General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone surprised by the SCOTUS hearings consumed too much "catnip"
"Catnip" is the phrase for news stories created for and directed to a specific audience to provide pleasure to the reader, watcher or listener... so they can roll around in the aroma and feel good.
Don't forget, ALL media, digital, TV, social... all is trying to make a dollar off of you.
Your favorite attorney or former federal prosecutor or former Congressman on TV? Content creators hired by the media to make palatable stories to make the corporation money.
Content creators. No different than the guy on Youtube who buys new iphones and comes up with creative ways to destroy them for clicks... to generate ad revenue.
Colorado is going down 9-0, IMHO. I said so months ago despite what the content creators we saying.
jimfields33
(16,020 posts)The explanations by those who write them will be fascinating.
Sympthsical
(9,132 posts)People were wishcasting instead of forecasting.
There were always major problems with this, and when the liberal justices are piling on about them, it's over.
tritsofme
(17,413 posts)It was almost as if some folks thought if they could speak with enough confidence, they could manifest their desired result, it was pretty strange honestly.
AllaN01Bear
(18,534 posts)reminds me of the comentary of the winter olympic game sports . esp ice skating . id wish the comentator would shut up during the performance and then analyze the performance after .
WarGamer
(12,488 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,534 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,481 posts)But, a lot of it was over my head.
Ocelot II
(115,900 posts)While the theory advanced by Luttig et al. is pretty persuasive, the big problems are in its application. It will be interesting to see how the various justices view it, but I don't see any pro-Trump bias. Actually, I think the conservative justices would be happy to be rid of him because he's destroying the GOP, but there are too many sticky spots in this case to uphold it - including the possibility that a state controlled by rabid GOPers could turn it against a Democratic candidate on the flimsiest possible claims of "insurrection." And we know they would. Of course 1/6 was a for-real insurrection and that TFG instigated and encouraged it, but they're not going to decide the case by rejecting those facts.
FalloutShelter
(11,887 posts)We have to bury this walking corpse and his zombie followers on Election Day!
All of our energy from here on out needs to go to that end.
WarGamer
(12,488 posts)RockRaven
(15,037 posts)Tweets, YouTube videos, etc with ALLCAPS words in the title; quotes or clips from bobbleheads on MSNBC saying something could or should happen being celebrated as if it were a fait accompli; predictions by "expert" pundits being touted based on their CVs while their track record of failed predictions is ignored.
WarGamer
(12,488 posts)Maybe, but probably not, people will be a bit more cautious is assuming that the statements of some "expert" -- including some that seem to be infatuated with making appearances on cable news channels -- can be taken to the bank. This case was never the slam dunk in favor of Colorado that some experts claimed it was -- if anything, it more likely was going to be a slam dunk against Colorado.
Even during the argument, some posters were spiking the football when Trump's counsel was being questioned hard by some of the justices, only to find themselves whipsawed when some of the same justices took apart Colorado's lawyer.
TwilightZone
(25,499 posts)DU is great for what it is, but I also think it tends to lead many, perhaps all of us at one time or another, to develop false expectations in situations like this. When there's a constant barrage of "expert" opinions about how this should be a slam dunk, it's human nature to feel that maybe the outlook is better than it really is.
I went in with tempered expectations, basically assuming that it would be defeated, though from the sound of it, even those tempered expectations were a bit lofty.
Cheezoholic
(2,042 posts)you can't let one state deprive citizens from other states a vote (removal from the ballot in one state deprives voters in other states for that candidate with a vote IMO). Besides it would be a cluster from hell moving forward. I mean if your to young to run obviously self executing, serving more than 2 terms obviously self executing but insurrection isnt so clear on the how, who committed an insurrection therby its self executing is foggy and needs to be decided through other legal means IMO.
I want him on the ballot if the idiots at the RNC want him and I want, can't wait, to see Joe land the final punch in him politically. Biden deserves it. And as we watch Joe in his "Trump goes down, Trump goes down" moment we can further and gleefully watch as the NY case bleeds his company to dust and possibly Capone his ass with tax evasion, watch Alvin Bragg get him for fraud and even voter intimidation, relish in Smith convicting him of all of those federal charges, Fani nailing him and his cohorts for whats being argued here, and finally, watch him get convicted in Fl. in the espionage case for treason.
This case brings up valid arguments in some grey areas from within the Constitution concerning the executive that should be addressed legislatively moving forward, but if the court denies Colorado here (probably will) The other sides going to scream and yell and shoot of fireworks, this was the smallest case against him. The real shit storm is coming his way!