Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(55,137 posts)
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 02:55 PM Feb 2024

Ian Millhiser: The Supreme Court sure sounds eager to put Trump back on the ballot

https://www.vox.com/scotus/2024/2/8/24066103/supreme-court-trump-anderson-ballot-disqualification-roberts-thomas-barrett-jackson

Two things were obvious Thursday morning in the Supreme Court, where the justices pondered whether former President Donald Trump is disqualified from seeking the presidency because of his role in inciting the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol.

One is that Jonathan Mitchell, the lawyer representing Trump, was in way over his head. During Mitchell’s time at the podium, the justices took turns ripping apart his arguments — or even criticizing him for abandoning stronger legal arguments in favor of weaker ones. Mitchell also made embarrassing concessions, admitting that he had no historical evidence to support some of his key claims.

The other obvious thing is that it didn’t matter: Trump is going to win. After Mitchell stepped down from the podium, after emphasizing two arguments that nearly all the justices appeared to view as weak, most of the Court spent the rest of the argument trying to come up with a better reason to rule in favor of Trump.

In this case, Trump v. Anderson, the Colorado Supreme Court determined that Trump must be removed from its presidential ballot under a provision of the 14th Amendment that prohibits former high-ranking officials who engage in an “insurrection” from serving in office again.

*snip*
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ian Millhiser: The Supreme Court sure sounds eager to put Trump back on the ballot (Original Post) Nevilledog Feb 2024 OP
Trump was never REMOVED from the ballot... even in CO WarGamer Feb 2024 #1
That's right... 2naSalit Feb 2024 #3
Of course they are... Blue Idaho Feb 2024 #2
Yup republianmushroom Feb 2024 #4

2naSalit

(103,809 posts)
3. That's right...
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 04:33 PM
Feb 2024

I think they should have removed him and let him fight to get back on. Might have turned out a little differently.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ian Millhiser: The Suprem...