Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(84,316 posts)
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 11:21 PM Feb 2024

Embattled 'Squad' members Bowman, Bush face growing primary threat

A couple of the Squad’s most high-profile members are facing formidable primary challenges as criticism over their stances in office mounts.

Reps. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) have both been outraised by centrist primary opponents, according to the latest filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), even as other ‘Squad’ members such as Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) are financially thriving.

The development comes as Bush and Bowman have faced blowback not only for their positions on the Israel-Hamas war, but also growing scrutiny over more personal public controversies.

Their possible defeat at the hands of more moderate Democrats would deal a significant blow to the Squad, Congress’s most vocal left-wing group, and hand the establishment-aligned faction of the party a significant victory.



https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4445124-cori-bush-jamaal-bowman-squad-israel-primary/

96 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Embattled 'Squad' members Bowman, Bush face growing primary threat (Original Post) RandySF Feb 2024 OP
Great news! Not familiar with the Bowman challenger, but I think Wesley Bell has a real chance of knocking off Bush! tritsofme Feb 2024 #1
Rec TY I really like George Latimer, too.. Cha Feb 2024 #8
"more interested in the national profile that you're creating for yourself" Not voting for infrastructure bill betsuni Feb 2024 #19
I Hope So. It's about time NY District 16 Cha Feb 2024 #26
Best to be free to support the Democratic Party and vote with Biden without worrying about getting betsuni Feb 2024 #31
So True, betsuni... this has been Cha Feb 2024 #38
This candidate looks like a good guy to contribute to LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #37
Oh Yes he Does!! Cha Feb 2024 #39
Latimer is an environmentalist with solid legislative accomplishments. lapucelle Feb 2024 #44
George Latimer is such a Solid Dem who Cha Feb 2024 #53
Maybe they could align themselvs with the goals Democratic party a little more than their own wishes. bottomofthehill Feb 2024 #2
"Centrist" is one of those misused words that doesn't mean anything, it's the new "establishment." betsuni Feb 2024 #23
No, no, don't you understand?! It's "the establishment" being all mean and stuff. yardwork Feb 2024 #65
What specific goals diverge from the party? Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2024 #67
Defunding the Police bottomofthehill Feb 2024 #78
Weird list Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2024 #79
Beware false-dichotomy in your post Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #84
I'm fully aware of what a false dichotomy is. Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2024 #88
215 Democrats voted for President Biden's infrastructure bill. 6 Democrats voted against it, lapucelle Feb 2024 #86
Sure they voted against it, but you do know Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2024 #87
They voted against the infrastructure bill "for specific reasons with constituency"? What does that even mean? lapucelle Feb 2024 #89
You should include her whole tweet. Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2024 #90
So now "they had the Clyburn's approval" has magically morphed into "they didn't blindside Clyburn". lapucelle Feb 2024 #92
I adore you lapucelle. You always bring receipts!!!! Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #94
Facts are our friends. lapucelle Feb 2024 #96
Thank you. betsuni Feb 2024 #91
Sounds good to me NT Chuuku Davis Feb 2024 #3
GOTV Missouri Dems For Wesley Bell! Cha Feb 2024 #4
I hope they can hold on. ificandream Feb 2024 #5
agree.... bahboo Feb 2024 #6
The only one that I really like is AOC Polybius Feb 2024 #48
Please! Please! Please! Let it be so! So sick of hearing about "the squad", I could vomit. Here's hoping their.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #7
Aloha, Tarheel.. Cha Feb 2024 #9
Hey Cha! Thanks for that tidbit. I didn't know anything about Bowman's opponent, but I figured that any... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #10
I've read about how many were trying Cha Feb 2024 #11
He sounds like exactly what is needed at this crucial time, and I'm not talking just about Israel. Pres. Biden can.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #12
Exactly.. ALL HANDS ON DECK!! 💙🌊🇺🇸🕯️🕊️ Cha Feb 2024 #14
Looks like AIPAC is spending $100 million to crush progressives womanofthehills Feb 2024 #13
GOTV For Wesley Bell in Missouri and Cha Feb 2024 #15
Are you concerned that the largest donors to Latimer are Trump-GOP mega-donors? nt PufPuf23 Feb 2024 #18
Link? Because he just isn't friends with those guys from what I've seen. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #49
That's the beauty of the conspiracy theory that Democrats are corrupted by money without any evidence betsuni Feb 2024 #58
Do you have a link? N/T lapucelle Feb 2024 #50
I googled. It's true. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #61
Do you have a link? N/T lapucelle Feb 2024 #68
Almost half his war chest. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #74
The claim was that "the largest donors to Latimer are Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]". lapucelle Feb 2024 #75
Who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" donating to Democratic County Executive Latimer? lapucelle Feb 2024 #76
Well, you didn't answer so I went looking. And you are right. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #60
Thank you. Had no desire to be beat up in thread. PufPuf23 Feb 2024 #66
Do you have a link? lapucelle Feb 2024 #69
AIPAC harms the Democratic Party in total. PufPuf23 Feb 2024 #16
Wish they could spend more! Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #17
Is it a good idea for a foreign country to provide funding to USA members of Congress in order PufPuf23 Feb 2024 #20
I could care less. How's that? Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #22
We're supposed to be outrage-scared that money spent on campaigns has supernatural corrupting powers betsuni Feb 2024 #24
Give me a hardworking Democrat who keeps his/her head down, and gets the job done w/o having to be.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #27
Al Franken describes the actual job in his book: betsuni Feb 2024 #33
Your choice. nt PufPuf23 Feb 2024 #25
As if I needed your permission. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #28
AIPAC isn't run by a "foreign country" this is a vicious lie, to begin with. tritsofme Feb 2024 #30
I've been smacked over the head with the AIPAC bogeyman before. Doesn't bother me in the least. Also, glad to... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2024 #93
What foreign country? AIPAC is led by American Jews who support Israel, are you accusing them of "dual loyalty" tritsofme Feb 2024 #29
What foreign countery provides funding to members of Congress? lapucelle Feb 2024 #45
You seem to be unfamiliar with AIPAC. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #51
Everything's a shadowy nefarious conspiracy! Everybody panic! Mommy, AIPAC is hiding under my bed! betsuni Feb 2024 #55
On the contrary, some folks know quite a bit, but choose to lie anyways. tritsofme Feb 2024 #71
... lapucelle Feb 2024 #41
Wow, that's quite a grassroots gap! betsuni Feb 2024 #59
I'm not sure why Jamaal Bowman is so frequently labeled a progressive. lapucelle Feb 2024 #42
AIPAC is a right-wing organization that supports extremist Republican election-denier candidates redqueen Feb 2024 #21
Not 37, they supported 109 treasonous sitting RW Rethug election denialists. Celerity Feb 2024 #32
Thank you SocialDemocrat61 Feb 2024 #34
In Ryan Grim's new book "The Squad' womanofthehills Feb 2024 #35
Grim has claimed many things... lapucelle Feb 2024 #43
"Grim" TY for Shining the Light on Grim. Cha Feb 2024 #54
I thought the name sounded familiar. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #57
Whoa - thanks Celerity. redqueen Feb 2024 #36
It's a single issue PAC Zeitghost Feb 2024 #81
+1 betsuni Feb 2024 #85
And it turns out they gave him $600k. Which is a lot. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #62
Best of Good Luck to Wesley Bell & Geroge Latimer!! Cha Feb 2024 #40
please.read post 32 FoxNewsSucks Feb 2024 #52
It seems lately that folks are very, very busy pushing the same talking point. lapucelle Feb 2024 #80
How rude to interrupt the anti-Semitic conniption some folks were enjoying with stubborn facts! tritsofme Feb 2024 #82
Caveat lector, Indeed! That's a good addition to my vocab! Cha Feb 2024 #83
Post removed Post removed Feb 2024 #46
Great news about the challenge to Bush Polybius Feb 2024 #47
44. Latimer is an environmentalist with solid legislative accomplishments. Cha Feb 2024 #56
Already addressed. justaprogressive Feb 2024 #63
President Biden has received more than $4M in donations from pro-Israel PACs over his career. tritsofme Feb 2024 #70
Good on George Latimer.. I HOPE HE WINS!! Cha Feb 2024 #73
"....the establishment-aligned faction of the party..." - ??? yardwork Feb 2024 #64
This has a lot more vitriol sarisataka Feb 2024 #72
"Left wing" sounds like an unnecessary pejorative. LakeArenal Feb 2024 #77
I have no problem with "left wing" brooklynite Feb 2024 #95

tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
1. Great news! Not familiar with the Bowman challenger, but I think Wesley Bell has a real chance of knocking off Bush!
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 11:30 PM
Feb 2024
https://bell4mo.com/

Good luck to both!

Cha

(319,079 posts)
8. Rec TY I really like George Latimer, too..
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 12:22 AM
Feb 2024
George Latimer says run against Bowman is about more than Israel

*snip*

While Latimer takes issue with Bowman’sstance on Israel, he said that he does not want it to become a one-issue race. He also criticized Bowman for voting against the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. (Bowman, like other members of the Squad, supported the bill but refused to vote for it unless the House also considered passing the Build Back Better bill at the same time.)

“To some extent, it's not about Israel at all,” Latimer said. “It's about (how Bowman) doesn't vote for the infrastructure bill when we desperately need money for infrastructure to deal with backyard issues. It's the question of how do you gear up your district office to really focus on the local needs of a community and are you more interested in the national profile that you're creating for yourself?”

https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2023/12/george-latimer-says-run-against-bowman-about-more-israel/392550/

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
19. "more interested in the national profile that you're creating for yourself" Not voting for infrastructure bill
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:32 AM
Feb 2024

wouldn't sit well with constituents, I'd think. I have a feeling the majority are regular people and not revolutionaries demanding their reps pass all-or-nothing Justice Democrats/Democratic Socialists of America purity tests.

Cha

(319,079 posts)
26. I Hope So. It's about time NY District 16
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 03:22 AM
Feb 2024

Got Someone Working for them and Working With Pres Biden.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
31. Best to be free to support the Democratic Party and vote with Biden without worrying about getting
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 04:32 AM
Feb 2024

in trouble for doing so because of purity tests, like people being mad at John Fetterman!

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
44. Latimer is an environmentalist with solid legislative accomplishments.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 09:42 PM
Feb 2024
Westchester County Executive George Latimer Introduces Slate of Environmental Laws Aimed at Protecting Our County for Generations

As Earth Month comes to a close, County Executive George Latimer is announcing his introduction of four bills aimed at advancing the environmental goals of his administration. These new proposals come at the end of a month filled with action on the environment by Latimer on behalf of the roughly one million current residents of Westchester and all its future residents.

Latimer said: “Whether its ensuring communities that have been overlooked are now addressed to promote real environmental justice, encouraging our partners in government to find innovative ways to expand their renewable energy capacity or ensuring the safety of our parks and the children who play in them – these bills I am proud to introduce take aim at long-standing environmental issues we as a County must address. We only have one planet and its on us all to work to protect it.”

https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9822-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-introduces-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations

--------------------------------------------------

Westchester County Executive George Latimer Signs Slate of Environmental Laws Aimed at Protecting Our County for Generations
Published: 12 October 2023

(White Plains, NY) – In a significant milestone for the residents of Westchester County, County Executive George Latimer signed several crucial environmental bills that have been crafted by his Administration, through the County’s Director of Research Ellen Hendrickx and Director of Environment, Energy, & Sustainability Peter McCartt, and refined through months of collaboration with the Board of Legislators. These bills represent the County’s commitment to enhancing the quality of life for our community by addressing pressing issues and meeting the evolving needs of our residents.

Latimer said: “The signing of these bills into law is a testament to the power of collaboration and the steadfast dedication of our Board of Legislators to improve the lives of Westchester County residents and protect our planet’s future. Through their hard work and our shared commitment to good governance, we have crafted and signed laws that address pressing issues in our community. Further, our bold steps towards expanding access to Electric Vehicle charging stations and electrifying our car and bus fleet reflect our determination to lead the way in sustainability. We are proud to serve the people of Westchester, and together, we are building a brighter, cleaner future for our County."

https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9974-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-signs-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations

Cha

(319,079 posts)
53. George Latimer is such a Solid Dem who
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 10:46 PM
Feb 2024

will be a brilliant Benefit for the Dem party!

Mahalo for his, Lapucelle!

bottomofthehill

(9,390 posts)
2. Maybe they could align themselvs with the goals Democratic party a little more than their own wishes.
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 11:38 PM
Feb 2024

Lacy Clay, who Ms Bush ran against was hardly a centrist nor was Mr Engle who Mr Bowman beat. They were both on the extreme left flank of the Democratic party. Yelling the loudest is great for organizing but not for legislating.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
23. "Centrist" is one of those misused words that doesn't mean anything, it's the new "establishment."
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:46 AM
Feb 2024

Them vs Us.

yardwork

(69,364 posts)
65. No, no, don't you understand?! It's "the establishment" being all mean and stuff.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 11:43 AM
Feb 2024

/sarcasm.

Cuthbert Allgood

(5,339 posts)
79. Weird list
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 05:22 PM
Feb 2024

You are in favor of a big police state? Odd stance for a liberal.
Where have they argued for the ELIMINATION of customs and border patrol?
Specifics on the Infrastructure Bill that are not in line with the party?

Those sound a lot like RW talking points against them. Only this missing is that they are socialists.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
84. Beware false-dichotomy in your post
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 07:12 AM
Feb 2024

It is a fallacy to say that if a person is against cutting that they are therefore in favour of expansion. It is a false dichotomy. "Dichotomy" means "split into two", as if there are only two choices.

In reality there are many choices and even if you were to grossly limit the choices there are at least three: reduce, stay the same or increase. But that is still a ridiculous mischaracterization of options. There are many choices, like 1% cut, 10% cut, 50% cut, 100% cut or 2% increase, 5% increase, and on and on. Essentially an infinite array of options.

It is important to know that most things are measured in real numbers (think decimal numbers and fractions and percents), not binary numbers 0 or 1, not yes/no, not black/white.

Defunding does not necessarily mean elimination. Likewise, being against defunding does not necessarily mean calling for a huge expansion into a police state such as tRump would like to create.

It is not respectable to make appeals to logical fallacies. Outlandish invocations of binary thinking is a good way to make allies angry and to sink a meaningful discussion.

Cuthbert Allgood

(5,339 posts)
88. I'm fully aware of what a false dichotomy is.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 01:41 PM
Feb 2024

I realize there is nuance in the issue. But how is what the "squad" is proposing not Democratic. Generally, the Democratic position would be to not increase the size and military-ness of the police. Just like the stance of the Democratic Party is pro-choice. You can nuance the shit out of the abortion issue, but it wouldn't be wrong to say that the Dems are pro-choice.

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
86. 215 Democrats voted for President Biden's infrastructure bill. 6 Democrats voted against it,
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 07:19 AM
Feb 2024
among them Bush and Bowman. That certainly seems like a divergence.

---------------------------------------------

In what world is being against defunding the police equivalent to being "in favor a big police state"?

---------------------------------------------

Both Bush and Bowman are to the right of Leader Jeffries in terms of their policy positions and votes in Congress. They might present as "socialists", but they don't govern that way. Nancy Pelosi's record makes them look positively centrist.



Nancy Pelosi is a Hard-Core Liberal

======================




Cori Bush is a Populist-Leaning Liberal

======================




Jamaal Bowman is a Moderate Liberal

======================




Hakeem Jeffries is a Libertarian-Leaning Progressive


https://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm
======================


Constituents will have a choice in the primaries. For many, that's a good thing



https://www.timesofisrael.com/j-street-pulls-jamaal-bowman-endorsement-over-anti-israel-rhetoric/

Cuthbert Allgood

(5,339 posts)
87. Sure they voted against it, but you do know
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 01:39 PM
Feb 2024

that they did it for specific reasons with the constituency and with the approval of the whip since they had the votes for it to pass, right?

It just seems to me that those who are progressive would not want to see a big police state. Which the "squad" is pointing out. Rather than give money to a large, basically military organization, for more and more weaponry, why not give more money to social workers and other more fit to deal with domestic violence, drug addiction, etc. Defunding the police should be a Democratic stance.

My comment about socialists is that that is what the RW usually throws at them. I fully realize they aren't.

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
89. They voted against the infrastructure bill "for specific reasons with constituency"? What does that even mean?
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 08:35 PM
Feb 2024

That's not what they said on social media.

AOC, The Squad defend infrastructure "no" vote

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is trying to tweet her way out of her vote against the Democrats' $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill — even correcting President Biden's claims about its benefits.

Why it matters: AOC, the rest of The Squad and two other progressives were the only Democrats to vote against the bill. That prompted criticism from their colleagues and social media followers, since the road-and-bridge spending will so directly impact their constituents. Thirteen Republicans helped cover their lost votes.

- "We did not fund the replacement of every child’s [lead water] pipe & we shouldn’t tell people we did," Ocasio-Cortez tweeted about Biden.

- The other five Democrats who voted against have released their own statements and explanations on Twitter.

- They placed blame on other factors — like the president, "corporate polluters," conservative Democrats, procedural issues and agreements, as well as a refusal to "choose" between supporting union workers or childcare and health care workers.

https://www.axios.com/2021/11/09/aoc-squad-defend-infrastructure-no-vote

-------------------------------------------------------------

Where did you read that the 6 Democrats who voted "no" had the approval of Majority Whip Clyburn?

Clyburn wound up having to (indirectly) reach out to Republicans to get President Biden's bill passed.

SC's Jim Clyburn takes credit for whipping 13 GOP votes for Biden's infrastructure package

NORTH CHARLESTON — House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn took credit for securing the 13 GOP votes necessary to push President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure plan across the finish line last week, but some Republicans are saying Democratic pressure is overblown.

Speaking to reporters at the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments office in North Charleston on Nov. 9, the Democratic congressman from Columbia took some credit over the passage of the bill, which will bring $6 billion in federal dollars to South Carolina.

"I indirectly whipped those votes," Clyburn told The Post and Courier. "I had members in the caucus assigned to certain Republican people that I couldn't talk to and that's how we got those votes."

https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/scs-jim-clyburn-takes-credit-for-whipping-13-gop-votes-for-bidens-infrastructure-package/article_64e731c6-4191-11ec-89d2-af61ab228177.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------

SC to get $6B from the infrastructure bill. How Jim Clyburn got it to Biden’s desk

Congressman Jim Clyburn was confident he would secure enough votes to pass President Joe Biden’s infrastructure bill after a day of arm twisting, which put Democrats on the precipice of their most important legislative victory since the party reclaimed the White House.

But there were a handful of holdouts who Clyburn, the chief vote counter for House Democrats, had outstanding concerns about heading into the Friday evening vote.

The South Carolina congressman and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gathered with staff just off the House floor in a small, gilded, gold room that had little more than a printer, chairs and a monitor that displays vote totals. Pelosi was speaking to the president on her cell phone and asked Clyburn to update Biden on the status of negotiations.

“I need you to talk to him, to explain to him where we are,” Clyburn recalled Pelosi telling him. “So I told the president that I thought that we were in a good place. That we could pass a bill. But I thought that he needed to get on the phone with several people.”

https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article255742646.html



Cuthbert Allgood

(5,339 posts)
90. You should include her whole tweet.
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 12:19 AM
Feb 2024

The first part says, "I want to protect our party from the disappointment and collapse in turnout from communities like mine that occurs when we tell them we did things we didn't do." So, you know, she did indicate it was about her constituents. And Axios was also clear to point out that she fact checked Biden about fixing the lead pipe problems. Why didn't you include that information?

Also, Clyburn thought there would be 21 no votes from the Dems and only had 19. So things were fine. And clearly AOC and the squad didn't blindside Clyburn.

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
92. So now "they had the Clyburn's approval" has magically morphed into "they didn't blindside Clyburn".
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 10:41 AM
Feb 2024

Similarly, wanting to "protect our Party" by stemming a potential collapse in turnout is not the same thing as addressing the needs of constituents.

(Interesting fact: In the 2022 midterm elections, in AOC's NY-14 district overall turnout was down by almost 100,000 voters with AOC receiving more than 70,000 fewer votes than she did in 2020. Overall turnout for NY-14 was also down from 2018 midterm levels, with AOC receiving 25,000+ fewer votes in the 2022 midterms than she did in 2018.)

https://ballotpedia.org/New_York%27s_14th_Congressional_District
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

While it may be true that a representative hastily "fact checking" a president might temporarily forestall criticism for a bewildering vote on that president's signature legislation, it is not particularly wise if it ignores the fact that someone like President Biden knows how to play a longer game in order to accomplish major policy goals.


Splashy, publicity-generating non-binding resolutions like the Green New Deal document of 5 years ago are all well and good, but executable policy takes real planning and real work, sometimes over the course of several years, and the Biden-Harris Administration know how to get that done.


December 16, 2021
FACT SHEET: The Biden-⁠Harris Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan

Vice President Kamala Harris to Announce Action Plan that Accelerates Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Investments to Replace All Lead Pipes in Next Decade

Today, the Biden-Harris Administration is releasing its Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan. The plan represents a historic effort of unprecedented ambition that will deploy catalytic resources from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law while leveraging every tool across federal, state, and local government to deliver clean drinking water, replace lead pipes, and remediate lead paint. The plan includes over 15 new actions from more than 10 federal agencies that ensure the federal government is marshalling every resource to make rapid progress towards replacing all lead pipes in the next decade.

That is why the President and Vice President made replacing lead pipes a centerpiece of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law – to deliver clean drinking water to families and children across America. These game-changing investments will put American plumbers and pipefitters to work replacing all of America’s lead pipes and service lines and making other critical upgrades. All families, children, and Americans should be able to turn on the faucet at home or school and drink clean water — including in low-income communities and communities of color that have been disproportionally affected by dangerous lead pipes – while we also create good paying jobs remediating lead paint in homes.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/12/16/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-lead-pipe-and-paint-action-plan/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

FACT SHEET: January 27, 2023
Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces New Actions and Progress to Protect Communities From Lead Pipes and Paint


Today, at a White House Summit on Accelerating Lead Pipe Replacement hosted by Vice President Harris, the Biden-Harris Administration announced new actions and progress to deliver clean drinking water, replace lead pipes, and remediate lead paint to protect children and communities across America. Through historic levels of funding from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and American Rescue Plan, annual appropriations, and harnessing a variety of tools across federal, state, and local government, the Administration is delivering tangible progress on the groundbreaking Biden-Harris Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan announced in December of 2021. The Biden-Harris Administration is working aggressively to replace all lead service lines in America in the next decade.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/01/27/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-and-progress-to-protect-communities-from-lead-pipes-and-paint/

-------------------------------------------------------------------

November 30, 2023
FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces New Action to Protect Communities from Lead Exposure

The Biden-Harris Administration is working to ensure a future where every child and family can live safely in their communities without the fear and harmful effects of lead exposure. Today, as part of President Biden and Vice President Harris’s vision for a lead-free future, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to strengthen its Lead and Copper Rule that would require water systems to replace lead service lines within 10 years, helping secure safe drinking water for communities across the country.

The President’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law invests over $50 billion for the largest upgrade to the nation’s water infrastructure in history, and today’s action builds on these historic levels of funding from President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, a key pillar of Bidenomics, to replace lead service lines across the nation.

snip==================

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides $15 billion in funding specifically dedicated for replacing lead service lines, along with an additional $11.7 billion in general-purpose funding through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, which can also be used for lead pipe replacement. To date, EPA has awarded over $3.5 billion of this lead service line funding to replace hundreds of thousands of lead service lines in homes, buildings, and schools. To advance President Biden’s Justice40 Initiative, EPA has committed to deploying at least 49 percent of its State Revolving Funds to disadvantaged communities. In total during this administration, EPA’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund programs have provided over $796 million to help systems that serve disadvantaged communities begin removal of lead service lines across the country, protecting the health of over 9.8 million people.

Funding from the American Rescue Plan’s $350 billion State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund can be used by states and communities to replace lead service lines and remediate lead paint. To date, well over $20 billion nationwide has been invested in water infrastructure projects, including significant clean water investments.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/11/30/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-action-to-protect-communities-from-lead-exposure/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biden-Harris Administration Proposes to Strengthen the Lead and Copper Rule to Protect All Communities in America from Lead in Drinking Water

EPA proposal would accelerate progress toward achieving President Biden’s goal of removing 100% of lead pipes


November 30, 2023
WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to strengthen its Lead and Copper Rule that would require water systems across the country to replace lead service lines within 10 years. EPA is also proposing additional improvements to protect public health, such as lowering the lead action level and improving sampling protocols utilized by water systems. Today’s proposed action significantly advances President Biden’s commitment to remove every lead service line in America to protect children and vulnerable populations from the negative impacts of lead in drinking water, particularly those living in disadvantaged communities.

https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-proposes-strengthen-lead-and-copper-rule-protect-all



ificandream

(11,837 posts)
5. I hope they can hold on.
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 11:56 PM
Feb 2024

I believe the Democratic Party should be wide-ranging. I like the Squad even if I don’t always agree with them.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
7. Please! Please! Please! Let it be so! So sick of hearing about "the squad", I could vomit. Here's hoping their....
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 12:10 AM
Feb 2024

opponents crush them.

Cha

(319,079 posts)
9. Aloha, Tarheel..
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 12:27 AM
Feb 2024

Please check out Post #8 I jsut posted on George Latimer.

And, I hear ya!

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
10. Hey Cha! Thanks for that tidbit. I didn't know anything about Bowman's opponent, but I figured that any...
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 01:13 AM
Feb 2024

level headed Democrat would be better than the attention seeking "squad". I don't take any of them seriously, because they're not serious people. Much luck to George Latimer, I hope he's a serious threat to Bowman.

Cha

(319,079 posts)
11. I've read about how many were trying
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 01:33 AM
Feb 2024

to recruit George Latimer to run against Bowman for Months.

And, he's taken the Plunge! I Know he'll vote For Pes Biden's Democratic Agenda and Help his District 16 to Flourish . Not Always Voting Against.

🕊️🕯️💙🌊

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
12. He sounds like exactly what is needed at this crucial time, and I'm not talking just about Israel. Pres. Biden can....
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:03 AM
Feb 2024

use all the help we can give him.

womanofthehills

(10,988 posts)
13. Looks like AIPAC is spending $100 million to crush progressives
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:12 AM
Feb 2024

The Squad are my favorites in Congress. Sad- that AIPAC is going after them - but their young constituents will save them.

From Democracy Now -

“AIPAC vs. AOC & The Squad: Pro-Israel Lobby Group to Spend $100M to Target Progressive Lawmakers

As we begin a pivotal election year in the United States, we look at the powerful U.S. lobby group AIPAC, which is set to spend more than $100 million to defeat progressives who are critical of Israeli human rights violations in Palestine. “
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/1/2/ryan_grim_the_squad_congress_2024

Scrivener7

(59,522 posts)
49. Link? Because he just isn't friends with those guys from what I've seen.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 10:16 PM
Feb 2024

Lattimer has been around a long time and he's been a good County Executive. I think if he were going to veer right we would have seen it already.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
58. That's the beauty of the conspiracy theory that Democrats are corrupted by money without any evidence
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 12:31 AM
Feb 2024

of changed votes or policies or turning into Republicans or any of this corruption: Saying something makes it true! At least they stopped using the word "beholden" in every sentence.

Scrivener7

(59,522 posts)
74. Almost half his war chest.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 03:22 PM
Feb 2024
https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2024/02/expected-bowman-latimer-primary-pricey/393880/
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, long expected to inject money into his campaign, donated over $600,000 to him in the latest filings, over 40% of his fundraising total.

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
75. The claim was that "the largest donors to Latimer are Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]".
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 04:33 PM
Feb 2024

Who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" donating to County Executive Latimer's campaign?

AIPAC is a single issue lobbying group. Mega-donors are individuals.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is a lobbying group that advocates pro-Israel policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States government.



What is Megadonor?
Definition and meaning of megadonor: A Megadonor is an individual who makes extraordinarily large political donations to a candidate, political party, or organization. These donations are often in the millions of dollars and greatly exceed the legal limits of donations set by the Federal Election Commission. Megadonors are often major players in American politics, contributing immense amounts of money to influence the outcomes of elections and policy initiatives.

https://goodparty.org/political-terms/megadonor

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So one more time, who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" funding Dmocratic County Executive George Latimer?


lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
76. Who are the "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" donating to Democratic County Executive Latimer?
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 04:42 PM
Feb 2024
What is Megadonor?
Definition and meaning of megadonor: A Megadonor is an individual who makes extraordinarily large political donations to a candidate, political party, or organization. These donations are often in the millions of dollars and greatly exceed the legal limits of donations set by the Federal Election Commission. Megadonors are often major players in American politics, contributing immense amounts of money to influence the outcomes of elections and policy initiatives.

https://goodparty.org/political-terms/megadonor

Scrivener7

(59,522 posts)
60. Well, you didn't answer so I went looking. And you are right.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 09:50 AM
Feb 2024

He is heavily funded by them. Very disappointing.

Thanks for the heads up.

Where's Eliot Engel when you need him?

PufPuf23

(9,856 posts)
66. Thank you. Had no desire to be beat up in thread.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 11:56 AM
Feb 2024

Have neither the energy nor will to argue.

Not much on being called antisemitic nor not knowing about AIPAC either.

That is ludicrous.

PufPuf23

(9,856 posts)
16. AIPAC harms the Democratic Party in total.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:25 AM
Feb 2024

AIPAC is right wing and gives money to more GOP members of Congress than Democrats but more to individual Democrats, close to 3/4s of the House take money from AIPAC.

There was a concentrated effort by AIPAC to fund opponents to Democratic incumbents against progressive Democrats in 2022 and even more for 2024. Not hard to find reputable documentation.

PufPuf23

(9,856 posts)
20. Is it a good idea for a foreign country to provide funding to USA members of Congress in order
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:39 AM
Feb 2024

to distort elections?

Think weird there is a contingent that do not fully support POTUS Biden's efforts in Middle East.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
24. We're supposed to be outrage-scared that money spent on campaigns has supernatural corrupting powers
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 03:13 AM
Feb 2024

that automatically turns Democrats into Republican monsters if it comes from the wrong place. BEHOLDEN FOR ALL ETERNITY.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
27. Give me a hardworking Democrat who keeps his/her head down, and gets the job done w/o having to be....
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 03:25 AM
Feb 2024

glorified for simply doing their job. I have never understood the hype surrounding these attention seeking individuals. The more I hear about them, the more I despise them, especially Jayapal. I wish they would all just go away. Other than talking a lot, I'm not sure what they've actually accomplished.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
33. Al Franken describes the actual job in his book:
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 05:30 AM
Feb 2024

"Be a workhorse, not a showhorse. Go to all your hearings. Come early, stay late. Do your homework. Don't do national press. Be accessible to your state media and to your constituents. That sounded smart to me. ... I'd be Minnesota's senator and nobody else's."

His chief of staff called it the "Hillary Model" because of her "not just earning the respect of her colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but getting a whole lot done for the people of the state."

That's the point. Getting things done for the people.

tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
30. AIPAC isn't run by a "foreign country" this is a vicious lie, to begin with.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 04:00 AM
Feb 2024

Good call on not giving a shit about such a lie and utter nonsense.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
93. I've been smacked over the head with the AIPAC bogeyman before. Doesn't bother me in the least. Also, glad to...
Sun Feb 11, 2024, 10:17 PM
Feb 2024

hear that it's just another in a long line of vicious & antisemitic tropes. Shouldn't be allowed here, but I don't run the joint.

tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
29. What foreign country? AIPAC is led by American Jews who support Israel, are you accusing them of "dual loyalty"
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 03:56 AM
Feb 2024

or some other anti-Semitic nonsense?

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
51. You seem to be unfamiliar with AIPAC.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 10:19 PM
Feb 2024

AIPAC is an American organization. It's right there in the name: American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
55. Everything's a shadowy nefarious conspiracy! Everybody panic! Mommy, AIPAC is hiding under my bed!
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 11:55 PM
Feb 2024

One of the subjects of the OP said "What it is about is white supremacy" the other day.

tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
71. On the contrary, some folks know quite a bit, but choose to lie anyways.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 02:23 PM
Feb 2024

Especially when the subject is Jews!

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
42. I'm not sure why Jamaal Bowman is so frequently labeled a progressive.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 08:54 PM
Feb 2024

Bowman has the record of a moderate liberal.

=======================================



Jamaal Bowman is a Moderate Liberal

https://bit.ly/488WQzW

redqueen

(115,186 posts)
21. AIPAC is a right-wing organization that supports extremist Republican election-denier candidates
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:40 AM
Feb 2024

They supported the campaigns of 37 Republicans in Congress who voted against certifying Biden's 2020 U.S. presidential election victory after the 2021 United States Capitol attack.

Imo it's sickening to see them praised here, but politics makes strange bedfellows.

Wonder how many of the challengers they're funding support medicare for all

Celerity

(54,410 posts)
32. Not 37, they supported 109 treasonous sitting RW Rethug election denialists.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 05:05 AM
Feb 2024

AIPAC is not a Dem ally on balance. As stated above, in 2022 they endorsed 109 Republicans who refused to certify Biden's election (Including the christofash Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Gym 'the paedo enabler' Jordan, ultra MAGAette cheerleader Elise Stefanik, the worm of worms Kevin McCarthy, the crazed gunhumper Greg Steube, Ronny 'Trump's drunk Dr Feelgood' Jackson, Joe 'you lie!' Wilson, John 'I am a racist, climate change denying MAGAt, but look!, Henry Cuellar campaigns and fundraises for me so it's all good' Carter, Troy 'make shit up about being threatened, get caught, and then distract by trying to get Biden 25th Amendment'ed' Nehls, etc etc). AIPAC values fealty to a foreign power more than the health of American democracy as shown by their support for those RW treasonous MAGAts simply because the MAGAts are also pro-Israel hawks.

Why pro-Israel lobby group Aipac is backing election deniers and extremist Republicans

Among those candidates endorsed by Aipac is the New York congresswoman Elise Stefanik, a Trump loyalist whose home town newspaper criticised her for “despicable” advertising and “hateful rhetoric” that promoted the racist and antisemitic “great replacement theory”, claiming the US is being flooded with immigrants to outvote white people. The Times Union accused Stefanik of “fear-based political tactics”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/18/pro-israel-lobby-group-aipac-midterms-election-deniers-and-extremist-republicans



The US’s largest pro-Israel lobby group is backing dozens of racists, homophobes and election deniers running for Congress next month because they have pledged to defend Israel against stiffening criticism of its oppression of the Palestinians. The powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) has justified endorsing Republicans with extremist views, including members of Congress with ties to white supremacist groups and representatives who attempted to block Joe Biden’s election victory, on the grounds that the singular issue of support for Israel trumps other considerations.

But Aipac’s support for rightwing politicians has privately embarrassed some Democrats also endorsed by the powerful group and drawn accusations from more moderate pro-Israel organisations that it is attempting to stifle legitimate criticism of hardline Israeli policies. Logan Bayroff, a spokesman for J Street, a group campaigning for Washington to take a stronger stand to end the occupation of Palestinian territories, accused Aipac of attempting to impose a narrow definition of what it is to be pro-Israel amid shifting views in Democratic ranks.

“Their actions have made clear that they view pro-Israel, pro-peace progressive Democrats as threats – and Trumpist Republicans as allies. That worldview could not be more out of touch with the vast majority of American Jews,” he said. “Aipac may hope to silence and intimidate political leaders who believe that settlement expansion, endless conflict and permanent occupation are harmful to Israel, the Palestinian people and US interests. Ultimately, however, these common-sense views are too popular, widespread and important to be suppressed, and will continue to gain strength within American politics and among the American Jewish community.”

Aipac’s backing of extreme rightwing Republicans follows its $27m advertising campaign during the Democratic primaries to defeat candidates who spoke up for Palestinian rights, mostly with attacks over issues that had nothing to do with Israel. The campaign is part of push by more hawkish pro-Israel groups to shore up support in Congress in the face of rising advocacy for the Palestinian cause within the Democratic party and erosion of approval for Israeli actions among American Jews, particularly younger people.

snip





updated list:

https://jstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AIPAC-Endorsee-List-042022.pdf

AIPAC endorsees that voted against certifying the 2020 presidential election results

Robert Aderholt (AL-04)
Jerry Carl (AL-01)
Barry Moore (AL-02)
Gary Palmer (AL-06)
Mike Rogers (AL-03)
Andy Biggs (AZ-05)

Debbie Lesko (AZ-08)
David Schweikert (AZ-01)
Rick Crawford (AK-01)
Ken Calvert (CA-41)
Mike Garcia (CA-27)
Darrell Issa (CA-48)
Doug LaMalfa (CA-01)
Kevin McCarthy (CA-20)
Jay Obernolte (CA-23)
Doug Lamborn (CO-05)
Kat Cammack (FL-03)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-25)
Byron Donalds (FL-19)
Neal Dunn (FL-02)
Scott Franklin (FL-15)
Carlos Gimenez (FL-26)
Brian Mast (FL-18)
Bill Posey (FL-08)
John Rutherford (FL-04)
Greg Steube (FL-17)
Daniel Webster (FL-11)
Rick Allen (GA-12)
Buddy Carter (GA-01)
Ross Fulcher (ID-01)
Mike Bost (IL-12)
Jim Baird (IN-04)
Jim Banks (IN-03)
Greg Pence (IN-06)

Ron Estes (KS-04)
Jake LaTurner (KS-02)
Tracey Mann (KS-01)
Hal Rogers (KY-05)
John Kennedy (LA-Sen)

Garret Graves (LA-06)
Clay Higgins (LA-03)
Mike Johnson (LA-04)
Steve Scalise (LA-01)

Andy Harris (MD-01)
Jack Bergman (MI-01)
Lisa McClain (MI-09)
Tim Walberg (MI-05)
Michelle Fischbach (MN-07)
Michael Guest (MS-03)
Trent Kelly (MS-01)
Steven Palazzo (MS-04)
Sam Graves (MO-06)
Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO-03)
Jason Smith (MO-08)
Matt Rosendale (MT-02)
Adrian Smith (NE-03)
Jeff Van Drew (NJ-02)
Yvette Herrell (NM-02)
Chris Jacobs (NY-24)
Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11)
Elise Stefanik (NY-21)
Dan Bishop (NC-08)
Virginia Foxx (NC-05)
Richard Hudson (NC-09)
Greg Murphy (NC-03)
David Rouzer (NC-07)
Steve Chabot (OH-01)
Bill Johnson (OH-06)
Jim Jordan (OH-04)
Stephanie Bice (OK-05)
Tom Cole (OK-04)
Kevin Hern (OK-01)
Mike Kelly (PA-16)
Dan Meuser (PA-09)
Scott Perry (PA-10)
Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14)
Lloyd Smucker (PA-11)
G.T. Thompson (PA-15)
Jeff Duncan (SC-03)
Ralph Norman (SC-05)
Tom Rice (SC-07)
William Timmons (SC-04)
Joe Wilson (SC-02)
Tim Burchett (TN-02)

Scott DesJarlais (TN-04)
Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03)
Mark Green (TN-07)
Diana Harshbarger (TN-01)
David Kustoff (TN-08)
John Rose (TN-06)
Jodey Arrington (TX-19)
Brian Babin (TX-36)
Michael Burgess (TX-26)
John Carter (TX-31)
Michael Cloud (TX-27)
Lance Gooden (TX-05)
Ronny Jackson (TX-13)
Troy Nehls (TX-22)

August Pfluger (TX-11)
Pete Sessions (TX-17)
Beth Van Duyne (TX-24)
Randy Weber (TX-14)
Roger Williams (TX-25)
Chris Stewart (UT-02)
Ben Cline (VA-06)
Morgan Griffith (VA-09)
Rob Wittman (VA-01)
Scott Fitzgerald (WI-05)
Carol Miller (WV-01)

womanofthehills

(10,988 posts)
35. In Ryan Grim's new book "The Squad'
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 11:03 AM
Feb 2024

He claims AIPAC tried to buy AOC with a huge donation but she declined & now they are going after her. I like the congresspeople who can’t be bought.

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
57. I thought the name sounded familiar.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 11:58 PM
Feb 2024

Some people sure do rely on some interesting sources.

redqueen

(115,186 posts)
36. Whoa - thanks Celerity.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 11:39 AM
Feb 2024

It's even worse than I thought.

Sad to see people here cheering for this ally to the far right.

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
81. It's a single issue PAC
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 08:43 PM
Feb 2024

They also give to famous "far right" politicians like Nancy Pelosi.


AIPAC isn't left or right, they are pro-Israel. I understand you might want to over-simplify things into some sort black/white, right/left, my team/their team dichotomy because it's simple, but it's lacking context and a lazy way to think.

lapucelle

(21,061 posts)
80. It seems lately that folks are very, very busy pushing the same talking point.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 08:26 PM
Feb 2024
In the interest of accuracy, here are some facts:

- AIPAC is one of several lobbying groups that advocates pro-Israel policies to the legislative and executive branches of the United States.

- AIPAC is not a "right wing organization".

- Democratic Westchester County Executive George Latimer is not being funded by "Trump-GOP super-donors [sic]"

- Democratic Westchester County Executive George Latimer is not accepting donations from foreign nationals or foreign countries.

- AIPAC has contributed to the campaigns of 208 Democratic representatives and senators because of their support of pro-Israel policies.

- So far in the 2024 cycle, 62.7% of AIPAC funding has gone to Democratic candidates while 37.2% has gone to Republicans.

-----------------------------------

It appears that several people are misinformed about the distinction between a "right wing organization" and a lobbying group. There also seems to be confusion about the difference between "Trump-GOP mega-donors [sic]" and a single-issue pac.

Some have even gone so far to claim that a Democrat currently in office is knowingly accepting funds from a foreign country when doing so is a crime.

There is a point when misinformation becomes disinformation.

Caveat lector





tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
82. How rude to interrupt the anti-Semitic conniption some folks were enjoying with stubborn facts!
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 08:53 PM
Feb 2024

Cha

(319,079 posts)
83. Caveat lector, Indeed! That's a good addition to my vocab!
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 08:54 PM
Feb 2024

Thank You So Much For This Reality Check on AIPAC, Lapucelle!

I know it wasn't a bad thing but this gives us who know better the actual facts.

And, you are so good at Shining the Light on that.

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Polybius

(21,902 posts)
47. Great news about the challenge to Bush
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 09:57 PM
Feb 2024

She has long been my least favorite elected Democrat.

Cha

(319,079 posts)
56. 44. Latimer is an environmentalist with solid legislative accomplishments.
Tue Feb 6, 2024, 11:56 PM
Feb 2024
Westchester County Executive George Latimer Introduces Slate of Environmental Laws Aimed at Protecting Our County for Generations

As Earth Month comes to a close, County Executive George Latimer is announcing his introduction of four bills aimed at advancing the environmental goals of his administration. These new proposals come at the end of a month filled with action on the environment by Latimer on behalf of the roughly one million current residents of Westchester and all its future residents.

Latimer said: “Whether its ensuring communities that have been overlooked are now addressed to promote real environmental justice, encouraging our partners in government to find innovative ways to expand their renewable energy capacity or ensuring the safety of our parks and the children who play in them – these bills I am proud to introduce take aim at long-standing environmental issues we as a County must address. We only have one planet and its on us all to work to protect it.”


https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9822-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-introduces-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations

--------------------------------------------------

Westchester County Executive George Latimer Signs Slate of Environmental Laws Aimed at Protecting Our County for Generations
Published: 12 October 2023

(White Plains, NY) – In a significant milestone for the residents of Westchester County, County Executive George Latimer signed several crucial environmental bills that have been crafted by his Administration, through the County’s Director of Research Ellen Hendrickx and Director of Environment, Energy, & Sustainability Peter McCartt, and refined through months of collaboration with the Board of Legislators. These bills represent the County’s commitment to enhancing the quality of life for our community by addressing pressing issues and meeting the evolving needs of our residents.

Latimer said: “The signing of these bills into law is a testament to the power of collaboration and the steadfast dedication of our Board of Legislators to improve the lives of Westchester County residents and protect our planet’s future. Through their hard work and our shared commitment to good governance, we have crafted and signed laws that address pressing issues in our community. Further, our bold steps towards expanding access to Electric Vehicle charging stations and electrifying our car and bus fleet reflect our determination to lead the way in sustainability. We are proud to serve the people of Westchester, and together, we are building a brighter, cleaner future for our County."

https://www.westchestergov.com/home/all-press-releases/9974-westchester-county-executive-george-latimer-signs-slate-of-environmental-laws-aimed-at-protecting-our-county-for-generations

to lapucelle Post #44 Mahalo!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18658918

justaprogressive

(6,909 posts)
63. Already addressed.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 11:36 AM
Feb 2024

Latimer was given $600K by AIPAC.

Aipac is as pure, and democracy loving, as the driven slush.

tritsofme

(19,900 posts)
70. President Biden has received more than $4M in donations from pro-Israel PACs over his career.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 02:18 PM
Feb 2024

Does that imply something nefarious to you?

sarisataka

(22,695 posts)
72. This has a lot more vitriol
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 02:35 PM
Feb 2024

than the OP about Muslim Americans campaigning against Biden. Also that discussion avoided adding Islamophobia.

LakeArenal

(29,949 posts)
77. "Left wing" sounds like an unnecessary pejorative.
Wed Feb 7, 2024, 04:45 PM
Feb 2024

We, Democrats, aren't “factioned” like the media and pundits would have us believe.

I believe I am “left wing” but never think of it as a negative or divisive label.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Embattled 'Squad' members...