General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA top U.N. official says Hamas is 'not a terrorist organization,' sparking furious backlash from Israel
A top United Nations official said Hamas was not a terrorist organization on Wednesday, sparking outrage from Israel as the U.N. grapples with allegations of anti-Israel bias and antisemitism.
Asked in a TV interview on Wednesday about Israels plan to eliminate Hamas, Martin Griffiths, the head of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said, Ive worked with many, many different terrorist and insurgent groups.
Hamas is not a terrorist group for us, of course, as you know. Its a political movement, Griffiths added in the exchange on the U.K.s Sky News.
Following criticism, Griffiths aimed to clarify his statement on Thursday afternoon, but ended up drawing more backlash.
more...
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)Is this: "Both the General Assembly and the Human Rights Council annually condemn Israel more than all other countries combined."
For real?
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Twenty-one resolutions condemning violations of human rights were passed: fourteen denounced Israeli acts in regard to Palestine.
RAB910
(4,030 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Do you think that, taking the sum of human rights violations around the globe, two thirds are inflicted on less than a thousandth of its population?
RAB910
(4,030 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)I do love it when people chant the names of some purported fallacy like it were a word of power to undo sound arguments they haven't the face for.
"It's not something you can ever say, because silence is the perfect expression of scorn."
RAB910
(4,030 posts)undefendable. Suggesting that Israel's crimes should be ignored because there are other crimes in the world simply is illogical.
you didn't really. To ignore the UN's obsession with every misdeed by Israel, while ignoring worse actions by member countries is the point that you don't want to address.
It calls into question the the UN's motives in it's condemnations.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Nobodys fooled. Nobody.
We know exactly why Israel is singled out while Congo, Sudan, Syria, KSA, Iran (insert monstrous nation/regime here) gets a pass.
Its because theyre Jews.
Its the antisemitism. Period
RAB910
(4,030 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)We see yall.
Nobodys fooled
RAB910
(4,030 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)Its that the UN believes Hamas is just a political movement and Israel/the Jews are always the bad guys - for decades, above and beyond any other nation on the planet (its the antisemitism)
RAB910
(4,030 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)Im responding to this OP
(And fyi, most of Israel is made up of Jews who were forcibly removed/expelled/who fled mass pogroms from neighboring Arab/Muslim countries like Syria, Jordan etc. For the most part Israelis ARE brown skinned and 25% of Israelis are Muslim)
thucythucy
(9,104 posts)as you put it, "brown skinned?"
These include those who are descendants of Jews ethnically cleansed from a host of Arab majority nations, such as Tunisia, Algeria, Syria, Iraq, Somalia.... According to Wiki, more than half of Israeli Jews are descendants of or are actually from "brown skinned" areas of the world.
Add to these the several million Arab non-Jewish citizens of Israel, who enjoy greater economic prosperity, and greater political freedoms, than ordinary Arabs anywhere else in the Middle East, and one might ask if there isn't a racist component to all those ethnic Europeans so eager to hold Israel responsible for crimes while other nations, particularly majority white ones, are allowed to skate.
As one example, I have yet to hear any European-American who is arguing for an unfettered right to return for Palestinians making the same demand on behalf of Native Americans. To be consistent, shouldn't they be urging the return of the Dakotas, California, Florida, Texas, New Mexico...in fact the entire continental United States, back to their original inhabitants? I defy you to identity one square mile of the United States, not part of a "reservation," that wasn't stolen from someone.
Every white American then is heir to an inheritance of genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Rather than condemn others for the alleged crimes that they themselves are in fact heir to, what are white anti-Zionist Americans willing to give up to address this horrific historic injustice, so close to home?
Or is it simply that it's so much easier to condemn others when you have no actual "skin," brown red or otherwise, in the game?
LeftInTX
(34,483 posts)Including my family.
This is a thread about the UN. They are stating that Hamas is not a terrorist group.
I find that disturbing. They are a terrorist group.
Muslims aren't better than Jews or Christians.
They were many Christian Palestinians, but their numbers are dwindling.
Heck, Yasser Arafat's wife was a Christian. ( Suha Daoud Tawil)
Sirhan Sirhan was also Christian.
I don't know if Palestinians really see themselves as "brown", as much as displaced (That is the start of the conflict in the 1940s, but Palestinians refused their own state too, because they would lose their property)
Israel isn't fighting Hamas because they're brown and Muslim or somehow disadvantaged because of it.
And they weren't displaced in the 1940s because they were brown and Muslim. They were displaced because the UN created two states.
SoFlaBro
(3,795 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)It's an absurd focus for what purports to be a global body.
It certainly can't be justified on the 'brown and Muslim' wheeze, there are Muslim people of color being mistreated all over the world, from Sinkiang to Timbuktu, and in many cases the people mistreating them are colored Muslims themselves.
EX500rider
(12,621 posts)Do they uphold human rights more then Israel?
It is time for the international community to address itself directly to the most serious of North Koreas human rights violations the prison labor camps. Situated in the mountains of North Korea, the camps are estimated to hold some 100,000 to 200,000 prisoners, including whole families, many of whom are not expected to survive.
But no Jews involved, so who cares, right?
RAB910
(4,030 posts)The fallacy of relative privation rejects an argument by stating the existence of a more important problem. The existence of such a worse issue, the fallacy insists, thereby makes the initial argument irrelevant. This fallacy is also known as the appeal to worse problems or not as bad as.
https://academy4sc.org/video/fallacy-of-relative-privation-all-problems-are-relative/
EX500rider
(12,621 posts)Iran:
was rocked by an unprecedented popular uprising against the Islamic Republic system. Security forces unlawfully fired live ammunition and metal pellets to crush protests, killing hundreds of men, women and children and injuring thousands. Thousands of people were arbitrarily detained and/or unfairly prosecuted solely for peacefully exercising their human rights. Women, LGBTI people, and ethnic and religious minorities suffered intensified discrimination and violence. Enforced disappearances, torture and other ill-treatment, including through the deliberate denial of medical care, were widespread and systematic. Cruel and inhuman punishments, including flogging, amputation and blinding, were imposed and/or carried out. The use of the death penalty increased and public executions resumed. Trials remained systematically unfair
China:
Disregard for Human Rights
Repression in Xinjiang.
Fear of Arbitrary Arrest.
Religious Freedom Abuses.
Stifling Freedom of Expression.
Forced Labor.
Assault on Hong Kong's Autonomy.
Severe Restrictions in Tibet.
Cuba:
Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial killings, by the government; torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of political dissidents, detainees, and prisoners by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions
But lets concentrate on Israel!
A lone democracy with LGBT parades in the Middle East.
RAB910
(4,030 posts)We shouldn't be ignoring Israel's human rights violations because there are other countries with human rights violations
EX500rider
(12,621 posts)Or is Israel somehow worse then N Korea or Iran?
I see you don't want to address why that is so.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)You're dealing with someone who would shunt a stroke victim aside to deal with a snapped finger in an emergency room. After all, it would be a fallacy to neglect the trivial in favor of attending to the critical....
RAB910
(4,030 posts)disagree with your analogy
EX500rider
(12,621 posts)Who'd guess that would turn out poorly for them?
RAB910
(4,030 posts)EX500rider
(12,621 posts)However that didn't protect Germans from the war their government started
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)We need to offer humanitarian aid to the Palestinians living in Gaza. We need to ensure that they are able to return home and rebuild. But this is the fault of Hamas, who provoked the fury of a neighboring state. Israel's response has a lot to be criticized, but Hamas' atrocities against the Israelis should not be forgotten in all of this. If you're angry at Israel, you should also be furious with Hamas. If you don't feel that fury, I don't trust that you can see the humanity in either party.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Only the hyperbole is far too shop-worn to carry any impact. You will find argument by hyperbole numbs you as much as your listeners over time....
RAB910
(4,030 posts)Double standards are being used to try and defend the indefensible. It's also why I am in immune to the use of ad hominem tactics as well.
EX500rider
(12,621 posts)Is that like when the UN concentrates on Israel as opposed to far worse human rights violators? That kind of double standard?
I am in immune to the use of ad hominem tactics as well. More like immune to logic IMO
I have to clean my screen
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,106 posts)you're being very transparent here.
I would suggest that you stick to the discussion about the gist of the thread and go start your own thread.
Just a suggestion.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)Your argument is goofy, it would mean never examining sentencing disparities or over policing.
It demands that some kid with a joint be hammered and never mind the bank robbers or that the white kid with powder get a pass while the black kid across town with a rock be crucified.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)That is going into the rotation....
Happy Hoosier
(9,547 posts)... the level of attention appears to ne at least suspicious.
Not that Israel doesn't commit human rights violations... they surely do. But a majority in the world? NOPE. But hey, they're jews. They (apparently) deserve it.
RAB910
(4,030 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,547 posts)I'm saying, and I say this with confidence, that Israel is NOT the primary perpetrator of human rights violations in the world. I think that can be empiracally demonstrated.
My suspicion is that the disproportionate respnse is driven by Antisemitism. I do not assert that as fact, but as a deeply held suspicion based on hisotrical hatred of Jews.
RAB910
(4,030 posts)The fallacy of relative privation rejects an argument by stating the existence of a more important problem. The existence of such a worse issue, the fallacy insists, thereby makes the initial argument irrelevant. This fallacy is also known as the appeal to worse problems or not as bad as.
https://academy4sc.org/video/fallacy-of-relative-privation-all-problems-are-relative/
sarisataka
(22,704 posts)where Israel has not been the country with the most condemnations. It is an unusual year where Israel is not the subject of 51%+ of the UNHRC actions.
Relative privation could explain a one-off situation, but what the same thing is seen year after year, it becomes necessary to look beyond standard fallacies to see if there is another reason for what is happening
RAB910
(4,030 posts)sarisataka
(22,704 posts)For Israel, perfection is the minimum acceptable standard.
Just above you said-
Here you imply we can ignore other countries human rights violations until Israel has no violations
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)No number of knots to tie themselves up in is too many.
Just don't call them on it, like the Republican white nationalist crime syndicate, theocratic domestic terrorist organization, and insane death cult racists it is considered the incomparably greater "sin" than their racism.
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)Cha
(319,338 posts)betsuni
(29,111 posts)LeftInTX
(34,483 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)If you want to have safety and security with people who are inevitably going to continue to be your neighbor in some form or another youre going to have to create a relationship based on some shared values.
I expect hearing his idea of what those 'shared values' might be would appeal to the imp which passes for a sense of humor with me.
Swede
(39,623 posts)He needs to walk off the stage and never open his mouth again.
DFW
(60,264 posts)A mere fact-finding mission, of course.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)The UN has been biased against Israel for decades.
This belief has filtered down to organizations like UNRWA who are hopelessly complicit with Hamas, the political movement.
Amishman
(5,929 posts)And undermining their legitimacy. The UN already is hobbled by the fact that outside the security council, they are powerless.
Not a good look.
Happy Hoosier
(9,547 posts)... if Hamas is indeed a "political movement," and not a "terrorist" organization, then the political entity of Hamas planned and executed an attack aimed at civilians and levereaged rape, sexual assault, and torture.
Can't see how any of that makes anything better.
I've lost all confidence in the UN on this matter.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)It is possible to pretend a 'terrorist' organization is a mere gang of criminals, a foreign body lodged within a society, separate from its people, and not reflecting on them. But a political movement must, by definition, be something which has some broad footing among a populace, and whose platform and acts must be taken as expressing the will of all its adherents, not just its dues-paying membership.
GuppyGal
(1,748 posts)sarisataka
(22,704 posts)individuals and organizations.
His clarification is BS. 'They are not terrorists, they just engage in terrorism.'
BannonsLiver
(20,658 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,658 posts)Seems just like yesterday lol
Solly Mack
(97,001 posts)Damn
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)ripcord
(5,553 posts)Anti-semitism seems to run rampant there.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)high positions in the UN, they are not an unbiased party.
I wonder how many will try to justify those comments made by Martin Griffiths.
LeftInTX
(34,483 posts)Cha
(319,338 posts)mcar
(46,123 posts)What is going on at the UN?
mcar
(46,123 posts)their actions against Putin for the assasination of Navalny.