General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsno_hypocrisy
(46,390 posts)I relish the opportunity to object to speculation.
Speculation
Calls for speculation is an appropriate objection to a question that requires the witness to guess or speculate on an issue where they do not possess direct knowledge. Attorneys can also raise the speculation objection if a witness is speculating with their testimony, regardless of the question they are responding to.
Example
If an attorney asks What do you think the defendants intentions were?, it is a clear call for speculation.
https://www.clio.com/blog/objections-in-court/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CCalls%20for%20speculation%E2%80%9D%20is%20an,do%20not%20possess%20direct%20knowledge.
lapfog_1
(29,252 posts)as a contractor.
I did large scale acquisitions for the federal government for many years, and even the appearance of inappropriate relations is to be avoided.
This list of restrictions on who I could hire or who could send gifts to me, etc was very long. you could give me a T-shirt or a coffee mug with your logo on it, or a pen... so long as the value wasn't over $25. You could not buy me dinner.
As soon as they started dating, she needed to press pause on the relationship.
Oneironaut
(5,555 posts)Is it the worst thing in the world? Nope. Is it in any way acceptable? No.
Trump is still a criminal, and, it sucked that the GOP was trying to jump all over this and cast doubt on his guilt because of it, which is a massive non-sequitur.
Tickle
(2,635 posts)Allegedly, Wade's phone records indicate that they were in close proximity multiple times. Fani's response seemingly downplays this evidence, suggesting it merely indicates their presence in the same area and not necessarily evidence of collusion. However, this raised questions from Republicans about whether Fani had previously utilized phone records as evidence in her own cases. Must be their plan B.
It's worth noting that Fani's decision to intervene in Wade's trial or provide testimony may have been ill-advised. Additionally, an old acquaintance, with whom they no longer maintain contact, has claimed Fani and Wade were together in 2019.
maxrandb
(15,440 posts)if Donnie Dipshit told them it rose in the south.
This is nothing but classic Retrumplican rat-fucking.
As for workplace "romances", somewhere north of 60% are the number of marriages that begin that way.
Hell, even in the Navy, we knew that when we put men and women on ships together, some were going to develop "relationships". For those wondering, "Yes! It is possible in a shipboard rack".
Anyway, aside from making sure they weren't "consummating" their relationship in Shaft Alley, or the Anchor Windless Room, there were few restrictions on dating. Of course, chain of command, undue influence and rank were important considerations, but if the 3RD Class Boatswain's Mate was dating the 2ND Class Hull Technician, it was NOT a big deal.
A lot of people meet where they work.
Baitball Blogger
(46,828 posts)"You didn't ask me if I was speculating."
Did this witness have it in for Fani Willis? Because, if it was me, I would have known to protect myself as a witness to make sure I wasn't being used for some inappropriate agenda. If someone was asking me to be a witness, and all I had was hearsay, I would have wondered what was the prosecutor's motives, since any prosecutor knows how tenuous hearsay can be.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Post removed
republianmushroom
(14,029 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.