Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,156 posts)
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 11:32 AM Feb 2024

Looks like journos were cherry-picking the polls to make it the horse race they wanted

One Thought
By Josh Marshall
|
"One thought on how this race turned out. As far as I know, not a single poll showed Pilip ahead. There were a few at the end that showed it close. But this was yet another race with a lot of junk or what we might call plain wrap polls. There were a couple polls I saw recently that had a modest single-point lead for Suozzi. But at least one of these and I think two also added a tighter screen of voters who were sure they were going to vote — slightly different from a standard “likely voter” screen. Those showed Suozzi moving into double digits. That made me pretty confident Suozzi was going to take this, for obvious reasons. The vibes world picked up a big Pilip surge in the final days. But that didn’t pan out.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/one-thought-2

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like journos were cherry-picking the polls to make it the horse race they wanted (Original Post) kpete Feb 2024 OP
Suozzi +4 to actual +8 is not a radical departure from polling detail. brooklynite Feb 2024 #1
Give me my heart back.💕 gab13by13 Feb 2024 #3
They're doing this in the daily trying to dampen our enthusiasm. My rage will only subside when the recons are onecaliberal Feb 2024 #2
I'm Shocked, SHOCKED, that the media manipulated polls getagrip_already Feb 2024 #4
Please elaborate, with evidence of "manipulation" brooklynite Feb 2024 #6
Cherry picking polls is a form of manipulation... nt getagrip_already Feb 2024 #7
What cherry-picking? brooklynite Feb 2024 #8
Don't know about anyone else but I pretty much either decline to participate or outright lie to pollsters. dutch777 Feb 2024 #5

brooklynite

(95,632 posts)
1. Suozzi +4 to actual +8 is not a radical departure from polling detail.
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 11:34 AM
Feb 2024

The last poll (Suozzi +1) was a pro-Republican pollster that was highlighted by the NY Post.

onecaliberal

(33,416 posts)
2. They're doing this in the daily trying to dampen our enthusiasm. My rage will only subside when the recons are
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 11:37 AM
Feb 2024

Sitting in prison where they belong.

getagrip_already

(15,357 posts)
4. I'm Shocked, SHOCKED, that the media manipulated polls
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 11:46 AM
Feb 2024

To create a narrative.

My faith in journalism is shattered!

brooklynite

(95,632 posts)
8. What cherry-picking?
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 12:36 PM
Feb 2024

With the exception of last week's pro-Republican poll (Suozzi +1), every other poll was Suozzi +4, and 3 of the 4 were academic rather than media.

dutch777

(3,111 posts)
5. Don't know about anyone else but I pretty much either decline to participate or outright lie to pollsters.
Wed Feb 14, 2024, 12:06 PM
Feb 2024

Not sure why I just dislike the process but I do. So given my personal behavior I pretty much heavily discount upfront polls especially when well in advance of the election date. I guess journalists need something to hang their hat on and create content but polls are a pretty weak peg.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like journos were c...