadfast dedication of our Board of Legislators to improve the lives of Westchester County residents and protect our planets future. Through their hard work and our shared commitment to good governance, we have crafted and signed laws that address pressing issues in our community. Further, our bold steps towards expanding access to Electric Vehicle charging stations and electrifying our car and bus fleet reflect our determination to lead the way in sustainability. We are proud to serve the people of Westchester, and together, we are building a brighter, cleaner future for our County."
https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9974-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-signs-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18658918
justaprogressive
(6,909 posts)Latimer was given $600K by AIPAC.
Aipac is as pure, and democracy loving, as the driven slush.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)Does that imply something nefarious to you?
Cha
(319,079 posts)yardwork
(69,364 posts)Gross.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)than the OP about Muslim Americans campaigning against Biden. Also that discussion avoided adding Islamophobia.
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)We, Democrats, aren't factioned like the media and pundits would have us believe.
I believe I am left wing but never think of it as a negative or divisive label.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Cori Bush is. Joe Biden is not.