Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,153 posts)
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 03:28 PM Feb 2024

Fani Willis turns the tables

Published Feb 08, 2024 at 10:38 AM EST

Fani Willis has hit back at those criticizing her over her relationship with a prosecutor ...

"It is worth noting that there are at least two personal relationships among the collection of defense attorneys representing the Defendants that, under the standard urged by the Roman's motion, would almost certainly require disqualification.

"Amanda Clark Palmer, counsel representing Defendant Ray Smith, and Scott Grubman, representing Defendant Kenneth Chesebro, are publicly known to be in a personal relationship. Since Defendant Chesebro has plead guilty and agreed to testify for the State in the upcoming trial against Defendant Smith and the other remaining defendants, one who was illinformed about the standard for attorney disqualification in Georgia might argue that the personal relationship between Clark Palmer and Grubman could rise to the level of a conflict given potential testimony by Grubman's client inculpating Clark Palmer's client.

"That, of course, would be an incorrect conclusion to draw. Similarly, counsel for Defendant Jenna Ellis are married law partners, working together and representing Defendant Ellis throughout these proceedings" ...

https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-georgia-complaint-nathan-wade-1868185

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fani Willis turns the tables (Original Post) struggle4progress Feb 2024 OP
weak sauce .. - -(nt)- stopdiggin Feb 2024 #1
Your user name is perfect for this post! 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #2
she's only human... anyway, it really shouldn't matter except for the distraciton factor LymphocyteLover Feb 2024 #4
She may be only human but she's also in a very highly scrutinized position, and IMO 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #6
Do you really think she did it "without a care"? SunSeeker Feb 2024 #23
These situations are far more common than a lot of us admit. I've spooky3 Feb 2024 #28
Yup! SunSeeker Feb 2024 #42
Even worse if she gave it a lot of thought and did it anyway, risking blowing up the case. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #47
How is she risking "blowing up the case"? This is not a basis for dismissing the case. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #53
Her successful record in bringing, trying and winning cases says everything about her judgement to me happy feet Feb 2024 #43
Okay, except you left out the defense attorneys conflict of interest Ponietz Feb 2024 #8
Because it's fucking irrelevant. "They did it too!" Is no justification in my book. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #10
Duty to the client is ALL that's relevant here Ponietz Feb 2024 #11
Well, I guess you just told me! Yeah, I'm way less perturbed by the F-word than that Fani Wills 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #16
What legal basis is there for throwing her off the case? SunSeeker Feb 2024 #22
I suspect you're not going to get an answer because there is no legal basis MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #26
+ OverBurn Feb 2024 #13
Willis and Wade are co-counsel on this case. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #9
Wade didn't hire himself. Willis hired him. He doesn't report to himself. He reports to her. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2024 #12
The county contracted with him. He does report to himself; he's an independent contractor. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #21
Very good points. I also think sexism is involved here. Some people spooky3 Feb 2024 #30
I think there may well be some jealousy here with Roman's lawyer who was a big Bev54 Feb 2024 #40
A government employee Zeitghost Feb 2024 #29
What LEGAL basis is there for removing her from the case? nt MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #31
None Zeitghost Feb 2024 #33
That may be, but I don't think she gives a crap about the media, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #35
She's a prosecutor, not a politician. From what I've read spooky3 Feb 2024 #36
Nope. The contract was signed months before they started dating. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #41
Good point. Apparently he doesn't have much RICO experience, but is a good QB? Evolve Dammit Feb 2024 #44
Wade really knows his way around a courtroom. That makes him a great QB. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #54
Thanks much. Good info. Evolve Dammit Feb 2024 #55
She still has direct influence over his contract Zeitghost Feb 2024 #48
She is not his supervisor. He is an independent contractor. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #49
She is the DA Zeitghost Feb 2024 #50
She is not regulating Wade. They are co-counsel. They're on the same side. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #52
SOME PEOPLE... homegirl Feb 2024 #34
awesome-- glad to see her fighting back LymphocyteLover Feb 2024 #3
hate newsweek blogslug Feb 2024 #5
Thank you, Willis, after that there will be nothing but crickets. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #7
Love the fact she's staying strong. ificandream Feb 2024 #14
Keeping my opinion to myself until I hear from Katyal, Kirschner and Weissman SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2024 #15
Weissman: SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2024 #19
Glenn Kirschner: SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2024 #20
Love those guys! Evolve Dammit Feb 2024 #45
I am glad to see Fani Willis fighting back. Let's have her back. Hekate Feb 2024 #17
All of us in this thread, except for one, do have her back. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #25
I too have her back. But it doesn't stop me stopdiggin Feb 2024 #37
I certainly didn't mean to imply you didn't have her back, if I came off that way, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #38
no prob. no offense taken. -(nt)- stopdiggin Feb 2024 #39
I read she tried to hire 2 different prosecutors prior to Wade judesedit Feb 2024 #18
Correct. There aren't a lot of seasoned Atlanta prosecutors willing to risk their life for a temp job. SunSeeker Feb 2024 #24
That is one very sad reality that seems to be trending. Cult 45. Evolve Dammit Feb 2024 #46
Bookmarking Drum Feb 2024 #27
I really hope that's not the best she's got. NT Patton French Feb 2024 #32
K&R spanone Feb 2024 #51

50 Shades Of Blue

(11,391 posts)
2. Your user name is perfect for this post!
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 03:52 PM
Feb 2024

There's a big difference between 2 colleagues being in a relationship, and a supervisor/subordinate being in a relationship. Whether it has zero impact on the case or not, it gives ammunition to Trump and his lawyers to use against her, and I can't understand how she wouldn't have foreseen this.

50 Shades Of Blue

(11,391 posts)
6. She may be only human but she's also in a very highly scrutinized position, and IMO
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 04:25 PM
Feb 2024

it doesn't say anything good about her judgment that she had an affair with an underling, without a care as to what kind of impact the news of their affair would have on her highest-of-high profile cases.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
23. Do you really think she did it "without a care"?
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 09:23 PM
Feb 2024

Come on.

I am sure she wished she had not fallen in love with him, but she did. She's human. I could totally see how it happened. She is in a very stressful situation, working her ass off, and she has this amazing, handsome, brilliant co-counsel supporting her when she needs support the most. Hell, I'd fall in love with him too.

spooky3

(38,633 posts)
28. These situations are far more common than a lot of us admit. I've
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:34 PM
Feb 2024

Known of at least five in my career, despite most people’s wanting to keep them secret, plus a few more where participants later married.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
53. How is she risking "blowing up the case"? This is not a basis for dismissing the case.
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 02:49 AM
Feb 2024

She no doubt knew this could result in more right wing scorn on her, with the inevitable "slut shaming" talking points. But the comfort she found in his love outweighed that to her, obviously.

happy feet

(1,279 posts)
43. Her successful record in bringing, trying and winning cases says everything about her judgement to me
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 09:17 AM
Feb 2024

Ponietz

(4,330 posts)
8. Okay, except you left out the defense attorneys conflict of interest
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 04:51 PM
Feb 2024

The question is whether Willis is upholding her duty to the public. There is no material harm to the defendants.

Whereas, it can be presumed a personal relationship between defense attorneys representing cofendants will interfere with the principal duty each one owes to their client.

50 Shades Of Blue

(11,391 posts)
10. Because it's fucking irrelevant. "They did it too!" Is no justification in my book.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 05:22 PM
Feb 2024

Unless you think Trumpers are the ones who should be setting behavior standards.

Ponietz

(4,330 posts)
11. Duty to the client is ALL that's relevant here
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 05:42 PM
Feb 2024

The public for one side — individual codefendants for the other.

50 Shades Of Blue

(11,391 posts)
16. Well, I guess you just told me! Yeah, I'm way less perturbed by the F-word than that Fani Wills
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 05:52 PM
Feb 2024

has opened herself to fresh attempts to get herself and her office thrown of the case because of it.

Pretty sad when her defense is that Republicans did it too.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
22. What legal basis is there for throwing her off the case?
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 08:59 PM
Feb 2024

Can you cite a legal prohibition she violated?

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,060 posts)
26. I suspect you're not going to get an answer because there is no legal basis
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:01 PM
Feb 2024

for removing her and him from the case.
I'm happy to see her hitting back, I knew she would in due time.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
9. Willis and Wade are co-counsel on this case.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 05:19 PM
Feb 2024

Wade is an independent contractor. He is a contracted special counsel who acts with the same powers as the DA for purposes of this prosecution. This is not like a boss dating a secretary. This is absolutely analogous to the defense counsel she is referring to.

50 Shades Of Blue

(11,391 posts)
12. Wade didn't hire himself. Willis hired him. He doesn't report to himself. He reports to her.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 05:44 PM
Feb 2024

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
21. The county contracted with him. He does report to himself; he's an independent contractor.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 08:53 PM
Feb 2024

He was contracted to prosecute this one case. By legal definition, an independent contractor is not told how to do his job, he decides how he does the job. When you contract with a painter, you don't tell him how to paint, you just tell him you want your house painted.

Wade shepherded the case through the entire grand jury process, and did it quite well, according to the grand jury itself. He is not some office flunky. He is Willis' co-counsel on this case.

I agree with Willis when she says that the way Wade has been described is not only inaccurate, but racist. It's as if people can't imagine that this black man is a seasoned prosecutor who can do his job without being spoonfed what to do.

spooky3

(38,633 posts)
30. Very good points. I also think sexism is involved here. Some people
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:38 PM
Feb 2024

Are incensed when women do what they are fine with men doing.

Bev54

(13,431 posts)
40. I think there may well be some jealousy here with Roman's lawyer who was a big
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 01:54 AM
Feb 2024

supporter of Wade's and fawned all over his credentials a few years ago. She seemed a bit too much, wearing a Wade shirt etc. I really think she had a thing for him and perhaps she is jealous of Fani. She knows he was qualified for the job and this seems like a personal hit job that she also thought would help her client.

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
29. A government employee
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:37 PM
Feb 2024

Dating a contractor/vendor is just as bad if not worse. She has direct influence over the government contract of someone she is dating, that is a huge conflict of interest.

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,060 posts)
35. That may be, but I don't think she gives a crap about the media,
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:56 PM
Feb 2024

she's just going to keep on keeping on.

spooky3

(38,633 posts)
36. She's a prosecutor, not a politician. From what I've read
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:50 PM
Feb 2024

None of this affects her case.

When this story first hit the media (with all kinds of speculation, later shown to be incorrect, eg, the truth was that she hired Wade before their personal relationship began, at a pay rate below what was typical for that level of job), NYT published an article on it. The reader comments (almost exclusively from men, judging from usernames) were very judgmental and negative, with sexist and racist overtones. Probably some were trolls, but I was appalled given that it was NYT readers. Reactions were very similar to those for the Harvard - Dr. Gay story.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
41. Nope. The contract was signed months before they started dating.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 02:06 AM
Feb 2024

Their intimate relationship does not change the contract. He was contracted to prosecute the Georgia elections case for $250/ hour, and that remains unchanged.

Evolve Dammit

(21,777 posts)
44. Good point. Apparently he doesn't have much RICO experience, but is a good QB?
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 09:58 AM
Feb 2024

At least that is what some cable pundits were claiming.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
54. Wade really knows his way around a courtroom. That makes him a great QB.
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 03:08 AM
Feb 2024

He tried felonies in both state and federal court, he was the first Black man to serve as a municipal judge in the Atlanta suburb of Marrietta, and has taught judicial training classes to new judges in Georgia. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fani-willis-filing-confirms-romantic-relationship-denies-conflict/

Wade is a seasoned trial lawyer and has done excellent work shepherding this complex case through the grand jury process. The grand jury thought he did a great job:

There is one group of Atlantans who have seen Wade demonstrate his legal abilities at great length: the members of the Fulton County Special Purpose Grand Jury, who in the end recommended that Trump and 18 other co-defendants
be charged with election conspiracy. Wade ran the grand jury process for Willis over more than six months, guiding the jurors through hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of documents and a thicket of legal and evidentiary issues.

Interviews with some of those grand jurors indicate they were impressed with Wade. One member of the panel, the only lawyer among them, told CBS News Wade was "in command" and "highly skilled." The source, who asked not to be identified discussing what occurred inside the grand jury room, described Wade as a deft performer in front of the grand jury.

"He had a lightness of tone when that was appropriate and was very serious when it was time to be serious," the grand juror said.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fani-willis-trump-2020-election-case-prosecutor-nathan-wade/

That is why he was tapped for the job.
 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
48. She still has direct influence over his contract
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 11:51 AM
Feb 2024

And evaluating his work. That's a direct conflict of interest.

This is government ethics 101. You are not supposed to have personal relationships of any kind with those receiving public funds that you control. Even if there is no sign of impropriety, the potential for bias exists and you are supposed to remove yourself from any decisions involving the other person.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
49. She is not his supervisor. He is an independent contractor.
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 04:43 PM
Feb 2024

Government ethics 101 is that you must not have a financial interest in a contract you are negotiating. That was not the case when Wade signed the contract, and that is not the case now. Willis does not "control" the funds used to pay Wade. He is paid by the county according to the terms of his contract.

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
50. She is the DA
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 04:52 PM
Feb 2024

She supervises every attorney doing prosecutorial work for the County regardless of their employment status as a contractor or employee. She can extend his contract, she can decide to terminate his contract (according to it's terms), etc.

I've sat through conflict of interest training at the state and federal level. I've had to disclose relationships I've had in the industry I regulated in both and if there was any connection at all, I was not allowed to work with those entities, simply to avoid the appearance of a conflict. Even when it was as indirect as my cousin working as an office clerk for a company being inspected.

She absolutely knew the relationship should have been disclosed to avoid the appearance of bias.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
52. She is not regulating Wade. They are co-counsel. They're on the same side.
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 02:05 AM
Feb 2024

That's completely different from your situation where you were regulating industry, where you are supposed to be on opposite sides. Your situation would be akin to Willis having a cousin on Trump’s defense team.

Again, when he was contracted, they were not in a relationship, other than he was her friend, as were the other two contracted special prosecutors. It was her friendship with these three that convinced them to enter the contract and literally risk their (and their families') lives. That does not present a conflict of interest for Willis.

homegirl

(1,965 posts)
34. SOME PEOPLE...
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 10:52 PM
Feb 2024

NEVER LEARNED LESSON NUMBER ONE OF THE SCHOOL YARD. If you give it-be prepared to take it!

SleeplessinSoCal

(10,412 posts)
19. Weissman:
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 06:05 PM
Feb 2024
Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor, posted on X, "The new Fani Willis brief, supporting affidavit and exhibits are so powerful you wish the substance was public right after the allegations, so as to nip them in the bud. And unless something changes, this makes the Feb. 15 hearing much ado about nothing, by a desperate defendant."

SleeplessinSoCal

(10,412 posts)
20. Glenn Kirschner:
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 06:09 PM
Feb 2024
"It's a bad look in the court of public opinion, but it looks like it will be much ado about nothing in the court of law," he said. "Based on what I've reviewed and what I've read, what I've seen. I don't think it will have any impact on the RICO [racketeering] prosecution of Donald Trump and his criminal associates down in Georgia."

stopdiggin

(15,463 posts)
37. I too have her back. But it doesn't stop me
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:57 PM
Feb 2024

from observing what I think to be an "own goal" (unforced error) against the home team - that could have been seen (foreseen) from roughly a mile off.

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,060 posts)
38. I certainly didn't mean to imply you didn't have her back, if I came off that way,
Fri Feb 9, 2024, 12:02 AM
Feb 2024

I do apologize, and I see your point.

judesedit

(4,592 posts)
18. I read she tried to hire 2 different prosecutors prior to Wade
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 06:03 PM
Feb 2024

They refused the position cause they were afraid of Trump's magats retaliation toward them and/or their families.

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)
24. Correct. There aren't a lot of seasoned Atlanta prosecutors willing to risk their life for a temp job.
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 09:28 PM
Feb 2024

Serving on this case requires unpending your life and receiving death threats from Trumpanzees on a daily basis. Not an easy ask. Atlanta prosecutors willing to risk their lives are few and far between. That is why Wade was Willis' third choice, after 2 others said no.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fani-willis-trump-2020-election-case-prosecutor-nathan-wade/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fani Willis turns the tab...