General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIsrael is blocking humanitarian aid in clear violation of U.S. law, (Bernie on what used to be twitter)
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
littlemissmartypants
(33,585 posts)Trueblue1968
(19,251 posts)TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)Hes not a Democrat, hes worked against Democrats for decades, and no Democrat should care what he thinks. Especially when hes so monumentally wrong.
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Do you believe watching children starving to death will help President Biden in November?
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)In Gaza. Quit trying to place the blame on Israel. I want Biden to win reelection and stand behind the principles that every Democrat should support. One of those is assisting our ally Israel against Hamas murderers and rapists.
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)and it won't stop before November, and I damn sure wouldn't want to be a President trying to win a reelection selling your message.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)and that the third or fourth generation of their descendants are therefore entitled to kill just as many innocent women and children as they want, "forevermore"....
aurora the great
(142 posts)The Palestinians are dying of disease, malnutrition and an endless barrage of attacks, The health care system has collapsed. Humanitarian aid is essential at this point. But I guess you don't care about any of this. Just hide behind the "Hamas is responsible" mantra and refuse to see the whole of the situation. Look at these children dying of starvation and say well that's just too bad. It must be nice to have everything be so black and white.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)Israel is just playing a role that Hamas is dictating.
It's not hard to understand.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)nor blocking food and water shipments into Gaza,
nor gunning down unarmed civilians who are frantically rushing towards food trucks.
It is ISRAEL who is doing all those things,
so I will place the blame where it belongs.
HAMAS deserves condemnation for their attack on Israel on October 7th,
and all of the crimes that they committed on that date.
However, it is now March 14th of the following year,
and the overwhelming number of subsequent civilian casualties ever since,
have been brought by Israeli fingers on the trigger.
I don't have to "try" to place the blame on Israel.
Israel have convicted themselves of these war crimes.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)Should I be posting trump's quotes?
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Sometimes, if the quote is the truth and actually works to promote democracy while not letting children starve to death.
Good luck with your search.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)You know there are plenty of Trump quotes praising Bernie, but you also know I am not permitted to quote Trump by the DU Terms of Use.
You also know there are plenty of Bernie quotes bashing Democrats.
The point is, quoting someone who is not a Democrat under the pretense of attracting non-Democrats to vote for Biden in November is quite a disingenuous proposition.
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)You know that Bernie isn't running in this race, you know that he has endorsed President Biden.
You also know that Bernie doesn't "bash" he constructively criticizes.
The point is quoting any conscientious human being; whether Democrat, Republican, ie: (Liz Cheney, Adam Kissinger) Independent or even a non-American to attract any legal American vote for President Biden is the most logical and moral course out of the quagmire that is the Republican cult.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)For a second I thought you were actually inviting me to quote Trump in my (rhetorical) desire to see non-Democrats voting for Biden. I was all ready to go with Trump quotes praising Bernie, which I doubt you would argue does not works to promote democracy while not letting children starve to death.
I am also glad to hear, regardless of the context or absence thereof, that Bernie is not running and is endorsing Biden, but that deserves a whole different thread in addition to this one.
BTW, how often do you quote Liz Cheney, Adam Kissinger (Kinzinger?), Independents or non-Americans to attract any legal American vote for President Biden?
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)You couldn't find a decent *rump tweet if you tried.
I don't believe that I've made OPs of Cheney or Kinzinger, but I was speaking of D.U. We've had countless Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger posts here rightfully attacking *rump and bringing more voters of all stripes to President Biden, do you dispute that?
We've had posts here as well citing Bernie's announcement of endorsing President Biden, did you miss those as well?
I'm beginning to think the real problem that you have is with the message, it's against U.S. law to arm Israel while they're blockading humanitarian assistance for the people of Gaza.
You can't serve two masters, support Netanyahu or support President Biden, take your pick Beastly.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)Should I send you a couple of juicy Trump quotes praising Bernie via DU mail?
We can keep it a secret, just between the two of us...
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)I couldn't care less about what *rump has to say about anything.
If *rump says he likes puppies, does that mean you hate dogs?
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)Are you withdrawing your challenge?
Because, frankly, I also couldn't care less about what Trump says, Bernie or not.
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)We can make it a circular argument if you wish, and get back to the question of how quoting a non-Democrat is not necessarily useful in attracting non-Democratic voters to vote for Biden.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)That renders the rest of your opinions as unworthy of consideration.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)I therefore humbly request your explanation how my refusal to violate TOU despite a challenge to do so renders all of my consequent opinions unworthy of consideration.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)NOTHING in the DU Terms of Use prevents you from quoting Trump---
only from advocating for him.
We quote Trump here 24-7 every day of the week,
because his quotes convict himself.
Your supposition here is utterly stupid. Perhaps you should delete it....
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)The praises he extended to Bernie do not convict Trump of anything. Still, I would consider gratuitously quoting Trump on any subject to be a borderline violation and will not risk it for the sake of defending a hypothetical question which illustrates a point that has nothing to do with Trump and has everything to do with a general statement that presumes that quoting a non-Democrat would convince non-Democrats to vote for Biden.
It was an analogy. An analogy is not synonymous with Strawman. Look it up. Then, hopefully, you might change your mind about bringing up the subject of utterly stupid suppositions.
TheRealNorth
(9,647 posts)When they need the votes.
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)H2O Man
(79,051 posts)I've really liked Bernie since I first met him, over 40 years ago. He was amayor then.
edisdead
(3,396 posts)Israel is breaking a U.S. Law? Ok. Not that it is right what they are allegedly doing, but they arent breaking a law because how do you break a law that is outside the jusrisdiction?
SocialDemocrat61
(7,647 posts)for the US to give military aid to any country that blocks humanitarian aid. The law applies to the US government not to foreign governments.
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)I became a Democrat in 1965. I was already a Socialist and remain both to this day.
I realize there are Democrats who are hawks and think it's good for the party and country to kill people to protect us from the current bogeymen.
See My-lai, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, for reference to our humanity.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)Exactly what do you mean by that?
Are you calling Hamas 'ficticous' as a "bogeyman"?
Hamas did hideous, heinuous things on Oct 7.
But in my post below you'll see I'm not for the way Netanyahu is conducting his war.
__________________________
As for the horrific events you've mentioned - I was a younger teen when Mai Lai happened, and I was appalled.
As for the nearly unthinkable use of atomic bombs against Japanese cities I can't say 100% that I agree with that action. Or perhaps at least with the most sobering reluctance to agreeing with it.
We in NYC in the ' ?'70's: I believe we were the first to see a traveling exhibit from Japan of Atomic Bomb actifacts
(along with photos, and text).
There was the infamous "Stopped Clock"; the clock frozen at the time the bomb exploded. More sobering: seeing pieces of a "Shadow Wall" (what I'm calling it, though it is a literal description of what it is - don't know if there's a official name for them).
For those who don't know...
the shadow walls are real walls. People who were standing in front of them when the A Bombs exploded the light was so brightthat the shadows it cast of those people onto various walls, and the light surrounding them (the shadows) - I think the walls almost acted as photographic paper retaining their images.
I've met Hibakushas (A Bomb victims) in the ?'80's on NYC when they were here as part of increasing the idea of dismantling more nuclear weapons around the world. I think rallies at, marches to the U.N.
But to judge the US's humanity by only those actions; doesn't acknowledge the other genuine humanitarian actions we have taken through the decades.
We are a flawed country, but we have done good as well.
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)I was 18 - 19 and in the marines. There was a young lady (in her 20s) who was a bar maid in the EM club. The other young marines called her "Ground Zero" because she lost one eye and had a heavily scarred face and one arm. She had been a young girly in 1945 in Hiroshima.
Seeing her and others there was one of the things that started to push me towards becoming a pacifist. My enlistment was up in '[65 and LBJ was sending more and more troops to Vietnam to fight the Commie Bogeyman there. And enhance his creds as a "Strong Leader". LBJ did some good and humanitarian things while in office. But, he remained a war criminal in my eyes after the slaughter in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos.
I'm old enough to remember too many manufactured "threats" that had be confronted by violence and the deaths of innocents. I'll have no part of it.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)to, and beyond the max before resorting to war. I also believe in defending one's self, family, friends, country.
That poor bar maid. Still, she lived. Hmmm, sounds like keloid scars. Very heavy, raised. They also showed photos of those at that exhibit.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)but the tide of blood shed at the hands of the Israeli military in Gaza,
dims my memory about whatever Hamas did 5 months ago....
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)I didn't know about this law.
Perhaps we need to do this to in order to shake up enough of the Israeli politicians, general citizens to move against Netanyahu?
I support Israel's right to exist.
I don't support what seems to me like excessive military action that has wound up causing death, injuries, and now current, or pending starvation against too many innocent Gazans in order to eradicate murderous Hamas fighters that started the whole process by their heneious actions on Oct 7.
moondust
(21,286 posts)says that the aid trucks are slow because IDF has to inspect them all closely for anything that might help Hamas. I don't know who loads the trucks but with so many of them I can see how that could potentially be an issue. ???
I suppose the ships would be loaded by parties trusted by IDF, as are the air drops, so close inspections wouldn't be needed. ???
Basic LA
(2,047 posts)It's geologically slow, then sudden.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)Here is the full text of Section 620I in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Foreign%20Assistance%20Act%20Of%201961.pdf ) that Bernie is referring to:
RESTRICT UNITED STATES HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.No assistance shall be furnished under
this Act or the Arms Export Control Act to any country when
it is made known to the President that the government of such
country prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly,
the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assist-
ance.
(b) EXCEPTION.Assistance may be furnished without re-
gard to the restriction in subsection (a) if the President deter-
mines that to do so is in the national security interest of the
United States.
(c) NOTICE.Prior to making any determination under
subsection (b), the President shall notify the Committee on
International Relations, the Committee on Foreign Relations,
and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and
House of Representatives of his intention to make such a de-
termination, the effective date of the determination, and the
reasons for making the determination.
A few procedural matters:
1. Who let Biden be known that the government of Israel prohibits the transport or delivery of US aid in Gaza? What is the evidence? Without this formality being met, there is no violation of the Foreign Aid Act.
2. Did Biden respond as per (c) above? Of course not. He had nothing to respond to.
3. If he ever gets to respond, he has full discretion to disregard Section 620I. Just because someone says someone violated the law doesn't make it so.
So what violation of the US law is Bernie talking about? What US aid to Gaza did Israel prohibit?
But wait, there is more!
There is no military assistance to be furnished to Israel under the Foreign Aid Act. The only military assistance that may or may not be withdrawn under the Foreign Aid Act is covered by the Arms Export Control Act.
Ok, so let's do that, right? Not so fast!
Here's the part of it that deals with Israel specifically:
Pub. L. 9592, §26, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 625, provided that: "In accordance with the historic special relationship between the United States and Israel and previous agreements and continuing understandings, the Congress joins with the President in reaffirming that a policy of restraint in United States arms transfers, including arms sales ceilings, shall not impair Israel's deterrent strength or undermine the military balance in the Middle East."
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title22/chapter39&edition=prelim
Now THAT is the law! And Bernie is calling for violating it without as much as meeting the criteria for challenging it under the Foreign Assistance Act!
But wait, there is more!
https://www.stimson.org/2023/law-and-policy-guide-to-us-arms-transfers-to-israel/
So Bernie is calling for violating the Arms Control Act without as much as meeting the criteria for challenging it under the Foreign Assistance Act in order to cut a small portion of military aid to Israel while the great majority of US aid to Israel continues unimpeded.
Bernie wants to cut military aid to Israel just a little bit. But it sounds very progressive in a tweet!
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)a bit premature, no?