Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:20 PM Feb 2024

They are not "shooters" - they are terrorists

shooters are a group of shots taken at a bar - or perhaps, someone "shooting" pool

these horrible creatures that take murderous weapons of mass killing to public events are TERRORISTS

a terrorist is someone who wants to change the way that people live their lives - in this case, by living in fear of being killed by someone with a tool of deadly destruction

I am sick to death of these terrorists going into schools, churches, grocery stores, movie theaters and parades and murdering people.

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They are not "shooters" - they are terrorists (Original Post) UpInArms Feb 2024 OP
2nd amendment terrorists sanatanadharma Feb 2024 #1
If there is no political motive it is not terrorism. NT Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #2
What is the definition of terrorism? UpInArms Feb 2024 #4
Domestic terrorism usonian Feb 2024 #3
Radicalized by stochastic terrorists. Hugin Feb 2024 #5
Who radicalized them? TheProle Feb 2024 #7
Or, alternative explanation: They had beef Kid Charlemagne Feb 2024 #6
"But this is going to be gun violence that Free Republic is very eager to condemn." TheProle Feb 2024 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #18
"I can't find the post" -- precisely my point TheProle Feb 2024 #24
not buying that UpInArms Feb 2024 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #10
doesn't matter what you wear UpInArms Feb 2024 #15
What leads you to believe Zeitghost Feb 2024 #11
anyone bringing a weapon of mass destruction UpInArms Feb 2024 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #17
yes UpInArms Feb 2024 #19
Words have meanings Zeitghost Feb 2024 #20
when a society decides that anyone can take a weapon of mass destruction UpInArms Feb 2024 #21
What leads you to believe Zeitghost Feb 2024 #22
you are entitled to your opinion UpInArms Feb 2024 #26
It's not my opinion Zeitghost Feb 2024 #27
from your post UpInArms Feb 2024 #31
It's also ignoring much of my post Zeitghost Feb 2024 #36
Where and when have I claimed there would be no consequences? UpInArms Feb 2024 #37
Post 21 Zeitghost Feb 2024 #40
Thank you .... UpInArms Feb 2024 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #29
welcome to DU, Kid Charlemagne UpInArms Feb 2024 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #33
DU is my home UpInArms Feb 2024 #34
No consequence? onenote Feb 2024 #47
So you want a different definition of "terrorist." Igel Feb 2024 #42
I don't think gang members got the memo AkFemDem Feb 2024 #13
the memo is don't kill random strangers in public places UpInArms Feb 2024 #16
No, it makes you a murderer AkFemDem Feb 2024 #28
True, you are correct, Terrorists. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #12
see the post below yours UpInArms Feb 2024 #35
"Stop calling them "shooters." They're "killers, murderers!" " Sogo Feb 2024 #23
GMTA UpInArms Feb 2024 #25
I avoid going out Marthe48 Feb 2024 #30
But- Violent crime is dropping fast in the U.S. sarisataka Feb 2024 #38
I'm not worried about crime per se Marthe48 Feb 2024 #44
And what exactly do you think the odds are in a nation of 331,000,000? EX500rider Feb 2024 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #49
Mixed messages. limbicnuminousity Feb 2024 #45
I am so sorry, Marte48 UpInArms Feb 2024 #39
Don't be sorry, please Marthe48 Feb 2024 #46
I am sorry for a Marthe SoFlaBro Feb 2024 #41

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
4. What is the definition of terrorism?
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:31 PM
Feb 2024

Terrorism is an action or threat designed to influence the government or intimidate the public. Its purpose is to advance a political, religious or ideological cause.

usonian

(25,201 posts)
3. Domestic terrorism
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:30 PM
Feb 2024
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-dhs-domestic-terrorism-definitions-terminology-methodology.pdf

Domestic Terrorism for the FBI’s purposes is referenced in U.S. Code at 18 U.S.C. 2331(5), and is defined as activities:

• Involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
• Appearing to be intended to:
o Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
o Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or
o Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping;
and

• Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.


TheProle

(3,980 posts)
7. Who radicalized them?
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:54 PM
Feb 2024

Do we think these juveniles spraying other kids in a parking garage are Trumpists? AM radio enthusiasts? Christian nationalists?

 

Kid Charlemagne

(52 posts)
6. Or, alternative explanation: They had beef
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:51 PM
Feb 2024

As I said, on anther thread, as soon as this story broke and the first details came out, everyone in KC knew this was some gang bullshit and not a spree shooting thing.

Not that it ultimately matters. Dead is dead. Guns are guns.

But this is going to be gun violence that Free Republic is very eager to condemn.

TheProle

(3,980 posts)
8. "But this is going to be gun violence that Free Republic is very eager to condemn."
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:56 PM
Feb 2024

Conversely, the myriad threads here fell off the front page with the quickness once it was all but obvious that this wasn't a beer-bellied white guy / Taylor Swift assassination attempt.

Curious that...

Response to TheProle (Reply #8)

TheProle

(3,980 posts)
24. "I can't find the post" -- precisely my point
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:43 PM
Feb 2024

And I get the frustration and am an advocate for real gun control. But howling in the wind is intellectually dishonest.

If we froze all gun sales today and were able to somehow confiscate half of all civilian-held firearms, there would still be 200 million guns in the country.

We need to keep the political pressure on lawmakers and lobbyists and remain firm in our resolve for some common-sense reform.

But we also need to learn to extend the conversation to personal accountability, and not only when the bad actors are politically opposed to us.

And that means addressing the culture of violence in all its permutations.

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
9. not buying that
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 12:59 PM
Feb 2024

those 11 children - what, collateral damage?????

the beloved DJ killed?

the other 10 people?

no .... you do not bring weapons of mass destruction to a parade for a "gang" thing

((((shakes head violently))))

Response to UpInArms (Reply #9)

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
15. doesn't matter what you wear
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:25 PM
Feb 2024

or under what guise you do your killing

you become a terrorist when you terrorize

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
11. What leads you to believe
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:17 PM
Feb 2024

That people don't bring guns to public events for gang activity?

That seems like an odd position to take given the countless examples of gang violence over the past few decades.

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
14. anyone bringing a weapon of mass destruction
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:24 PM
Feb 2024

to a public event is a terrorist ...

you plan to kill someone - anyone - random strangers

you become a terrorist, be you a gang member or a MAGAt

same effort ... same effect

Response to UpInArms (Reply #14)

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
19. yes
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:30 PM
Feb 2024

send them to Gitmo

let them rot behind very strong iron bars for the rest of their miserable lives

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
20. Words have meanings
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:33 PM
Feb 2024

And while thee is no shortage of adjectives and labels I would put on those who harm others. This does not meet the well established definition of terrorism.

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
21. when a society decides that anyone can take a weapon of mass destruction
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:35 PM
Feb 2024

Last edited Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:59 PM - Edit history (1)

to any public event and kill or maim numerous people with no consequence (edited to add) to the change of legislation, the dialogue needs to change

to think "oh, they are gang members so it's okay to have guns and kill people" certainly sounds whitewashy to me.

 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
22. What leads you to believe
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:37 PM
Feb 2024

That there will be no consequence?

Or that anyone here or elsewhere think it's okay for gang members to possess and use guns to kill people at parades.

My only point here is that this does not appear to be terrorism.

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
31. from your post
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:03 PM
Feb 2024
My only point here is that this does not appear to be terrorism.

That is your opinion.
 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
36. It's also ignoring much of my post
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:21 PM
Feb 2024

Including my challenge to your claim that there would be no consequences.


But again, words have meanings. And they are not dependent on your opinion or mine.

Response to UpInArms (Reply #21)

Response to UpInArms (Reply #32)

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
34. DU is my home
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:13 PM
Feb 2024

51,195 posts since Apr 25, 2001

I have lived 2 hours north of KC for 31 years ....

in 2001, Earl, Elad and Skinner gave all of us a home and I cannot imagine how lost all of us would be without it.

Long may you post

onenote

(46,136 posts)
47. No consequence?
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 03:29 PM
Feb 2024

Sounds like you think that the only options are to treat them as "terrorists" -- despite any evidence that they were intending to terrorize -- or to let them go.

Which is absurd

Igel

(37,527 posts)
42. So you want a different definition of "terrorist."
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:43 PM
Feb 2024

In other words, you like the connation of the word and want to leverage it while assigning it a new denotation in order to get people to agree (or to emote).

Personally, I don't like distorting language.

"Terrorist" has a meaning and I'm not willing to call the KC shooters that any more than I'm willing to call the two guys that walked into a diner and killed 4 people (including my cousin) and wounded others "terrorists." They were dignity-clad angry young men with bad attitudes that couldn't settle a disagreement because they'd never been taught reasonable conflict resolution skills by their parents and families but instead bought into the all-too-common idea that "real men" are inflexible and are permitted to use violence to settle verbal disagreements. That their mothers defended them and said they were "good boys" in calling the accusers "racist" did them a disservice. But they had no intent to intimidate the diner's patrons. They just wanted to preserve their sense of dignity and self-worth by not backing down and demonstrating it by being piss-poor shots and indifferent to anybody else. (Both shooters aimed at each other but each walked away unharmed.)

 

AkFemDem

(2,508 posts)
28. No, it makes you a murderer
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:55 PM
Feb 2024

“Terrorism” is a legal term of art.

“Murderer” isn’t a warmer, fuzzier, softer accusation.

UpInArms

(54,950 posts)
25. GMTA
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 01:49 PM
Feb 2024

Terrorism's goal is to change the victim of such in a profound way. The perpetrator wants to alter how each and every person affected by terrorism views his/her world and force a change to the ways of the terrorist.

Marthe48

(23,168 posts)
30. I avoid going out
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:01 PM
Feb 2024

Terror is stalking our country, rwnj want it this way, and if I have to hole up to save my life, I will do that. I loathe every single person who has put American lives in harm's way, just to arm their unpaid, untrained army they can direct to any event they want to disrupt, and don't care how many people die, what age, what sex, what color, what religion. A mad dog rw court has turned this terror loose on us. They have taken the pursuit of happiness from us, and destroyed our standard of living and quality of life.

sarisataka

(22,672 posts)
38. But- Violent crime is dropping fast in the U.S.
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 02:24 PM
Feb 2024
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218676283

We have dual messages, - that violent crime is dropping and all talk of crime is GOP fearmongering. But then we will say it is too dangerous to leave our homes because crime is so prevalent

Marthe48

(23,168 posts)
44. I'm not worried about crime per se
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 03:09 PM
Feb 2024

I live in a low crime town, (high in drug trafficking, because there is a n/s Interstate with easy access). I don't worry about getting my pursed snatched, or getting mugged, home invasion.

I do go out, mainly for groceries, a few other errands, but hesitate to go to crowd venues, figuring the odds of getting shot by a rwnj anarchist killer who wants to set a record for the most fatalities and brag about it online. Or more darkly, my own conspiracy theory that the rw wants all members of their unpaid, untrained army to have the guns and ammo they need to try to subvert the will of the people by answering the call from any rw fascist mouthpiece with access to a national megaphone. Better to have a few gang members, a few mentally ill people, a few minors get hold of guns and kill innocent people trying to share an experience, than to deny a single one of their fascist soldiers arms.
Try as I might, no other reason for perverting The Constitution of the United States of America makes sense. If 2A is to be interpreted as liberally as can be, then the body and every other amendment deserves the same kind of interpretation. But no. Our right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness has been ignored; and by the actions of the rw fascists on the (formerly) s.c., that entire phrase has been made meaningless. The 14th Amendment clarified individual rights for all Americans (to put it in a vague nutshell) and yet, women are denied the right to control their own bodies. So the current murderous interpretation of 2A has to be intended for an entire shadow army to have weapons, and if there is collateral damage, it is a small price to pay when the end (loss of Democracy in the U.S.) justifies the means to an entire class of people who see a bottom line and absolutely nothing else.

EX500rider

(12,578 posts)
48. And what exactly do you think the odds are in a nation of 331,000,000?
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 03:34 PM
Feb 2024

Homicide deaths per 100,000 population: 7.8

That makes the chances of being a homicide victim 0.0078% or 12,820 to 1.

Which makes it very safe to go out, you will be in much greater danger driving there.

Or using a ladder or having poisonous chemicals under the sink.

Motor vehicle traffic deaths
Number of deaths: 45,404
Deaths per 100,000 population: 13.7

Unintentional fall deaths
Number of deaths: 44,686
Deaths per 100,000 population: 13.5

Unintentional poisoning deaths
Number of deaths: 102,001
Deaths per 100,000 population: 30.7

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/accidental-injury.htm

Response to Marthe48 (Reply #44)

limbicnuminousity

(1,416 posts)
45. Mixed messages.
Thu Feb 15, 2024, 03:22 PM
Feb 2024

Violent crime is down, mass shootings are up. Rape is down compared to a few years ago but is somewhat elevated relative to the pre-Trump years. Hate crimes reached record levels in 2023. Shooting deaths are down but remain significantly elevated relative to the pre-Trump years. And right wing decapitations has a jump in 2024.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/642458/rape-and-sexual-assault-victims-in-the-us-by-gender/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/01/05/hate-crimes-hit-record-levels-in-2023-why-2024-could-be-even-worse/72118808007/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

The crime rate may be dropping but it has a way to go, imho.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They are not "shooters" -...