General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter November Biden should replace Garland
and I wouldn't want any move now to interfere with the election.
It's one thing for the AG to be nonpartisan, it's another to try this hard to look non partisan by appointing partisan attorneys to look into the President and his family.
The AG is not the President's lawyer, but he serves at his pleasure and should reflect his priorities.
dalton99a
(95,885 posts)SheilaAnn
(10,816 posts)Demsrule86
(71,560 posts)the Trumper fix that report and make it accurate. That guy should never never been appointed in this matter.
catrose
(5,381 posts)yliza
(211 posts)But sadly we are living in interesting times and I believe he is not up to the challenge.
dchill
(42,660 posts)Never appoint someone who would have been fine during normal times. As long as there are Republicans - or ANY racist apologist anti-democratic political parties - we won't have really normal times. Endit.
Vadem
(2,599 posts)Mr. Evil
(3,478 posts)That would be the most awesome thing that could happen! Talk about innumerable MAGAt heads exploding in unison! It would be a glorious day.
Scrivener7
(60,236 posts)Vadem
(2,599 posts)leftieNanner
(16,180 posts)After November.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)AverageOldGuy
(4,280 posts)Should never have appointed him.
tritsofme
(19,946 posts)DFW
(60,622 posts)It is highly unusual for a cabinet member to remain at the post for more than four years.
Although I highly doubt she'd want it, I'd beam with delight at seeing Hillary Clinton take the AG's post for Biden's second term. I'd bet that Clarence Thomas's resignation would come within 48 hours of Garland's.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...is that quick on his feet! But I'm with you philosophically.
Emile
(43,851 posts)ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)I hope he doesn't make keeping him the worst decision of his second.
Scrivener7
(60,236 posts)Mr. Sparkle
(3,729 posts)It's failure after failure from him, he never ceases to disappoint. He will go down in history as a closet republican or incompetent boob
Marcuse
(9,120 posts)Obama knew any nominee was DOA anyway so he forced the reliably cynical GOP to stonewall Garland, against whom it had no plausible non partisan objection, without a Senate hearing.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now
dchill
(42,660 posts)... alteration to your source's statement: 63-year-old Federalist!
SocialDemocrat61
(8,182 posts)but I believe it is a tradition for all cabinet members to submit a letter of resignation before the second term. Then the President can decide whos to accept and whos to reject.
tritsofme
(19,946 posts)But it is quite rare for cabinet officials to stay on a full 8 years.
SocialDemocrat61
(8,182 posts)By Ann Compton
There is an unwritten tradition in Washington that cabinet secretaries all submit pro forma letters of resignation at the end of a first term for a re-elected president, but apparently it doesn't really work that way.
https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/do-cabinet-secretaries-get-the-boot-at-terms-end
Greybnk48
(10,757 posts)to try and make President Biden look weak or bad.
The press in the room with Biden looked and acted like a pack of rabid dogs.
mountain grammy
(29,291 posts)TeamProg
(6,630 posts)Response to edhopper (Original post)
TeamProg This message was self-deleted by its author.
Xipe Totec
(44,592 posts)Ol' Mitch might have done this country a favor.
LeftInTX
(34,888 posts)He showed poor judgement by appointing Hur. That doesn't mean Garland is full blown heritage foundation Trumper.
Xipe Totec
(44,592 posts)The fact that Gorsuch is bad doesn't automatically make Garland good.
LeftInTX
(34,888 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,592 posts)BaronChocula
(4,893 posts)with propriety, appearances, and meticulous judgment he would resign now.
Rebl2
(17,976 posts)done it sooner, but I know that looks like meddling in places Biden must stay out of.