General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter November Biden should replace Garland
and I wouldn't want any move now to interfere with the election.
It's one thing for the AG to be nonpartisan, it's another to try this hard to look non partisan by appointing partisan attorneys to look into the President and his family.
The AG is not the President's lawyer, but he serves at his pleasure and should reflect his priorities.
dalton99a
(94,133 posts)SheilaAnn
(10,712 posts)Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)the Trumper fix that report and make it accurate. That guy should never never been appointed in this matter.
catrose
(5,365 posts)yliza
(207 posts)But sadly we are living in interesting times and I believe he is not up to the challenge.
dchill
(42,660 posts)Never appoint someone who would have been fine during normal times. As long as there are Republicans - or ANY racist apologist anti-democratic political parties - we won't have really normal times. Endit.
Vadem
(2,599 posts)Mr. Evil
(3,457 posts)That would be the most awesome thing that could happen! Talk about innumerable MAGAt heads exploding in unison! It would be a glorious day.
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)Vadem
(2,599 posts)leftieNanner
(16,159 posts)After November.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)AverageOldGuy
(3,838 posts)Should never have appointed him.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)DFW
(60,186 posts)It is highly unusual for a cabinet member to remain at the post for more than four years.
Although I highly doubt she'd want it, I'd beam with delight at seeing Hillary Clinton take the AG's post for Biden's second term. I'd bet that Clarence Thomas's resignation would come within 48 hours of Garland's.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...is that quick on his feet! But I'm with you philosophically.
Emile
(42,293 posts)ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)I hope he doesn't make keeping him the worst decision of his second.
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)Mr. Sparkle
(3,711 posts)It's failure after failure from him, he never ceases to disappoint. He will go down in history as a closet republican or incompetent boob
Marcuse
(9,010 posts)Obama knew any nominee was DOA anyway so he forced the reliably cynical GOP to stonewall Garland, against whom it had no plausible non partisan objection, without a Senate hearing.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now
dchill
(42,660 posts)... alteration to your source's statement: 63-year-old Federalist!
SocialDemocrat61
(7,648 posts)but I believe it is a tradition for all cabinet members to submit a letter of resignation before the second term. Then the President can decide whos to accept and whos to reject.
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)But it is quite rare for cabinet officials to stay on a full 8 years.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,648 posts)By Ann Compton
There is an unwritten tradition in Washington that cabinet secretaries all submit pro forma letters of resignation at the end of a first term for a re-elected president, but apparently it doesn't really work that way.
https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/do-cabinet-secretaries-get-the-boot-at-terms-end
Greybnk48
(10,724 posts)to try and make President Biden look weak or bad.
The press in the room with Biden looked and acted like a pack of rabid dogs.
mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)TeamProg
(6,630 posts)Response to edhopper (Original post)
TeamProg This message was self-deleted by its author.
Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)Ol' Mitch might have done this country a favor.
LeftInTX
(34,301 posts)He showed poor judgement by appointing Hur. That doesn't mean Garland is full blown heritage foundation Trumper.
Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)The fact that Gorsuch is bad doesn't automatically make Garland good.
LeftInTX
(34,301 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)BaronChocula
(4,555 posts)with propriety, appearances, and meticulous judgment he would resign now.
Rebl2
(17,743 posts)done it sooner, but I know that looks like meddling in places Biden must stay out of.