'Hound them': Supreme Court faces flood of protests over Trump immunity case

[turbinetree]

By David Edwards
Published February 29, 2024 4:34 PM ET

An online movement aims to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly deny Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity in the election subversion case against him.

The unorganized group is concerned that the high court may have helped Trump by taking up the case that is expected to delay his trial past the 2024 presidential election.

"I've written my feelings to the US Supreme Court on the Trump immunity case. Have you?" one person wrote on X.

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-complaints/

[Bayard]

1. I seriously doubt they read letters from the populace...

[emulatorloo]

3. Yeah they don't care.

[Scrivener7]

7. I think you're right, but it felt good.

[Trueblue1968]

28. I sent my opinions and everyone else should took

[gab13by13]

2. Don't bother with the middle men

Send texts to Harlan Crowe and Leonard Leo

[et tu]

16. good one but

they don't care either! a fine mess~

[senseandsensibility]

4. This is the attitude I'm looking for

It's a start, if nothing else Other movements will spring up, and I will support all of them. Don't let the corporate media gaslight and depress you. We are the answer we've been looking for.

[SWBTATTReg]

5. and talk about not interfering w/ elections, and the Supreme Court is doing it in front of us all. Interfering

in Justice being sought for trump's misdoings in the last election. Talk about hypocrites.

[Scrivener7]

6. I did! I said: The names "Roberts" and "Taney" will forever vie for first place

on "worst courts" lists.

The names "Roberts" and "Taney." Always together.

You will not be forgotten.

Congratulations.

[BaronChocula]

23. That's just how I see it!

Mr. "calling balls and strikes" is calling strikes with Democracy at the plate. And when we come back from this flirtation with fascism, his name will be Mudd... or Taney rather.

[ShazzieB]

27. Ah yes, the Dred Scott case.

AKA the all time low point in the history of the US Supreme Court. I had to Google to be sure, but I was pretty sure Taney was that Chief Justice! (Plessy v. Ferguson was pretty bad, too, but not as horrible as Dred Scott v. Sandford.)

I'm not sure even Roberts is as bad as Taney was, but Roberts has definitely earned his place in the SCOTUS Chief Justices Hall of Shame with the Dobbs decision alone.

[Cha]

8. Protest Anyway & By

Any means Necessary!

We can’t be silent

[senseandsensibility]

9. That's the spirit!

[Cha]

11. Right! 🕯️🕊️💙🌊🇺🇸

[spanone]

10. K&R

[BigmanPigman]

12. They only notice if you interrupt their fine dining

experience at a restaurant. Then they cry, "Boo hoo hoo, these Dems are nasty".

[Irish_Dem]

13. They take direction only from the GOP think tanks and rich benefactors.

[cayugafalls]

14. Rather than a sternly worded letter, why not a million person march?

Somehow I kind of think it could be pulled off...

But alas, I am just a old guy who volunteers sometimes, when I can.

I'd be willing to head to DC...

[budkin]

33. I would too

LFG

[Demobrat]

15. They are set for life.

Why would they care what the little people think?

[Hermit-The-Prog]

18. They can't live in cocoons and we still have the 1st Amendment.

[SergeStorms]

30. For now.

nt

[Hermit-The-Prog]

17. It should be a louder protest than the infamous Brooks brothers sham in Bush v Gore.

[AllaN01Bear]

19. rich mans court.

[SouthernDem4ever]

20. To all the Debbie Downers

We still need to put pressure on them. Whether or not we think the SCOTUS cares or not, contacting them is the only option. At least they'll be reminded what sleazeballs they've become.

[senseandsensibility]

21. Absolutely

Frankly, I'm surprised at the negativity aimed at citizens who are trying to do something.

[mtngirl47]

22. I agree!

Emails are a start....but phone calls are noisy and someone has to answer the phone. I'm going to start calling tomorrow.

I will call several times per day.

[senseandsensibility]

24. Good for you!

Let us know how it goes!

[bucolic_frolic]

25. Unequal protection of the laws

You or I could not find such a sweetheart deal, even at our local Justice of the Peace.

[ForgedCrank]

26. Yes, becasue

application of law should be subject to the pressures of protesters. That totally sounds like how our justice system was meant to function.

[SergeStorms]

29. They don't care.

They didn't care when they effectively overturned Roe v. Wade, and they don't care that they've effectively given Trump a "get out of jail free" card.

They. Don't. Freaking. Care.

Something is in the wind, other than Trump's farts. They've been working on this for well over four years. And that's all I'm going to say about that. For now.

[rubbersole]

31. Working on this for 30 years probably.

Also probably relishing the crying of the 'owned libs'.

[Takket]

32. i appreciate the enthusiasm, but their time would be much better spent campaigning for Biden

because a Biden victory is the only thing that will stop him at this point.

[Ninga]

34. Take a random envelope, seal it empty. Address it to

the Supremes, write on the back, Justice delayed is Justice denied, slap a first class stamp and mail. I timed myself. Envelope took 4 min 10 seconds. Getting it to a mail box required 3 minutes off course.
The idea is to over load the Supremes mail room. With thousands. They will get the idea.