Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(54,906 posts)
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 07:32 AM Mar 2024

Regarding the agreement for the RNC to pay TSF's legal bills . . . .

Republican Donations Now Likely Paying Trump's Legal Bills
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143213618

This use of campaign donations is illegal.

Irrespective test per FEC (Federal Elections Commission).

Commission regulations provide a test, called the "irrespective test," to differentiate legitimate campaign and officeholder expenses from personal expenses. Under the "irrespective test," personal use is any use of funds in a campaign account of a candidate (or former candidate) to fulfill a commitment, obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign or responsibilities as a federal officeholder.

More simply, if the expense would exist even in the absence of the candidacy or even if the officeholder were not in office, then the personal use ban applies.

Conversely, any expense that results from campaign or officeholder activity falls outside the personal use ban.

EXAMPLE

A candidate may not make tuition payments with campaign funds, unless the costs are associated with training campaign staff.

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/making-disbursements/personal-use/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regarding the agreement for the RNC to pay TSF's legal bills . . . . (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Mar 2024 OP
since when do repukes give a fuck about anything being LEGAL Skittles Mar 2024 #1
Point taken. But the FEC may care. no_hypocrisy Mar 2024 #2
Lock these fuckers up.....NOW spanone Mar 2024 #3
Mark my words malaise Mar 2024 #4
Ah, but you see, he claims he wouldn't be facing the bills if he'd never run for office!!!! Maeve Mar 2024 #5
Who is going to stop him? Make him stop breaking the law. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #6

Skittles

(171,710 posts)
1. since when do repukes give a fuck about anything being LEGAL
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 07:47 AM
Mar 2024

unless it is HUMAN FUCKING BEINGS

Maeve

(43,456 posts)
5. Ah, but you see, he claims he wouldn't be facing the bills if he'd never run for office!!!!
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 08:23 AM
Mar 2024

Yeah, it's total BS, but WITCH HUNT!!!!! (the trumper equivalent of yelling SQUIRREL!)

Right now, I'm of a mind to let them empty their coffers down the black hole that is his legal bills....less money to run any kind of campaigns down-ballot

Irish_Dem

(81,266 posts)
6. Who is going to stop him? Make him stop breaking the law.
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 09:35 AM
Mar 2024

No one has been successful so far.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the agreement f...