General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe real issue is not Biden's age -- it's VP Kamala Harris.
"...Eight vice presidents have taken over for leaders who have died in office, and reading between the lines of the actuarial tables, Vice-President Kamala Harris has even odds to become the ninth...
This demographic divergence is the beginning and end of the consternation around Harriss possible succession to the presidency, because she meets or exceeds every other qualification on their collective resumes. Among the most famous successes, she has more government and elected experience than Teddy Roosevelt, more education and accomplishment than Harry Truman, and broader popular support than Lyndon Johnson. And she had to do it all as a Black and South Asian-American woman... Shes just the least likely to be recognized for it...
... we ... had this discussion with the nomination of Sen. John McCain. As an elder statesman with a unique and non-transferrable political cache, a history of cancer survival, and a then-unprecedented advanced age, McCains choice for his successor in the event of a health emergency was heavily scrutinized, even before he made a decision. His pick would be a window into his judgment: How he would approach the problems of the country ... who heand by extension, wewould trust to carry them out with all the care and faith due to the American people.
And he picked Sarah Palin.
To even begin to go into how wildly unprepared and unqualified she was for the role would be an insult to both Biden and Harris, so I wont make a comparison. Instead, I will point out that many of the same worries and constraints that weighed down McCains candidacy were as true of Biden in 2020made even more urgent by the COVID-19 pandemic and placed under a harsher spotlight by an unhinged opposition. Biden made his decision as a responsibility to the country and the party, recognizing that the best result for the latter would be to pick someone who could capably and faithfully serve the former. He was a vice president himself, after all...
That is the worry that is consuming our political discourse under the guise of (im)polite concern over how old President Joe Biden is. There is no telling what it would mean for the country to experience that kind of shift, to lose a president and accept a new one under the most tragic and terrible conditions. People want to know that there will be continuity, that there will be success, that we can place our trust in the successor as much as the person who preceded them. Because of how unprecedented she is, Kamala Harris doesnt immediately provide that comfort for the people who are watching. But seeing her as vice president, Ive realized that she doesnt have to.
The quality of a vice president isnt just about their résumé or their achievements; its about the person that picked them, and their understanding of the costs. I dont need to believe that Vice-President Kamala Harris will be the right successor to President Joe Biden; he doesand thats enough."
Full essay at
https://www.damemagazine.com/2023/10/12/the-media-has-a-real-thing-against-vp-kamala-harris/
I'd forgotten I'd read this a while ago when it showed up on FB today. Put this way, it now seems so much more plausible and obvious. I wonder if others have thought this.
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
brooklynite
(95,631 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 14, 2024, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)
Kamala Harris was not a popular Presidential choice (she was in single digits during most of her campaign) and she hasn't established a high public profile in her assignments as VP. Its not that she's Black or a woman; its that she's still an unknown quantity to many people.
bamagal62
(3,312 posts)Shes an unknown quantity to people is that Joe Biden does not put her out there. Or, if he does, the media doesnt cover it. I distinctly remember that we saw Obama and Joe together ALL the time. Obama put Joe Biden out there and showed us they were a team working together. I dont see any of that with Kamala. I wonder why? Voters need to get to know her better.
Attilatheblond
(2,537 posts)And she has been working on many facets of administration work. Biden does not have her sidelined, but rather has her working hard so she knows what to do and how to do it. If it seems we don't see her enough, that's media and/or the media each of us relies on for information.
brooklynite
(95,631 posts)bamagal62
(3,312 posts)Is this because the media ignores her?
TheProle
(2,274 posts)This, to me, has been a tactic that speaks to the same deficiencies that ended her run before the election year even started.
That said, she's getting very active on the campaign trail, so his confidence has increased; that, or it's seen as a calculated risk.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)Here are a few examples of their bullpen warmup issues:
-- Exasperation and Dysfunction: Inside Kamala Harris Frustrating Start as Vice President (CNN, November 2021).
-- A Kamala Harris Staff Exodus Reignites Questions About Her Leadership StyleAnd Her Future Ambitions (The Washington Post, December 2021).
-- New Book Says Biden Called Harris a Work in Progress (Politico, December 2022).
-- Kamala Harris Is Trying to Define Her Vice Presidency. Even Her Allies Are Tired of Waiting (The New York Times, February 2023).
...In June 2023, an NBC News poll put Harriss approval rating at 32 percent. While Bidens own approval numbers, in the low 40s, are hardly inspiring, the percentage of those who disapprove of Harriss performance is higher than for any other vice president in the history of the poll.
TheProle
(2,274 posts)was a media creation.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)druidity33
(6,479 posts)was 4 people over the course of almost a year. How many people are on the staff of the VP? I'd venture more than 20. It's also a highish turnover job. Long hours and burnout are real. So are family crises and healthcare issues. So yeah, the "staff exodus" was primarily a media creation. The WaPo article was typical scaremongering.
TheProle
(2,274 posts)https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3572304-revolving-door-creates-questions-and-complications-for-kamala-harris/
druidity33
(6,479 posts)4 people had left. It has been over 2 years since then. Got a comparison for other VPs who have served 3+ years and how many "high profile aides" had moved on to other things during their tenure?
And really? The Hill? Like i said, media construction...
Thanks for the levity. Attacking the source is usually the last refuge of fact deniers.
The number of staff who have left Harris are documented facts and it wouldn't matter if it were reported on a Bazooka Joe wrapper.
jaxexpat
(7,060 posts)The lament of the founding mothers is seldom sung. We must intuit its importance and even its existence. I doubt Abigail Adams was the only intelligent woman behind (and beside) the founders. Though, even from a POV based on ignorance, I doubt those intelligent and well-spoken women were spouses/mothers of Georgian, Virginian or Carolinian representatives to the continental congress. It's no coincidence Massachusetts is, today, ranked # 1 for so many positives based on so many various metrics.
Man.....what a digression, and I'm not done. I think it's legitimate to presume, via observation, a multi-generational connection with economic dependence on slave holding to extreme paternalism to the current abortion banning/woman controlling aspect of the American clown dilemma. Pssst.....it's mostly the white redneck losers in the old south and their post-civil war transplanted brethren in the mountain west who are the "base" for our current problems. Pretty much the country music belt, really. It's not me. Honest. It's the demographics and the fact these inbreds are looking for any excuse to hate Kamala Harris.
There's no reason to denigrate or doubt Kamala's potential. There are already plenty who will vote against her and very existence based solely on the turning of the worms in their heads.
Silent Type
(3,526 posts)Lochloosa
(16,135 posts)Most people had no idea who Gerald Ford was when he took the oath. They knew he was the Vice-President, but couldn't have projected what his policies would be.
The VP works in the background for most administrations. The most notable one that didn't was Cheney, but that may have been different if there had not been 9/11.
The VP works for some big egos and most don't want competition within thier administrations. Obama was an exception. He was fearless and wasn't worried about Joe. Hence, he allowed him free reign to be himself.
Response to bamagal62 (Reply #7)
Post removed
NoRethugFriends
(2,454 posts)Who are you kidding?
JohnSJ
(92,761 posts)Polybius
(15,738 posts)Do you seriously think the other side wouldn't bring up Biden's age?
NoRethugFriends
(2,454 posts)But it wouldn't scare people like Kamala Harris's name does
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18685440
Perhaps you should pay more attention, she is not unknown.
betsuni
(26,277 posts)zanana1
(6,163 posts)brooklynite
(95,631 posts)News to me.
zanana1
(6,163 posts)brooklynite
(95,631 posts)Won the nomination? Got more votes than Trump?
zanana1
(6,163 posts)She ran against a deranged clown and still lost.
SocialDemocrat61
(825 posts)in over 200 years? Not much of an argument.
StarryNite
(9,562 posts)Who but a misogynist would vote for a POS who has been convicted of sexual assault on a woman? So naturally they wouldn't want a woman to be president.
Tribetime
(4,861 posts)And he's campaign for biden obama clinton all of them and has a degree in political science
bucolic_frolic
(44,095 posts)Think. Again.
(10,151 posts)ancianita
(36,534 posts)SarahD
(1,632 posts)We choose a reasonably well qualified woman and we get all sorts of innuendo that is just trying to cover up misogyny. They choose a VP candidate who quit her governor job halfway through and quash all criticism as being sexist. The GOP knows fear about our VP becoming president is already here, and they have plans to whip it into a frenzy for the general election. I think Trump will not reveal his running mate intentions because his choice is unlikely to compare favorably with Kamala Harris.
Attilatheblond
(2,537 posts)Deep State Witch
(10,627 posts)A WOC from (gasp!) San Franciscoooooo.... Oh, noes! She's a librul who's going to take away your gunz!
Nikki Haley, who likes to hide the fact that she's also Indian-American, has really been leaning into this.
bucolic_frolic
(44,095 posts)And MSM ignores it.
dutch777
(3,111 posts)I jokingly wrote right after Biden was elected and there was plenty of drama about his VP pick at that time, that I would really like to see him under some minor medical or other excuse relinquish control to the VP for some period of time. I also said, she should then do similar and hand the reigns to then Speaker of the House Pelosi. Mostly I wanted to see how many Repug head's would explode over all their worst fears coming true with people who are more than capable to be President but they choose to vilify on no grounds of merit. It scares me to death now that Johnson in that number 3 slot!
getagrip_already
(15,355 posts)And other venues where the younger and minority voters have access.
People wait for hours to get in and the venues are packed.
She has no problem with the base. I'm sure there are certain constituencies that have their pet candidates and would love people to think otherwise, but I'm not seeing it.
There certainly isn't the anti-hillary hatred (yet) aimed at her. But the right worked on that poison for 30 years.
My secret scenario is Joe wins in 24, and retires in 27 just after his 2 year mark giving her almost 2 full years as potus, and the opportunity to serve a full 10. Unless of course he is still full of piss and vinegar and giving Republicans hell while helping the american people just brings joy to his heart.
Response to ancianita (Original post)
Post removed
ancianita
(36,534 posts)sucks all the oxygen out of any room or platform.
If anyone wanted to know who she'd be as president, a few facts will appear buried by negative headlines about her.
-- When Biden underwent a colonoscopy in November 2021, Harris served as acting president, becoming the first woman (and first South Asian American) to officially wield presidential authority.
-- She had spent the better part of her career as a smart on crime prosecutor who won her first electiondistrict attorney of San Francisco, in 2003by positioning herself as a pragmatic reformer. As Californias attorney general, she targeted transnational gangs and cartels and won billions in extra relief from big banks at the center of the foreclosure crisis.
-- She had been California's junior senator for just over two years when she launched a bid for the presidency, in 2019, buoyed by the brief but bright flashes of stardom shed earned from her tough, courtroom-style questioning of Trump-administration officials, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions (Im not able to be rushed this fast; it makes me nervous, Sessions complained to her at one point), and of the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Anyone can Google her prosecutorial record or read her Wikipedia entry.
ScratchCat
(2,073 posts)My "fear" when she was chosen as VP was that Biden might not be able to make a second term and she was not popular enough to win as our candidate.
You can be certain that the next GOP conspiracy theory will be along the lines that the Democrat plan is for Biden to resign shortly after winning the election, therefore you shouldn't vote for Biden because you are voting for Harris. Heck, Ted Cruz already swears we will swap Biden for Michelle Obama at some point here, so I don't doubt they will be running this talking point about a Biden/Harris switcheroo after he is elected.
elocs
(22,773 posts)So if Biden wins, why should he stay on for another 4 years? What more can he accomplish? It's not unreasonable to believe that once he beats Trump and is inaugurated he would resign to allow Harris to become president.
crickets
(26,060 posts)Being inaugurated as president involves taking an oath:
Joe Biden is not the type of man to take that oath on behalf of all Americans, including the millions who voted him into office, and then casually hand the job to someone else. Not at all.
What more can he accomplish? Just wait and watch him. Underestimating Joe has proven, again and again, to be a big mistake. He gets the job done.
chouchou
(771 posts)She's not the President now, so I have to put my faith in Joe Biden>. Joe Biden picked her. He's not an idiot.
Plus> Never under estimate people, in any way. A lot of people are the proverbial "Still waters run deep"
Americans tend to judge people by their words and bravado. THAT can get you people like Donald Trump.
No Thanks.
patphil
(6,362 posts)She's not flashy.
Like Joe, she's a competent professional who does her job without a lot of drama.
I don't have any concerns about her ability to take over if something happens to President Biden in his second term.
She'd do a great job.
twodogsbarking
(10,359 posts)sheshe2
(84,531 posts)She has Shone. People are just not paying attention.
WASHINGTON During her whirlwind Summer of Action, Vice President Kamala Harris traveled to 17 states as she touted the accomplishments of the Biden-Harris Administration and led the continued fight for fundamental freedoms. While logging thousands of miles on the road and holding dozens of engagements on the ground, the Vice President continued her leadership on key issues that directly impact the American people from protecting reproductive rights and addressing gun violence, to advancing economic opportunity, delivering climate action, and fighting for the freedom to learn and teach America's full history.
snip//
From Florida and Massachusetts to Illinois and Indiana, she spoke directly with Black Americans, Latinos, women, young people and students, and faith leaders. Vice President Harris keynoted the Rainbow PUSH Coalition's Convention, the Delta Sigma Theta National Conference, the UnidosUS Conference, the NAACP National Convention, the AME Women's Missionary Society Quadrennial Convention, the ESSENCE Festival, and Everytown's Gun Sense University.
The Vice President's Summer of Action also included a flurry of events in which she touted how the Biden-Harris Administration has delivered for people throughout the country. She was in Arizona and the Gila River Indian Community to talk about infrastructure investments, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to discuss successful efforts to boost manufacturing and create good-paying jobs, and Maryland, Washington, and Colorado to uplift historic work to address the climate crisis. Additionally, Vice President Harris fought to improve maternal health while in Iowa, Texas, and North Carolina, and met with small business owners in California and Washington, DC to highlight new investments.
Vice President Harris not only took her message to the road but also to the airwaves. She reached diverse audiences on a variety of digital platforms, spoke with local media outlets, and sat down for a series of national interviews. This includes speaking with ABC News, MSNBC, Univision, NPR, Indian Country Today, and large print outlets.
twodogsbarking
(10,359 posts)betsuni
(26,277 posts)But cynical whining about Democrats ignoring everybody is more fun than paying attention and knowing what the hell you're talking about, I guess.
Harris has a lot of charisma, calm strength and intelligence, she shines. I love seeing how excited young women are about her, which is rare because not reported.
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)Link to tweet
Victor Shi
@Victorshi2020
WOW. Watch the moment Vice President Kamala Harris walked onto stage for her first college kickoff tour. No boos. No one sticking the middle finger. Gen Z gave a standing ovation with uproarious applause and cheers. Kamala Harris IS Gen Zs MVP.
betsuni
(26,277 posts)sheshe2
(84,531 posts)Response to twodogsbarking (Reply #24)
bamagal62 This message was self-deleted by its author.
PCIntern
(25,854 posts)If you dont think that that makes them nuts, you havent been paying attention.
byronius
(7,432 posts)But I live in California, and followed her early career.
Like Biden, shes a serious civil servant, a hard working woman with a long history of common sense.
I was amazed that Biden chose her. Shes the future.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)The Democratic Senate knows her well.
The Cabinet knows her.
Gen Z love her.
Women love her.
100 countries of the world know and respect her.
Being a former state AG, she would choose the best AG for the DOJ.
There would be three former presidents who would advise her.
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)I've never put my finger on precisely what is off-putting, but it's there. It's not race or gender; it's mannerisms.
Diffidence? Maybe not the precise word.
It's like interviews I've watched of Bowie and Jagger. On record, or on stage, they're compelling and confident. When they talk, they're not - they aren't particularly engaging or insightful and come off somewhat guarded.
unblock
(52,879 posts)It's a realistic possibility, and and vpotus may become potus, so sure, it matters. But odds are, Joe will be solid for another 4 years and then some.
I posted about this earlier:
https://democraticunderground.com/100218680097
ancianita
(36,534 posts)Start 14:15 to hear Biden speak of her early on.
PortTack
(32,955 posts)pinkstarburst
(1,331 posts)Voters in 2016 had the opportunity to elect the most qualified candidate ever to run. Instead they chose the least qualified candidate ever to run because this country is deeply misogynistic. Kamala Harris faces that same misogynism plus racism PLUS the fact that she was never a popular candidate even when running against other democrats in the primary in 2020 and dropped out early. Her popularity has never improved since that time. She is smart and qualified, but she does not have charisma.
The other factor is that voters are unexcited about the prospect of a Trump-Biden rematch in 2024. They want two new candidates. They do not want the choices to be two 80+ year old men. And I think the idea of "well, if anything happens, you get KH even though you're not happy about that either" just sort of compounds that feeling of not getting any say or choice this time around.
marble falls
(58,796 posts)ancianita
(36,534 posts)Thanks for the smile.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)and stay true to our democracy. Something I CAN'T say about any repuglican right now.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
tavernier
(12,520 posts)her main emphasis is on race. They are usually pretty intelligent people and usually I respect their opinions, but we have been conflicted on this ever since Joe chose her. I had heard that she had an exceptional mind especially in matters of law, and was a brilliant debater. When I mentioned that, they said that the only thing they ever heard from her in public appearances was the emphasis on color. To be honest, I dont really remember seeing much of her, so I cant really defend her. Perhaps she needs to be pushed harder in the foreground so that people can see and hear and get to know her better.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)The West Wing has now been intentional about showing Harris ability to lead, frequently sharing her work on official outreach channels that once mostly promoted Biden. The vice president also held a prominent role in Bidens April reelection announcement video, where she appeared 13 times, a clear signal officials said, of Harris importance to the reelection effort.
Theres been a change in understanding that how Kamala does is really important for Bidens legacy, a second person in communication with the West Wing told CNN. I think a lot of the folks who have had some misgivings about Kamala have come to terms with that fact.
Ron Klain, former Biden chief of staff and an early Harris advocate inside the West Wing, disagreed that the level of support from the White House for the vice president has changed.
I always believed that when the public got enough chance to see her, her coverage would get better, Klain told CNN in an interview, touting the ways the White House has tried to support Harris and her platform. And so, I think the support for us always been there in the White House. I think finally, the coverage is reflecting what a great job shes been doing since day one.
tavernier
(12,520 posts)My friends pretty much only watch the evening news not FOX and like most folks out there, dont otherwise follow daily politics. If the VP is out there doing events and speaking out about her work, unless its covered by the evening news, they wont know about it.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)There's lots of info about her, and enough to show that she'll carry on with Biden's domestic and foreign policy.
Do they know there's no daylight between her and Joe on the Israel-Hamas war? And that she's already been on the campaign trail?
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2023-12-21/kamala-harris-2024-campaign-stops-nevada-south-carolina
tavernier
(12,520 posts)no, the normal world doesnt give a shit until perhaps a month before election time. Thats not entirely true because we have to seep in information, crawl under the rug and above the clouds and sprinkle it into the cereal. Problem is Fox News is really good at doing that.
I think what you dont understand is that America has to become more educated or we are screwed!
jalan48
(13,989 posts)He'll play the race card via the VP choices.
captain queeg
(10,635 posts)Wounded Bear
(59,065 posts)doc03
(35,599 posts)in the primary but when he picked Caribou Barbie he lost me. I am not comparing her to Palin at all. But
I have seen very little of her myself in the media and she has been a target by the MAGAs from the start.
But face the facts Biden is 80 years old and just because of that he my not finish his term. On the bright
side I have faith Trump will find someone even worse that Palin though.
dlk
(11,709 posts)Even worse, in their small minds, she could potentially become the most powerful person in the world. I agree, much of this irrational fear is driving the endless media attacks on President Bidens age. Hes the proxy.
Hekate
(91,687 posts)I hope all of you can now see what the real problem is, captured in two words. She (is a woman) and is Black (a POC).
Just like Hillary an extremely competent and experienced politician, but golly gee she is a woman.
Its not Kamala. Its the misogyny and racism.
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)justareader
(1 post)She is the GOAT (greatest of all time) of tie-breakers. Had to remain close to DC to ensure that appointments requiring senate approval were approved.
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)Welcome to DU.
KS Toronado
(17,891 posts)![](https://media.tenor.com/_1cvtJ-K7_oAAAAC/forest-gump-welcome-group.gif)
TomSlick
(11,230 posts)My wife has been on DU for years. She reads DU every day but rarely posts. I've never liked the term "lurker."
Welcome to DU. Your user name notwithstanding, please join the conversation.
mcar
(42,692 posts)and has been held to a higher standard than all of her white male predecessors. MSM has been out to get her from the start.
Harris was, in large part, responsible for turning the midterms from a Red tsunami to a pink trickle. She speaks forcefully about women's health rights.
I cannot believe what I am reading in this thread about our great VP.
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)mcar
(42,692 posts)I was here through the horrors of 2016, when people left this site after the primary because they weren't allowed to call HRC the c word.
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)ancianita
(36,534 posts)![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
sheshe2
(84,531 posts)She is a good woman and has what it takes to be a strong leader.
kentuck
(111,263 posts)That's the bottom line.
ecstatic
(32,932 posts)that I regularly interact with.
I can't speak for what the right is thinking, but on the left, it really is about ageism / superficial concerns.
cilla4progress
(24,957 posts)dat.
yellowdogintexas
(22,375 posts)for the Black Women Vice President.
Only this and nothing more
LymphocyteLover
(5,762 posts)Mike Nelson
(10,053 posts)... how the media has portrayed Kamala Harris. I'm in California and had been following, and voting for, her... a great, no nonsense worker... tough, professional, competent... the "Conservative media" has created a Kamala Harris that is the opposite of reality.
betsuni
(26,277 posts)Frasier Balzov
(2,738 posts)Obliging Democrats.
She isn't going to be much help bringing Independents along for Joe.
We're in for a pound through primary season.
Hopefully, the deficiencies are finally acknowledged and resolved at the convention in August.
ancianita
(36,534 posts)is that they're really women hiding their political party choice in red states. She and Joe will win that Independent vote demographic.
msfiddlestix
(7,302 posts)Kid Charlemagne
(52 posts)Up front, I think she would be a perfectly competent president. I actually backed her initially in 2020, because I was under the mistaken impression that she was a decent retail politician. She is not a good retail politician and unfortunately, that's a problem, because it's how he largely choose presidents. I don't think people care if she is a poor manager or not. I think that's just a convenient excuse to dislike her.
If Biden could make Shapiro or Whitmer VP today, it would not eliminate the age issue, but it would alleviate concerns somewhat.
(Fun fact. The second Pennsylvania was called for Biden in 2020. I turned to my wife and said, "Oh thank God." Then thirty seconds later, I said, "He's so goddamn old." I said it with a smile, but it was true. And I haven't spent the past four years thinking, "Look at that young sprite."
._.
(526 posts)This was his decision, and his batting average is remarkable. She is very qualified for the Presidency if it comes to that.
LetMyPeopleVote
(147,460 posts)These racist assholes really cannot deal with non-white woman becoming POTUS. Hopefully most of these assholes will have died off by 2028